Search Results

Search found 13149 results on 526 pages for 'contains'.

Page 1/526 | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >

  • :contains for multiple words

    - by Emin
    I am using the following jQuery var etag='kate' if (etag.length > 0) { $('div').each(function () { $(this).find('ul:not(:contains(' + etag + '))').hide(); $(this).find('ul:contains(' + etag + ')').show(); }); }? towards the following HTML <div id="2"> <ul> <li>john</li> <li>jack</li> </ul> <ul> <li>kate</li> <li>clair</li> </ul> <ul> <li>hugo</li> <li>desmond</li> </ul> <ul> <li>said</li> <li>jacob</li> </ul> </div> <div id="3"> <ul> <li>jacob</li> <li>me</li> </ul> <ul> <li>desmond</li> <li>george</li> </ul> <ul> <li>allen</li> <li>kate</li> </ul> <ul> <li>salkldf</li> <li>3kl44</li> </ul> </div> basically, as long as etag has one word, the code works perfectly and hides those elements who do not contain etag. My problem is, when etag is multiple words (and I don't have control over it. Its coming from a database and could be combination of multiple words seperated with space char) then the code does not work.. is there any way to achieve this?

    Read the article

  • Testing if a list contains another list with Python

    - by None
    How can I test if a list contains another list. Say there was a function called contains: contains([1,2], [-1, 0, 1, 2]) # Returns [2, 3] (contains returns [start, end]) contains([1,3], [-1, 0, 1, 2]) # Returns False contains([1, 2], [[1, 2], 3) # Returns False contains([[1, 2]], [[1, 2], 3]) # Returns [0, 0] Edit: contains([2, 1], [-1, 0, 1, 2]) # Returns False contains([-1, 1, 2], [-1, 0, 1, 2]) # Returns False contains([0, 1, 2], [-1, 0, 1, 2]) # Returns [1, 3]

    Read the article

  • C# collection/string .Contains vs collection/string.IndexOf

    - by Daniel
    Is there a reason to use .Contains on a string/list instead of .IndexOf? Most code that I would write using .Contains would shortly after need the index of the item and therefore would have to do both statements. But why not both in one? if ((index = blah.IndexOf(something) = 0) // i know that Contains is true and i also have the index

    Read the article

  • jquery contains with class

    - by proee
    I'm using jQuery :contains selector to filter through some link tags. The following code works great. $('a:contains('string').each(function(i){ //do some stuff }); I'd like only run this function if the anchor tags are inside a specific class, I've tried the following but it does not appear to work: $('my_class a:contains('string').each(function(i){ //do some stuff });

    Read the article

  • Problem with .Contains

    - by Rene
    Hello there, I have a little problem which i can't solve. I want to use an SQL-In-Statement in Linq. I've read in this Forum and in other Forums that I have to use the .Contains (with reverse-thinking-notation :-)). As input i have a List of Guids. I first copied them into an array and then did something like that : datatoget = (from p in objectContext.MyDataSet where ArrayToSearch.Contains(p.Subtable.Id.ToString()) select p).ToList(); datatoget is the result in which all records matching the Subtable.Id (which is a Guid) should be stored. Subtable is a Detail-Table from MyData, and the Id is a Guid-Type. I've tried several things (Convert Guid to String, and then using .Contains, etc), but I always get an Exception which says : 'Linq to Entities' doesn't recognize the Method 'Boolean Contains(System.Guid) and is not able to Translate this method into a memory expression. (Something like that, because I'm using the German Version of VS2008) I am using L2E with .NET 3.5 and am programming in C# with VS 2008. I've read several Examples, but it doesn't work. Is it perhaps because of using Guid's instead of strings ? I've also tried to write my own compare-function, but I don't know how to integrate it so that .NET calls my function for comparing.

    Read the article

  • SQL Server CONTAINS with digits gives no results

    - by dale
    Hi, I have a database table which is full-text indexed and i use the CONTAINS-function to perform a search-query on it. When I do: SELECT * FROM Plants WHERE CONTAINS(Plants.Description, '"Plant*" AND "one*"'); I get back all correct results matching a description with the words "Plant" and "one". Some plant are named like "Plant 1", "Plant 2" etc. and this is the problem. When i do this, i get no results: SELECT * FROM Plants WHERE CONTAINS(Plants.Description, '"Plant*" AND "1*"'); Anyone know why?

