Search Results

Search found 10366 results on 415 pages for 'const char pointer'.

Page 114/415 | < Previous Page | 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121  | Next Page >

  • multiple definition in header file

    - by Jérôme
    Here is a small code-example from which I'd like to ask a question : complex.h : #ifndef COMPLEX_H #define COMPLEX_H #include <iostream> class Complex { public: Complex(float Real, float Imaginary); float real() const { return m_Real; }; private: friend std::ostream& operator<<(std::ostream& o, const Complex& Cplx); float m_Real; float m_Imaginary; }; std::ostream& operator<<(std::ostream& o, const Complex& Cplx) { return o << Cplx.m_Real << " i" << Cplx.m_Imaginary; } #endif // COMPLEX_H complex.cpp : #include "complex.h" Complex::Complex(float Real, float Imaginary) { m_Real = Real; m_Imaginary = Imaginary; } main.cpp : #include "complex.h" #include <iostream> int main() { Complex Foo(3.4, 4.5); std::cout << Foo << "\n"; return 0; } When compiling this code, I get the following error : multiple definition of operator<<(std::ostream&, Complex const&) I've found that making this fonction inline solves the problem, but I don't understand why. Why does the compiler complain about multiple definition ? My header file is guarded (with #define COMPLEX_H). And, if complaining about the operator<< fonction, why not complain about the public real() fonction, which is defined in the header as well ? And is there another solution as using the inline keyword ?

    Read the article

  • why can't i bind ipv6 socket to a linklocal address

    - by Haiyuan Zhang
    #include <sys/types.h> #include <sys/socket.h> #include <netinet/in.h> #include <netdb.h> #include <stdio.h> void error(char *msg) { perror(msg); exit(0); } int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { int sock, length, fromlen, n; struct sockaddr_in6 server; struct sockaddr_in6 from; int portNr = 5555; char buf[1024]; length = sizeof (struct sockaddr_in6); sock=socket(AF_INET6, SOCK_DGRAM, 0); if (sock < 0) error("Opening socket"); bzero((char *)&server, length); server.sin6_family=AF_INET6; server.sin6_addr=in6addr_any; server.sin6_port=htons(portNr); inet_pton( AF_INET6, "fe80::21f:29ff:feed:2f7e", (void *)&server.sin6_addr.s6_addr); //inet_pton( AF_INET6, "::1", (void *)&server.sin6_addr.s6_addr); if (bind(sock,(struct sockaddr *)&server,length)<0) error("binding"); fromlen = sizeof(struct sockaddr_in6); while (1) { n = recvfrom(sock,buf,1024,0,(struct sockaddr *)&from,&fromlen); if (n < 0) error("recvfrom"); write(1,"Received a datagram: ",21); write(1,buf,n); n = sendto(sock,"Got your message\n",17, 0,(struct sockaddr *)&from,fromlen); if (n < 0) error("sendto"); } } when I compile and run the above code I got : binding: Invalid argument and if change to bind the ::1 and leave other thing unchanged in the source code, the code works! so could you tell me what's wrong with my code ? thanks in advance.

    Read the article

  • Cannot overload function

    - by anio
    So I've got a templatized class and I want to overload the behavior of a function when I have specific type, say char. For all other types, let them do their own thing. However, c++ won't let me overload the function. Why can't I overload this function? I really really do not want to do template specialization, because then I've got duplicate the entire class. Here is a toy example demonstrating the problem: http://codepad.org/eTgLG932 The same code posted here for your reading pleasure: #include <iostream> #include <cstdlib> #include <string> struct Bar { std::string blah() { return "blah"; } }; template <typename T> struct Foo { public: std::string doX() { return m_getY(my_t); } private: std::string m_getY(char* p_msg) { return std::string(p_msg); } std::string m_getY(T* p_msg) { return p_msg->blah(); } T my_t; }; int main(int, char**) { Foo<char> x; Foo<Bar> y; std::cout << "x " << x.doX() << std::endl; return EXIT_SUCCESS; } Thank you everyone for your suggestions. Two valid solutions have been presented. I can either specialize the doX method, or specialize m_getY() method. At the end of the day I prefer to keep my specializations private rather than public so I'm accepting Krill's answer.

    Read the article

  • How to enforce users to create objects of class derived from mine with "new" only?

    - by sharptooth
    To implement reference counting we use an IUnknown-like interface and a smart pointer template class. The interface has implementation for all the reference-count methods, including Release(): void IUnknownLike::Release() { if( --refCount == 0 ) { delete this; } } The smart pointer template class has a copy constructor and an assignment operator both accepting raw pointers. So users can do the following: class Class : public IUnknownLike { }; void someFunction( CSmartPointer<Class> object ); //whatever function Class object; someFunction( &object ); and the program runs into undefined behavior - the object is created with reference count zero, the smart pointer is constructed and bumps it to one, then the function returns, smart pointer is destroyed, calls Release() which leads to delete of a stack-allocated variable. Users can as well do the following: struct COuter { //whatever else; Class inner;// IUnknownLike descendant }; COuter object; somefunction( &object.Inner ); and again an object not created with new is deleted. Undefined behavior at its best. Is there any way to change the IUnknownLike interface so that the user is forced to use new for creating all objects derived from IUnknownLike - both directly derived and indirectly derived (with classes in between the most derived and the base)?

