Search Results

Search found 18606 results on 745 pages for 'mysql comments'.

Page 173/745 | < Previous Page | 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180  | Next Page >

• Select between dates with wildcard mysql

  - by Michael

  Hi, I am trying to select between two dates, but in the table they have timestamps after them. Example: calldate is 2010-03-16 22:43:28 How would I select this using calldate between '$date1' AND '$date2' to wildcard the timestamp after the date? I tried using like but it didn't work I just want to do between '$date1%' AND '$date2%' Anyone know how to do this? Thank you in advance!

  Read the article

• mysql select update

  - by Tillebeck

  Got this: Table a ID RelatedBs 1 NULL 2 NULL Table b AID ID 1 1 1 2 1 3 2 4 2 5 2 6 Need Table a to have a comma separated list as given in table b. And then table b will become obsolete: Table a ID RelatedBs 1 1,2,3 2 4,5,6 This does not rund through all records, but just ad one 'b' to 'table a' UPDATE a, b SET relatedbs = CONCAT(relatedbs,',',b.id) WHERE a.id = b.aid

  Read the article

• MYSQL - Retrieve Results by Date Proximity

  - by aSeptik

  Hi All! ;-) my question is: assuming we have a calendar_table with UNIX datestamp date_column, i want retrieve the event with the closest proximity to the today date. So, for example if there is no event today, keep the closest one based on it's date! Thanks All you guys! ;-)

  Read the article

• MySQL slow query

  - by andrhamm

  SELECT items.item_id, items.category_id, items.title, items.description, items.quality, items.type, items.status, items.price, items.posted, items.modified, zip_code.state_prefix, zip_code.city, books.isbn13, books.isbn10, books.authors, books.publisher FROM ( ( items LEFT JOIN bookitems ON items.item_id = bookitems.item_id ) LEFT JOIN books ON books.isbn13 = bookitems.isbn13 ) LEFT JOIN zip_code ON zip_code.zip_code = items.item_zip WHERE items.rid = $rid` I am running this query to get the list of a user's items and their location. The zip_code table has over 40k records and this might be the issue. It currently takes up to 15 seconds to return a list of about 20 items! What can I do to make this query more efficient?

  Read the article

• MySQL: Transactions across multiple threads

  - by Zombies

  Preliminary: I have an application which maintains a thread pool of about 100 threads. Each thread can last about 1-30 seconds before a new task replaces it. When a thread end, that thread almost always will result in inserting 1-3 records into a table, this table is used by all of the threads. Right now, no transactional support exists, but I am trying to add that now. So... Goal I want to implement a transaction for this. The rules for whether or not this transaction commits or rollback reside in the main thread. Basically there is a simple function that will return a boolean. Can I implement a transaction across multiple connections? If not, can multiple threads share the same connection? (Note: there are a LOT of inserts going on here, and that is a requirement).

  Read the article

• problems with mysql "or"

  - by Simon

  i have a problem with "and" "or" syntax!!! here is my query. . . SELECT `act1`.`name`, `act1`.`surname`, `act2`.`name`, `act2`.`surname`, `act3`.`name`, `act3`.`surname` FROM videos, actors AS act1, actors AS act2, actors AS act3 WHERE videos.ident = 'somethink' AND ( act1.id = videos.id_actor1 OR act2.id = videos.id_actor2 OR act3.id = videos.id_actor3 ) it returns me all variations of {name, surname}, but why!!! i want the name and surname of first axactly, second and thirth, if they exist!!! halp me please

  Read the article

• Sorting MySQL results within a resultset

  - by InnateDev

  I have a resultset of lets say 10 results. 3 of them have a type 'Pears', and the next 3 have a type 'Apples' and the next three have a type of 'Bananas'. The last record has a type of 'Squeezing Equipment' - unrelated to the fruits. How do I return this set of results (for pagination too) in a GROUPED order that I specify WITHOUT using any inherent sort factor like ALPHABETA or ID etc? I have the all types at my disposal before running the code so they can be specified. i.e. ID | Bananas ID | Bananas ID | Bananas ID | Apples ID | Apples ID | Apples ID | Pears ID | Pears ID | Pears ID | Squeezing Equipment

  Read the article

• MySQL: Complex Join Statement involving two tables and a third correlation table

