Search Results

Search found 24285 results on 972 pages for 'build events'.

Page 157/972 | < Previous Page | 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164  | Next Page >

  • Prototype to JQuery - how to access originator of event

    - by ciaranarcher
    Hi there I'm coming from a Prototype background and looking into JQuery. I'd like to know the 'right' way to do attach a click event to a bunch of elements, but then know in the event handler which one of my elements was clicked. I've come up with the following: MYNS.CarouselHelper.prototype.attachImgHandlers = function () { $j(".carouselItem").bind("click", this, function(e){ e.data.openCarouselImage(e) }); } I then have the following in my event handler: MYNS.CarouselHelper.prototype.openCarouselImage = function(e) { var img = e.currentTarget; // Do stuff to the image element }; Is this 'right'? It feels wrong to me as I am used to explicitly passing the element to the event handler in Prototype as I loop through an array of elements. Thanks in advance.

    Read the article

  • How to add a click event to a textbox created in code

    - by jvcoach23
    I'm using silverlight 3 and i'd like to create a handler and event wired up to a mouse click in a text box that was created in code behind. Can someone point me in the right direction. I need to make it so that some things fire off when that textbox is clicked into. if you have an example in vb.net that would be even better. thanks shannon

    Read the article

  • bind event handler on keydown listen function JavaScript jQuery

    - by user1644123
    I am trying to bind a handler to an event. The event is a keydown function. The handler will listen for hit variables to produce one of two conditions. The 1st condition (odd number of hits) will perform 1 function, the 2nd (even number of hits) will perform another function. To elaborate, the 1st function will scroll to one element, the 2nd will scroll to another element. My syntax may be the wrong approach, but it works for the 1st condition, but not the 2nd. I think I have the conditional statement in the wrong place. How can I rewrite this to work as intended? Thank you kindly, in advance! $(document).keydown(function(e) { switch (e.which) { case 37: break; case 38: break; case 39: break; case 40: //bottom arrow key var hits = 0; if (hits % 2 !== 0) { $('#wrap').animate({ scrollTop: $("#scrollToHere").offset().top }, 2800); } else { $('#wrap').animate({ scrollTop: $("#scroll2ToHere").offset().top }, 2800); } hits++; return false; break; } })? *I moved "var hits = 0;" to the top, but it only works! But is there a way I can reset the whole thing after every two hits? I want to reset because when there is a bug and if I press a 3rd time it scrolls to the very top of the page, where there is no element to make it scroll to the top. Why would it scroll to the top of the page if I never scripted it to do so?? *

    Read the article

  • Monitoring DOM Changes in JQuery

    - by user363866
    Is there a way to detect when the disabled attribute of an input changes in JQuery. I want to toggle the style based on the value. I can copy/paste the same enable/disable code for each change event (as I did below) but I was looking for a more generic approach. Can I create a custom event that will monitor the disabled attribute of specified inputs? Example: <style type="text/css">.disabled{ background-color:#dcdcdc; }</style> <fieldset> <legend>Option 1</legend> <input type="radio" name="Group1" id="Radio1" value="Yes" />Yes <input type="radio" name="Group1" id="Radio2" value="No" checked="checked" />No <div id="Group1Fields" style="margin-left: 20px;"> Percentage 1: <input type="text" id="Percentage1" disabled="disabled" /><br /> Percentage 2: <input type="text" id="Percentage2" disabled="disabled" /><br /> </div> </fieldset> <fieldset> <legend>Option 2</legend> <input type="radio" name="Group2" id="Radio3" value="Yes" checked="checked" />Yes <input type="radio" name="Group2" id="Radio4" value="No" />No <div id="Group2Fields" style="margin-left: 20px;"> Percentage 1: <input type="text" id="Text1" /><br /> Percentage 2: <input type="text" id="Text2" /><br /> </div> </fieldset> <script type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { //apply disabled style to all disabled controls $("input:disabled").addClass("disabled"); $("input[name='Group1']").change(function () { var disabled = ($(this).val() == "No") ? "disabled" : ""; $("#Group1Fields input").attr("disabled", disabled); //apply disabled style to all disabled controls $("input:disabled").addClass("disabled"); //remove disabled style to all enabled controls $("input:not(:disabled)").removeClass("disabled"); }); $("input[name='Group2']").change(function () { var disabled = ($(this).val() == "No") ? "disabled" : ""; $("#Group2Fields input").attr("disabled", disabled); //apply disabled style to all disabled controls $("input:disabled").addClass("disabled"); //remove disabled style to all enabled controls $("input:not(:disabled)").removeClass("disabled"); }); }); </script>

