What is wrong with Stubs for unit testing?
        Posted  
        
            by MatthewMartin
        on Stack Overflow
        
        See other posts from Stack Overflow
        
            or by MatthewMartin
        
        
        
        Published on 2009-10-05T23:02:52Z
        Indexed on 
            2010/04/23
            14:43 UTC
        
        
        Read the original article
        Hit count: 380
        
I just watched this funny YouTube Video about unit testing (it's Hitler with fake subtitles chewing out his team for not doing good unit tests--skip it if you're humor impaired) where stubs get roundly criticized. But I don't understand what wrong with stubs.
I haven't started using a mocking framework and I haven't started feeling the pain from not using one.
Am I in for a world a hurt sometime down the line, having chosen handwritten stubs and fakes instead of mocks (like Rhinomock etc)? (using Fowler's taxonomy)
What are the considerations for picking between a mock and handwritten stub?
© Stack Overflow or respective owner