Search Results

Search found 11138 results on 446 pages for 'spring mvc'.

Page 141/446 | < Previous Page | 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148  | Next Page >

  • Visual Studio 2010 RC + ASP.NET MVC 2 RTM won't re-target from .NET Framework 4 to 3.5

    - by Solution Evangelist
    Per the above I am trying to re-target a fresh ASP.NET MVC 2 application in Visual Studio 2010 RTM. After all sorts of tweaking the closest I am getting is the error below: The primary reference "System.Web.Mvc, Version=2.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=31bf3856ad364e35, processorArchitecture=MSIL" could not be resolved because it has an indirect dependency on the framework assembly "System.Web, Version=2.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b03f5f7f11d50a3a" which could not be resolved in the currently targeted framework. ".NETFramework,Version=v3.5". To resolve this problem, either remove the reference "System.Web.Mvc, Version=2.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=31bf3856ad364e35, processorArchitecture=MSIL" or retarget your application to a framework version which contains "System.Web, Version=2.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b03f5f7f11d50a3a". Is there anyone who can assist in having this re-targeted to .NET Framework 3.5 (SP1), or is there perhaps a zip file of a VS 2010 + .NET Framework v3.5 + ASP.NET MVC 2 RTM project already online I could grab?

    Read the article

  • ASP.NET MVC.NET JQueryUI datepicker inside a div loaded/updated with ajax.actionlink

    - by ArjanW
    Im trying to incorporate jqueryUI's datepicker inside a partialview like this: <% using (Ajax.BeginForm("/EditData", new AjaxOptions { HttpMethod = "POST", UpdateTargetId = "div1" })) {%> Date: <%= Html.TextBox("date", String.Format("{0:g}", Model.date), new { id = "datePicker"})%> <% } %> <script type="text/javascript"> $(function() { $("#datePicker").datepicker(); }); </script> when i directly call the url to this partial view, so it renders only this view the datepicker works perfectly. (for the purpose of testing this i added the needed jquerry and jquerryui script and css references directly to the partial view) But if i use a Ajax.Actionlink to load this partial view inside a div (called div2, submitting the above form should update div1) like this: <div id="div1"> <%= Ajax.ActionLink("Edit", "/EditData", new { id = Model.id }, new AjaxOptions { HttpMethod = "GET", UpdateTargetId = "div2" } )%> </div> <div2>placeholder for the form</div> the datepicker wont apear anymore. My best guess is the javascript included in the loaded html doesnt get executed, ($(document).ready(function() { $("#datepicker").datepicker(); }); doesnt work either if that's the case how and where should i call the $("datepicker").datepicker(); ? (putting it in the ajaxoptions of the ajax.actionlink as oncomplete = "$(function() { $('#datepicker').datepicker();});" still doesnt work. if thats not the case, then where's my problem?

    Read the article

  • Testing the context in asp.net mvc

    - by user252160
    I got pretty experienced with testing controllers, my question here is though, aren't we supposed to test the data context as well, and how ? I mean, there are a lot of relationships and constraints coming from the DB that simply testing controllers does not cover. On the other hand, testing against the DB is not considered a good practice - what then ? Simply testing without db.SubmitChanges() or what ?

    Read the article

  • strang asp.net mvc behavior

    - by ooo
    i have a controlled called AppController. i have 2 actions: Details and Delete both pass in int id as the parameter to the action WHen i go to: mysite/App/Details/100 I can catch it in the controller details action but when i go to mysite/App/Delete/100 The breakpoint never hits and i get this in the browser: Server Error in '/' Application. The resource cannot be found. Description: HTTP 404. The resource you are looking for (or one of its dependencies) could have been removed, had its name changed, or is temporarily unavailable. Please review the following URL and make sure that it is spelled correctly. any idea what might be happening?