    Read the article

  • jQuery :contains selector to search for multiple strings

    - by Stefan
    Assuming i have: <li id="1">Mary</li> <li id="2">John, Mary, Dave</li> <li id="3">John, Dave, Mary</li> <li id="4">John</li> If i need to find all <li> Elements which contain "John" and "Mary", how would i construct the jQuery? A search for a single string seems easy: $('li:contains("John")').text() I am looking for something like the following pseudo code: $('li:contains("John")' && 'li:contains("Mary")').text() Thanks!

    Read the article

  • Linq help using "Contains"

    - by Kettenbach
    Good Morning All, I'm trying to use "Contains" to see if an object is within the collection. When I break I can see that the object is indeed part of the collection however "Contains" seems to be returning false indicating the item is not in the collection. Any idea what I'm doing wrong? if(HttpContext.Current.Session["AutoPayTypes"] != null) { var autopays = HttpContext.Current.Session["AutoPayTypes"] as List<PaymentTypeInfo>; char? coverageProductLine = null; if(entityProps.ContainsKey("CoverageProductLine")) { coverageProductLine = (char?)entityProps["CoverageProductLine"]; } var paymentTypeInfoRepository = new PaymentTypeInfoRepository(); var payType = paymentTypeInfoRepository.GetPaymentTypeInfo(paymentAdd.PayType, coverageProductLine); if (autopays != null && payType != null) paymentAdd.DaysPaid = autopays.Contains(payType) ? null : paymentAdd.DaysPaid; } If the object is not in the collection the "DaysPaid" needs to be null. Any ideas? Thanks, ~ck in San Diego

    Read the article

  • Extract item in a list if Contains returns true

    - by Matt
    I have two lists A and B, at the beginning of my program, they are both filled with information from a database (List A = List B). My program runs, List A is used and modified, List B is left alone. After a while I reload List B with new information from the database, and then do a check with that against List A. foreach (CPlayer player in ListA) if (ListB.Contains(player)) ----- Firstly, the object player is created from a class, its main identifier is player.Name. If the Name is the same, but the other variables are different, would the .Contains still return true? Class CPlayer( public CPlayer (string name) _Name = name At the ---- I need to use the item from ListB that causes the .Contains to return true, how do I do that?

    Read the article

  • How to use Contains() in my join

    - by jrep...
    I am trying to get my linq query to replicate my t-sql but I am lost. SELECT * FROM BaiDetail INNER JOIN BaiDetailMap ON BaiDetail.DetailText LIKE '%' + BaiDetailMap.BaiDetailMapSearchText +'%' This is what I have so far... but no go from det in Source from map in Map where det.DetailText.Contains(map.SearchText) select new {det, map} Error Message: Only arguments that can be evaluated on the client are supported for the String.Contains method.

    Read the article

  • SQL SERVER FULL-TEXT INDEX, CONTAINS return empty

    - by max
    Hi, All: I got a issue about full index, any body can help me on this? set up full text index CREATE FULLTEXT INDEX ON dbo.Companies(my table name) ( CompanyName(colum of my table) Language 0X0 ) KEY INDEX IX_Companies_CompanyAlias ON QuestionsDB WITH CHANGE_TRACKING AUTO GO Using CONTAINS to find the matched rows SELECT CompanyId, CompanyName FROM dbo.Companies WHERE CONTAINS(CompanyName,'Micro') All is going well. just just just return empty resultset. And I am sure there is company with CompanyName "Microsoft" in Table Company Much appreciated if anybody does me a favor on this.

    Read the article

  • Java - Is Set.contains() broken on OpenJDK 6?

    - by Peter
    Hey, I've come across a really strange problem. I have written a simple Deck class which represents a standard 52 card deck of playing cards. The class has a method missingCards() which returns the set of all cards which have been drawn from the deck. If I try and compare two identical sets of missing cards using .equals() I'm told they are different, and if I check to see if a set contains an element that I know is there using .contains() I am returned false. Here is my test code: public void testMissingCards() { Deck deck = new Deck(true); Set<Card> drawnCards = new HashSet<Card>(); drawnCards.add(deck.draw()); drawnCards.add(deck.draw()); drawnCards.add(deck.draw()); Set<Card> missingCards = deck.missingCards(); System.out.println(drawnCards); System.out.println(missingCards); Card c1 = null; for (Card c : drawnCards){ c1 = c; } System.out.println("C1 is "+c1); for (Card c : missingCards){ System.out.println("C is "+c); System.out.println("Does c1.equal(c) "+c1.equals(c)); System.out.println("Does c.equal(c1) "+c.equals(c1)); } System.out.println("Is c1 in missingCards "+missingCards.contains(c1)); assertEquals("Deck confirm missing cards",drawnCards,missingCards); } (Edit: Just for clarity I added the two loops after I noticed the test failing. The first loop pulls out a card from drawnCards and then this card is checked against every card in missingCards - it always matches one, so that card must be contained in missingCards. However, missingCards.contains() fails) And here is an example of it's output: [5C, 2C, 2H] [2C, 5C, 2H] C1 is 2H C is 2C Does c1.equal(c) false Does c.equal(c1) false C is 5C Does c1.equal(c) false Does c.equal(c1) false C is 2H Does c1.equal(c) true Does c.equal(c1) true Is c1 in missingCards false I am completely sure that the implementation of .equals on my card class is correct and, as you can see from the output it does work! What is going on here? Cheers, Pete

