Search Results

Search found 1214 results on 49 pages for 'protection'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 10/49 | < Previous Page | 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17  | Next Page >

  • Preventing apps to access info from wifi device?

    - by heaosax
    Browsers like Chrome and Firefox can use my wifi device to get information about the surrounded APs and pin point my physical location using Google Location Services, I know these browser always ask for permissions to do this, and that these features can also be "turned off". But I was wondering if there's a better way to prevent ANY application to access this information from my wifi device. I don't like anyone on the internet knowing where I live, and I am worried some software could do the same as these browsers but without asking for permissions. I am using Ubuntu 10.04.

    Read the article

  • Prevent acccess to the C drive

    - by Jenko
    Is it possible to prevent regular users from accessing the C drive via Windows Explorer? they should be allowed to execute certain programs. This is to ensure that employees cannot steal or copy out proprietary software even though they should be able to execute it. One way would be to change the option in windows Group Policy and set the "shell" to something other than "explorer.exe". I'm looking for a similar windows setting that just hides the C drive or otherwise prevents trivial access. This is for Windows XP/7.

    Read the article

  • Intel présente ses puces Sandy Bridge, axées sur l'overclocking, la protection de contenus et le contrôle graphique

    Intel présente ses puces Sandy Bridge, axées sur l'overclocking, la protection de contenus et le contrôle graphique Mise à jour du 04.01.2011 par Katleen C'est officiel, Intel va enfin dévoiler ses puces Sandy Bridge tant attendues, et dans les temps annoncés qui plus est. Les produits, qui viennent d'être lancés, seront présentés cette semaine lors du CES de Las Vegas. La gamme Sandy Bridge se compose de 4 Core i3, 12 Core i5 et 13 Core i7 dont 1 qualifié d'Extreme. Comme nous vous l'annoncions en septembre, ces processeurs seront gravés en 32nm et seront optimisés pour un usage dans les ordinateurs portables (laptops, netbooks, etc.), pour des fréquences de 2,2 GHz (po...

    Read the article

  • Le logiciel de protection de F-Secure a pris des fichiers Mac pour des malwares, le problème est heureusement corrigé

    La version bêta du logiciel de protection de F-Secure a pris des fichiers Mac pour des malwares, le problème est heureusement corrigé Un petit rien peu parfois se transformer en quelque chose de gigantesque, avec un effet boule de neige. C'est ce qu'est en train de constater actuellement F-Secure. La firme spécialisée dans la sécurité informatique a rencontré un bogue sur son programme anti-virus qui provoque l'indignation d'un grand nombre d'internautes. En effet, le logiciel, qui est actuellement en version bêta pour Mac OS X a de "sérieux problèmes de fausse alarme". Sur les Macs sur lesquels il est installé, il a par accident supprimé des fichiers sains en les prenant pour des malwares. Des erreurs de ...

    Read the article

  • Google ajoute Do Not Track à Chrome, la fonction de protection de la vie privée ne sera pas activée par défaut

    Google ajoute Do Not Track à Chrome la fonction de protection de la vie privée ne sera pas activée par défaut Google a annoncé l'ajout de la fonction Do Not Track au navigateur Chrome. Do Not Track (DNT) est une mesure de sécurisation de la vie privée des internautes en envoyant via HTTP une entête particulière aux annonceurs, qui informe ceux-ci que l'utilisateur ne souhaite pas que son activité en ligne soit tracée pour de la publicité ciblée. La fonctionnalité sera disponible au sein du navigateur de Google avant la fin de l'année et peut déjà être testée dans la version de Chrome qui est téléchargeable sur le canal « Canary ». L'option Do Not Track pourra être ac...

    Read the article

  • C#: protecting trial releases

    - by anfono
    I want to provide a trial version of my software. This version should only be evaluated within a specific period of time. Let's say only during January 2011. As this software massively uses the system clock in processing, it would be quite annoying to set the clock to an earlier time to be able to use it over and over. So because of this, I wound't think of a more complicated protection mechanism. So I have thought about exiting after a test like: if (DateTime.Now.Year != 2011 && DateTime.Now.Month != 1) { MessageBox.Show("expired!"); Application.Exit(); } How easy will this be cracked :-) ? Is there a "safe" way to do this ?

