Search Results

Search found 14956 results on 599 pages for 'undefined index'.

Page 11/599 | < Previous Page | 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18  | Next Page >

  • Compiling Ubuntu server: "libQtGui.so: undefined reference to png functions" errors

    - by Kowalikus
    I want to compile wkhtmltopdf on Ubuntu Server, but I have a problem with following errors: /usr/lib/libQtGui.so: undefined reference to `png_read_info@PNG12_0' /usr/lib/libQtGui.so: undefined reference to `png_set_gAMA@PNG12_0' /usr/lib/libQtGui.so: undefined reference to `png_set_PLTE@PNG12_0' ... /usr/lib/libQtGui.so: undefined reference to `png_create_info_struct@PNG12_0' /usr/lib/libQtGui.so: undefined reference to `png_set_bgr@PNG12_0' /usr/lib/libQtGui.so: undefined reference to `png_get_valid@PNG12_0' What can I do? in /usr/lib lrwxrwxrwx 1 17 2010-02-17 15:00 libQtGui.so -> libQtGui.so.4.5.2 lrwxrwxrwx 1 17 2010-02-17 14:59 libQtGui.so.4 -> libQtGui.so.4.5.2 lrwxrwxrwx 1 17 2010-02-17 14:59 libQtGui.so.4.5 -> libQtGui.so.4.5.2 -rw-r--r-- 1 10071604 2009-10-14 23:34 libQtGui.so.4.5.2

    Read the article

  • Same index for all (sub-)directories?

    - by whatisthis
    Hi. I was wondering if it was possible to write some .htaccess page that makes the server use an index.php file in a SINGLE directory as the index file for every directory/sub-directory on my server, rather than placing the exact same index.php in 200+ directories. If my description isn't clear, what I essentially mean is: /files/index.php is to be used as the index for, for example, /files/morefiles, as well as the index for all directories and sub-directories within /files/, even though those directories would not have an index file themselves. Thanks to all in advance.

    Read the article

  • jQuery RadioButton index

    - by Tomas
    Hello How to get checked RadioButton Index using jQuery? I need to read it and save to cookies to load status later using code $('input[name="compression"]')[{Reading from cookies code}].checked = true; 1<input name="compression" type="radio" value="1" checked="checked" /> 2<input name="compression" type="radio" value="2" /> 3<input name="compression" type="radio" value="3" /> Regards Tomas

    Read the article

  • Why is postgresql update query so slow sometimes, even with index

    - by Matija
    i have a simple update query (foo column type is BOOLEAN (default false)): update tablename set foo = true where id = 234; which "id" is set to (primary) key, and if i run "explain analyze" i got: Index Cond: (id = 234) Total runtime: 0.358 ms but still, i have plenty of unexplained queries at slow log (pgfouine), which took more than 200s (?!): Times executed: 99, Av. duration (s): 70 can anyone please explain, whats the reason for that? (1.5 mio rows in table, postgresql 8.4)

    Read the article

  • setting z-index jquery ui controls?

    - by maxp
    Annoyingly, the jquery ui's set a few css properties inline, making it impossible to override them in the stylesheet. I tried to override the values with jquery, but then they get changed back as soon as the control is interacted with. Does anyone know if any of the jquery ui control's initialisers/constructors have the ability to override their z-index value or set other css properties?

    Read the article

  • jQuery oembed plugin z-index problem

    - by Ben
    I'm using the jQuery oembed plugin to display videos from a Vimeo feed. The only problem is they display over the top of my navigation menu. I have tried setting the z-index of the menu but this makes no difference. A common suggestion seems to be to set the wmode parameter to transparent or opaque. However, passing this as a parameter to the oembed function makes no difference. Thanks

    Read the article

  • MySQL won't use index for query?

