Search Results

Search found 54955 results on 2199 pages for 'asp net roles'.

Page 1211/2199 | < Previous Page | 1207 1208 1209 1210 1211 1212 1213 1214 1215 1216 1217 1218  | Next Page >

  • Very interesting problem in Compact Framework

    - by Alexander
    Hi, i have a performance problem while inserting data to sqlce.I'm reading string and making inserts to My tables.In LU_MAM table,i insert 1000 records withing 8 seconds.After Mam tables i make some inserts but my largest table is CR_MUS.When i want to insert record into CR_MUS,it takes too much time.CR_MUS has 2000 records and insert takes 35 seconds.What can be reason?I use same logic in my insert functions.Do u have any idea?I use VS 2008 sp1. Dim reader As StringReader reader = New StringReader(data) cn = New SqlCeConnection(General.ConnString) cn.Open() If myTransfer.ClearTables(cn, cmd) = True Then progress = 0 '------------------------------------------ cmd = New SqlServerCe.SqlCeCommand Dim rs As SqlCeResultSet cmd.Connection = cn cmd.CommandType = CommandType.TableDirect Dim rec As SqlCeUpdatableRecord ' name of table While reader.Peek > -1 If strerr_col = "" Then satir = reader.ReadLine() ayrac = Split(satir, "|") If ayrac(0).ToString() = "LC" Then prgsbar.Maximum = Convert.ToInt32(ayrac(1)) ElseIf ayrac(0).ToString = "PPAR" Then . If ayrac(2).ToString <> General.PMVer Then ShowWaitCursor(False) txtDurum.Text = "Wrong Version" Exit Sub End If If p_POCKET_PARAMETERS = True Then cmd.CommandText = "POCKET_PARAMETERS" txtDurum.Text = "POCKET_PARAMETERS" rs = cmd.ExecuteResultSet(ResultSetOptions.Updatable) rec = rs.CreateRecord() p_POCKET_PARAMETERS = False End If strerr_col = myVERI_AL.POCKET_PARAMETERS_I(ayrac, cmd, rs, rec) prgsbar.Value += 1 ElseIf ayrac(0).ToString() = "MAM" Then If p_LU_MAM = True Then txtDurum.Text = "LU_MAM " cmd.CommandText = "LU_MAM" rs = cmd.ExecuteResultSet(ResultSetOptions.Updatable) rec = rs.CreateRecord() p_LU_MAM = False End If strerr_col = myVERI_AL.LU_MAM_I(ayrac, cmd, rs, rec) prgsbar.Value += 1 ElseIf ayrac(0).ToString = "KMUS" Then If p_CR_MUS = True Then cmd.CommandText = "CR_MUS" txtDurum.Text = "CR_MUS" rs = cmd.ExecuteResultSet(ResultSetOptions.Updatable) rec = rs.CreateRecord() p_TR_KAMPANYA_MALZEME = False End If strerr_col = myVERI_AL.CR_MUS_I(ayrac, cmd, rs, rec) prgsbar.Value += 1 end while Public Function CR_KAMPANYA_MUSTERI_I(ByVal f_Line() As String, ByRef myComm As SqlCeCommand, ByRef rs As SqlCeResultSet, ByRef rec As SqlCeUpdatableRecord) As String Try rec.SetValue(0, If(f_Line(1) = String.Empty, DirectCast(DBNull.Value, Object), f_Line(1))) rec.SetValue(1, If(f_Line(2) = String.Empty, DirectCast(DBNull.Value, Object), f_Line(2))) rec.SetValue(2, If(f_Line(3) = String.Empty, DirectCast(DBNull.Value, Object), f_Line(3))) rec.SetValue(3, If(f_Line(5) = String.Empty, DirectCast(DBNull.Value, Object), f_Line(5))) rec.SetValue(4, If(f_Line(6) = String.Empty, DirectCast(DBNull.Value, Object), f_Line(6))) rs.Insert(rec) Catch ex As Exception strerr_col = ex.Message End Try Return strerr_col End Function