    Read the article

  • c++ File input/output

    - by Myx
    Hi: I am trying to read from a file using fgets and sscanf. In my file, I have characters on each line of the while which I wish to put into a vector. So far, I have the following: FILE *fp; fp = fopen(filename, "r"); if(!fp) { fprintf(stderr, "Unable to open file %s\n", filename); return 0; } // Read file int line_count = 0; char buffer[1024]; while(fgets(buffer, 1023, fp)) { // Increment line counter line_count++; char *bufferp = buffer; ... while(*bufferp != '\n') { char *tmp; if(sscanf(bufferp, "%c", tmp) != 1) { fprintf(stderr, "Syntax error reading axiom on " "line %d in file %s\n", line_count, filename); return 0; } axiom.push_back(tmp); printf("put %s in axiom vector\n", axiom[axiom.size()-1]); // increment buffer pointer bufferp++; } } my axiom vector is defined as vector<char *> axiom;. When I run my program, I get a seg fault. It happens when I do the sscanf. Any suggestions on what I'm doing wrong?

    Read the article

  • C when to allocate and free memory - before function call, after function call...etc

    - by Keith P
    I am working with my first straight C project, and it has been a while since I worked on C++ for that matter. So the whole memory management is a bit fuzzy. I have a function that I created that will validate some input. In the simple sample below, it just ignores spaces: int validate_input(const char *input_line, char* out_value){ int ret_val = 0; /*false*/ int length = strlen(input_line); cout << "length = " << length << "\n"; out_value =(char*) malloc(sizeof(char) * length + 1); if (0 != length){ int number_found = 0; for (int x = 0; x < length; x++){ if (input_line[x] != ' '){ /*ignore space*/ /*get the character*/ out_value[number_found] = input_line[x]; number_found++; /*increment counter*/ } } out_value[number_found + 1] = '\0'; ret_val = 1; } return ret_val; } Instead of allocating memory inside the function for out_value, should I do it before I call the function and always expect the caller to allocate memory before passing into the function? As a rule of thumb, should any memory allocated inside of a function be always freed before the function returns?

    Read the article

  • Providing less than operator for one element of a pair

    - by Koszalek Opalek
    What would be the most elegant way too fix the following code: #include <vector> #include <map> #include <set> using namespace std; typedef map< int, int > row_t; typedef vector< row_t > board_t; typedef row_t::iterator area_t; bool operator< ( area_t const& a, area_t const& b ) { return( a->first < b->first ); }; int main( int argc, char* argv[] ) { int row_num; area_t it; set< pair< int, area_t > > queue; queue.insert( make_pair( row_num, it ) ); // does not compile }; One way to fix it is moving the definition of less< to namespace std (I know, you are not supposed to do it.) namespace std { bool operator< ( area_t const& a, area_t const& b ) { return( a->first < b->first ); }; }; Another obvious solution is defining less than< for pair< int, area_t but I'd like to avoid that and be able to define the operator only for the one element of the pair where it is not defined.

    Read the article

  • Thread-safty of boost RNG

    - by Maciej Piechotka
    I have a loop which should be nicely pararellized by insering one openmp pragma: boost::normal_distribution<double> ddist(0, pow(retention, i - 1)); boost::variate_generator<gen &, BOOST_TYPEOF(ddist)> dgen(rng, ddist); // Diamond const std::uint_fast32_t dno = 1 << i - 1; // #pragma omp parallel for for (std::uint_fast32_t x = 0; x < dno; x++) for (std::uint_fast32_t y = 0; y < dno; y++) { const std::uint_fast32_t diff = size/dno; const std::uint_fast32_t x1 = x*diff, x2 = (x + 1)*diff; const std::uint_fast32_t y1 = y*diff, y2 = (y + 1)*diff; double avg = (arr[x1][y1] + arr[x1][y2] + arr[x2][y1] + arr[x2][y2])/4; arr[(x1 + x2)/2][(y1 + y2)/2] = avg + dgen(); } (unless I make an error each execution does not depend on others at all. Sorry that not all of code is inserted). However my question is - are boost RNG thread-safe? They seems to refer to gcc code for gcc so even if gcc code is thread-safe it may not be the case for other platforms.

    Read the article

  • C++ casted realloc causing memory leak

    - by wyatt
    I'm using a function I found here to save a webpage to memory with cURL: struct WebpageData { char *pageData; size_t size; }; size_t storePage(void *input, size_t size, size_t nmemb, void *output) { size_t realsize = size * nmemb; struct WebpageData *page = (struct WebpageData *)output; page->pageData = (char *)realloc(page->pageData, page->size + realsize + 1); if(page->pageData) { memcpy(&(page->pageData[page->size]), input, realsize); page->size += realsize; page->pageData[page->size] = 0; } return realsize; } and find the line: page->pageData = (char *)realloc(page->pageData, page->size + realsize + 1); is causing a memory leak of a few hundred bytes per call. The only real change I've made from the original source is casting the line in question to a (char *), which my compiler (gcc, g++ specifically if it's a c/c++ issue, but gcc also wouldn't compile with the uncast statement) insisted upon, but I assume this is the source of the leak. Can anyone elucidate? Thanks

