Difference between these two ways of localizing a string in an aspx/ascx file?
Posted
by Brandon
on Stack Overflow
See other posts from Stack Overflow
or by Brandon
Published on 2010-05-21T14:57:58Z
Indexed on
2010/05/23
4:40 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 202
When I started localizing a website the first time, I just did the localization like this:
<%= Resources.ResourceFile.ResourceName %>
and it seems to work perfectly fine. However, the ReSharper 5.0 Beta does it like this:
<asp:Localize Text="<%$ Resources: ResourceFile, ResourceName %>" runat="server">
Value
</asp:Localize>
Does it matter which way it gets done? If it doesn't matter, is there any way to make ReSharper do it the way I'm doing it? I kind of prefer it this way since it is less text in the aspx/ascx files.
© Stack Overflow or respective owner