    Read the article

  • Resolving Circular References for Objects Implementing ISerializable

    - by Chris
    I'm writing my own IFormatter implementation and I cannot think of a way to resolve circular references between two types that both implement ISerializable. Here's the usual pattern: [Serializable] class Foo : ISerializable { private Bar m_bar; public Foo(Bar bar) { m_bar = bar; m_bar.Foo = this; } public Bar Bar { get { return m_bar; } } protected Foo(SerializationInfo info, StreamingContext context) { m_bar = (Bar)info.GetValue("1", typeof(Bar)); } public void GetObjectData(SerializationInfo info, StreamingContext context) { info.AddValue("1", m_bar); } } [Serializable] class Bar : ISerializable { private Foo m_foo; public Foo Foo { get { return m_foo; } set { m_foo = value; } } public Bar() { } protected Bar(SerializationInfo info, StreamingContext context) { m_foo = (Foo)info.GetValue("1", typeof(Foo)); } public void GetObjectData(SerializationInfo info, StreamingContext context) { info.AddValue("1", m_foo); } } I then do this: Bar b = new Bar(); Foo f = new Foo(b); bool equal = ReferenceEquals(b, b.Foo.Bar); // true // Serialise and deserialise b equal = ReferenceEquals(b, b.Foo.Bar); If I use an out-of-the-box BinaryFormatter to serialise and deserialise b, the above test for reference-equality returns true as one would expect. But I cannot conceive of a way to achieve this in my custom IFormatter. In a non-ISerializable situation I can simply revisit "pending" object fields using reflection once the target references have been resolved. But for objects implementing ISerializable it is not possible to inject new data using SerializationInfo. Can anyone point me in the right direction?

    Read the article

  • How can i use ClearCanvas in remote database?

    - by programmerist
    How can i get data from REMOTE database using OnStart method? protected override int OnStart(StudyLoaderArgs studyLoaderArgs) { ApplicationEntity ae = studyLoaderArgs.Server as ApplicationEntity; _ae = ae; EventResult result = EventResult.Success; AuditedInstances loadedInstances = new AuditedInstances(); try { XmlDocument doc = RetrieveHeaderXml(studyLoaderArgs); StudyXml studyXml = new StudyXml(); studyXml.SetMemento(doc); _instances = GetInstances(studyXml).GetEnumerator(); loadedInstances.AddInstance(studyXml.PatientId, studyXml.PatientsName, studyXml.StudyInstanceUid); return studyXml.NumberOfStudyRelatedInstances; } finally { AuditHelper.LogOpenStudies(new string[] { ae.AETitle }, loadedInstances, EventSource.CurrentUser, result); } } i need to use OnStart in main project. How cn i use or call OnStart method

    Read the article

  • How to produce precisely-timed tone and silence?

    - by Bob Denny
    I have a C# project that plays Morse code for RSS feeds. I write it using Managed DirectX, only to discover that Managed DirectX is old and deprecated. The task I have is to play pure sine wave bursts interspersed with silence periods (the code) which are precisely timed as to their duration. I need to be able to call a function which plays a pure tone for so many milliseconds, then Thread.Sleep() then play another, etc. At its fastest, the tones and spaces can be as short as 40ms. It's working quite well in Managed DirectX. To get the precisely timed tone I create 1 sec. of sine wave into a secondary buffer, then to play a tone of a certain duration I seek forward to within x milliseconds of the end of the buffer then play. I've tried System.Media.SoundPlayer. It's a loser because you have to Play(), Sleep(), then Stop() for arbitrary tone lengths. The result is a tone that is too long, variable by CPU load. It takes an indeterminate amount of time to actually stop the tone. I then embarked on a lengthy attempt to use NAudio 1.3. I ended up with a memory resident stream providing the tone data, and again seeking forward leaving the desired length of tone remaining in the stream, then playing. This worked OK on the DirectSoundOut class for a while (see below) but the WaveOut class quickly dies with an internal assert saying that buffers are still on the queue despite PlayerStopped = true. This is odd since I play to the end then put a wait of the same duration between the end of the tone and the start of the next. You'd think that 80ms after starting Play of a 40 ms tone that it wouldn't have buffers on the queue. DirectSoundOut works well for a while, but its problem is that for every tone burst Play() it spins off a separate thread. Eventually (5 min or so) it just stops working. You can see thread after thread after thread exiting in the Output window while running the project in VS2008 IDE. I don't create new objects during playing, I just Seek() the tone stream then call Play() over and over, so I don't think it's a problem with orphaned buffers/whatever piling up till it's choked. I'm out of patience on this one, so I'm asking in the hopes that someone here has faced a similar requirement and can steer me in a direction with a likely solution.

    Read the article

  • Alternatives to dotfuscator suite?