    Read the article

  • Ordering the calling of asynchronous methods in c#

    - by Peter Kelly
    Hi, Say I have 4 classes ControllerClass MethodClass1 MethodClass2 MethodClass3 and each MethodClass has an asynchronous method DoStuff() and each has a CompletedEvent. The ControllerClass is responsible for invoking the 3 asynchronous methods on the 3 MethodClasses in a particular order. So ControllerClass invokes MethodClass1.DoStuff() and subscribes to MethodClass1.CompletedEvent. When that event is fired, ControllerClass invokes MethodClass2.DoStuff() and subscribes to MethodClass2.CompletedEvent. When that event is fired, the ControllerClass invokes MethodClass3.DoStuff() Is there a best practice for a situation like this? Is this bad design? I believe it is because I am finding it hard to unit test (a sure sign) It is not easy to change the order I have an uneasy, code-smell feeling about it What are the alternatives in a situation like this?

    Read the article

  • Continuous integration with .net and svn

    - by stiank81
    We're currently not applying the automated building and testing of continous integration in our project. We haven't bothered this far as we're only 2 developers working on it, but even with a team of 2 I still think it would be valuable to use continous integration and get a confirmation that our builds don't break or tests start failing. We're using .Net with C# and WPF. We have created Python-scripts for building the application - using MSbuild - and for running all tests. Our source is in SVN. What would be the best approach to apply continous integration with this setup? What tool should we get? It should be one which doesn't require alot of setup. Simple procedures to get started and little maintanance is a must.

    Read the article

  • Flex: Result event given multiple times

    - by Tom
    Hello everybody!! I am trying to learn Flex and now i have the next code: http://pastebin.com/rZwxF7w1 This code is for my login component. I want to get a special string for encrypting my password. This string is given by my authservice. But when i login i get a multiple times a alert with Done(line 69 in the pastebin code or line 4 in the code on the bottom of this question). But i want that it shows one single time. Does someone know what is wrong with this code? Tom protected function tryLogin():void { encryptStringResult.addEventListener('result', function(event:ResultEvent):void { var encryptString:String = event.result.toString(); Alert.show('Done'); }); encryptStringResult.token = auth.getEncryptString(); }

    Read the article

  • Are there any drawbacks to the Major.Minor.YMDD.Build version strategy?

    - by Chu
    I'm trying to come up with a good version strategy to fit our specific needs. We've proposed settling on this and I wanted to ask the question to see if anyone's experience would suggest avoiding this or altering it in any way. Here's our proposal: Versions are released in this format: MAJOR.MINOR.YMDD.BN. Here it is broken out: MAJOR & MINOR are typical; we'll increase MINOR when we feel code and new feature sets warrants it; once every few months most likely. MAJOR will increase ~yearly. YMDD: Y will be the last digit of the current year, so "1" for 2011, "2" for 2012, etc. A non-padded month will be used to keep the number smaller (9 instead of 09 for example). DD of course is the day, padded with a zero for days under 10. BN: BN is the build number and increases by one anytime we make a change to a branch of the code represented by the build, for example: If were to make a build today, our release would be version 5.0.1707.1. I release to QA today and 3 days from now QA finds that a change broke the save functionality on a page. Instead of me changing our current development code, I'd go back to the code that I used to create version 5.0.1707.1, make the fix there, then increase the BN portion of the version and would then re-release 5.0.1707.2 back to QA. In short, anytime a change is made to a branched version that isn't the active dev branch, we'd use the original version number and increase only the BN portion (even if the change happened 3 days, 3 weeks or 3 months from the initial release of that version). Anytime we make a new release from our Active dev branch, we'd come up with a new version based on the M/D of the release using the outlined strategy. We do this once every 2-3 weeks. Are there holes or pitfalls with this? If so, what are they? Thanks EDIT To clarify one point that I didn't get out very well - Oct/Nov/Dec will be two digits, it's only the year that won't be. So 9 for Sept, 10 for Oct, 11 for Nov, etc.

