Search Results

Search found 9325 results on 373 pages for 'mvc'.

Page 104/373 | < Previous Page | 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111  | Next Page >

  • asp.net mvc - bootstrapping object via model binder

    - by csetzkorn
    Hi, I have a domain object Thing which can contain several Categories. So I have implemented my HTML helper to create a checkbox group of all possible Categories. I have no problem receiving: [AcceptVerbs(HttpVerbs.Post)] public ActionResult Create(Thing Thing, List<string> Categories) However I am wondering whether I could use a custom Model binder to use just this: [AcceptVerbs(HttpVerbs.Post)] public ActionResult Create(Thing Thing) So basically I am looking for a way to use the model binder to bootstrap the object tree/graph. Any pointers appreciated. Thanks. Christian

    Read the article

  • How to register assemblies using Windsor in ASP.NET MVC

    - by oz
    This is how my project looks: TestMvc (my web project) has a reference to the DomainModel.Core assembly where my interfaces and business objects reside. The class that implements the interfaces in DomainModel.Core is in a different assembly called DomainModel.SqlRepository; the reason behind it is that if I just want to create a repository for Oracle I just have to deploy the new dll, change the web.config and be done with it. When I build the solution, if I look at the \bin folder of my TestMvc project, there is no reference to the DomainModel.SqlRepository, which makes sense because it's not being reference anywhere. Problem arises when my windsor controller factory tries to resolve that assembly, since it's not on the \bin directory. So is there a way to point windsor to a specific location, without adding a reference to that assembly? My web.config looks like this: <component id="UserService" service="TestMvc.DomainModel.Core.Interface, TestMvc.DomainModel.Core" type="TestMvc.DomainModel.SqlRepository.Class, TestMvc.DomainModel.SqlRepository" lifestyle="PerWebRequest" /> There's many ways around this, like copying the dll as part of the build, add the reference to the project so it will get copied to the \bin folder or install it on the GAC and add an assembly reference in the web.config. I guess my question is specific to Windsor, to see if I can give the location of my assembly and it will resolve it.