    Read the article

  • Asp.Net MVC and ajax async callback execution order

    - by lrb
    I have been sorting through this issue all day and hope someone can help pinpoint my problem. I have created a "asynchronous progress callback" type functionality in my app using ajax. When I strip the functionality out into a test application I get the desired results. See image below: Desired Functionality When I tie the functionality into my single page application using the same code I get a sort of blocking issue where all requests are responded to only after the last task has completed. In the test app above all request are responded to in order. The server reports a ("pending") state for all requests until the controller method has completed. Can anyone give me a hint as to what could cause the change in behavior? Not Desired Desired Fiddler Request/Response GET http://localhost:12028/task/status?_=1383333945335 HTTP/1.1 X-ProgressBar-TaskId: 892183768 Accept: */* X-Requested-With: XMLHttpRequest Referer: http://localhost:12028/ Accept-Language: en-US Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 10.0; Windows NT 6.1; Trident/6.0) Connection: Keep-Alive DNT: 1 Host: localhost:12028 HTTP/1.1 200 OK Cache-Control: private Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Vary: Accept-Encoding Server: Microsoft-IIS/8.0 X-AspNetMvc-Version: 3.0 X-AspNet-Version: 4.0.30319 X-SourceFiles: =?UTF-8?B?QzpcUHJvamVjdHNcVEVNUFxQcm9ncmVzc0Jhclx0YXNrXHN0YXR1cw==?= X-Powered-By: ASP.NET Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2013 21:39:08 GMT Content-Length: 25 Iteration completed... Not Desired Fiddler Request/Response GET http://localhost:60171/_Test/status?_=1383341766884 HTTP/1.1 X-ProgressBar-TaskId: 838217998 Accept: */* X-Requested-With: XMLHttpRequest Referer: http://localhost:60171/Report/Index Accept-Language: en-US Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 10.0; Windows NT 6.1; Trident/6.0) Connection: Keep-Alive DNT: 1 Host: localhost:60171 Pragma: no-cache Cookie: ASP.NET_SessionId=rjli2jb0wyjrgxjqjsicdhdi; AspxAutoDetectCookieSupport=1; TTREPORTS_1_0=CC2A501EF499F9F...; __RequestVerificationToken=6klOoK6lSXR51zCVaDNhuaF6Blual0l8_JH1QTW9W6L-3LroNbyi6WvN6qiqv-PjqpCy7oEmNnAd9s0UONASmBQhUu8aechFYq7EXKzu7WSybObivq46djrE1lvkm6hNXgeLNLYmV0ORmGJeLWDyvA2 HTTP/1.1 200 OK Cache-Control: private Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Vary: Accept-Encoding Server: Microsoft-IIS/8.0 X-AspNetMvc-Version: 4.0 X-AspNet-Version: 4.0.30319 X-SourceFiles: =?UTF-8?B?QzpcUHJvamVjdHNcSUxlYXJuLlJlcG9ydHMuV2ViXHRydW5rXElMZWFybi5SZXBvcnRzLldlYlxfVGVzdFxzdGF0dXM=?= X-Powered-By: ASP.NET Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2013 21:37:48 GMT Content-Length: 25 Iteration completed... The only difference in the two requests headers besides the auth tokens is "Pragma: no-cache" in the request and the asp.net version in the response. Thanks Update - Code posted (I probably need to indicate this code originated from an article by Dino Esposito ) var ilProgressWorker = function () { var that = {}; that._xhr = null; that._taskId = 0; that._timerId = 0; that._progressUrl = ""; that._abortUrl = ""; that._interval = 500; that._userDefinedProgressCallback = null; that._taskCompletedCallback = null; that._taskAbortedCallback = null; that.createTaskId = function () { var _minNumber = 100, _maxNumber = 1000000000; return _minNumber + Math.floor(Math.random() * _maxNumber); }; // Set progress callback that.callback = function (userCallback, completedCallback, abortedCallback) { that._userDefinedProgressCallback = userCallback; that._taskCompletedCallback = completedCallback; that._taskAbortedCallback = abortedCallback; return this; }; // Set frequency of refresh that.setInterval = function (interval) { that._interval = interval; return this; }; // Abort the operation that.abort = function () { // if (_xhr !== null) // _xhr.abort(); if (that._abortUrl != null && that._abortUrl != "") { $.ajax({ url: that._abortUrl, cache: false, headers: { 'X-ProgressBar-TaskId': that._taskId } }); } }; // INTERNAL FUNCTION that._internalProgressCallback = function () { that._timerId = window.setTimeout(that._internalProgressCallback, that._interval); $.ajax({ url: that._progressUrl, cache: false, headers: { 'X-ProgressBar-TaskId': that._taskId }, success: function (status) { if (that._userDefinedProgressCallback != null) that._userDefinedProgressCallback(status); }, complete: function (data) { var i=0; }, }); }; // Invoke the URL and monitor its progress that.start = function (url, progressUrl, abortUrl) { that._taskId = that.createTaskId(); that._progressUrl = progressUrl; that._abortUrl = abortUrl; // Place the Ajax call _xhr = $.ajax({ url: url, cache: false, headers: { 'X-ProgressBar-TaskId': that._taskId }, complete: function () { if (_xhr.status != 0) return; if (that._taskAbortedCallback != null) that._taskAbortedCallback(); that.end(); }, success: function (data) { if (that._taskCompletedCallback != null) that._taskCompletedCallback(data); that.end(); } }); // Start the progress callback (if any) if (that._userDefinedProgressCallback == null || that._progressUrl === "") return this; that._timerId = window.setTimeout(that._internalProgressCallback, that._interval); }; // Finalize the task that.end = function () { that._taskId = 0; window.clearTimeout(that._timerId); } return that; };