    Read the article

  • Change button's enabled property via checkbox

    - by Ivan Stoyanov
    I tried this javascript but it doesn't work - here I need to change the button's enabled property to true when the checkbox is checked and to false when it isn't. This is my code. <tr> <td colspan="2" align="center"> <asp:CheckBox ID="cbAcceptAgreement" runat="server" OnClientClick="acceptAgreement(this)" /> <asp:Label ID="lblUserAgreement" runat="server" Text="I accept the " /> <asp:HyperLink ID="hlUserAgreement" runat="server" Text="User Agreement" NavigateUrl="Help/UserAgreement.aspx" /> </td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2" align="center"> <asp:Button ID="btnRegister" runat="server" Text="Register" /> </td> </tr> <script type="text/javascript"> function acceptAgreement(Obj) { document.getElementById('<%=btnRegister.ClientID%>').disabled = !obj.checked; } </script> Can you help me solve this problem?

    Read the article

  • What's the problem of this piece of JavaScript code?

    - by Yousui
    Hi guys, The following piece of JavaScript code is a cross browser way to add/remove event handler. It will save a deleting method as a property of an HTML element object. Now it works well in FireFox but not in IE6. I can't find out why so I came here for help. Great thanks. <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"> <html> <head> <meta http-equiv="Content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" /> <title>pop</title> </head> <body> <input type="text" name="input1" id="input1" value="" /> <div id="result"> </div> <div id="result2" style="width:200px;height:100px;border:1px solid red;"> </div> <button id="stop" name="stop">click me</button><button id="stop2" name="stop2">click me</button> <script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8"> function handler(e){ e = e || window.event; var key_code = e.keyCode || e.charCode || e.which, source = e.srcElement || e.target; document.getElementById("result").innerHTML = "" + key_code; } function handler2(e){ e = e || window.event; var key_code = e.keyCode || e.charCode || e.which, source = e.srcElement || e.target; document.getElementById("result2").innerHTML = e.button; } function add_event(o, event_type, callback, capture){ o = typeof o === "string" ? document.getElementById(o) : o; if(document.addEventListener){ add_event = function(o, event_type, callback, capture){ o = typeof o === "string" ? document.getElementById(o) : o; capture = typeof(capture) === "undefined" ? false : true; o.addEventListener(event_type, callback, capture); o.removes = o.removes || {}; o.removes[event_type] = function(){ o.removeEventListener(event_type, callback, capture); }; if(!o.remove_event){ o.remove_event = function(type){ if(typeof type === "undefined"){ return; } o.removes[type](); } } } }else if(document.attachEvent){ add_event = function(o, event_type, callback, capture){ o = typeof o === "string" ? document.getElementById(o) : o; capture = typeof(capture) === "undefined" ? false : true; o.attachEvent(event_type, callback); o.removes = o.removes || {}; o.removes[event_type] = function(){ o.detachEvent(event_type, callback); } if(!o.remove_event){ o.remove_event = function(type){ if(typeof type === "undefined"){ return; } o.removes[type](); } } } } add_event(o, event_type, callback, capture); } add_event("input1", "keyup", handler); add_event("input1", "click", handler2); add_event("stop", "click", function(){ document.getElementById("input1").remove_event("keyup"); }); add_event("stop2", "click", function(){ document.getElementById("input1").remove_event("click"); }); </script> </body> </html>

    Read the article

  • User Control's Page Init Event Not Firing After Another User Control Using

    - by Murat
    I have an user control. I add dynamicly control to this control on its Page Init. This user control's parent Page's every postback, its page init works fine. After I added an different user control to Page. In Second User control, user select photos and uploads them with asyncfileupload control(AJAX). And I save all of them with a button at the end of Page. In EveryPostBack Parent Page Load event works. If I dont select any photo from Second User Control, First User Control's Page Init event works fine when I click Save Button. But if I select a photo, first User Control dont work. What is the problem?

    Read the article

  • How to REALLY focus a link using jQuery / javascript

    - by Bobby Jack
    Calling the jQuery focus() method on a link appears to only partially focus the link. Whilst the link has focus to the extent that pressing ENTER follows the link, it doesn't take on the default outline styling (or adopt any styling set via the :focus pseudo-class), nor is the tab-order correctly 'entered'. Any ideas on how to resolve this? (results observed in Firefox 3.6.2)

    Read the article

  • NorCal Weekly .Net is Up Now! Catch All for the .Net Events in Northern California!