    Read the article

  • MySQL query String contains

    - by arik-so
    Hello. This may sound easy, but I've been trying - in vain, apparently - to figure out how I can make a query with MySQL that checks if the value (string $haystack ;) ) in a certain column contains certain data ( $needle ;) ), like this: mysql_query(" SELECT * FROM `table` WHERE `column`.contains('{$needle}') "); In PHP, the function is called substr($haystack, $needle), so maybe: WHERE substr(`column`, '{$needle}')=1 Thanks in advance!

    Read the article

  • nhibernate activerecord linq Contains problem

    - by Robert Ivanc
    Hi, I am having problems with the following query in Castle ActiveRecord 2.12: var q = from o in SodisceFMClientVAR.Queryable where taxnos2.Contains(o.TaxFileNo) select o; taxNos2 is an array of strings. When run I get an exception: + InnerException {"Index was out of range. Must be non-negative and less than the size of the collection.\r\nParameter name: index"} System.Exception {System.ArgumentOutOfRangeException} StackTrace " at Castle.ActiveRecord.ActiveRecordBase.ExecuteQuery(IActiveRecordQuery query)\r\n at Castle.ActiveRecord.Linq.LinqResultWrapper`1.Populate()\r\n at Castle.ActiveRecord.Linq.LinqResultWrapper`1.GetEnumerator()\r\n at NHibernate.Linq.Query`1.GetEnumerator()\r\n at System.Linq.Buffer`1..ctor(IEnumerable`1 source)\r\n at System.Linq.Enumerable.ToArray[TSource](IEnumerable`1 source)\r\n at prosoft.skb.insolventnostDataAccess.InsolventnostDataAccAR.GetOurUsersListLS(ICollection`1 taxNos) in C:\\svn\\skb\\insolventnostWithAR\\prosoft.skb.insolventnostDataAccess\\InsolventnostDataAR.cs:line 214\r\n at prosoft.skb.insolventnostDataFromWS.InsolventnostFromWS.filterByOurUsers(IEnumerable`1 odprtiPostopki) in C:\\svn\\skb\\insolventnostWithAR\\prosoft.skb.insolventnostDataFromWS\\InsolventnostFromWS.cs:line 237\r\n at prosoft.skb.insolventnostDataFromWS.InsolventnostFromWS.SyncData() in C:\\svn\\skb\\insolventnostWithAR\\prosoft.skb.insolventnostDataFromWS\\InsolventnostFromWS.cs:line 53" string Does Contains even work in linq for nhibernate? I couldn't find anything via google... Is there a workaround? Thanks!

    Read the article

  • Problem with ranking of search results in SharePoint 2007 if using the CONTAINS predicate

    - by mythicdawn
    While writing a front-end for the SharePoint Search web service for work, I did some quick testing with the MOSS Search Tool to make sure things were working right under the hood. What I found was that queries composed only of CONTAINS predicates (FREETEXT ones were fine) would have a rank of 1000 for any results that were returned. According to the documentation (http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms544086.aspx): "If the query returns a document because a non–full-text predicate evaluates to TRUE for that document, the rank value is calculated as 1000." Given that the behaviour I am seeing seems to contradict the documentation, is it the case that all queries that use only the CONTAINS predicate will produce ranking like this?

    Read the article

  • jQuery :contains(unicode_characters)

    - by SeanJA
    I have an element like this: <span class="tool_tip" title="The full title">The ful&#8230;</span> This seems to work: jQuery('span:contains(…)'); But this does not: jQuery('span:contains(&#8230;)'); I am pretty sure that it would be bad to use the first one because if someone else saves the file, or the browser decides to get the file in a different character set for some reason things will not work. There has to be a way to properly select this span, right?

