VIM: created syntax not showing up?

Posted by joxnas on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by joxnas
Published on 2010-03-21T20:26:28Z Indexed on 2010/03/21 20:31 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 466

Filed under:

gvim

|

syntax

|

operators

|

highlight

HI people

I recently changed to VIM for coding in C.

I'd like to hightlight the operators +-<=& ... etc

I searched in google how should i do it, and i found the answer in this website: I was suppose to do something like:

syntax match Operadores /[][><()&!|+*={}-]/
hi Operadores guifg=#000000 gui=BOLD

Those characters were supposed to appear as black, bold characters. However, that doesn't happen when I open my .C files. However, if I create a newfile, (where there the C syntax doesn't show up), I am able to see the black, bolded operators.

How can i correct this situation, and why is this happening (it seams like if my syntax is beeing overwrided by the C syntax).

I'm using gvim, and this is my vimrc:

colorscheme nicotine
set smartindent
set number
set guifont=Inconsolata\ Medium\ 11
set numberwidth=5
noremap j jzz
noremap k kzz

Thanks, any help is appreciated. (And dont forget I'm a novice in VIM, and ..sorry for my English)

© Stack Overflow or respective owner

Related posts about gvim

How to use cyg-wrapper to fork a new tab in win32 gvim

as seen on Super User - Search for 'Super User'
I would like to set up an alias in my cygwin .bashrc that translates pathnames unix-to-dos and passes them to windows gvim in a new tab of an existing instance. I am trying to use Luc Hermitte's cyg-wrapper script for running native win32 applications from Cygwin as per this vim tip. Luc's example… >>> More
Setting the viminfo path in gVim for portability (Windows)

as seen on Super User - Search for 'Super User'
I'm trying to make my gVim installation as portable as possible, and in doing so I want to put the _viminfo file in the $VIM directory rather than $HOME. I'm pretty new to hacking vimrc configurations, but here's what I've been trying: let viminfopath=$VIM."\\_viminfo" execute "set viminfo='1000… >>> More
GVim theme italics cuts off character

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
The italics cause the last character to cut off, making it hard to see. Is this something that can be fixed without removing the italics style from the theme? >>> More
gVim doesn't recognize the Meta (Alt) Key in an imap after changing the encoding

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
In order to edit html files, I have the following three imaps in a file that I source for filetype html: imap <buffer> <M-[> ü imap <buffer> <M-;> ö imap <buffer> <M-'> ä This works fine until I change the encoding of the html file… >>> More
how to run commands (external) in gvim

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
I am getting ready to write lot of small experimental java programs as I am studying for java certification. Since I want to avoid using an IDE I'm giving gvim a try. I have a HelloWorld.java file open. How can I run javac and then java and then be able to see the output all in one window? I do… >>> More

Related posts about syntax

learning to make sense of the syntax of syntax

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
i want to use alter table but the syntax posted here: http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.1/en/alter-table.html is very confusing i do not understand what the [ ] mean or the { } mean or the pipes is there some kind of tutorial that can help me understand this? >>> More
C syntax or binary optimized syntax?

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
Let's take an simple example of two lines supposedly doing the same thing: if (value = 96 || value < 0) ... or if (value & ~ 95) ... Say 'If's are costly in a loop of thousands of iterations, is it better to keep with the traditional C syntax or better to find a binary optimized one if… >>> More
If you had to reinvent a new syntax for regular expressions, what would it look like?

as seen on Programmers - Search for 'Programmers'
Regular expressions as they are today are pretty much as concise and compact as they can be. Consequently, they are often criticised for being unreadable and hard to debug. If you had to reinvent a new syntax for regular expressions, what would it look like? Do you prefer the concise syntax they… >>> More
online utility to convert jquery syntax to mootools syntax

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
Is there any online utility to convert jquery syntax to mootools syntax? Is there any guideline to convert jquery to mootools? >>> More
Transform XAML syntax from Shorthand to full syntax

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
Is there a tool or a simple way to transform XAML code from the shorthand syntax to the full syntax? For example: moving from something like: <_TextBox Text="{Binding Path=Formula.Production, Mode=TwoWay, UpdateSourceTrigger=PropertyChanged}" to <_TextBox <_TextBox.Text <Binding… >>> More