    Read the article

  • C release dynamically allocated memory

    - by user1152463
    I have defined function, which returns multidimensional array. allocation for rows arr = (char **)malloc(size); allocation for columns (in loop) arr[i] = (char *)malloc(v); and returning type is char** Everything works fine, except freeing the memory. If I call free(arr[i]) and/or free(arr) on array returned by function, it crashes. Thanks for help EDIT:: allocating fuction pole = malloc(zaznamov); char ulica[52], t[52], datum[10]; float dan; int i = 0, v; *max = 0; while (!is_eof(f)) { get_record(t, ulica, &dan, datum, f); v = strlen(ulica) - 1; pole[i] = malloc(v); strcpy(pole[i], ulica); pole[i][v] = '\0'; if (v > *max) { *max = v; } i++; } return pole;` part of main where i am calling function pole = function(); releasing memory int i; for (i = 0; i < zaznamov; i++) { free(pole[i]); pole[i] = NULL; } free(pole); pole = NULL;

    Read the article

  • c programming malloc question

    - by user535256
    Hello guys, Just got query regarding c malloc() function. I am read()ing x number of bytes from a file to get lenght of filename, like ' read(file, &namelen, sizeof(unsigned char)); ' . The variable namelen is a type unsigned char and was written into file as that type (1 byte). Now namelen has the lenght of filename ie namelen=8 if file name was 'data.txt', plus extra /0 at end, that working fine. Now I have a structure recording file info, ie filename, filelenght, content size etc. struct fileinfo { char *name; ...... other variable like size etc }; struct fileinfo *files; Question: I want to make that files.name variable the size of namelen ie 8 so I can successfully write the filename into it, like ' files[i].name = malloc(namelen) ' However, I dont want it to be malloc(sizeof(namelen)) as that would make it file.name[1] as the size of its type unsigned char. I want it to be the value thats stored inside variable &namelen ie 8 so file.name[8] so data.txt can be read() from file as 8 bytes and written straight into file.name[8? Is there a way to do this my current code is this and returns 4 not 8 files[i].name = malloc(namelen); //strlen(files[i].name) - returns 4 //perhaps something like malloc(sizeof(&namelen)) but does not work Thanks for any suggestions Have tried suggested suggestions guys, but I now get a segmentation fault error using: printf("\nsizeofnamelen=%x\n",namelen); //gives 8 for data.txt files[i].name = malloc(namelen + 1); read(file, &files[i].name, namelen); int len=strlen(files[i].name); printf("\nnamelen=%d",len); printf("\nname=%s\n",files[i].name); When I try to open() file with that files[i].name variable it wont open so the data does not appear to be getting written inside the read() &files[i].name and strlen() causes segemntation error as well as trying to print the filename

    Read the article

  • Appending unique values only in a linked list in C

    - by LuckySlevin
    typedef struct child {int count; char word[100]; inner_list*next;} child; typedef struct parent { char data [100]; inner_list * head; int count; outer_list * next; } parent; void append(child **q,char num[100],int size) { child *temp,*r,*temp2,*temp3; parent *out=NULL; temp = *q; temp2 = *q; temp3 = *q; char *str; if(*q==NULL) { temp = (child *)malloc(sizeof(child)); strcpy(temp->word,num); temp->count =size; temp->next=NULL; *q=temp; } else { temp = *q; while(temp->next !=NULL) { temp=temp->next; } r = (child *)malloc(sizeof(child)); strcpy(r->word,num); r->count = size; r->next=NULL; temp->next=r; } } This is my append function which I use for adding an element to my child list. But my problem is it only should append unique values which are followed by a string. Which means : Inputs : aaa bbb aaa ccc aaa bbb ccc aaa Append should act : For aaa string there should be a list like bbb->ccc(Not bbb->ccc->bbb since bbb is already there if bbb is coming more than one time it should be increase count only.) For bbb string there should be list like aaa->ccc only For ccc string there should be list like aaa only I hope i could make myself clear. Is there any ideas? Please ask for further info.

    Read the article

  • ERROR 2019 Linker Error Visual Studio

    - by Corrie Duck
    Hey I hope someone can tell me know to fix this issue I am having i keep getting an error 2019 from Visual studio for the following file. Now most of the functions have been removed so excuse the empty varriables etc. Error error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol "void * __cdecl OpenOneDevice(void *,struct _SP_DEVICE_INTERFACE_DATA *,char *)" (?OpenOneDevice@@YAPAXPAXPAU_SP_DEVICE_INTERFACE_DATA@@PAD@Z) referenced in function _wmain c:\Users\K\documents\visual studio 2010\Projects\test2\test2\test2.obj test2 #include "stdafx.h" #include <windows.h> #include <setupapi.h> SP_DEVICE_INTERFACE_DATA deviceInfoData; HDEVINFO hwDeviceInfo; HANDLE hOut; char *devName; // HANDLE OpenOneDevice(IN HDEVINFO hwDeviceInfo,IN PSP_DEVICE_INTERFACE_DATA DeviceInfoData,IN char *devName); // HANDLE OpenOneDevice(IN HDEVINFO HardwareDeviceInfo,IN PSP_DEVICE_INTERFACE_DATA DeviceInfoData,IN char *devName) { PSP_DEVICE_INTERFACE_DETAIL_DATA functionClassDeviceData = NULL; ULONG predictedLength = 0, requiredLength = 0; HANDLE hOut = INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE; SetupDiGetDeviceInterfaceDetail(HardwareDeviceInfo, DeviceInfoData, NULL, 0, &requiredLength, NULL); predictedLength = requiredLength; functionClassDeviceData = (PSP_DEVICE_INTERFACE_DETAIL_DATA)malloc(predictedLength); if(NULL == functionClassDeviceData) { return hOut; } functionClassDeviceData->cbSize = sizeof (SP_DEVICE_INTERFACE_DETAIL_DATA); if (!SetupDiGetDeviceInterfaceDetail(HardwareDeviceInfo, DeviceInfoData, functionClassDeviceData, predictedLength, &requiredLength, NULL)) { free( functionClassDeviceData ); return hOut; } //strcpy(devName,functionClassDeviceData->DevicePath) ; hOut = CreateFile(functionClassDeviceData->DevicePath, GENERIC_READ | GENERIC_WRITE, FILE_SHARE_READ | FILE_SHARE_WRITE, NULL, OPEN_EXISTING, 0, NULL); free(functionClassDeviceData); return hOut; } // int _tmain(int argc, _TCHAR* argv[]) { hOut = OpenOneDevice (hwDeviceInfo, &deviceInfoData, devName); if(hOut != INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE) { // error report } return 0; } Been driving me mad for hours. Any help appreciated. SOLVED THANKS TO CHRIS :-) Add #pragma comment (lib, "Setupapi.lib") Thanks

