TIBRV: Remote vs Local RVD

Posted by jsw on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by jsw
Published on 2010-04-07T22:52:34Z Indexed on 2010/05/28 19:32 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 385

Filed under:
|

When connected to a local RVD a sending application is shielded from network interruptions and the send message methods will only block for the time it takes for the message to reach the local RVD process.

With remote RVD the sending application is no longer shielded from network interruptions and the send message methods will block for the time it takes to hop across the network to reach the remote RVD process.

Is my understanding correct? The documentation is vague regarding remote daemons.

I'm mostly concerned with how reliable and performant the send message will be from the perspective of a sending application. Introducing unnecessary blocking on the client side due to sending a message (especially a network hop) is a big no-no in this application. The speed at which the messages reach the consumer is not of the utmost importance. With this in mind is a remote RVD out of the question?

© Stack Overflow or respective owner

Related posts about messaging

Related posts about tibco-rv