Backing Up vs. Redundancy

Posted by TK Kocheran on Super User See other posts from Super User or by TK Kocheran
Published on 2012-12-14T04:39:46Z Indexed on 2012/12/14 5:06 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 360

Filed under:
|
|

I'm currently in stage 2 of 3 of building my home workstation. What this means is that my RAID-0 array of solid state disks will be backed up nightly to a RAID-5 or RAID-6 array of traditional spinning hard disks. However, it recently dawned on me that redundancy is not backup. The main reason for setting up a RAID array with redundancy was to protect myself in the event of a drive failure to serve as an effective backup solution.

Wait. What if a bolt of lightning finds a way to travel into my house, through my surge-protector, into my power supply and physically destroys all of my hard disks and SSDs? Well, in that case, I guess I'd be fine because I generally keep most important files (music, pictures, videos) stored in multiple places like on my laptop, my wife's laptop, and an encrypted USB hard drive.

Wait. What if a giant hedgehog meteor attacks my house from space traveling at mach 3 and all machines and hard disks are blown to smithereens. Well, I guess I could find a way to do ridiculously slow and cumbersome rsyncs or backups to Amazon's Glacier.

Wait. What if there's a nuclear apocalypse... and at this point I start laughing hysterically. At what point does backing up become irrelevant? I completely understand situation one (mechanical drive failure), situation two (workstation compromised or destroyed somehow), possibly even situation three (all machines and disks destroyed), but situation four?

There's no questioning the need for backups. None. However, there are three questions I'd really like addressed:

  1. To what level should one backup?

    • I definitely understand the merits of physical disk redundancy.
    • I also believe in keeping important files on multiple machines and thinning out the possibility of losing all of my files.
    • Online backups make sense, but they beg the following question.
  2. What should I be backing up remotely and how often?

    • It's no problem storage-wise to back up important files (music, pictures, videos) and even configuration and temporal data for all of the machines in my network (all Linux based)... albeit locally. Transferring to the cloud is another story.
    • Worst-case scenario, if I lost all of my configuration for my individual computers, the reality is that I probably lost the machines too.

The cloud is a long way away from here; I can run backups over CAT-6 here and see 100MB/s easily, but I'm afraid that I'm only going to see 2MB/s at best when transferring up to the cloud.

© Super User or respective owner

Related posts about backup

Related posts about online-backup