    Read the article

  • How to Create a Simple Dictation Pad in Delphi2009+Vista

    - by XBasic3000
    the code are not so complecated.. private { Private declarations } SpSharedRecoContext1 : TSpSharedRecoContext; fMyGrammar : ISpeechRecoGrammar; procedure SpSharedRecoContext1Recognition(ASender: TObject; StreamNumber: Integer; StreamPosition: OleVariant; RecognitionType: SpeechRecognitionType; const Result: ISpeechRecoResult); procedure SpSharedRecoContext1Hypothesis(ASender: TObject; StreamNumber: Integer; StreamPosition: OleVariant; const Result: ISpeechRecoResult); procedure TForm1.FormCreate(Sender: TObject); begin SpSharedRecoContext1 := TSpSharedRecoContext.Create(self); SpSharedRecoContext1.OnHypothesis := SpSharedRecoContext1Hypothesis; SpSharedRecoContext1.OnRecognition :=SpSharedRecoContext1Recognition; fMyGrammar := SpSharedRecoContext1.CreateGrammar(0); fMyGrammar.DictationSetState(SGDSActive); end; procedure TForm1.SpSharedRecoContext1Recognition(ASender: TObject; StreamNumber: Integer; StreamPosition: OleVariant; RecognitionType: SpeechRecognitionType; const Result: ISpeechRecoResult); begin Memo1.Text := Result.PhraseInfo.GetText(0,-1,true); end; procedure TForm1.SpSharedRecoContext1Hypothesis(ASender: TObject; StreamNumber: Integer; StreamPosition: OleVariant; const Result: ISpeechRecoResult); begin Memo1.Text := Result.PhraseInfo.GetText(0,-1,true); end; My Problem, was the vista-OS voice command will intercept on my program. if i say "START", instead of writing start on memo1 it press the start menu on my desktop. or what ever command like START CANCEL EDIT DELETE SELECT etc. please help..... sorry for my english

    Read the article

  • iPhone and iPad : Doing a "select * from something" query in a SQLite database

    - by Abramodj
    Hi folks, i'm trying to use the SQLite data base in my iPad app, and here's my function to make a query: - (void)executeQuery:(char*)query { NSString *file = [self getWritableDBPath]; NSFileManager *fileManager = [NSFileManager defaultManager]; BOOL success = [fileManager fileExistsAtPath:file]; // If its not a local copy set it to the bundle copy if(!success) { //file = [[NSBundle mainBundle] pathForResource:DATABASE_TITLE ofType:@"db"]; [self createEditableCopyOfDatabaseIfNeeded]; } dataArray = NULL; dataArray = [NSMutableArray array]; sqlite3 *database = NULL; if (sqlite3_open([file UTF8String], &database) == SQLITE_OK) { sqlite3_exec(database, query, loadTimesCallback, dataArray, NULL); } sqlite3_close(database); [self logResults]; } if I call [self executeQuery:"select name from table1"]; everything is working fine. But if i call [self executeQuery:"select * from cars"]; the app crashes telling me that the NSMutableArray dataArray is not the right kind of variable where to set the query results. So, how can i do a "select * form table1" query, and store the results? Thanks! EDIT: Here's my loadTimesCallback method: static int loadTimesCallback(void *context, int count, char **values, char **columns) { NSMutableArray *times = (NSMutableArray *)context; for (int i=0; i < count; i++) { const char *nameCString = values[i]; [times addObject:[NSString stringWithUTF8String:nameCString]]; } return SQLITE_OK; }

    Read the article

  • DBD::CSV: Append-extension-question

    - by sid_com
    Why does only the second example append the extension to the filename and what is the "/r" in ".csv/r" for. #!/usr/bin/env perl use warnings; use strict; use 5.012; use DBI; my $dbh = DBI->connect( "DBI:CSV:f_dir=/home/mm", { RaiseError => 1, f_ext => ".csv/r"} ); my $table = 'new_1'; $dbh->do( "DROP TABLE IF EXISTS $table" ); $dbh->do( "CREATE TABLE $table ( id INT, name CHAR, city CHAR )" ); my $sth_new = $dbh->prepare( "INSERT INTO $table( id, name, city ) VALUES ( ?, ?, ?, )" ); $sth_new->execute( 1, 'Smith', 'Greenville' ); $dbh->disconnect(); # -------------------------------------------------------- $dbh = DBI->connect( "DBI:CSV:f_dir=/home/mm", { RaiseError => 1 } ); $dbh->{f_ext} = ".csv/r"; $table = 'new_2'; $dbh->do( "DROP TABLE IF EXISTS $table" ); $dbh->do( "CREATE TABLE $table ( id INT, name CHAR, city CHAR )" ); $sth_new = $dbh->prepare( "INSERT INTO $table( id, name, city ) VALUES ( ?, ?, ?, )" ); $sth_new->execute( 1, 'Smith', 'Greenville' ); $dbh->disconnect();

