is back_insert_iterator<> safe to be passed by value?

Posted by afriza on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by afriza
Published on 2010-03-29T10:15:13Z Indexed on 2010/03/29 10:43 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 251

Filed under:
|
|

I have a code that looks something like:

struct Data { int value; };
class A {
public:
    typedef std::deque<boost::shared_ptr<Data> > TList;
    std::back_insert_iterator<TList> GetInserter()
    {
        return std::back_inserter(m_List);
    }
private:
    TList m_List;
};
class AA {
    boost::scoped_ptr<A> m_a;
public:
    AA() : m_a(new A()) {}
    std::back_insert_iterator<A::TList> GetDataInserter()
    {
        return m_a->GetInserter();
    }        
};
class B {
    template<class OutIt>
    CopyInterestingDataTo(OutIt outIt)
    {
        // loop and check conditions for interesting data
        // for every `it` in a Container<Data*>
        // create a copy and store it
        for( ... it = ..; .. ; ..) if (...) {
            *outIt = OutIt::container_type::value_type(new Data(**it));
            outIt++; // dummy
        }
    }
    void func()
    {
        AA aa;
        CopyInterestingDataTo(aa.GetInserter());
        // aa.m_a->m_List is empty!
    }
};

The problem is that A::m_List is always empty even after CopyInterestingDataTo() is called. However, if I debug and step into CopyInterestingDataTo(), the iterator does store the supposedly inserted data!

© Stack Overflow or respective owner

Related posts about c++

Related posts about stl