    Read the article

  • Downloading game assests to SD card on Android

    - by hgpc
    I'm developing an Android game that has to download some assets to the SD card to keep the size of the app as small as possible. I was thinking of using an uncompressed zip file to bundle all the assets. A requirement from the client is to protect these assets as much as possible. Being part of the apk is considered enough protection, but if I do this the apk size will be enormous. If I just put a zip bundle in the SD card, then anyone can unzip it and explore its contents. Is there a simple way to do this without retorting to horrid DRM? Obviously if someone really wants to check the resources of an Android game, they can. I'm just looking for a simple solution to avoid making this very easy.

    Read the article

  • Best ways to copyright protect your work for example Myows

    - by Saif Bechan
    Recently I have read about Myows, they say its: "The universal copyright management and protection app for smart creatives" It is used to protect your application from copyrights and more. Do you think this will be a good idea for large application, or are there better ways to achieve such a thing. url: Myows Update Referencing: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2618015/has-anyone-tried-myows-to-copyright-protect-your-work/2618628#2618628 Wow there is no better person to have answered this question like the creator himself. Currently I am working on a large web application which is in late testing phase. Because of the complexity of the app there are not many versions of it online so copyright will be a huge issue for me as much of the code is in JavaScript and is easy copyable. I was glad to see that there is some company out there that provide such services, and naturally I wanted to know if there were people using it. I did not know that this type of concept was so 'new'. There were some nice points made in the answer, and I think it will be a good service for people like me. In the next couple of weeks I will be looking further into the subject and start uploading my code and see how it will works out. I will leave this question up because I do want some more suggestions on this topic.

    Read the article

  • Does Firefox Phishing Protection / Safebrowsing have any privacy implications?

    - by Nowo
    The current google results are outdated. What is the current status? I was on www.mozilla.org/en-US/legal/privacy/firefox.html and saw "Protection Against Suspected Forgery and Attack Sites Features". Can you translate please more to human speak? First they download a list and compare local... Ok... Here it gets messy "If there is a match, Firefox will check with its third party provider to ensure that the website is still on the blacklist. The information sent between Firefox and its third party provider(s) are hashed URLs. In fact, multiple hashed URLs are sent with the real hash so that the third party provider(s) will not know what site you are visiting." - If that hash were send to mozilla, they would knew which site were accessed? "In order to safeguard your privacy, Firefox will not transmit the complete URL of web pages that you visit to anyone other than Mozilla and its service providers." - In other words, Mozilla and its service providers get all complete URLs (of sites, which were in blacklist)? "While it is possible that a third party service provider may determine the actual URL from the hashed URL sent, Mozilla’s policy is to require [...]" - Privacy is depends on policy rather than technology?