    - by Jack Sleight
    I have this table: CREATE TABLE `point` ( `id` INT(11) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT, `siteid` INT(11) NOT NULL, `lft` INT(11) DEFAULT NULL, `rgt` INT(11) DEFAULT NULL, `level` SMALLINT(6) DEFAULT NULL, PRIMARY KEY (`id`), KEY `point_siteid_site_id` (`siteid`), CONSTRAINT `point_siteid_site_id` FOREIGN KEY (`siteid`) REFERENCES `site` (`id`) ON DELETE CASCADE ) ENGINE=INNODB AUTO_INCREMENT=35 DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8 COLLATE=utf8_unicode_ci And this query: SELECT * FROM `point` WHERE siteid = 1; Which results in this EXPLAIN information: +----+-------------+-------+------+----------------------+------+---------+------+------+-------------+ | id | select_type | table | type | possible_keys | key | key_len | ref | rows | Extra | +----+-------------+-------+------+----------------------+------+---------+------+------+-------------+ | 1 | SIMPLE | point | ALL | point_siteid_site_id | NULL | NULL | NULL | 6 | Using where | +----+-------------+-------+------+----------------------+------+---------+------+------+-------------+ Question is, why isn't the query using the point_siteid_site_id index?

    Read the article

  • Setting clustered index in nhibernate

    - by SolBadguy
    Hi. I'm trying to define a property that is not the id as a clustered index in nhibernate, yet I've found no way of doing this. Could anyone give me a pointer of how this is done, or it is something not currently available in nhibernate? Thanks in advance

    Read the article

  • oracle drop index if exits

    - by CC
    How do you drop an index only if it exists? It seems simple but I did found anything on the net. The idea is to drop it only if it exists, because if not, I will have an error and my process stops.

    Read the article

  • Drupal - Hide a single page from search index

    - by ilowe
    Hi, I've taken over an existing Drupal installation and have been asked to remove a single page from the site search results. I know about the lullabot tutorial through this question: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1748837/hide-drupal-nodes-from-search, but that talks about excluding a class of content when I really just want to exclude a single page. I've tried manually deleting the node from the search_index table, but that didn't seem to work either. Any recommendations for excluding a single regular content page from the search index?

    Read the article

  • [C#] Get Index of Control in an Control-Array

    - by Cocaine112358
    I have a TextBox Array private TextBox[,] Fields = new TextBox[9, 9]; and all the TextBoxes have got the same TextChanged-Event void Field_Changed( object sender, EventArgs e ) Is there a way to get the Index of the sender in the Array (without giving each TextBox it's own EventHandler)?

    Read the article

  • Removing .html and index.html from URL

    - by James Turner
    I'm having some problems trying to Remove the .html extension from URLs Removing 'index.html' from an URL 1) To remove the extension I have tried using this in my htaccess file. RewriteEngine on RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME}\.html -f RewriteRule ^(.*)$ $1.html However when I click links in my HTML such as <a href="abcde.html"></a> it doesn't remove the .html from the URL and I am left with www.website.com/abcde.html 2) I tried using this to remove the index.html RewriteCond %{THE_REQUEST} \/index\.(php|html)\ HTTP [NC] RewriteRule (.*)index\.(php|html)$ /$1 [R=301,L] But when I load an index.html file on my server, my URL looks something like this www.website.com/folder// I am left with an extra / at the end. Can anyone help me out?

    Read the article

  • Index page content identical to page 1 of a gallery-type website

    - by WordPress Developer
    I have a gallery type website, e.g. a site that lists blog posts or pictures in a paginated manner. However, I have 2 pages that have identical content: example.com/index.html example.com/page/1 Page 2, 3 and so on have different content naturally. However, for SEO purposes, what is the best way of telling Google that page 1 is identical to index.html? Should I 302 redirect index.html to /page/1 so index.html is non-existent, so to say or should I put a canonical tag in /page/1 (but not on /page/2) that points to index.html?

