Is it bad to have a non-clustered index that contains the primary key from the clustered index?

Posted by Don on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by Don
Published on 2010-04-30T20:00:32Z Indexed on 2010/04/30 20:07 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 179

If you have a table with a clustered index on the Primary Key (int), is it redundant and bad to have one (ore more) non-clustered indexes that include that primary key column as one of the columns in the non-clustered index?

© Stack Overflow or respective owner

Related posts about sql-server

Related posts about indexing