    - by SnOrfus
    I've been looking for solutions that provide a couple of types of protection and dotfuscator has been what I've landed on each time I look. Specifically, I like: code obfuscation their usage analytics tamper detection/notification shelf-life enforcement Now, I know that there's lots of alternatives to the first, some of which are free, but are there alternatives to the others? It's not that I don't want to pay the cost of dotfuscator suite, but I want to be informed before I write the cheque.

    Read the article

  • Silverlight: Binding a child controls property to a property in a user control

    - by Jeremy
    If I have a user control defined: public partial class MainFooter : UserControl { public System.Windows.Media.Color BkColor; } and it's xaml: <UserControl x:Class="Test.MainFooter"> <Grid x:Name="LayoutRoot"> <Rectangle x:Name="rctBottom_Background2" HorizontalAlignment="Stretch" Grid.Row="2"> <Rectangle.Fill> <LinearGradientBrush EndPoint="0.82,0.895" StartPoint="0.911,-0.442"> <GradientStop Color="{**How can I bind this to the BkColor property?}"/**> <GradientStop Color="#00FFFFFF" Offset="1"/> </LinearGradientBrush> </Rectangle.Fill> </Rectangle> </Grid> </UserControl> and used: <MyControls:MainFooter x:Name="rcrMainFooter" BkColor="#FFE2B42A"> </MyControls:MainFooter> How would I go about binding the GradientStop Color in the Rectangle to the value of the it's user controls BkColor property?

    Read the article

  • What is massively parallel processing (MPP) ?

    - by HotTester
    Ever since Microsoft introduced sql-server version code-named "Madison" the massively parallel processing (MPP) has got into picture. What exactly is it and how does sql-server is going to benefit from it ? Further is massively parallel processing (MPP) related to parallel computing ? I read about Madison here and about parallel computing here. Thanks in advance.

    Read the article

  • Nini or any other config manager

    - by Incognito
    Hi, I need to have a very good configuration manager written in C#. Currently I am looking Nini which seems to be not bad. Please share your experience with this lib or with any lib similar to it. What do you like what not and are any suggestions. Thank you.

    Read the article

  • .Net4 ConcurrentDictionary: Tips & Tricks

    - by SDReyes
    Hi guys, I started to use the new ConcurrentDictionary from .Net4 yesterday to implement a simple caching for a threading project. But I'm wondering what I have to take care of/be careful about when using it? What have been your experiences using it?

    Read the article

  • "Row not found or changed" Problem

    - by winston schröder
    Hi there, I'm working on a SQL CE Database and get into the "Row nor found or changed" exception. The exception only occurs when I try to update. On the first Run after the insert it shows up a MemberChangeConflict which says, that my Column Created_at has in all three values (current, original, database) the same. But in a second attempt it doesn't appear anymore. The DataContext is instanciated on Startup and freed on Exit of my Local(!) Application. I use a sqlmetal generated mapping and code file. In the map I added some Associations and set the timemstamp columns UpdateCheck property to Always while all other have the setting never. The Timestamp Column is marked as isVersion="true", the Id Column as Primary Key. Since I don't dispose the datacontext I expected to be using implicit transaction. When I run the SubmitChanges Method within a TransactionScope. Can anyone tell me how I can update the timestamp within the code ? I know about the Problems one has to deal with if you dispose the datacontext. So I decided not to do this since I use a Single User Local DB Cache File. (I did already use a version where I disposed the datacontext after every usage, but this version had a real bad performance and error rate, so I decided to choose the other variant.) LibDB.Client.Vehicles tmp = null; try { tmp = e.Parameter as LibDB.Client.Vehicles; if (tmp == null) return; if (!this._dc.Vehicles.Contains(tmp)) { this._dc.Vehicles.Attach(tmp); } this.ShowChangesReport(this._dc.GetChangeSet()); using (TransactionScope ts = new TransactionScope()) { try { this._dc.SubmitChanges(); ts.Complete(); } catch (ChangeConflictException cce) { Console.WriteLine("Optimistic concurrency error."); Console.WriteLine(cce.Message); Console.ReadLine(); foreach (ObjectChangeConflict occ in this._dc.ChangeConflicts) { MetaTable metatable = this._dc.Mapping.GetTable(occ.Object.GetType()); LibDB.Client.Vehicles entityInConflict = (LibDB.Client.Vehicles)occ.Object; Console.WriteLine("Table name: {0}", metatable.TableName); Console.Write("Vin: "); Console.WriteLine(entityInConflict.Vin); foreach (MemberChangeConflict mcc in occ.MemberConflicts) { object currVal = mcc.CurrentValue; object origVal = mcc.OriginalValue; object databaseVal = mcc.DatabaseValue; MemberInfo mi = mcc.Member; Console.WriteLine("Member: {0}", mi.Name); Console.WriteLine("current value: {0}", currVal); Console.WriteLine("original value: {0}", origVal); Console.WriteLine("database value: {0}", databaseVal); } throw cce; } } catch (Exception ex) { this.ShowChangeConflicts(this._dc.ChangeConflicts); Console.WriteLine(ex.Message); } } this.ShowChangesReport(this._dc.GetChangeSet());

    Read the article

  • Data access pattern, combining push and pull?