    Read the article

  • Spring MVC and 406 Error XML request

    - by Asp1de
    Hi i have a problem when running my code outside eclipse. This is my Equinox enviroment: Framework is launched. id State Bundle 0 ACTIVE org.eclipse.osgi_3.7.0.v20110221 1 ACTIVE org.eclipse.equinox.common_3.6.0.v20110506 2 ACTIVE org.eclipse.update.configurator_3.3.100.v20100512 3 RESOLVED catalina-config_1.0.0 Master=20 4 ACTIVE org.springframework.osgi.catalina.start.osgi_1.0.0 Fragments=62 5 ACTIVE com.springsource.javax.activation_1.1.1 6 ACTIVE com.springsource.javax.annotation_1.0.0 7 ACTIVE com.springsource.javax.ejb_3.0.0 8 ACTIVE com.springsource.javax.el_1.0.0 9 ACTIVE com.springsource.javax.mail_1.4.0 10 ACTIVE com.springsource.javax.persistence_1.0.0 11 ACTIVE com.springsource.javax.servlet_2.5.0 12 ACTIVE com.springsource.javax.servlet.jsp_2.1.0 13 ACTIVE com.springsource.javax.servlet.jsp.jstl_1.1.2 14 ACTIVE com.springsource.javax.xml.bind_2.0.0 15 ACTIVE com.springsource.javax.xml.rpc_1.1.0 16 ACTIVE com.springsource.javax.xml.soap_1.3.0 17 ACTIVE com.springsource.javax.xml.stream_1.0.1 18 ACTIVE com.springsource.javax.xml.ws_2.1.1 19 ACTIVE com.springsource.org.aopalliance_1.0.0 20 ACTIVE com.springsource.org.apache.catalina_6.0.18 Fragments=3, 22 21 ACTIVE com.springsource.org.apache.commons.logging_1.1.1 22 RESOLVED com.springsource.org.apache.coyote_6.0.18 Master=20 23 ACTIVE com.springsource.org.apache.el_6.0.18 24 ACTIVE com.springsource.org.apache.juli.extras_6.0.18 25 ACTIVE com.springsource.org.apache.log4j_1.2.15 Fragments=33 26 ACTIVE com.springsource.org.apache.taglibs.standard_1.1.2 27 ACTIVE org.springframework.osgi.commons-el.osgi_1.0.0.SNAPSHOT 28 ACTIVE data_1.0.0 29 ACTIVE Api_1.0.0 30 ACTIVE connector_1.0.0 31 ACTIVE core_1.0.0 32 ACTIVE org.springframework.osgi.jasper.osgi_5.5.23.SNAPSHOT 33 RESOLVED com.springsource.org.apache.log4j.config_1.0.0 Master=25 34 ACTIVE testController_1.0.0 35 ACTIVE org.eclipse.core.contenttype_3.4.100.v20100505-1235 36 ACTIVE org.eclipse.core.jobs_3.5.0.v20100515 37 ACTIVE org.eclipse.equinox.app_1.3.0.v20100512 38 ACTIVE org.eclipse.equinox.preferences_3.3.0.v20100503 39 ACTIVE org.eclipse.equinox.registry_3.5.0.v20100503 40 ACTIVE org.eclipse.osgi.services_3.2.100.v20100503 41 ACTIVE osgi.core_4.3.0.201102171602 42 ACTIVE dataImplementation_1.0.0 43 ACTIVE org.springframework.osgi.servlet-api.osgi_2.4.0.SNAPSHOT 44 ACTIVE org.springframework.aop_3.1.1.RELEASE 45 ACTIVE org.springframework.asm_3.1.1.RELEASE 46 ACTIVE org.springframework.beans_3.1.1.RELEASE 47 ACTIVE org.springframework.context_3.1.1.RELEASE 48 ACTIVE org.springframework.context.support_3.1.1.RELEASE 49 ACTIVE org.springframework.core_3.1.1.RELEASE 50 ACTIVE org.springframework.expression_3.1.1.RELEASE 51 ACTIVE org.springframework.osgi.extensions.annotations_1.2.1 52 ACTIVE org.springframework.osgi.core_1.2.1 53 ACTIVE org.springframework.osgi.extender_1.2.1 54 ACTIVE org.springframework.osgi.io_1.2.1 55 ACTIVE org.springframework.osgi.mock_1.2.1 56 ACTIVE org.springframework.osgi.web_1.2.1 57 ACTIVE org.springframework.osgi.web.extender_1.2.1 58 ACTIVE org.springframework.oxm_3.1.1.RELEASE 59 ACTIVE org.springframework.transaction_3.1.1.RELEASE 60 ACTIVE org.springframework.web_3.1.1.RELEASE 61 ACTIVE org.springframework.web.servlet_3.1.1.RELEASE 62 RESOLVED tomcat-configuration-fragment_1.0.0 Master=4 My controller is: @RequestMapping(value = "/test1", method = RequestMethod.GET, produces = "application/json") public @ResponseBody Person test1() { logger.info(" <--- Test 1 ---> \n"); Person p = new Person("a", "b", "c"); return p; } @RequestMapping(value = "/test2", method = RequestMethod.GET, produces = "application/xml") public @ResponseBody Person test3() { logger.info(" <--- Test 1 ---> \n"); Person p = new Person("a", "b", "c"); return p; } @RequestMapping(value = "/test2", method = RequestMethod.GET, headers = "Accept=*/*") public @ResponseBody Person test4() { logger.info(" <--- Test 1 ---> \n"); Person p = new Person("a", "b", "c"); return p; } @RequestMapping(value = "/parent", method = RequestMethod.GET, headers = "Accept=application/xml") public @ResponseBody Parent test2() { logger.info(" <--- Test 1 ---> \n"); Parent p = new Parent("a", "b"); return p; } If i run the TEST 1(json request) it works perfectly but when i run the test 2, 3 and 4 the browser give me back that error: (406) The resource identified by this request is only capable of generating responses with characteristics not acceptable according to the request "accept" headers (). Could someone help me? PS: if i run the bundle inside ECLIPSE it works perfectly. I generate the bundles with maven.

    Read the article

  • C# .NET MVC Call an action from another controller

    - by Brian
    I have two different objects: contracts, and task orders. My requirements specify that in order to view the Details for either object, the Url should be "http://.../Contract/Details" or "http://.../TaskOrder/Details" depending on which type. They are both very similar and the details pages are almost identical, so I made a class that can either be a contract or a task order, and has a variable "objectTypeID" that says which type it is. I wrote the action "Details" in the task order controller, but now I want to call that from the contract controller instead of recopying the code. So is there any way to have the url still say ".../Contract/Details" but call the action in the TaskOrder controller instead? I tried using TaskOrderController TOController = new TaskOrderController(); TOController.Details(id); This would have worked except that I can't use the HttpContext.Session anymore, which I used several times in the action.