    Read the article

  • virtual methods and template classes

    - by soxs060389
    Hi I got over a problem, I think a very specific one. I've got 2 classes, a B aseclass and a D erived class (from B aseclass). B is a template class ( or class template) and has a pure virtual method virutal void work(const T &dummy) = 0; The D erived class is supposed to reimplement this, but as D is Derived from B rather than D being another template class, the compiler spits at me that virtual functions and templates don't work at once. Any ideas how to acomplish what I want? I am thankfull for any thoughts and Ideas, especially if you allready worked out that problem this class is fixed aka AS IS, I can not edit this without breaking existing code base template <typename T> class B { public: ... virtual void work(const T &dummy) = 0; .. }; take int* as an example class D : public B<int*>{ ... virtual void work(const int* &dummy){ /* put work code here */ } .. }; Edit: The compiler tells me, that void B<T>::work(const T&) [with T = int*] is pure virtual within D

    Read the article

  • Reading a C/C++ data structure in C# from a byte array

    - by Chris Miller
    What would be the best way to fill a C# struct from a byte[] array where the data was from a C/C++ struct? The C struct would look something like this (my C is very rusty): typedef OldStuff { CHAR Name[8]; UInt32 User; CHAR Location[8]; UInt32 TimeStamp; UInt32 Sequence; CHAR Tracking[16]; CHAR Filler[12];} And would fill something like this: [StructLayout(LayoutKind.Explicit, Size = 56, Pack = 1)]public struct NewStuff{ [MarshalAs(UnmanagedType.ByValTStr, SizeConst = 8)] [FieldOffset(0)] public string Name; [MarshalAs(UnmanagedType.U4)] [FieldOffset(8)] public uint User; [MarshalAs(UnmanagedType.ByValTStr, SizeConst = 8)] [FieldOffset(12)] public string Location; [MarshalAs(UnmanagedType.U4)] [FieldOffset(20)] public uint TimeStamp; [MarshalAs(UnmanagedType.U4)] [FieldOffset(24)] public uint Sequence; [MarshalAs(UnmanagedType.ByValTStr, SizeConst = 16)] [FieldOffset(28)] public string Tracking;} What is best way to copy OldStuff to NewStuff, if OldStuff was passed as byte[] array? I'm currently doing something like the following, but it feels kind of clunky. GCHandle handle;NewStuff MyStuff;int BufferSize = Marshal.SizeOf(typeof(NewStuff));byte[] buff = new byte[BufferSize];Array.Copy(SomeByteArray, 0, buff, 0, BufferSize);handle = GCHandle.Alloc(buff, GCHandleType.Pinned);MyStuff = (NewStuff)Marshal.PtrToStructure(handle.AddrOfPinnedObject(), typeof(NewStuff));handle.Free(); Is there better way to accomplish this?

    Read the article

  • Why is calling close() after fopen() not closing?

    - by Richard Morgan
    I ran across the following code in one of our in-house dlls and I am trying to understand the behavior it was showing: long GetFD(long* fd, const char* fileName, const char* mode) { string fileMode; if (strlen(mode) == 0 || tolower(mode[0]) == 'w' || tolower(mode[0]) == 'o') fileMode = string("w"); else if (tolower(mode[0]) == 'a') fileMode = string("a"); else if (tolower(mode[0]) == 'r') fileMode = string("r"); else return -1; FILE* ofp; ofp = fopen(fileName, fileMode.c_str()); if (! ofp) return -1; *fd = (long)_fileno(ofp); if (*fd < 0) return -1; return 0; } long CloseFD(long fd) { close((int)fd); return 0; } After repeated calling of GetFD with the appropriate CloseFD, the whole dll would no longer be able to do any file IO. I wrote a tester program and found that I could GetFD 509 times, but the 510th time would error. Using Process Explorer, the number of Handles did not increase. So it seems that the dll is reaching the limit for the number of open files; setting _setmaxstdio(2048) does increase the amount of times we can call GetFD. Obviously, the close() is working quite right. After a bit of searching, I replaced the fopen() call with: long GetFD(long* fd, const char* fileName, const char* mode) { *fd = (long)open(fileName, 2); if (*fd < 0) return -1; return 0; } Now, repeatedly calling GetFD/CloseFD works. What is going on here?

    Read the article

  • Multithreading using pthread in C++ with shared variables

    - by Saviour Self
    I'm new to threading (and C/C++ for that matter), and I'm attempting to use multiple threads to access shared variables. In the main, I've created a variable char inputarray[100]; Thread 1: This thread will be reading data from stdin in 2 byte bursts, and appending them to the inputarray. (input by feeding a file in) Thread 2: This thread will be reading data 1 byte at a time, performing a calculation, and putting its data into an output array. Thread 3: This thread will be outputting data from the output array in 2 byte bursts. (stdout) I've attempted the input part and got it working by passing a struct, but would like to do it without using a struct, but it has been giving me problems. If I can get input down, I'm sure I'll be able to use a similar strategy to complete output. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Below is a rough template for the input thread. #include <stdio.h> #include <pthread.h> using namespace std; void* input(void* arg) { char reading[3]; fread(reading,1,2,stdin); //append to char inputarray[]..??? } int main() { char inputarray[100]; pthread_t t1; pthread_create(&t1, NULL, &input, &inputarray); void *result; pthread_join(t1,&result); return 0; }

    Read the article

  • How to solve linker error in matrix multiplication in c using lapack library?