    - by andlju
    I need some advice on what kind of pattern(s) I should use for pushing/pulling data into my application. I'm writing a rule-engine that needs to hold quite a large amount of data in-memory in order to be efficient enough. I have some rather conflicting requirements; It is not acceptable for the engine to always have to wait for a full pre-load of all data before it is functional. Only fetching and caching data on-demand will lead to the engine taking too long before it is running quickly enough. An external event can trigger the need for specific parts of the data to be reloaded. Basically, I think I need a combination of pushing and pulling data into the application. A simplified version of my current "pattern" looks like this (in psuedo-C# written in notepad): // This interface is implemented by all classes that needs the data interface IDataSubscriber { void RegisterData(Entity data); } // This interface is implemented by the data access class interface IDataProvider { void EnsureLoaded(Key dataKey); void RegisterSubscriber(IDataSubscriber subscriber); } class MyClassThatNeedsData : IDataSubscriber { IDataProvider _provider; MyClassThatNeedsData(IDataProvider provider) { _provider = provider; _provider.RegisterSubscriber(this); } public void RegisterData(Entity data) { // Save data for later StoreDataInCache(data); } void UseData(Key key) { // Make sure that the data has been stored in cache _provider.EnsureLoaded(key); Entity data = GetDataFromCache(key); } } class MyDataProvider : IDataProvider { List<IDataSubscriber> _subscribers; // Make sure that the data for key has been loaded to all subscribers public void EnsureLoaded(Key key) { if (HasKeyBeenMarkedAsLoaded(key)) return; PublishDataToSubscribers(key); MarkKeyAsLoaded(key); } // Force all subscribers to get a new version of the data for key public void ForceReload(Key key) { PublishDataToSubscribers(key); MarkKeyAsLoaded(key); } void PublishDataToSubscribers(Key key) { Entity data = FetchDataFromStore(key); foreach(var subscriber in _subscribers) { subscriber.RegisterData(data); } } } // This class will be spun off on startup and should make sure that all data is // preloaded as quickly as possible class MyPreloadingThread { IDataProvider _provider; MyPreloadingThread(IDataProvider provider) { _provider = provider; } void RunInBackground() { IEnumerable<Key> allKeys = GetAllKeys(); foreach(var key in allKeys) { _provider.EnsureLoaded(key); } } } I have a feeling though that this is not necessarily the best way of doing this.. Just the fact that explaining it seems to take two pages feels like an indication.. Any ideas? Any patterns out there I should have a look at?

    Read the article

  • ActiveRecord Mapping

    - by Diego Dias
    Good morning, guys. I'm with a problem with the query that NHibernate generates. My mapping is like bellow: public class Matricula { [BelongsTo("IdTurma", NotNull=True)] public Turma {get;set;} } public class Turma { [BelongsTo("IdCurso", NotNull=True)] public Curso {get;set;} } public class Curso { [PrimaryKey("IdCurso", Generator=PrimaryKeyType.Identity)] public int IdCurso{get;set;} } The problem is: The Nh generates the query with left where should be inner. Between Matricula and Turma they makes inner, but between Turma and Curso they makes left outer. What's problem? What's wrong?

    Read the article

  • Changing DBML, how to change SQL database?

    - by Robbert Dam
    Hi all, A have an app with that uses an SQL database. The application is already released, but now I'm working on an update. In the update I've added an extra column in a table of my database. I've create the database from my DMBL using DataContext.CreateDatabase() (not the other way around, as I found out to be the more common scenario later) I there a facility in LINQ in which I can update my SQL database scheme?