    Read the article

  • jQuery Form, ASP.NET MVC JSon Result

    - by Stacey
    I'm trying to return a json result from a jQuery Form instance - but it keeps prompting me to download a file instead of displaying it in the window like it is supposed to... $("#ajaxImageForm").ajaxForm({ iframe: true, type: "GET", dataType: "json", beforeSubmit: function() { $("#ajaxImageForm").block({ message: '<img src="/content/images/loader.gif" /> Uploading . . .' }); }, success: function(result) { $("#ajaxImageForm").unblock(); $.growlUI(null, result.message); } }); [AcceptVerbs(HttpVerbs.Post)] public JsonResult Edit(FormCollection collection) { // return Json to the jQuery Form Result return new JsonResult { Data = new { message = string.Format("edited successfully.") } }; }

    Read the article

  • Handling button click in ASP.NET MVC 2 RTM

    - by Leniel Macaferi
    I have a View in which the user is able to upload a file to the server. In this view I also have 2 buttons: one to Upload a file and other to Download the last file imported. In my Controller I created 2 action methods: Import and Export. How could I manage to redirect each button click to the proper action method in my Controller? I have tried Html.ActionLink: <%= Html.ActionLink("Upload", "Import", "OracleFile")%> <%= Html.ActionLink("Download", "Export", "OracleFile")%> Html.ActionLink didn't do the trick. The action links were taking me to the right Action methods but they were generating a GET request. This way Request.Files.Count = 0. I need a POST request.

    Read the article

  • MVC Form and Dictionary Type

    - by Brian Schmitt
    I am attempting to use a property on my model that is of type Dictionary<string, string>. This dictionary is one of several other properties on the model, and I am using the dictionary as a key/value store to produce a 'dynamic' form. E.G.: User Name Settings A B I want to be able to submit and save any changes to settings A and B. I can submit the form and get my posted values in all my other fields, however the dictionary gets set to null. <%=Html.LabelFor(m => m.Name)%> <%=Html.DisplayFor(m => m.Name)%> <%=Html.LabelFor(m => m.Settings["A"])%> <%=Html.TextBoxFor(m => m.Settings["A"])%> <%=Html.LabelFor(m => m.Settings["B"])%> <%=Html.TextBoxFor(m => m.Settings["B"])%> Is there a better way to produce the dynamic form with a key/value pair? The actual code will be using partials (there several hundred variations), and the above is only a contrived example.

    Read the article

  • Ajax call with jQuery in ASP.NET MVC does not pass parameters

    - by desmati
    The Route is: routes.MapRoute( "Ajax", // Route name "BizTalk/Services/{action}", // URL with parameters new { // Parameter defaults controller = "BizTalk" } ); My Controller is: public JsonResult AjaxTest(string s, int i, bool b) { return Json("S: " + s + "," + "I: " + i + "," + "B: " + b); } My jQuery Code: $(document).ready(function() { $("#btn_test").click(function() { var s = "test"; var i = 8; var b = true; $.ajax({ type: "POST", cache: false, url: "/BizTalk/Services/AjaxTest", data: { i: i, s: s, b: b }, contentType: "application/json; charset=utf-8", dataType: "json", success: function(msg) { } }); }); });

    Read the article

  • MVC: models interacts with the view?

    - by fayer
    i know that everything is going through the controller. but i often read articles that says something like this: user interacts with the view controller asks the model to change its state model notifies the view when its sate has changed i dont get the 3rd one. why saying that the model notifies the view, when it actually is notifying the controller and the controller is notifying the view?

    Read the article

  • Building URL or link in REST ASP.NET MVC

    - by AWC
    I want to build a URL at runtime when a resource is render to either XML or JSON. I can do this easily when the view is HTML and is rendering only parts of the resource, but when I render a resource that contains a links to another resource I want to dynamically generate the correct URL according the host (site) and resource specific URI part. <components> <component id = "1234" name = "component A" version = "1.0"> <link rel = "/component" uri="http://localhost:8080/component/1234" /> </component> <components> How do I make sure the 'uri' value is correct?

    Read the article

  • Asp.net MVC, after using jeditable (Edit in place)

    - by coure06
    Ok, i can use jeditable to edit-in-place some content on a page and the content will be saved to a database. But whats the best way to re get that text-content from db to show into a place holder? p id="paraNo34" class="editable" --What i will write here so that it will get content from a db's table: [Content], where id=="paraNo34". /p The problem is if i will use some hard coded text like p id="paraNo34" class="editable" --Some text here /p I will able to edit-in-place using jeditable but when i will refresh page it will show the same "Some text here" as its not getting data from db.