    - by Malar
    I did Matrix multiplication using lapack library, I am getting an error like below. Can any one help me? "error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol "void __cdecl dgemm(char,char,int *,int *,int *,double *,double *,int *,double *,int *,double *,double *,int *)" (?dgemm@@YAXDDPAH00PAN1010110@Z) referenced in function _main" 1..\bin\matrixMultiplicationUsingLapack.exe : fatal error LNK1120: 1 unresolved externals I post my code below # define matARowSize 2 // -- Matrix 1 number of rows # define matAColSize 2 // -- Matrix 1 number of cols # define matBRowSize 2 // -- Matrix 2 number of rows # define matBColSize 2 // -- Matrix 2 number of cols using namespace std; void dgemm(char, char, int *, int *, int *, double *, double *, int *, double *, int *, double *, double *, int *); int main() { double iMatrixA[matARowSize*matAColSize]; // -- Input matrix 1 {m x n} double iMatrixB[matBRowSize*matBColSize]; // -- Input matrix 2 {n x k} double iMatrixC[matARowSize*matBColSize]; // -- Output matrix {m x n * n x k = m x k} double alpha = 1.0f; double beta = 0.0f; int n = 2; iMatrixA[0] = 1; iMatrixA[1] = 1; iMatrixA[2] = 1; iMatrixA[3] = 1; iMatrixB[0] = 1; iMatrixB[1] = 1; iMatrixB[2] = 1; iMatrixB[3] = 1; //dgemm('N','N',&n,&n,&n,&alpha,iMatrixA,&n,iMatrixB,&n,&beta,iMatrixC,&n); dgemm('N','N',&n,&n,&n,&alpha,iMatrixA,&n,iMatrixB,&n,&beta,iMatrixC,&n); std::cin.get(); return 0; }

    Read the article

  • how to write binary copy of structure array to file

    - by cerr
    I would like to write a binary image of a structure array to a binary file. I have tried this so far: #include <stdio.h> #include <string.h> #define NUM 256 const char *fname="binary.bin"; typedef struct foo_s { int intA; int intB; char string[20]; }foo_t; void main (void) { foo_t bar[NUM]; bar[0].intA = 10; bar[0].intB = 999; strcpy(bar[0].string,"Hello World!"); Save(bar); printf("%s written succesfully!\n",fname); } int Save(foo_t* pData) { FILE *pFile; int ptr = 0; int itr = 0; pFile = fopen(fname, "w"); if (pFile == NULL) { printf("couldn't open %s\n", fname); return; } for (itr = 0; itr<NUM; itr++) { for (ptr=0; ptr<sizeof(foo_t); ptr++) { fputc((unsigned char)*((&pData[itr])+ptr), pFile); } fclose(pFile); } } but the compiler is saying aggregate value used where an integer was expected fputc((unsigned char)*((&pData[itr])+ptr), pFile); and I don't quite understand why, what am I doing wrong? Thanks!

    Read the article

  • fix needed for bug in TextField/Text

    - by Mark
    Sort of a complicated scenario - just curious if anyone else could come up with something: I have a Text control and when I scroll it and stop the scroll with the cursor over some text that has a url, the cursor doesn't revert to a hand, and also flash player starts acting as if a selection is being made from the last cursor position. So IOW a bonafide bug in flash as far as I can determine. The above probably wasn't completely clear so let me elaborate. If you grab a scrollbar thumb and start moving it up and down, you don't actually have to keep the mouse pointer on the thumb while doing so. When you stop the scroll, the mouse pointer could be outside the browser window, inside your flash application, but not currently on the scroll bar thumb, or wherever. The previously mentioned bug occurs when you stop the scroll with the mouse pointer positioned over text with an html anchor (a hyperlink). At that point the cursor enters into some state of limbo, and doesn't show the url hand pointer, and furthermore acts as if some text selection is taking place from the last cursor position prior to the scroll. So the question would be, what sort of event could I simulate in code to jolt flash out of this erroneous state it is in. And furthermore in what event could I perform this simulated event (given that for example there is no AS3 event to signal the end of a scroll.) To be clear, the Text control in question is on a canvas, and that canvas (call it A) is on another canvas which actually owns the scrollbar, and scrolling takes place by changing the scrollRect of canvas A.

