Wireless technology - which is better: more single radio APs or less dual radio APs?

Posted by gert_78 on Server Fault See other posts from Server Fault or by gert_78
Published on 2012-11-15T20:52:53Z Indexed on 2012/11/15 23:05 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 288

Filed under:
|

We are currently talking to vendors of wireless solutions for a wireless deployment in a university campus with some 5000 students.

One vendor is offering us a Cisco solution with a WLC 5508 controller and 69 2x2 MIMO Dual-band/Dual radio APs (Aironet AP 1042 model)

The other vendor is offering us an Aruba solution with a 3600 controller and 96 2x2 MIMO dual band BUT single radio APs (Aruba AP93)

Both vendors are charging 82.000 US$ (support, 3y service contracts, switches and additional required options all included of course)

The Aruba vendor is trying to convince me that 96 single radio APs will give us more connection/users/capacity then the 69 dual radio APs.

I have my doubts about that and since it is my core competence-domain I wanted to ask here the opinion of people that have a more profound knowledge and experience in this area.

When you talk to vendors it's often hard to get objective information. So try to answer only if you are sure and please mention it if you are affiliated with one of the vendors.

I appreciate all useful help and want to thank you in advance for the effort!

© Server Fault or respective owner

Related posts about wireless

Related posts about 802.11