No architecture vs architecture-specific binaries

Posted by Aaron on Server Fault See other posts from Server Fault or by Aaron
Published on 2012-08-31T19:29:26Z Indexed on 2012/08/31 21:39 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 314

From what I understand, the noarch suffix means that it's architecture independent and should work universally. If this is the case, why should I install architecture-specific packages at all? Why not just go straight for the noarch? Are there optimizations in the x86 or x64 binaries that aren't found in the noarch binaries? What's best for high performance applications?

Folding@Home does this with their controller: enter image description here

© Server Fault or respective owner

Related posts about linux

Related posts about Performance