    Read the article

  • Process is killed without a (obvious) reason and program stops working

    - by Krzysiek Gurniak
    Here's what my program is supposed to do: create 4 child processes: process 0 is reading 1 byte at a time from STDIN, then writing it into FIFO process 1 is reading this 1 byte from fifo and write its value as HEX into shared memory process 2 is reading HEX value from shared memory and writing it into pipe finally process 3 is reading from pipe and writing into STDOUT (in my case: terminal) I can't change communication channels. FIFO, then shared memory, then pipes are the only option. My problem: Program stops at random moments when some file is directed into stdin (for example:./program < /dev/urandom). Sometimes after writing 5 HEX values, sometimes after 100. Weird thing is that when it is working and in another terminal I write "pstree -c" there is 1 main process with 4 children processes (which is what I want), but when I write "pstree -c" after it stopped writing (but still runs) there are only 3 child processes. For some reason 1 is gone even though they all have while(1) in them.. I think I might have problem with synchronization here, but I am unable to spot it (I've tried for many hours). Here's the code: #include <unistd.h> #include <fcntl.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <string.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <sys/shm.h> #include <sys/sem.h> #include <sys/types.h> #include <sys/wait.h> #include <sys/stat.h> #include <string.h> #include <signal.h> #define BUFSIZE 1 #define R 0 #define W 1 // processes ID pid_t p0, p1, p2, p3; // FIFO variables int fifo_fd; unsigned char bufor[BUFSIZE] = {}; unsigned char bufor1[BUFSIZE] = {}; // Shared memory variables key_t key; int shmid; char * tab; // zmienne do pipes int file_des[2]; char bufor_pipe[BUFSIZE*30] = {}; void proces0() { ssize_t n; while(1) { fifo_fd = open("/tmp/fifo",O_WRONLY); if(fifo_fd == -1) { perror("blad przy otwieraniu kolejki FIFO w p0\n"); exit(1); } n = read(STDIN_FILENO, bufor, BUFSIZE); if(n<0) { perror("read error w p0\n"); exit(1); } if(n > 0) { if(write(fifo_fd, bufor, n) != n) { perror("blad zapisu do kolejki fifo w p0\n"); exit(1); } memset(bufor, 0, n); // czyszczenie bufora } close(fifo_fd); } } void proces1() { ssize_t m, x; char wartosc_hex[30] = {}; while(1) { if(tab[0] == 0) { fifo_fd = open("/tmp/fifo", O_RDONLY); // otwiera plik typu fifo do odczytu if(fifo_fd == -1) { perror("blad przy otwieraniu kolejki FIFO w p1\n"); exit(1); } m = read(fifo_fd, bufor1, BUFSIZE); x = m; if(x < 0) { perror("read error p1\n"); exit(1); } if(x > 0) { // Konwersja na HEX if(bufor1[0] < 16) { if(bufor1[0] == 10) // gdy enter { sprintf(wartosc_hex, "0x0%X\n", bufor1[0]); } else { sprintf(wartosc_hex, "0x0%X ", bufor1[0]); } } else { sprintf(wartosc_hex, "0x%X ", bufor1[0]); } // poczekaj az pamiec bedzie pusta (gotowa do zapisu) strcpy(&tab[0], wartosc_hex); memset(bufor1, 0, sizeof(bufor1)); // czyszczenie bufora memset(wartosc_hex, 0, sizeof(wartosc_hex)); // przygotowanie tablicy na zapis wartosci hex x = 0; } close(fifo_fd); } } } void proces2() { close(file_des[0]); // zablokuj kanal do odczytu while(1) { if(tab[0] != 0) { if(write(file_des[1], tab, strlen(tab)) != strlen(tab)) { perror("blad write w p2"); exit(1); } // wyczysc pamiec dzielona by przyjac kolejny bajt memset(tab, 0, sizeof(tab)); } } } void proces3() { ssize_t n; close(file_des[1]); // zablokuj kanal do zapisu while(1) { if(tab[0] == 0) { if((n = read(file_des[0], bufor_pipe, sizeof(bufor_pipe))) > 0) { if(write(STDOUT_FILENO, bufor_pipe, n) != n) { perror("write error w proces3()"); exit(1); } memset(bufor_pipe, 0, sizeof(bufor_pipe)); } } } } int main(void) { key = 5678; int status; // Tworzenie plikow przechowujacych ID procesow int des_pid[2] = {}; char bufor_proces[50] = {}; mknod("pid0", S_IFREG | 0777, 0); mknod("pid1", S_IFREG | 0777, 0); mknod("pid2", S_IFREG | 0777, 0); mknod("pid3", S_IFREG | 0777, 0); // Tworzenie semaforow key_t klucz; klucz = ftok(".", 'a'); // na podstawie pliku i pojedynczego znaku id wyznacza klucz semafora if(klucz == -1) { perror("blad wyznaczania klucza semafora"); exit(1); } semafor = semget(klucz, 1, IPC_CREAT | 0777); // tworzy na podstawie klucza semafor. 1 - ilosc semaforow if(semafor == -1) { perror("blad przy tworzeniu semafora"); exit(1); } if(semctl(semafor, 0, SETVAL, 0) == -1) // ustawia poczatkowa wartosc semafora (klucz, numer w zbiorze od 0, polecenie, argument 0/1/2) { perror("blad przy ustawianiu wartosci poczatkowej semafora"); exit(1); } // Tworzenie lacza nazwanego FIFO if(access("/tmp/fifo", F_OK) == -1) // sprawdza czy plik istnieje, jesli nie - tworzy go { if(mkfifo("/tmp/fifo", 0777) != 0) { perror("blad tworzenia FIFO w main"); exit(1); } } // Tworzenie pamieci dzielonej // Lista pamieci wspoldzielonych, komenda "ipcs" // usuwanie pamieci wspoldzielonej, komenta "ipcrm -m ID_PAMIECI" shmid = shmget(key, (BUFSIZE*30), 0666 | IPC_CREAT); if(shmid == -1) { perror("shmget"); exit(1); } tab = (char *) shmat(shmid, NULL, 0); if(tab == (char *)(-1)) { perror("shmat"); exit(1); } memset(tab, 0, (BUFSIZE*30)); // Tworzenie lacza nienazwanego pipe if(pipe(file_des) == -1) { perror("pipe"); exit(1); } // Tworzenie procesow potomnych if(!(p0 = fork())) { des_pid[W] = open("pid0", O_WRONLY | O_TRUNC | O_CREAT); // 1 - zapis, 0 - odczyt sprintf(bufor_proces, "Proces0 ma ID: %d\n", getpid()); if(write(des_pid[W], bufor_proces, sizeof(bufor_proces)) != sizeof(bufor_proces)) { perror("blad przy zapisie pid do pliku w p0"); exit(1); } close(des_pid[W]); proces0(); } else if(p0 == -1) { perror("blad przy p0 fork w main"); exit(1); } else { if(!(p1 = fork())) { des_pid[W] = open("pid1", O_WRONLY | O_TRUNC | O_CREAT); // 1 - zapis, 0 - odczyt sprintf(bufor_proces, "Proces1 ma ID: %d\n", getpid()); if(write(des_pid[W], bufor_proces, sizeof(bufor_proces)) != sizeof(bufor_proces)) { perror("blad przy zapisie pid do pliku w p1"); exit(1); } close(des_pid[W]); proces1(); } else if(p1 == -1) { perror("blad przy p1 fork w main"); exit(1); } else { if(!(p2 = fork())) { des_pid[W] = open("pid2", O_WRONLY | O_TRUNC | O_CREAT); // 1 - zapis, 0 - odczyt sprintf(bufor_proces, "Proces2 ma ID: %d\n", getpid()); if(write(des_pid[W], bufor_proces, sizeof(bufor_proces)) != sizeof(bufor_proces)) { perror("blad przy zapisie pid do pliku w p2"); exit(1); } close(des_pid[W]); proces2(); } else if(p2 == -1) { perror("blad przy p2 fork w main"); exit(1); } else { if(!(p3 = fork())) { des_pid[W] = open("pid3", O_WRONLY | O_TRUNC | O_CREAT); // 1 - zapis, 0 - odczyt sprintf(bufor_proces, "Proces3 ma ID: %d\n", getpid()); if(write(des_pid[W], bufor_proces, sizeof(bufor_proces)) != sizeof(bufor_proces)) { perror("blad przy zapisie pid do pliku w p3"); exit(1); } close(des_pid[W]); proces3(); } else if(p3 == -1) { perror("blad przy p3 fork w main"); exit(1); } else { // proces macierzysty waitpid(p0, &status, 0); waitpid(p1, &status, 0); waitpid(p2, &status, 0); waitpid(p3, &status, 0); //wait(NULL); unlink("/tmp/fifo"); shmdt(tab); // odlaczenie pamieci dzielonej shmctl(shmid, IPC_RMID, NULL); // usuwanie pamieci wspoldzielonej printf("\nKONIEC PROGRAMU\n"); } } } } exit(0); }