    Read the article

  • MVC ActionLink omits action when action equals default route value

    - by rjygraham
    I have the following routes defined for my application: routes.MapRoute( "Referral", // Route name "{referralCode}", // URL with parameters new { controller = "Home", action = "Index" } // Parameter defaults ); routes.MapRoute( "Default", // Route name "{controller}/{action}", // URL with parameters new { controller = "Home", action = "Index" } // Parameter defaults ); And I'm trying to create an ActionLink to go on the Index action on my AdminController: @Html.ActionLink("admin", "Index", "Admin") However, when the view is executed the ActionLink renders as (Index action value is omitted): <a href="/Admin">admin</a> Normally this would be ok, but it's causing a collision with the "Referral" route. NOTE: If I instead use ActionLink to render a different action like "Default," the ActionLink renders correctly: <a href="/Admin/Default">admin</a> The fact that the "Default" action renders correctly leads me to believe the problem has to do with the default value specified for the route. Is there anyway to force ActionLink to render the "Index" action as well?

    Read the article

  • ASP.net AppendHeader not working in ASP MVC

    - by Chao
    I'm having problems getting AppendHeader to work properly if I am also using an authorize filter. I'm using an actionfilter for my AJAX actions that applies Expires, Last-Modified, Cache-Control and Pragma (though while testing I have tried including it in the action method itself with no change in results). If I don't have an authorize filter the headers work fine. Once I add the filter the headers I tried to add get stripped. The headers I want to add Response.AppendHeader("Expires", "Sun, 19 Nov 1978 05:00:00 GMT"); Response.AppendHeader("Last-Modified", String.Format("{0:r}", DateTime.Now)); Response.AppendHeader("Cache-Control", "no-store, no-cache, must-revalidate"); Response.AppendHeader("Cache-Control", "post-check=0, pre-check=0"); Response.AppendHeader("Pragma", "no-cache"); An example of the headers from a correct page: Server ASP.NET Development Server/9.0.0.0 Date Mon, 14 Jun 2010 17:22:24 GMT X-AspNet-Version 2.0.50727 X-AspNetMvc-Version 2.0 Pragma no-cache Expires Sun, 19 Nov 1978 05:00:00 GMT Last-Modified Mon, 14 Jun 2010 18:22:24 GMT Cache-Control no-store, no-cache, must-revalidate, post-check=0, pre-check=0 Content-Type text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Length 352 Connection Close And from an incorrect page: Server ASP.NET Development Server/9.0.0.0 Date Mon, 14 Jun 2010 17:27:34 GMT X-AspNet-Version 2.0.50727 X-AspNetMvc-Version 2.0 Pragma no-cache, no-cache Cache-Control private, s-maxage=0 Content-Type text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Length 4937 Connection Close

    Read the article

  • Fat ASP.NET MVC Controllers

    - by Mosh
    Hello, I have been reading about "Fat Controllers" but most of the articles out there focus on pulling the service/repository layer logic out of the controller. However, I have run into a different situation and am wondering if anyone has any ideas for improvement. I have a controller with too many actions and am wondering how I can break this down into many controllers with fewer actions. All these actions are responsible for inserting/updating/removing objects that all belong to the same aggregate. So I'm not quiet keen in having a seperate controller for each class that belongs to this aggregate... To give you more details, this controller is used in a tabbed page. Each tab represents a portion of the data for editing and all the domain model objects used here belong to the same aggregate. Any advice? Cheers, Mosh

    Read the article

  • Search Route in ASP.NET MVC

    - by olst
    Hi. I have a simple search form in my master page and a serach controller and view. I'm trying to get the following route for the string search term "myterm" (for example): root/search/myterm The form in the master page : <% using (Html.BeginForm("SearchResults", "Search", FormMethod.Post, new { id = "search_form" })) { %> <input name="searchTerm" type="text" class="textfield" /> <input name="search" type="submit" value="search" class="button" /> <%} %> The Controller Action: public ActionResult SearchResults(string searchTerm){...} The Route I'm Using : routes.MapRoute( "Search", "search/{term}", new { controller = "Search", action = "SearchResults", term = (string)null } ); routes.MapRoute( "Default", "{controller}/{action}", new { controller = "Home", action = "Index" } ); I'm always getting the url "root/search" without the search term, no matter what search term I enter. Thanks.

