Minimum vs Minimal vertex covers

Posted by panicked on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by panicked
Published on 2010-06-15T04:59:44Z Indexed on 2010/06/15 5:02 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 292

Filed under:
|
|
|

I am studying for an exam and one of the sample questions is as follows:

Vertex cover: a vertex cover in a graph is a set of vertices such that each edge has at least one of its two end points in this set.

Minimum vertex cover: a MINIMUM vertex cover in a graph is a vertex cover that has the smallest number of vertices among all possible vertex covers.

Minimal vertex cover a MINIMAL vertex cover in a graph is a vertex cover that does not contain another vertex cover (deleting any vertex from the set would create a set of vertices that is not a vertex cover)

Question: A minimal vertex cover isn't always a minimum vertex cover. Demonstrate this with a simple example.

Can anyone get their head around this? I am failing to see the distinction between the two. More importantly, I'm having a hard time visualizing it.

I seriously hope he's not gonna ask odd questions like this one on the exam!

© Stack Overflow or respective owner

Related posts about minimum

Related posts about vertex