    Read the article

  • How can I get Visual Studio 2010 to show Chinese comments properly

    - by Joe H
    I have some code from a Chinese business partner, but all of the comments in the code which are in Chinese. However, Visual Studio displays them as gibberish. How can I get them to display properly. Here is a code example with some comments converted to gibberish: //Á¬½Óµ½·þÎñÆ÷ void CTestAPIDlg::OnBnClickedButton2() { UpdateData(TRUE); //ÉèÖÃÊÇ·ñ¼Ç¼ÈÕÖ¾ m_ObjRSI->EnableLog(m_bIsOnLogReg,m_bIsOnLogComm); //ÅжÏÊÇ·ñÆôÓôúÀí if (m_bIsOnProxy) { //´úÀí²ÎÊý char proxyIP[64]; char proxyUserName[64]; char proxyUserPwd[64]; ZeroMemory(proxyIP,sizeof(proxyIP)); ZeroMemory(proxyUserName,sizeof(proxyUserName)); ZeroMemory(proxyUserPwd,sizeof(proxyUserPwd)); //×¢£º´Ë´¦ÒòΪÊÇʹÓÃunicode±àÒ룬ËùÒÔÒª×Ö·ûת»»£¬ÏÂͬ. WideCharToMultiByte(CP_ACP,0,m_strProxyIP,-1,proxyIP,64,NULL,NULL); WideCharToMultiByte(CP_ACP,0,m_strProxyUserName,-1,proxyUserName,64,NULL,NULL); WideCharToMultiByte(CP_ACP,0,m_strProxyPwd,-1,proxyUserPwd,64,NULL,NULL); //ÉèÖôúÀí²ÎÊý m_ObjRSI->SetProxyParam(proxyIP,m_iProxyPort,proxyUserName,proxyUserPwd,m_iProxyType); } //Á¬½Ó²ÎÊý char szIp[64]; ZeroMemory(szIp,sizeof(szIp)); WideCharToMultiByte(CP_ACP,0,m_strIP,-1,szIp,64,NULL,NULL); //Á¬½Ó·þÎñÆ÷ m_ObjRSI->SetCommParam(szIp,m_iPort,m_iCheckIDPort); m_ObjRSI->StartService(); //ÉèÖð´Å¥×´Ì¬ ((CButton*)GetDlgItem(IDC_CHECK2))->EnableWindow(FALSE); ((CButton*)GetDlgItem(IDC_CHECK3))->EnableWindow(FALSE); } Thanks in advance for any help...

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121  | Next Page >