    Read the article

  • asp.net mvc - reusing pages/controllers in workflow

    - by fregas
    I have 2 workflows: 1) the user signs up for the first time. They see 3 different screens, their basic user information, their credit card, and some additional profile information. They complete these 3 steps in a wizard like fashion, where each time they hit "submit" they leave the current screen and move on to the next. 2) the user already is signed up. He has links in the navigation to these 3 seperate pages. He can update them in any order. When he hits save, he doesn't leave the page he's on, it just shows something at the top that says "Credit Card Info saved..." or whatever. Possibly using ajax or maybe a full page refresh. I would like to reuse the code not only the view but also in the controller for these 3 screens between the two workflows, but without a ton of if...then logic to determine where to go next depending on whether its a first signup in the wizard or updating individual parts of a profile. Any ideas?

    Read the article

  • multiple partial views mvc 2

    - by nik1
    Hello World! Hi guys, I have a master page with two partial viewson it both of which submit to the AccountController. When I click Submit on either of the partial views the following happens: If I declare the partial views like Html.BeginForm("PartialAction1","Account") it redirects to that partial view on clicking submit instead bringing back the default HomeContoller Index view with validation errors. If I declare the partial view forms as Html.BeginForm() then it returns to the default index view of the home controller. But it actually fires both partial view actions inside the AccountController and thus returns validation errors for both partial views simultaneously. What I want is version 2 above with only one action firing instead of two. Am I missing, hopefully, something very simple? I hoping someone can help me or point me in the right direction. Here's the code from my master page for the partial views Html.Action("Login1","Account") Html.Action("Login2", "Account") Many Thanks!

    Read the article

  • asp.net MVC - how to get complete local and global resources

    - by Buthrakaur
    I'm localizing application and need to provide JSON representation of local and global resources for JS part of application for all views. My current idea is I'd implement HtmlHelper extension methods like GetLocalResourcesJSON/GetGlobalResourcesJSON which should encode all resource keys+values and return them JSON encoded as string (I'd implement caching as well). At the moment I'm able to retrieve single specific key from global or local resource belonging to current view (using httpContext.GetGlobalResourceObject/GetLocalResourceObject), but I'm not able to find out how to retrieve whole resource object and iterate all its keys+values. Is there any method how to achieve this? it looks like ResourceProviderFactory could be the the key to this problem, but it's not accessible publicly anywhere. I could instantiate ResourceExpressionBuilder and use reflection to retrieve the provider using GetLocal/GlobalResourceProvider() methods, but I don't like using reflection here at all...