    Read the article

  • Windows XP Domain Logon takes between 40 - 60 minutes

    - by Bryan
    Windows XP Clients, fully patched, with Symantec Endpoint Protection 11 client Windows 2008 R2 domain Roaming profiles Folder Redirection applied to Documents, AppData & Desktop I've enabled userenv logging, and logged on just after 17:00 last night. The user shell hadn't appeared at 17:45 when I left last night. When I arrived this morning, I checked the log file and found the following. USERENV(3f8.e7c) 17:02:18:296 LogExtSessionStatus: Successfully logged Extension Session data USERENV(654.a30) 17:04:09:468 ImpersonateUser: Failed to impersonate user with 5. USERENV(654.a30) 17:04:09:468 GetUserNameAndDomain Failed to impersonate user USERENV(654.a30) 17:04:09:468 GetUserDNSDomainName: Domain name is NT Authority. No DNS domain name available. USERENV(c8c.cb8) 17:04:09:781 LibMain: Process Name: C:\Program Files\Symantec\Symantec Endpoint Protection\SescLU.exe USERENV(cd0.cd4) 17:04:10:781 LibMain: Process Name: C:\PROGRA~1\Symantec\LIVEUP~1\LUCOMS~1.EXE USERENV(d08.c84) 17:07:09:609 LibMain: Process Name: C:\Program Files\Symantec\Symantec Endpoint Protection\SescLU.exe USERENV(cbc.cc0) 17:07:10:625 LibMain: Process Name: C:\Program Files\Symantec\LiveUpdate\luall.exe USERENV(db0.db4) 17:07:10:781 LibMain: Process Name: C:\PROGRA~1\Symantec\LIVEUP~1\LUCOMS~1.EXE USERENV(e00.e0c) 17:07:11:062 LibMain: Process Name: C:\Program Files\Symantec\LiveUpdate\LuCallbackProxy.exe USERENV(e20.e34) 17:07:11:203 LibMain: Process Name: C:\Program Files\Symantec\LiveUpdate\LuCallbackProxy.exe USERENV(e40.e50) 17:07:11:406 LibMain: Process Name: C:\Program Files\Symantec\LiveUpdate\LuCallbackProxy.exe USERENV(efc.54c) 17:07:11:656 LibMain: Process Name: C:\Program Files\Symantec\LiveUpdate\LuCallbackProxy.exe USERENV(ccc.df0) 17:08:45:687 LibMain: Process Name: C:\Program Files\Symantec\Symantec Endpoint Protection\SescLU.exe USERENV(e24.e20) 17:08:45:937 LibMain: Process Name: C:\Program Files\Symantec\LiveUpdate\luall.exe USERENV(ff0.ff4) 17:08:46:078 LibMain: Process Name: C:\PROGRA~1\Symantec\LIVEUP~1\LUCOMS~1.EXE USERENV(32c.cd0) 17:08:46:265 LibMain: Process Name: C:\Program Files\Symantec\LiveUpdate\LuCallbackProxy.exe USERENV(cc4.3d4) 17:08:46:406 LibMain: Process Name: C:\Program Files\Symantec\LiveUpdate\LuCallbackProxy.exe USERENV(434.4d0) 17:08:46:593 LibMain: Process Name: C:\Program Files\Symantec\LiveUpdate\LuCallbackProxy.exe USERENV(f2c.ac) 17:08:46:828 LibMain: Process Name: C:\Program Files\Symantec\LiveUpdate\LuCallbackProxy.exe USERENV(d60.d7c) 17:09:40:265 LibMain: Process Name: C:\Program Files\Symantec\Symantec Endpoint Protection\SescLU.exe USERENV(d94.d98) 17:09:40:531 LibMain: Process Name: C:\PROGRA~1\Symantec\LIVEUP~1\LUCOMS~1.EXE USERENV(bc4.3c4) 17:10:52:765 LibMain: Process Name: C:\Program Files\Symantec\Symantec Endpoint Protection\SescLU.exe USERENV(37c.90c) 17:10:52:984 LibMain: Process Name: C:\Program Files\Symantec\LiveUpdate\luall.exe USERENV(580.540) 17:10:53:109 LibMain: Process Name: C:\PROGRA~1\Symantec\LIVEUP~1\LUCOMS~1.EXE USERENV(c18.c30) 17:10:53:312 LibMain: Process Name: C:\Program Files\Symantec\LiveUpdate\LuCallbackProxy.exe USERENV(c44.288) 17:10:53:468 LibMain: Process Name: C:\Program Files\Symantec\LiveUpdate\LuCallbackProxy.exe USERENV(a34.cf4) 17:10:53:656 LibMain: Process Name: C:\Program Files\Symantec\LiveUpdate\LuCallbackProxy.exe USERENV(d3c.d4c) 17:10:53:890 LibMain: Process Name: C:\Program Files\Symantec\LiveUpdate\LuCallbackProxy.exe USERENV(970.948) 17:15:09:468 LibMain: Process Name: C:\Program Files\Symantec\Symantec Endpoint Protection\SescLU.exe USERENV(150.9dc) 17:15:09:734 LibMain: Process Name: C:\PROGRA~1\Symantec\LIVEUP~1\LUCOMS~1.EXE USERENV(f90.cec) 17:20:38:718 LibMain: Process Name: C:\Program Files\Symantec\Symantec Endpoint Protection\SescLU.exe USERENV(d8c.d70) 17:20:38:984 LibMain: Process Name: C:\PROGRA~1\Symantec\LIVEUP~1\LUCOMS~1.EXE USERENV(9a0.fa0) 17:26:07:953 LibMain: Process Name: C:\Program Files\Symantec\Symantec Endpoint Protection\SescLU.exe USERENV(844.51c) 17:26:08:218 LibMain: Process Name: C:\PROGRA~1\Symantec\LIVEUP~1\LUCOMS~1.EXE USERENV(d00.9ac) 17:31:19:453 LibMain: Process Name: C:\Program Files\Symantec\Symantec Endpoint Protection\SescLU.exe USERENV(ad4.624) 17:31:19:718 LibMain: Process Name: C:\PROGRA~1\Symantec\LIVEUP~1\LUCOMS~1.EXE USERENV(654.694) 17:31:46:390 ImpersonateUser: Failed to impersonate user with 5. USERENV(654.694) 17:31:46:390 GetUserNameAndDomain Failed to impersonate user USERENV(654.694) 17:31:46:390 GetUserDNSDomainName: Domain name is NT Authority. No DNS domain name available. USERENV(af8.610) 17:36:48:625 LibMain: Process Name: C:\Program Files\Symantec\Symantec Endpoint Protection\SescLU.exe USERENV(aa4.dfc) 17:36:48:906 LibMain: Process Name: C:\PROGRA~1\Symantec\LIVEUP~1\LUCOMS~1.EXE USERENV(2dc.5c8) 17:42:17:812 LibMain: Process Name: C:\Program Files\Symantec\Symantec Endpoint Protection\SescLU.exe USERENV(f70.8ac) 17:42:18:078 LibMain: Process Name: C:\PROGRA~1\Symantec\LIVEUP~1\LUCOMS~1.EXE USERENV(d50.c30) 17:47:47:062 LibMain: Process Name: C:\Program Files\Symantec\Symantec Endpoint Protection\SescLU.exe USERENV(c2c.c3c) 17:47:47:328 LibMain: Process Name: C:\PROGRA~1\Symantec\LIVEUP~1\LUCOMS~1.EXE USERENV(ef0.4cc) 17:53:16:234 LibMain: Process Name: C:\Program Files\Symantec\Symantec Endpoint Protection\SescLU.exe USERENV(cd4.c84) 17:53:16:500 LibMain: Process Name: C:\PROGRA~1\Symantec\LIVEUP~1\LUCOMS~1.EXE USERENV(828.8c4) 17:58:45:484 LibMain: Process Name: C:\Program Files\Symantec\Symantec Endpoint Protection\SescLU.exe USERENV(a24.b30) 17:58:45:750 LibMain: Process Name: C:\PROGRA~1\Symantec\LIVEUP~1\LUCOMS~1.EXE I've seen posts suggesting that it may be Windows Desktop Search 3.01 that is causing this, so I've removed that. I've removed the policy, 'Always wait for the network at startup or logon', thinking that might have helped. I'm running out of ideas. Has anyone seen this before?