    Read the article

  • linq and contains

    - by kusanagi
    i have func public PageOfList<ConsaltQuestion> Filter(int? type, int pageId, EntityCollection<ConsaltCost> ConsaltRoles) { // return _dataContext.ConsaltQuestion.Where((o => o.Type == type || type == null) && (o=>o.Paid == paid)); return (from i in _dataContext.ConsaltQuestion where ((i.Type == type || type == null) && (i.Paid == true) && (ConsaltRoles.Contains(ConsaltCostDetails(i.Type.Value)))) select i).ToList().ToPageOfList(pageId, 20); } it return error LINQ to Entities does not recognize the method 'Boolean Contains(mrhome.Models.ConsaltCost)' method, and this method cannot be translated into a store expression. how can i fix it?

    Read the article

  • Find tag that contains certain text and add a class

    - by David Gard
    I have the following HTML, and I need to add a class to both <li> and <a> where the text 'Charts' exists (so not the second line, but rather the 4th and 5th). I cannot change the output of the HTML. <div class="wp-submenu-wrap"> <div class="wp-submenu-head">Charts</div> <ul> <li class="wp-first-item"> <a class="wp-first-item" tabindex="1" href="admin.php?page=charts">Charts</a> </li> <li> <a tabindex="1" href="admin.php?page=add-chart">Add Chart</a> </li> </ul> </div> I've tried doing this by locating the <a> tag that contains the text, but it is not working. Can somebody please point me in the correct direction? Thanks. Code that I've tried - $(document).ready(function(){ if(pagenow === 'admin_page_edit-chart') { var page = $('.wp-submenu-wrap a:contains["Charts"]'); page.addClass('current'); page.parent('li').addClass('current'); } });

    Read the article

  • Trying to use contains selector within nested divs

    - by James
    <div> <div>test</div> </div> $("div:contains('test')").css('display','none'); I know I am going to kick myself on this. The problem is that when this runs all divs are hidden due to nesting. How do I make it so that the parent div does not get hidden? I am limited to using 1.2.6

    Read the article

  • Jquery ID Attribute Contains With Selector and Variable

    - by User970008
    I would like to search for an image ID that contains a value AND a variable. I need the below script to be something like $("[id*='MYVALUE'+x]") but that does not work. for (x=0; x< imageList.length; x++) { var imageSRC = imageList[x]; //need this to be MYVALUE + the X val //search for IDs that contain MYVALUE + X $("[id*='MYVALUE']").attr('src', 'images/'+imageSRC); }; <!-- These images are replaced with images from the array imageList--> <img id="dkj958-MYVALUE0" src="images/imageplaceholder" /> <img id="mypage-MYVALUE1" src="images/imageplaceholder" /> <img id="onanotherpage-MYVALUE2-suffix" src="images/imageplaceholder" />

    Read the article

  • Sorting List which has object that contains two string members that contains numbers

    - by Lemo
    I want to know the best solution for this my case here is that i am taking values from Excel sheet and pushing them to database field, sometimes that field might contain some strings (thats why I cant make my object members int / double) In my class below size is the variable responsible for showing size of files in bytes public class dataNameValue { public string Name { get; set; } public string Count { get; set; } public string Size { get; set; } } I wanted to sort the list by file Size something like List mylist = new List(); mylist = mylist.OrderByDescending(i = i.Size).ToList(); The problem is that if i sorted it without converting it to "int/double" first -- its not giving right results

    Read the article

  • How to write a contains statement to match a member of a class?

    - by afuzzyllama
    If I have the following structure: Public Class UserData Public ID As String Public Name As String End Class How can I select it in a conditional like this? Dim myUsers As New List(Of UserData) If myUsers.Contains(.ID = "1") = True Then ... I know that myUsers.Contains(.ID = "1") is totally wrong, but I am curious how to do something like that? Is it possible? Is this a job for LINQ?

    Read the article

  • Any big difference between using contains or loop through a list?

    - by Nazgulled
    Hi, Performance wise, is there really a big difference between using: ArrayList.contains(o) vs foreach|iterator LinkedList.contains(o) vs foreach|iterator HashMap.(containsKey|containsValue) vs foreach|iterator TreeMap.(containsKey|containsValue) vs foreach|iterator Of course, for the foreach|iterator loops, I'll have to explicitly compare the methods and return true or false accordingly. The object I'm comparing is an object where equals() and hashcode() are both properly overridden.

    Read the article

  • SQL Server Contains Equivalent

    - by Derek D.
    Many Oracle developers trying to find the SQL Server function compatible with their Contains clause will most likely accidently end up on this page. Therefore, this page will be devoted to them rather than the SQL Server’s Contains function which is used for full-text searching. The most similar function to Oracle’s contains is charindex. The usage [...]

    Read the article

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >