Why many libraries define own string classes instead of using std::string and std::wstring?
        Posted  
        
            by Anton Kazennikov
        on Stack Overflow
        
        See other posts from Stack Overflow
        
            or by Anton Kazennikov
        
        
        
        Published on 2010-04-06T17:01:49Z
        Indexed on 
            2010/04/06
            17:03 UTC
        
        
        Read the original article
        Hit count: 324
        
Why many libraries define their own string classes instead of using string classes from STL?
For example, xerces-c - it uses std::basic_string<>, but uses its own char type instead of wchar_t. Why?
Or MFC, for example?
© Stack Overflow or respective owner