Why many libraries define own string classes instead of using std::string and std::wstring?
Posted
by Anton Kazennikov
on Stack Overflow
See other posts from Stack Overflow
or by Anton Kazennikov
Published on 2010-04-06T17:01:49Z
Indexed on
2010/04/06
17:03 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 241
Why many libraries define their own string classes instead of using string classes from STL?
For example, xerces-c - it uses std::basic_string<>, but uses its own char type instead of wchar_t. Why?
Or MFC, for example?
© Stack Overflow or respective owner