    Read the article

  • ASP.net MVC - Check status request

    - by vdhant
    Hi guys Just wondering if its possible to get the status of a request from another request? To help provide some context, I want to use ajax to upload some files to the server. When the upload is started I want triggered another ajax request that checks to see how much of the file has been uploaded (or in other words how big was the other request and how far through receiving the request is the server). I was thinking that I could use a guid or something similar to ensure that I am checking the status of the right request. But how do I check the status of another request??? Cheers Anthony

    Read the article

  • asp.net MVC Partial Views how to initialise javascript

    - by Simon G
    Hi, I have an edit form that uses an ajax form to submit to the controller. Depending on the data submitted I redirect the user to one of two pages (by returning a partial view). Both pages rely on javascript/jquery and neither use anything common between the pages. What is the best way to initialise these javascripts on each page? I know there is the AjaxOption OnComplete but both pages are quite dynamic depending on the Model passed and I would rather keep the javascript for both pages seperate rather than having a common method. Thanks

    Read the article

  • asp.net mvc mixed validation

    - by maxxxee
    Can I use IDataError and service layer validation together? I am using IDataError for my my model. However, I need to check for a condition in my service layer. If the condition is not true I need to give the user a validation message so that user can input new values. Is this possible? Anything I need to take care of when attempting this?

    Read the article

  • Drop Down List in MVC

    - by Zerotoinfinite
    I want to do the following: 1: Add two dropdown list in the register.aspx [Say ddlRole,ddlGender] 2: Fill the dropdown list [ ddlRole should be filled from the database, and ddlRole should have two static field] 3: On submit I want to get the selected value of the two dropdown list. Please help. Thanks in advance.

    Read the article

  • How can I create and manage a multi-tenant ASP MVC application

    - by Wizzarding
    Hi, I want to create a multi-tenant application that uses the hostname to determine the customer. For example: CustomerOne.myapp.com AnotherCo.myapp.com AndOneMore.myapp.com ... I can do the database and security side with no problems, I can also get the hostname from the URL, but what I am struggling to find out is how to create the basic plumbing that would allow a new customer to sign up online, provide their company name, and for the application to create the new URL, ready to be used straight away. Can anyone help? Thanks, Rob.

    Read the article

  • asp.net mvc usercontrol viewdata

    - by kusanagi
    i have user control, which i render on several views. i want to show viewdata in the usercontrol, but viewdata must be filled in controller method, so i need to fill viewdata on each controller method of each view, where i render usercontrol. is there any simple solutions?

    Read the article

  • Binding a list of checkboxes from view to posted collection in ASP.NET MVC 2

    - by mare
    Given the code below within which I render a bunch of checkboxes in my view and the code for controller, someone please explain how can I get the values of the checkboxes (I need the key and the checked status) in the controller. <% foreach (string mappingId in Model.Mappings) {%> <tr><td> <%=mappingId %><br /> <%=Html.Label("Checkbox_" + mappingId, "Sync?")%> <%=Html.CheckBox("Checkbox_" + mappingId, true) %> </td></tr> <% } %> [HttpPost] public ActionResult Sync(FormCollection collection) { foreach (var posted in collection) { // here the "posted" variable shows up in the debugger as // "Checkbox_AD0D1" as Value (AD0D1 being the key in my model) and of type "object" // of course, this line fails but it shows what I want to do bool currentCheckbox = (bool) posted; } return View(); }

    Read the article

  • Mvc Redirect with IIS and Request Verification Token

    - by zsharp
    I am using IIS 7 rewrite to redirect certain pages to https. It seems that my post from such a page fails because i have Request Verification token attribute on the controller. Is this expected behavior or do I have something configured incorrectly? what to do to get around this? works fine without the https redirect.

    Read the article

  • Best placement for javascript in Asp.net MVC app that heavily uses partial views

    - by KallDrexx
    What is the best place for javascript that is specific to a partial view? For example, if I have a partial view (loaded via ajax call) with some divs and I want to turn those divs into an accordian, would it be better put the $("#section").accordion() in script tags inside of the partial view, or in a .js file in the function that retrieves that partial view and inserts it into the DOM? Obviously, common methods I will be keeping in a .js file, however I am more talking about javascript very specific to the partial view itself. Most things I find on the net seem to say to put all javascript into a separate .js but nothing addresses the idea of partial views.

    Read the article

  • GWT and MVC type calls

    - by arinte
    I have a GWT app that when launched it takes you to a page with just a menu. So as a shortcut type thing I would like the users to be able to go straight to the page they want. So if the default start page is x, the should be able to say x/add and it will take them to the add page. How would I get that in gwt? Do I need a bunch of different entry points?

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148  | Next Page >