Does mod_php honor HEAD requests properly?

Posted by rkulla on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by rkulla
Published on 2010-04-08T20:11:31Z Indexed on 2010/04/08 20:13 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 343

Filed under:
|
|

The HTTP/1.1 RFC stipulates "The HEAD method is identical to GET except that the server MUST NOT return a message-body in the response." I know Apache honors the RFC but modules don't have to. My question is, does mod_php5 honor this?

The reason I ask is because I just came across an article saying that PHP developers should check this themselves with:

    if (stripos($_SERVER['REQUEST_METHOD'], 'HEAD') !== FALSE) {
        exit();
    }

but seeing as how browsers send HEAD requests for cache checking it seems unlikely to me that no book, docs, etc., advise PHP developers to do this check.

I googled a second and not much turned up, other than some people saying they try to strange things like mod_rewrite/redirect after getting HEAD requests and some old bug ticket from like 2002 claiming that mod_php still executed the rest of the script by default. So I just ran a quick test by using PECL::HTTP to run

    http_head('http://mysite.com/test-head-request.php');

while having:

    <?php error_log('REST OF SCRIPT STILL RAN'); ?>

in test-head-request.php to see if the rest of the script still executed, and it didn't.

I figure that should be enough to settle it, but want to get more feedback and maybe help clear up confusion for anyone else who has wondered about this. So if anyone knows off the top of their head (no pun intended) - or have any conventions they use for receiving HEAD requests, that'd be great. Otherwise, I'll grep the C source later and respond in a comment with my findings. Thanks.

© Stack Overflow or respective owner

Related posts about php

Related posts about http