When defining a class as internal, do you define what would usually be public fields as internal?

Posted by devoured elysium on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by devoured elysium
Published on 2010-05-03T10:13:30Z Indexed on 2010/05/03 10:18 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 276

Filed under:

subjective

|

namespaces

|

c#

|

internal

When defining a class as internal, do you define what would usually be public fields as internal? Or do you leave them as public? I have a set of classes with public/private methods that I have decided to set as internal. Now, should I change the class' modifier to internal and let the rest of the methods/properties as they are (public/private) or switch them to (internal/private)?

I don't see a big point in changing it to internal, and if by some reason later I want to set them back to public it's going to give a lot of work to have to put them back to public again.

Any other thoughts on this?

© Stack Overflow or respective owner

Related posts about subjective

Scoring/analysis of Subjective testing for skills assessment

as seen on Programmers - Search for 'Programmers'
I am lucky in the sense that I have been given the opportunity to be a 'Technical Troubleshooter' for our offshore development team. While I am confident and capable of dealing with most issues, I have come across something that I am not. Based on initial discussions with various team members both… >>> More
Best Practise/Subjective: Implement a finite state automaton in OOP

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
Hi guys, I am thinking about implementing a programm with finite state automaton in an OOP language like Java or C++. What would you think is the best way to implement this with a manageable amount of available states, regarding to good software design? Is it good to implement for each state an… >>> More
Subjective question...would you use the Action delegate to avoid duplication of code?

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
Hello, I just asked a question that helps about using generics (or polymorphism) to avoid duplication of code. I am really trying to follow the DRY principle. So I just ran into the following code... Sub OutputDataToExcel() OutputLine("Output DataBlocks", 1) OutputDataBlocks() … >>> More
"Best" language /architecture for browser-based app with ODBC and sockets? (subjective)

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
Sorry to ask a subjective question, but I would welcome some advice. I am an experienced programmer of embedded s/w, but haven't done much network programming, although I have done a fair bit of hobbyist PHP. Anyway, I have to develop what is probably a fairly general type of app, as shown in this… >>> More
The best terminal emulator for a heavy terminal user?

as seen on Ask Ubuntu - Search for 'Ask Ubuntu'
I spend a lot of time at the command-line during the workday and at home too since I run Ubuntu exclusively. I've been using the default gnome terminal but I've reached a point where I'd really like to get my terminal tricked out so that my common tasks are as easy as possible. Specifically, I find… >>> More

Related posts about namespaces

XMLOutputStream, repairing namespaces, and attributes without namespaces

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
A simple task: write an element with an unnamespaced attribute: String nsURI = "http://example.com/"; XMLOutputFactory outF = XMLOutputFactory.newFactory(); outF.setProperty(XMLOutputFactory.IS_REPAIRING_NAMESPACES, true); XMLStreamWriter out = outF.createXMLStreamWriter(System.out); out.writeStartElement(XMLConstants… >>> More
Namespaces and Sub-Namespaces and the libraries they reference in C#

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
Can I have namespace somenamespace { //references functionality in DLL_1 namespace somesubnamespace { //references functionality in DLL_2 } } And if I do this, when I use just somenamespace, will it only include DLL_1 in the solution and if I use somenamespace.somesubnamespace… >>> More
Why were namespaces removed from ECMAScript consideration?

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
Namespaces were once a consideration for ECMAScript (the old ECMAScript 4) but were taken out. As Brendan Eich says in this message: One of the use-cases for namespaces in ES4 was early binding (use namespace intrinsic), both for performance and for programmer comprehension -- no chance… >>> More
A Twist In Namespaces

as seen on Internet.com - Search for 'Internet.com'
PHP continues to evolve with version 5.3 and the addition of namespaces. Explore this exciting new f ... >>> More
A Twist In Namespaces

as seen on Internet.com - Search for 'Internet.com'
PHP continues to evolve with version 5.3 and the addition of namespaces. Explore this exciting new f ... >>> More