sIFR3: controlling a and a:hover styles inside replaced through CSS rather than JS

Posted by sneeuwitje on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by sneeuwitje
Published on 2010-03-18T00:42:48Z Indexed on 2010/03/18 0:51 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 446

Filed under:
|
|
|

For graceful degrading and minimal coding for the sIFR feature on my websites I would want to define styles in CSS as much as possible. Here's what I do:

  • Define a H3 tag to be replaced by sIFR3.
  • H3 comes in varying colors by CSS depending on it's container, say

    body.blue-txt h3{ color: #009CDA; }

    body.white-txt h3{ color: #FFFFFF; }

    body.etc...

  • H3 might contain an anchor (I'm aware of semantical issues, but that's just how it is ... sorry)

With setting

sIFR.useStyleCheck = true;

sIFR3 will show replaced normal H3 text with correct color, but when it contains a link, it shows the Flash default #0000FF .... All fine; I can tweak e.g. blue text in sifr-config.js by using the css-parameter for sIFR.replace():

sIFR.replace(futura, {
  selector: 'body.blue-txt h3',
  css: 'a {color: #009CDA; }, a:hover { color: #009CDA; text-decoration: underline; }'
});

But that would have to be coded for every single text-color in my sIFR replacements in both JS and CSS. So I would want to make the sIFR.useStyleCheck setting just respect the CSS in sifr-config.css like:

body.blue-txt h3{ color: #009CDA; }
body.blue-txt h3 a{ color: #009CDA; }
body.blue-txt h3 a:hover{ color: #009CDA; text-decoration: underline; }

Only this doesn't seem to work ... the link text keeps popping up as #0000FF and the hover is not underlined. Is this just Not A Feature (Yet), or am doing something wrong?

© Stack Overflow or respective owner

Related posts about sifr

Related posts about html