    Read the article

  • Syntax for file and process exclusions in Forefront Endpoint Protection?

    - by Massimo
    I can't seem to find an official and up-to-date documentation on how to set up file and process exclusions in Forefront Endpoint Protection 2012. For file types, which of these will work? Are they the same? ext .ext *.ext What about wildcards? .e?t .e* .*t For file paths, which wildcards are allowed and how do they work? C:\path* C:\path\s*e C:\path\somef?le C:\*\somefile C:\pa*\somefile C:\pa?h\somefile *\path *:\path For processes, can wildcard be used when specifying the file name? Same syntax as file paths? Also: I read in this post that, as of October 2009, Real Time Protection ignored wildcards; is this still true for the 2012 version?

    Read the article

  • Where does Internet Explorer store saved passwords?

    - by Ian Boyd
    Where does Internet Explorer store saved passwords? And since this is a programming site, i'm not literally asking for the location where IE stores passwords, but which API ie uses to save passwords. At first i assumed that Microsoft was using the standard api: CredRead CredWrite which is used to save domain and generic program/web-site credentials. CredRead/CredWrite turn around and use CryptProtectData CryptUnprotectData to encrypt data with the current user's account. CredRead/CredWrite then store the data in some magical location, which contents you can see from the control panel: But i don't see IE passwords in there. So ie doesn't store passwords using CredRead/CredWrite. What api does IE use to store passwords, and if it uses CryptProtectData, where does it then store the protected data?

    Read the article

  • Password protect iPhone app

    - by Thomas
    I'm starting a new app, and I'd like to know how to require a password to open it. I've been researching on Google and the Apple Dev Forums and haven't found anything. I was considering a UIActionSheet, but am unsure how to go about doing so. I'm going to keep trying though. Any suggestions here are greatly appreciated. Thanks! Thomas

    Read the article

  • Protecting Data Feed for iPhone App

    - by Chris
    I am creating an App that pulls data from a file on my server. That file gets data from my database, based on GET values that are passed through the URL. I would like to keep this feed closed - that is, I don't want people finding the datasource and reading the data on their own. I considered sending an alphanumeric id along with the url string, but if they can find the URL that I am calling, then there won't be anything preventing them from grabbing that alphanumeric id also. I am looking for any ideas or experiences that might help me here. Thanks.

