Search Results

Search found 10241 results on 410 pages for 'sqlite3 ruby'.

Page 125/410 | < Previous Page | 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132  | Next Page >

  • Shortcut for rake db:migrate:down for ruby-on-rails

    - by Michaël
    Hi, I want to know if there is a short way to do the migrations down equivalent to rake db:migrate (for the migrations up). Instead of doing : rake db:migrate:up VERSION=1, rake db:migrate:up VERSION=2, ... we can do : rake db:migrate! But for : rake db:migrate:down VERSION=10, rake db:migrate:down VERSION=..., rake db:migrate:down VERSION=1, is there a shortcut? Tank you for your help!

    Read the article

  • Ruby gem to obscure data

    - by Jake
    Anyone know of a gem that will allow you to obscure/sanitize data? Usecase: Download a production database, run some sanitation so that real customers won't get emails, cards charged etc.

    Read the article

  • Strange Email Activity Ruby on Rails

    - by Stranger
    Environment.rb ActionMailer::Base.delivery_method = :sendmail ActionMailer::Base.sendmail_settings = { :address = "mail.example.org", :domain = "example.org", :port = 25, :authentication = :login, :user_name = "email+email.org", :password = "password" } ActionMailer::Base.perform_deliveries = true ActionMailer::Base.raise_delivery_errors = true ActionMailer::Base.default_charset = "utf-8" Development.log Sent mail to [email protected] Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2010 19:38:08 -0500 From: example.org To: [email protected] Subject: Hello Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 The process of sending email is ok but when I check my email I didn't recive any. What seems to be wrong?

    Read the article

  • Reading a file N lines at a time in ruby

    - by Sam
    I have a large file (hundreds of megs) that consists of filenames, one per line. I need to loop through the list of filenames, and fork off a process for each filename. I want a maximum of 8 forked processes at a time and I don't want to read the whole filename list into RAM at once. I'm not even sure where to begin, can anyone help me out?

    Read the article

  • Strange ruby behavior when using Hash.new([])

    - by Valentin Vasilyev
    Consider this code: h=Hash.new(0) #new hash pairs will by default have 0 as values h[1]+=1 # {1=>1} h[2]+=2 # {2=>2} that's all fine, but: h=Hash.new([]) #empty array as default value h[1]<<=1 #{1=>[1]} - OK h[2]<<=2 #{1=>[1,2], 2=>[1,2]} # why ?? At this point I expect the hash to be: {1=>[1], 2=>[2]} But something goes wrong. Does anybody know what happens?

    Read the article

  • Attaining Explicit and Predictable Ruby on Rails...

    - by Winston
    I need help, how can I learn this framework? Here's what I need to know. Routes, it's expected outcome, the prefix/suffix methods associated with every changes made with it. ActiveRecord, the dynamic generation of methods, the behind the scenes with prefix_ and _suffix methods. The View, how do I know what prefix/suffix methods can be used in the View. Is there's a way to know all those behind-the-scenes actions in console.

    Read the article

  • Problem with migrating a model in ruby

    - by Shreyas Satish
    I run script/generate model query edit query.rb in models.. class Query < ActiveRecord::Base #I even tried Migrations instead of Base def sef.up create table :queries do|t| t.string :name end end def self.down drop_table :queries end end ,run rake db:migrate. and what I see in db is this: mysql> desc queries; +------------+----------+------+-----+---------+----------------+ | Field | Type | Null | Key | Default | Extra | +------------+----------+------+-----+---------+----------------+ | id | int(11) | NO | PRI | NULL | auto_increment | | created_at | datetime | YES | | NULL | | | updated_at | datetime | YES | | NULL | | +------------+----------+------+-----+---------+----------------+ Where is the "name" field? HELP ! Cheers !

    Read the article

  • [Ruby on Rails] scribd_fu gsub error

    - by siulamvictor
    I have an application which allow user upload documents to Scribd. I tried to use scribd_fu in Rails. An error occurred when the controller try to save the model. NoMethodError in DocumentsController#processupload private method `gsub' called for nil:NilClass here is the related controller def processupload @document = Document.new(params[:document]) if @document.save session[:scribdid] = @document.ipaper_access_key else xxxxx and this is the related html form <form action="/documents/processupload" enctype="multipart/form-data" method="post"> <input name="authenticity_token" type="hidden" value="FqTCmlGGIvRjiaiaa+YtF50wgI7FfpxfrZsulLCbXcw=" /> <label class="label_h2">Upload a Document</label> <input id="document_document_upload" name="document[document_upload]" size="30" type="file" /></div> <div class="buttons"><button type="submit" class="positive"><img src="/images/icons/tick.png" alt="Save Document"/>Save Document</button> </form> Is there anything wrong?