    Read the article

  • Passing PaginatedList to ActionResult MVC C#

    - by Darcy
    Hi all, I wanted to create a simple paginated search for my project. I'm having trouble with my 'advanced search' page, where I have several textbox inputs that the user would fill with the appropriate data (basically just several filters). My view is strongly-typed with the paginatedList class similar to the NerdDinner tutorial. In my controller, I wanted to pass the PaginatedList as a parameter since my view contains several bits of info from the PaginatedList model. The PaginatedList was null (as parameter), then I changed added the route; the object itself is not null anymore, but the values are. View: <%= Html.TextBox("Manufacturers", Model.Manufacturers) %> <%= Html.TextBox("OtherFilters", Model.FilterX) %> //...etc etc Controller: public ActionResult AdvancedSearchResults(PaginatedList<MyModel> paginatedList) { //... } Any ideas? Am I even going about this correctly? Should I create a ViewModel that encapsulates the paginatedList info as well as the additional info I need instead?

    Read the article

  • calling asp.net mvc action method using jquery post method expires the session

    - by nccsbim071
    hi, i have a website where i provicde a link. On clicking the link a controller action method is called to generate a zip file after creation of zip file is done, i show the link to download the zip file by replacing the link to create a zip with the link to download the zip. the problem is that after zip file creation is over and link is shown, when user clicks on the link to download the zip file, they are sent to login. After providing correct credentials in the login page they are prompted to download the zip file. they sould not be sent to the login page. In the action to generate zip file i haven't abondoned the session or haven't not done anything that abondons the session. the user should not be sen't to login page after successful creation of zip file user should be able to download the file without login. i search internet on this problem, but i did not find any solution. In one of the blog written by hanselman i found this statement that creates the problem with the session: Is some other thing like an Ajax call or IE's Content Advisor simultaneously hitting the default page or login page and causing a race condition that calls Session.Abandon? (It's happened before!) so i thought there might be some problem with ajax call that causes the session to expire, but i don't know what is happening? any help please thanks

    Read the article

  • Can't log in a user in MVC!

    - by devlife
    I have been scratching my head on this for a while now but still can't get it. I'm trying to simply log in a user in an MVC2 application. I have tried everything that I know to try but still can't figure out what I'm doing wrong. Here are a few things that I have tried: FormsAuthentication.SetAuthCookie( emailAddress, rememberMe ); var cookie = FormsAuthentication.GetAuthCookie( emailAddress, rememberMe ); HttpContext.Response.Cookies.Add( cookie ); FormsAuthenticationTicket ticket = new FormsAuthenticationTicket( emailAddress, rememberMe, 15 ); FormsIdentity identity = new FormsIdentity( ticket ); GenericPrincipal principal = new GenericPrincipal(identity, new string[0]); HttpContext.User = principal; I'm not sure if any of this is the right thing to do (as it's not working). After setting HttpContext.User = principal then Request.IsAuthenticated == true. However, in Global.asax I have this: HttpCookie authenCookie = Context.Request.Cookies.Get( FormsAuthentication.FormsCookieName ); The only cookie that ever is available is the aspnet session cookie. Any ideas at all would be much appreciated!

    Read the article

  • ASP.NET MVC Master Page

    - by john
    hi Guys How can one do this? I would like to save the master pages template in the database and then based on a query string pull the correct template. Is this possible?

    Read the article

  • Visual Studio 2010 RC + ASP.NET MVC 2 RTM won't re-target from .NET Framework 4 to 3.5

    - by Solution Evangelist
    Per the above I am trying to re-target a fresh ASP.NET MVC 2 application in Visual Studio 2010 RTM. After all sorts of tweaking the closest I am getting is the error below: The primary reference "System.Web.Mvc, Version=2.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=31bf3856ad364e35, processorArchitecture=MSIL" could not be resolved because it has an indirect dependency on the framework assembly "System.Web, Version=2.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b03f5f7f11d50a3a" which could not be resolved in the currently targeted framework. ".NETFramework,Version=v3.5". To resolve this problem, either remove the reference "System.Web.Mvc, Version=2.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=31bf3856ad364e35, processorArchitecture=MSIL" or retarget your application to a framework version which contains "System.Web, Version=2.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b03f5f7f11d50a3a". Is there anyone who can assist in having this re-targeted to .NET Framework 3.5 (SP1), or is there perhaps a zip file of a VS 2010 + .NET Framework v3.5 + ASP.NET MVC 2 RTM project already online I could grab?

    Read the article

  • Crystal report file does not get deployed to server in ASP.NET MVC

    - by Andrew
    I am using a crystal reports through crystal report viewer server side control in a webform. I am using a webform because the crystal report viewer provides an easy way to export to PDF and to Excel. My problem is that when I deploy to the server, the crystal report .rpt file does not get copied to the target folder. My solution structure looks like this: Solution |-Content |-Controllers |-Models |-Views |-etc... |-Reports |-Default.aspx |-Report.rpt On the server, the Report.rpt file is missing after I publish.

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111  | Next Page >