    Read the article

  • Prevent illegal behavior to the registered user

    - by Al Kush
    I am building a website in which this website will be focused on the publishing of novels. Every writers who publish their novels with us will get a royalty from us. And this royalty comes from the user or the reader who read the novel online in our website. When a user search for a novel and want to read that, they will click a link to the page which its content is that novel. The html page for each novels will have a session function that first will force them to login or register to make a payment such as with a credit-card or paypal before accessing that html page. My problem now is if the user has succesfully login and access the html page, I am afraid if the user will copy the content of the novel. Some disccussion out here How to Disable Copy Paste (Browser) have a solution to create it in Flash so that it can't be coppied-paste. But the I think, if the user who access it is a web developer like us they will try to find the path of the file from the link in the page source, and then they can steal it. For now I think it is enough I am explaining this. I hope anyone fully accept this problem (question) with a good idea to solve it.

    Read the article

  • Prevent password leakage while using sql* loader

    - by Jai
    I have shell script calling Sql*loader utility which inturn uses username/password as arguments. This details cannot be stored on server in any form due to security related policies. i got 2 approaches to handle this situation, 1. create hidden parameter file with login details and limit the access to owner. again the implication is i cannot store login data in any format on server 2. Create the user as OS authenticated and straight away login into sql without any userid/password I am not able to figure out risks involved in 2nd approach which u experienced folks could have come across. let me know if there is any other approach to handle password leakage issue

    Read the article

  • Protecting DLL's

    - by j-t-s
    Hi All Quite a few people have really taken interest in the dll's ivé sent them, and they're not the type that should be given away for free too often... I was just wondering, if I were to sell my components, user controls etc, how would I go about protecting them, in terms of ownership/encrypting code (if possible) etc.. What steps have you taken to help prevent people using yours without paying for them? Thank you very much! jt

    Read the article

  • How to protect/monitor your site from crawling by malicious user

    - by deathy
    Situation: Site with content protected by username/password (not all controlled since they can be trial/test users) a normal search engine can't get at it because of username/password restrictions a malicious user can still login and pass the session cookie to a "wget -r" or something else. The question would be what is the best solution to monitor such activity and respond to it (considering the site policy is no-crawling/scraping allowed) I can think of some options: Set up some traffic monitoring solution to limit the number of requests for a given user/IP. Related to the first point: Automatically block some user-agents (Evil :)) Set up a hidden link that when accessed logs out the user and disables his account. (Presumably this would not be accessed by a normal user since he wouldn't see it to click it, but a bot will crawl all links.) For point 1. do you know of a good already-implemented solution? Any experiences with it? One problem would be that some false positives might show up for very active but human users. For point 3: do you think this is really evil? Or do you see any possible problems with it? Also accepting other suggestions.

    Read the article

  • How to create a asp.net membership provider hashed password manually?

    - by Anheledir
    I'm using a website as a frontend and all users are authenticated with the standard ASP.NET Membership-Provider. Passwords are saved "hashed" within a SQL-Database. Now I want to write a desktop-client with administrative functions. Among other things there should be a method to reset a users password. I can access the database with the saved membership-data, but how can I manually create the password-salt and -hash? Using the System.Web.Membership Namespace seems to be inappropriate so I need to know how to create the salt and hash of the new password manually. Experts step up! :)

    Read the article

  • How to prevent application thievery (specific to Android applications)?

    - by Berdon Magnus
    Hey, I was wondering what the most effective way of preventing people from stealing my application (downloading a copy of the .apk online rather than buying it). I've spent a lot of time on one in particular (Droidbox) and won't be releasing Sync until I can guarantee that the people who are providing illegal copies of the pro version aren't able to. Anyone implemented this? I've tried checking my package signature verses an the signature of an unsigned copy but it appears to be the same - perhaps I'm doing something incorrectly here. I'm unsure whether people actually distribute the signed .apk in which case I don't think signature validation would work to begin with... Please note, this question is specific to Android Marketplace Applications - the difference being, application delivery is out of my hands and I have no way of linking between a legitimate purchase and an illegal download.

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17  | Next Page >