      Ive always wanted a place that I could look through to find what .net events are going on in Northern California.  Ive found that there is a core group of people with common interested... This site is a resource for asp.net web programming. It has examples by Peter Kellner of techniques for high performance programming...Did you know that DotNetSlackers also publishes .net articles written by top known .net Authors? We already have over 80 articles in several categories including Silverlight. Take a look: here.

    Read the article

  • Firefox DOMContentLoaded event problem

    - by mck89
    Hi, i've created a script that works with the Dom so it has to wait until the Dom is ready before execute every operation. I want that this script can be included in two ways: In the head tag so that it is loaded before the Dom is ready. I've used document.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){...},false) for this and it works well Loaded dinamically when the Dom is already loaded. In this case the script doesn't work because for some reasons if the Dom is already loaded the DOMContentLoaded event isn't fired So i want to know, is there a way to check if the Dom is already loaded so that the script can execute the code without using the DOMContentLoaded event?

    Read the article

  • Visual C++ preprocessor definitions

    - by alemjerus
    Is there a way to transfer C++ preprocessor definitions into a custom pre-link step procedure call as a command-line parameter or export them into a file any other way? Example: Let's say, I have a c++ project, and in it's Debug configuration I put a preprocessor definition like MAKUMBA_OBA=0x13 Then I add custom pre-link step which executes some javascript like sarahjessicaparker.js /to tomsrhinoplasty $(MAKUMBA_OBA) It would be great, if it just worked, but I never get a third parameter in my js. So the question is: how to pass a preprocessor definition to s script?

    Read the article

  • how to stop onChange in javascript

    - by shrimpy
    in one of my selection box, i have a onChange="..." specified... coz i want to change some other form value after any selection changes. however ... in the same page, some wired case i have to manually set the value.. so i have to use some javascript to set the value of the selection combox, but in this case, i don`t want that onChange event to be fired... how can i walk around it??? Forgot to mention that i am actually using dijit.form.comboBox. for normal HTML form comboBox, it won`t cause any issue. Only i use the dijit comboBox, and i try to set the value to some other value, dojo will trigger the onChange.

    Read the article

  • Is there a way to know in VB.NET if a handler has been registered for an event?

    - by Seth Spearman
    In C# I can test for this... public event EventHandler Trigger; protected void OnTrigger(EventArgs e) { if (Trigger != null) Trigger(this, e); } Is there a way to do this in VB.NET? Test for null I mean? MORE INFO I forgot to mention. I have classes written in C# but I am writing my unit tests in VB.NET. I am trying this in the unit test... If myObject.Trigger IsNot Nothing Then 'do something End If This is causing a compile time error which says ... "Public Event Trigger is an Event and cannot be called directly. Use the RaiseEvent statement to raise an event." Seth

    Read the article

  • Remove preceeding tag

    - by Hulk
    If there is a tag as <p id="name" onclick="javascript:var ele=context(this);">sumtext here</p><br> <p id="name" onclick="javascript:var ele=context(this);">newtext here</p><br> <script> function context(obj) { var b = document.getelementbyID("area"); b.removeChild(obj); //How to remove the preceeding element i.e,<br> } </script> <textarea id='area' rows="4" cols="70"></textarea> <p> and <br> are not in a div and so if i remove <p> how to remove the preceding tag br from javascript

    Read the article

  • is it possible to tell if DOM was modified, and which part?

    - by mkoryak
    Are there any practical ways to tell what part of the DOM was modified if you know that it will be modified? I am writing a plugin that will be running along with javascript that i did not write. an event will be triggered before DOM is modified, and one event will be triggered after the modification. It is my job to decide what was changed. is this possible, and if so what is the least horrible way to do this?

    Read the article

  • getting value of another tag

    - by Hulk
    In the below code onclick edit how can the value of tag test be obtained in the edit function. <script> function edit(a) { } var a= <tr class="clickable"><td id="userval" BGCOLOR="#FF6699"><label id="test">' + a + '</lable>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <IMG SRC="edit.gif" onclick="javascript:edit(test.value);" > ></td></tr> </script> Thanks.

    Read the article

  • Doing Cross-platform builds with Qt Creator

    - by Joe Cannatti
    I am working on a desktop application using the Qt framework and Qt Creator IDE. I am doing my development on mac, and would like to begin testing on Windows as well. I am having trouble finding documentation on how do this. What's is the best way to develop on mac and automate windows builds of a Qt Creator project?

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164  | Next Page >