    Read the article

  • How to organize a Shoes Ruby app?

    - by luca
    can I have some examples of how you organize your Shoes apps? I mean, simply using a Shoes.app{} block and instance variables is clumsy.. I'd like to achieve a MVC like structure.. I'm used to it (from rails, FLEX frameworks and others..) and would like to recreate something similar..

    Read the article

  • Ruby &&= edge case

    - by Alan O'Donnell
    Bit of an edge case, but any idea why &&= would behave this way? I'm using 1.9.2. obj = Object.new obj.instance_eval {@bar &&= @bar} # => nil, expected obj.instance_variables # => [], so obj has no @bar instance variable obj.instance_eval {@bar = @bar && @bar} # ostensibly the same as @bar &&= @bar obj.instance_variables # => [:@bar] # why would this version initialize @bar? For comparison, ||= initializes the instance variable to nil, as I'd expect: obj = Object.new obj.instance_eval {@foo ||= @foo} obj.instance_variables # => [:@foo], where @foo is set to nil Thanks!

    Read the article

  • Basic Array Iteration in Ruby

    - by michaelmichael
    What's a better way to traverse an array while iterating through another array? For example, if I have two arrays like the following: names = [ "Rover", "Fido", "Lassie", "Calypso"] breeds = [ "Terrier", "Lhasa Apso", "Collie", "Bulldog"] Assuming the arrays correspond with one another - that is, Rover is a Terrier, Fido is a Lhasa Apso, etc. - I'd like to create a dog class, and a new dog object for each item: class Dog attr_reader :name, :breed def initialize(name, breed) @name = name @breed = breed end end I can iterate through names and breeds with the following: index = 0 names.each do |name| dog = Dog.new("#{name}", "#{breeds[index]}") index = index.next end However, I get the feeling that using the index variable is the wrong way to go about it. What would be a better way?

    Read the article

  • Basic Ruby On Rails Linking Help

    - by dweebsonduty
    So I am beginning to work with Rails and I get some of the concepts but am stuck on an important one. Let's say I have customers which has many jobs and jobs which belongs to customers. How would I go about creating a new job for a customer? I can create a link that goes to customers/1/jobs/new and I can grab the customer ID but how do I tell it that I am creating a job for customer 1? I know this is the most basic of things but I just need a push in the right direction. This is my form so far: How do I get :customer_id to populate with the customer_id param? <h1>New job</h1> <% form_for(@job) do |f| %> <%= f.error_messages %> <p> <%= f.label :customer_id %><br /> <%= f.text_field :customer_id %> </p> <p> <%= f.label :manufacturer %><br /> <%= f.text_field :manufacturer %> </p> <p> <%= f.label :serial_number %><br /> <%= f.text_field :serial_number %> </p> <p> <%= f.label :problem %><br /> <%= f.text_area :problem %> </p> <p> <%= f.label :notes %><br /> <%= f.text_area :notes %> </p> <p> <%= f.label :status %><br /> <%= f.text_field :status %> </p> <p> <%= f.label :tech_id %><br /> <%= f.text_field :tech_id %> </p> <p> <%= f.submit 'Create' %> </p> <% end %> <%= link_to 'Back', jobs_path %>

    Read the article

  • Ruby Metaprogramming

    - by VP
    I'm trying to write a DSL that allows me to do Policy.name do author "Foo" reviewed_by "Bar" end The following code can almost process it: class Policy include Singleton def self.method_missing(name,&block) puts name puts "#{yield}" end def self.author(name) puts name end def self.reviewed_by(name) puts name end end Defining my method as class methods (self.method_name) i can access it using the following syntax: Policy.name do Policy.author "Foo" Policy.reviewed_by "Bar" end If i remove the "self" from the method names, and try to use my desired syntax, then i receive an error "Method not Found" in the Main so it could not find my function until the module Kernel. Its ok, i understand the error. But how can i fix it? How can i fix my class to make it work with my desired syntax that?

    Read the article

  • Ruby Methods: how to return an usage string when insufficient arguments are given

    - by Shyam
    Hi, After I have created a serious bunch of classes (with initialize methods), I am loading these into IRb to test each of them. I do so by creating simple instances and calling their methods to learn their behavior. However sometimes I don't remember exactly what order I was supposed to give the arguments when I call the .new method on the class. It requires me to look back at the code. However, I think it should be easy enough to return a usage message, instead of seeing: ArgumentError: wrong number of arguments (0 for 9) So I prefer to return a string with the human readable arguments, by example using "puts" or just a return of a string. Now I have seen the rescue keyword inside begin-end code, but I wonder how I could catch the ArgumentError when the initialize method is called. Thank you for your answers, feedback and comments!

