When to use CouchDB vs RDBMS

Posted by Andrew Whitehouse on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by Andrew Whitehouse
Published on 2009-08-20T15:47:25Z Indexed on 2010/04/28 16:13 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 374

Filed under:
|
|

I am looking at CouchDB, which has a number of appealing features over relational databases including:

  • intuitive REST/HTTP interface
  • easy replication
  • data stored as documents, rather than normalised tables

I appreciate that this is not a mature product so should be adopted with caution, but am wondering whether it is actually a viable replacement for an RDBMS (in spite of the intro page saying otherwise - http://couchdb.apache.org/docs/intro.html).

  1. Under what circumstances would CouchDB be a better choice of database than an RDBMS (e.g. MySQL), e.g. in terms of scalability, design + development time, reliability and maintenance.
  2. Are there still cases where an RDBMS is still clearly the right choice?
  3. Is this an either-or choice, or is a hybrid solution more likely to emerge as best practice?

© Stack Overflow or respective owner

Related posts about couchdb

Related posts about database