    Read the article

  • ModalPopupExtender z-index value decreases after every show

    - by ryanulit
    This is a new one I have never seen before. I have a gridview containing a bunch of categories that can be edited by clicking on the respective "Edit" link within the gridview. The modalpopupextender is then shown programmatically (.show() method) and the user is allowed to edit the category. Then the modal popup is programmtically hidden (.hide() method) when the user presses "Update" or "Cancel". For some reason after every new show of the modal popup, the z-index is decreasing by 1000 until it is hidden behind everything on my page. It starts at 7000 for the very first show. Therefore the user would not be able to edit an infinite number of categories if they wanted to. Any ideas why this is happening? Css class used on modalpopupextender: DIV.box-pop { border: #95aab9 1px solid; background-color: #ECF1F5; display: block; position: relative; margin: -6px 6px 6px -6px; padding: 4px; z-index: 10000; } Panel used for popup: <asp:Panel ID="PanelModify" runat="server" Width="250px" CssClass="box-pop"> <asp:UpdatePanel ID="UpdatePanelModify" runat="server" UpdateMode="Conditional"> <ContentTemplate> <table width="100%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="3"> <tr> <td> <div class="box"> <h1> <span><strong> <asp:Literal ID="LiteralModalTitle" runat="server" /></strong></span> </h1> <table border="0" width="100%"> <tr> <td> <asp:TextBox ID="TextBoxModifiedText" runat="server" Width="173px" ValidationGroup="Modify"></asp:TextBox> <asp:RequiredFieldValidator ID="RequiredFieldValidatorModifiedText" runat="server" ValidationGroup="Modify" ErrorMessage="*" ControlToValidate="TextBoxModifiedText" Display="Dynamic"> </asp:RequiredFieldValidator> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <asp:Button ID="ButtonUpdate" runat="server" Text="Update" ValidationGroup="Modify" /><asp:Button ID="ButtonInsert" runat="server" Text="Insert" ValidationGroup="Modify" /> &nbsp; <asp:Button ID="ButtonCancel" runat="server" Text="Cancel" CausesValidation="false" /> </td> </tr> </table> </div> </td> </tr> </table> </ContentTemplate> </asp:UpdatePanel> </asp:Panel> <ajaxToolkit:ModalPopupExtender ID="ModalPopupExtenderModify" runat="server" PopupControlID="PanelModify" TargetControlID="ButtonHideModify" BackgroundCssClass="modalBackground"> </ajaxToolkit:ModalPopupExtender> <asp:Button ID="ButtonHideModify" runat="server" Style="display: none;" />

    Read the article

  • z-index not working in IE8 with the sortable jQuery plugin

    - by Ojtwist
    I'm working with the jQuery Sortable plugin to drag and drop images from one box to another box. This works fine in ff,chrome and safari but it fails in IE8. It seems that when you start dragging that the image is send to the back. I've tried to solve this by adding the z-index option to the sortable plugin, i've tried appending it to a node higher in the hierarchy (body). It appears that setting a z-index on every other item in the page would fix this, haven't tried it yet and i'm not planning on doing this because this would mess up alot. So the user can drag an image from 1 gallery to the next gallery screenshot of how it should work: http://img69.imageshack.us/i/draganddrop.jpg/ Some html: <!--SECOND ARROCRDION ITEM --> <a class="flickr_accordeon_header" id="flickr_second_header" href="javascript:;">__MSG__SEARCH_FOR_PHOTOS__</a> <div> <p class ="flickr_text" > __MSG__SEARCH_FOR_PHOTOS__</p> <form method="GET" action="javascript:;"> <p> <input type="text" value="__MSG__SEARCH__" id="flickr_key_input" class="flickr_changeColorNormal" /> <button class="s3d-button flickr_search" id="flickr_seach_button"> <span class="s3d-button-inner" >__MSG__SEARCH__</span> </button> <img src="/devwidgets/flickr/images/ajax-loader-gray.gif" alt="__MSG__LOADING_IMAGE__" id="flickr_loading_img" /> <a href="javascript:;" id="flickr_refresh_key_button"><img src="/dev/_images/recent_activity_icon.png" alt="refresh" title='refresh' /></a> </p> </form> <div id="flickr_input_error">__MSG__INPUT_ERROR__</div> <div id="flickr_input_same_error">__MSG__INPUT_SAME_ERROR__</div> **<div id="flickr_key_gallery" ><ul class="flickr_key_ul"><li></li></ul></div>** <div id="flickr_key_pagging" ></div> </div> </div> <!--SLIDING SIDEBAR --> <div id="flickr_sidebar" class="jcarousel-skin-tango"> <div id="flickr_side_paging"></div> **<ul> <li><img src="/devwidgets/flickr/images/drop-image.png" alt="__MSG__DROP_HERE__" class="flick_drop_here"></li> </ul>** </div> The images get rendered into the ul, so basically it's just an ul with li's with images javascript for sortable: horizontal: { helper: "clone", // Instead of dragging the real image a copy will be dragged connectWith: ["#flickr_sidebar ul"], // To be able to drag and drop an image to another image gallery they need to be connected cursor: 'pointer', //change the cursor when dragging opacity: 0.50, //Change the opacity while dragging appendTo: 'body', //When dropped the images need to be appended to the image gallery where they are dropped containment: 'body', //Make sure the user can't drag the images outside the widget revert: true, // if the user releases the image ouside the dropbox it'll return to it's original position zIndex: 9999 } I've tried it with setting the dragged image to absolute and the container on relative... doesn't work Anyone know how to solve this in IE8 ?

