Is memcached a dinosaur in comparison to Redis?

Posted by Industrial on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by Industrial
Published on 2010-05-20T11:35:17Z Indexed on 2010/05/20 16:20 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 206

Filed under:
|
|

Hi everyone,

I have worked quite a bit with memcached the last weeks and just found out about Redis. When I read this part of their readme, I suddenly got a warm, cozy feeling in my stomach:

Redis can be used as a memcached on steroids because is as fast as memcached but with a number of features more. Like memcached, Redis also supports setting timeouts to keys so that this key will be automatically removed when a given amount of time passes.

This sounds amazing. I'd also found this page with benchmarks: http://www.ruturaj.net/redis-memcached-tokyo-tyrant-mysql-comparison

So, honestly - Is memcache really that old dinousaur that is a bad choice from a performance perspective when compared to this newcomer called Redis?

I haven't heard lot about Redis previously, thereby the approach for my question!

© Stack Overflow or respective owner

Related posts about memcache

Related posts about redis