Type patterns and generic classes in Haskell

Posted by finnsson on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by finnsson
Published on 2010-03-12T15:38:49Z Indexed on 2010/03/12 16:07 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 260

Filed under:

haskell

|

generics

|

reflection

I'm trying to understand type patterns and generic classes in Haskell but can't seem to get it.

Could someone explain it in laymen's terms?

In [1] I've read that

"To apply functions generically to all data types, we view data types in a uniform manner: except for basic predefined types such as Float, IO, and ?, every Haskell data type can be viewed as a labeled sum of possibly labeled products."

and then Unit, :*: and :+: are mentioned. Are all data types in Haskell automatically versions of the above mentioned and if so how do I figure out how a specific data type is represented in terms of :*:, etc? The users guide for generic classes (ch. 7.16) at haskell.org doesn't mention the predefined types but shouldn't they be handled in every function if the type patterns should be exhaustive?

[1] Comparing Approaches to Generic Programming in Haskell, Ralf Hinze, Johan Jeuring, and Andres Löh

© Stack Overflow or respective owner

Related posts about haskell

Learning Haskell: How to remove an item from a List in Haskell

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
Trying to learn Haskell. I am trying to write a simple function to remove a number from a list without using built-in function (delete...I think). For the sake of simplicity, let's assume that the input parameter is an Integer and the list is an Integer list. Here is the code I have, Please tell me… >>> More
Using Data.Heap in Haskell, or reading Haskell docs for a beginner

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
I'm trying to use Haskells Data.Heap module, but I'm incapable of even using it with integers. The only heap I've been capable of using is "empty", which does not take any arguments. Later on I'll figure out how to instance for my needs, but for now I'd be glad if I was even able to test it with… >>> More
What kind of things are easy in Haskell and hard in Scala, and vice versa?

as seen on Programmers - Search for 'Programmers'
There has been some intermingling of Scala and Haskell communities, and I have noticed now and then people commenting on stuff that's supposed to be easy in Haskell and hard and Scala. Less often (maybe because I read Scala questions, not Haskell ones), I see someone mentioning that something in Scala… >>> More
Haskell's cabal dependency problem with happy

as seen on Programmers - Search for 'Programmers'
I have problems installing ghc-mod on my linux machine. cabal worries about "happy" not being available in versione = 1.17: $ cabal install ghc-mod Resolving dependencies... [1 of 1] Compiling Main ( /tmp/haskell-src-exts-1.14.0-1357/haskell-src-exts-1.14.0/Setup.hs, /tmp/haskell-src-exts-1… >>> More
Understanding Haskell's fibonacci

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
fibs :: [Int] fibs = 0 : 1 : [ a + b | (a, b) <- zip fibs (tail fibs)] This generates the Fibonacci sequence. I understand the behaviour of the guards, of :, zip and tail, but I don't understand <-. What is it doing here? >>> More

Related posts about generics

Java generics: What is the compiler's issue here?

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
I have the following methods: public <T> T fromJson( Reader jsonData, Class<T> clazz ) { return fromJson( jsonData, (Type)clazz ); } public <T> T fromJson( Reader jsonData, Type clazz ) { ... } The compiler is saying about the first method: type parameters of <T>T… >>> More
Why does NUnit ignore datapoints when using generics in a theory

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
I'm trying to make use of the TheoryAttribute, introduced in NUnit 2.5. Everything works fine as long as the arguments are of a defined type: [Datapoint] public double[,] Array2X2 = new double[,] { { 1, 0 }, { 0, 1 } }; [Theory] public void TestForArbitraryArray(double[,] array) { // ... } It… >>> More
Instantiating generics type in java

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
I would like to create an object of Generics Type in java. Please suggest how can I achieve the same. suppose I have the class declaration as: public class Abc<T> { public static void main(String[] args) { // I want to create an instance of T } } >>> More
.NET converting simple arrays to List Generics

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
This question might seem trivial and also stupid at the first glance, but it is much more than this. I have an array of any type T (T[]) and I want to convert it into a List generic (List<T>). Is there any other way apart from creating a Generic list, traversing the whole array and adding the… >>> More
Instantiating a list of parameterized types, making beter use of Generics and Linq

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
I'm hashing a file with one or more hash algorithms. When I tried to parametrize which hash types I want, it got a lot messier than I was hoping. I think I'm missing a chance to make better use of generics or LINQ. I also don't like that I have to use a Type[] as the parameter instead of limiting… >>> More