    Read the article

  • CSS - Can't get the z-index to apply correctly in Internet Explorer

    - by peaki
    I've written a jQuery script to replace <select /> elements with some DIV's and UL's allowing my to simulate the original SELECT but also allow me to style it. So far, aside from a few minor bugs, it works rather nicely. However, in Internet Explorer, the 'options' div is getting rendered underneath the elements below the div. Here's the HTML: <div class="styledSelect-parent" style="display: inline-block; width: 59px;"> <div class="styledSelect-newSelect" style="position: relative;"> <input class="styledSelect-newSelect-selector" style="width: 59px;" readonly="readonly" name="hello" value="Test1" type="text"> <div class="styledSelect-newSelect-options" style="display: none; z-index: 20; width: 59px; position: absolute; left: 0px; top: 18px;"> <ul> <li>Test1</li> <li>Test2</li> <li>Test3</li> <li class="styledSelect-active">Test4</li> <li>Test1</li> <li>Test2</li> </ul> </div> </div> </div> <br /><br /> <div class="styledSelect-parent" style="display: inline-block; width: 59px;"> <div class="styledSelect-newSelect" style="position: relative;"> <input class="styledSelect-newSelect-selector" style="width: 59px;" readonly="readonly" name="hello" value="Test1" type="text"> <div class="styledSelect-newSelect-options" style="display: none; z-index: 20; width: 59px; position: absolute; left: 0px; top: 18px;"> <ul> <li class="styledSelect-active">Test1</li> <li>Test2</li> <li>Test3</li> </ul> </div> </div> </div> If I open the first select, the LI list sits underneath the second select box rather than above it. I can't get the z-indexes to work properly. What am I missing? :/

    Read the article

  • Does Google index HTTPS ASP.NET pages?

    - by ncakmak
    I have an online application that all of its pages use HTTPS. I have 3 questions: Does Google index HTTPS pages? I have a password protected single ASP.NET page (using HTTPS). Password protection is basically achieved by a Session object. When the correct password is entered, it hides the login panel and displays the same page which has a sensitive data. Is this page indexed by Google? I have a Secure folder that I implemented Forms Authentication. All pages in folder use HTTPS as well. Are the pages in this folder indexed by Google? Thank you for your help, Niyazi

    Read the article

  • jQuery UI Autocomplete with scrollbar z-index help

    - by rpf3
    I have a textbox that I am attaching jQuery UI's Autocomplete functionality to and I am using CSS to give it a max height via the example here. My problem is that doing this causes the z-index problem that bgiframe solves to come back again, but in a different way. The initial autocomplete menu is above all the controls underneath it, but when I begin to scroll the autocomplete menu falls behind them. Any suggestions? EDIT: This is purely an IE6 bug. As you can see, after scrolling down the autocomplete falls behind the other controls.

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18  | Next Page >