    Read the article

  • Passing parameters thru Ruby's OAuth

    - by JP
    I'm using Mirven's Twitter OAuth Sinatra example and trying to figure out how I can send a 'next page' parameter with the Oauth request: ie. The user attempts to visit /edit/profile which requires a login so I redirect to /request which deals with login via twitter - I now want to be able to redirect the user to the address they were originally looking for if they log in successfully. I thought I could do this in the .get_request_token line with this code: @request_token = @consumer.get_request_token({:oauth_callback => "http://#{request.host}/auth"},{:next => params['next'] || '/'}) But params has no additional items in the /auth handler. I'm new to OAuth, how would I go about doing this?

    Read the article

  • Ruby assertions and disabled inputs

    - by brad
    Does anyone know how to assert that a checkbox or input is disabled? I can't find anything to indicated that this is supported I'm writing cucumber tests with webrat and test/unit. I'd like to have a step that is able to assert_disabled :some_checkbox || assert_disabled :some_input. Or some way that I can check a property of the checkbox.

    Read the article

  • urldecode in ruby ?

    - by wefwgeweg
    how do i transform www.bestbuy.com/site/Electronics\Audio\abcat0200000.c=3fid=3dabcat0200000 into its original format ? www.bestbuy.com/site/Electronics/Audio/abcat0200000.c?id=abcat0200000 urldecode ?

    Read the article

  • How to retrieve caller context object in Ruby ?

    - by David
    Hi, hereafter is my piece of code that I want to simplify in order to avoid passing an extra argument on each call : module M def do_something(context) puts "Called from #{context}" end module_function :do_something end class Foo def do_stuff M.do_something(self) end end Foo.new.do_stuff Is there a way to do the same think without passing 'self' as an input argument to 'do_something' method like this ? module M def do_something puts "Called from #{method that returns caller object}" end module_function :do_something end class Foo def do_stuff M.do_something end end Foo.new.do_stuff Thanks for your support!

    Read the article

  • Ruby: what the hell does this code saying ????

    - by wefwgeweg
    i discovered this in a dark place one day...what the hell is it supposed to do ?? def spliceElement(newelement,dickwad) dox = Nokogiri::HTML(newelement) fuck = dox.xpath("//text()").to_a fuck.each do |shit| if shit.text.include? ": " dickwad << shit.text.split(': ')[1].strip + "|" else if shit.text =~ /\s{1,}/ or shit.text =~ /\n{1,}/ puts "fuck" else dickwad << shit.text.squeeze(" ").strip + "|" end end end dickwad << "\n" end def extract(newdoc, newarray) doc = Nokogiri::HTML(newdoc) collection = Array.new newarray.each do |dong| newb = doc.xpath(dong).to_a #puts doc.xpath(dong).text collection << newb end dickwad = ""; if collection.length > 1 (0...collection.first.length).each do |i| (0...collection.length).each do |j| somefield = collection[j][i].to_s.gsub(/\s{2,}/,' ') spliceElement(somefield, dickwad) end newrow = dickwad.chop + "\n" return newrow.to_s end else collection.first.each do |shit| somefield = shit.to_s.gsub(/\s{2,}/,' ') spliceElement(somefield, dickwad) puts somefield + "\n\n" #newrow = dickwad.chop + "\n" #puts newrow #return newrow.to_s sleep 1 end end

    Read the article

  • Ruby on Rails: How to use a local variable in a collection_select

    - by mmacaulay
    I have a partial view which I'm passing a local variable into: <%= render :partial => "products/product_row", :locals => { :product => product } %> These are rows in a table, and I want to have a <select> in each row for product categories: <%= collection_select(:product, :category_id, @current_user.categories, :id, :name, options = {:prompt => "-- Select a category --"}, html_options = { :id => "", :class => "product_category" }) %> (Note: the id = "" is there because collection_select tries to give all these select elements the same id.) The problem is that I want to have product.category be selected by default and this doesn't work unless I have an instance variable @product. I can't do this in the controller because this is a collection of products. One way I was able to get around this was to have this line just before the collection_select: <% @product = product %> But this seems very hacky and would be a problem if I ever wanted to have an actual instance variable @product in the controller. I guess one workaround would be to name this instance variable something more specific like @product_select_tmp in hopes of not interfering with anything that might be declared in the controller. This still seems very hacky though, and I'd prefer a cleaner solution. Surely there must be a way to have collection_select use a local variable instead of an instance variable. Note that I've tried a few different ways of calling collection_select with no success: <%= collection_select(product, ... <%= collection_select('product', ... etc. Any help greatly appreciated!

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132  | Next Page >