    Read the article

  • WPF validation red border doesn't show If UserControl collapsed first

    - by Creepy Gnome
    There seems to be a bug with WPF in 3.5, and I was hoping someone may have found a workaround. Basically if you have a custom UserControl that contains a TextBox and it is in a Window but initialized to be Collapsed by default in the xaml or code behind if it fails validation when you make the control visible it will not show the red border until it fails while visible. However, this works correctly when visibility is set to Hidden, just no when Collapsed. I am already overriding the ErrorTemplate with a style to workaround the Adornment issue with the red border staying visibile when you collapse the control. Below is my full style for the TextBox. If there is any additional changes or additions to make it work correctly with collapsed controls that would be great. <Style TargetType="TextBox"> <Setter Property="Margin" Value="3" /> <Setter Property="Validation.ErrorTemplate"> <Setter.Value> <ControlTemplate> <ControlTemplate.Resources> <BooleanToVisibilityConverter x:Key="converter" /> </ControlTemplate.Resources> <DockPanel LastChildFill="True"> <Border BorderThickness="2" BorderBrush="Red" Visibility="{ Binding ElementName=placeholder, Mode=OneWay, Path=AdornedElement.IsVisible, Converter={StaticResource converter}}" > <AdornedElementPlaceholder x:Name="placeholder" /> </Border> </DockPanel> </ControlTemplate> </Setter.Value> </Setter> <Style.Triggers> <Trigger Property="Validation.HasError" Value="true" > <Setter Property="ToolTip" Value="{Binding RelativeSource={RelativeSource Self}, Path=(Validation.Errors)[0].ErrorContent}" /> </Trigger> </Style.Triggers> </Style>

    Read the article

  • Prevent users from being able to access a webpage via web browser?

    - by Rob
    My friend and I are working on a program. This program is going to submit GET data to our webpage. However, we don't want users accessing the webpage any other way than the program. We can prevent users from sharing the program using HWID authentication, but nothing prevents them from using a packet scanner to get the URL of the webpage. We thought about user-agent authentication, which we will implement, but user-agents can easily be spoofed. So my question is, how can we prevent users from accessing the webpage directly, instead of through the program? Even if you don't have an answer that will completely work, anything that will help deter them would be nice. Currently we will be implementing: HWID Authentication to use the program User-Agent Authentication to access the web page Instant IP Blacklisting to anyone accessing the webpage without the proper User-Agent

    Read the article

  • Lazy property loading in Nhibernate and Spring

    - by Khash
    I'm using NHibernate 2.1.2 and Spring 1.3 I have two Text columns (blobs) in one of my classes. I'm trying to use lazy="true" for the mapping of those properties but NHProfiler still shows the two columns being added to the SELECT statement when the main object is loaded. I'm using Spring.NHibernate session factory and have configured ProxyFactory with both Castle and Spring with no luck.

    Read the article

  • Cant get the catch statement to catch the custom exception

    - by user282807
    i have created a custom exception in the business layer and also using wcf layer where I am calling the methods in the business layer then in another website i am calling the method from wcf. i can see the message that i wrote in custom exception but the program goes staright to exception (the second catch block) instead of hitting my first catch block(where the custom exception is) when i hover over the exception i see my message but it's inside something called faultexception which i am not familiar with. and in there under details..there i see type= CanOnlyApplyOnceException. here is my code: protected void AddNewApplication() { try { using (var proxy = new ServiceReference1.ServiceClient()) { proxy.AddApplication(new Application { Credentials = 2, Comments = txtComments.Text, }); } } catch (CanOnlyApplyOnceException c) { ErrorSummary.AddError(c.Message, this); return; } catch (Exception) { lblStatus.Text = "There has been an error. Please try again"; } }

    Read the article

  • C++/CLI: Compiling static library with /CLR support

    - by user289770
    We have old (working) code that consists of a static library compiled with /CLR, and a C++/CLI DLL that links to the static lib. We are about to add new features to this static lib. Now, I've have heard from numerous sources that CLR static libraries are not supported by Microsoft, and therefore I'm pushing to clean this up and switch to DLL before we start adding new features to this project. However, I haven't been able to find any official information from Microsoft regarding this (say, from MSDN - other than their forums). I will appreciate any resources about this whole "static lib with CLR" issue.

    Read the article

  • Best way to copy the entire contents of a directory in C#

    - by Keith
    I want to copy the entire contents of a directory from one location to another in C#. There doesn't appear to be a way to do this using System.IO classes without lots of recursion. There is a method in VB that we can use if we add a reference to Microsoft.VisualBasic: new Microsoft.VisualBasic.Devices.Computer(). FileSystem.CopyDirectory( sourceFolder, outputFolder ); This seems like a rather ugly hack. Is there a better way?

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 1207 1208 1209 1210 1211 1212 1213 1214 1215 1216 1217 1218  | Next Page >