  - by Stephen

  I have two tables that were built for two disparate systems. I have records in one table (called "leads") that represent customers, and records in another table (called "manager") that are the exact same customers but "manager" uses different fields (For example, "leads" contains an email address, and "manager" contains two fields for two different emails--either of which might be the email from "leads"). So, I've created a correlation table that contains the lead_id and manager_id. currently this correlation table is empty. I'm trying to query the "leads" table to give me records that match either "manager" email field with the single "leads" email field, while at the same time ignoring fields that have already been added to the "correlated" table. (this way I can see how many leads that match have not yet been correlated.) Here's my current, invalid SQL attempt: SELECT leads.id, manager.id FROM leads, manager LEFT OUTER JOIN correlation ON correlation.lead_id = leads.id WHERE correlation.id IS NULL AND leads.project != "someproject" AND (manager.orig_email = leads.email OR manager.dest_email = leads.email) AND leads.created BETWEEN '1999-01-01 00:00:00' AND '2010-05-10 23:59:59' ORDER BY leads.created ASC; I get the error: Unknown column 'leads.id' in 'on clause' Before you wonder: there are records in the "leads" table where leads.project != "someproject" and leads.created falls between those dates. I've included those additional parameters for completeness.

  Read the article

• MYSQL: Simplify this Query for better performance

  - by Treby

  How can i simplify this code. coz this uses subquerying SELECT ub.id_product as c_pid,DATE(ub.datetime_prchs)AS datePurchased,cb.bookname, (SELECT GROUP_CONCAT(c.userid ORDER BY c.userid ASC SEPARATOR ', ') FROM user_books ub INNER JOIN campus_bookinfo cb ON ub.id_product=cb.idx_campus_bookinfo LEFT JOIN customer c ON ub.id_customer=c.id_customer WHERE ub.id_product = c_pid )as buyer, cb.iAmount FROM user_books ub INNER JOIN campus_bookinfo cb ON ub.id_product=cb.idx_campus_bookinfo LEFT JOIN customer c ON ub.id_customer=c.id_customer WHERE ub.id_customer = 29 GROUP BY bookname ORDER BY ub.datetime_prchs I need a better code for the same output.. Thanks in advance

  Read the article

• IE Conditional Comments: lt IE 7 = lte IE 6?

  - by lucas

  Hi! Are there any differences using <!--[if lt IE 7]>...<![endif]--> or <!--[if lte IE 6]>...<![endif]--> ?

  Read the article

• MySQL where condition but not limited by it

  - by Manny Calavera

  Hello. I would like to run a query on my database like this: SELECT SUM( t1.value ) AS total1, SUM( t2.value ) AS total2, SUM( t3.value ) AS total3, SUM( t4.value ) AS total4 FROM pay1 t1, pay2 t2, pay3 t3, pay4 t4 WHERE t1.date = '2010-04-29' AND t2.date = '2010-04-29' AND t3.date = '2010-04-29' AND t4.date = '2010-04-29' I am generating a report on payments and I would like to see a total of payments from each table based on the matching date. The problem is that some of the tables would not meet the condition of date and I want them to show up with 0 value if not. Currently, if any of the tables does not match the date, I get 0 results. I want to display value of 0 anywhere the date is not met and other fields should appear with the found values. The perfect operand for me would be "ANDOR" so that it won't be limited by any date that doesn't math in any table. Unfortunately, ANDOR does not exist as I am aware of so what should I do ? Can anyone help ? Thanks.

  Read the article

• php, mySQL - how to create a table?

  - by user296516

  Hi guys, I have written a code that should check weather there is a table called imei.$addimei and, if not, create it... $userdatabase = mysqli_connect('localhost', 'root', 'marina', 'imei'); ... $result = mysqli_query($userdatabase, "SELECT * FROM imei".$addimei."" ); if ( !$result ) { echo('creating table...'); /// if no such table, make one! mysql_query ( $userdatabase, 'CREATE TABLE imei'.$addimei.'( ID int NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT, PRIMARY KEY(ID), EVENT varchar(15), TIME varchar(25), FLD1 varchar(35), FLD2 varchar(35), IP varchar(25), )' ); } Yet the CREATE TABLE somehow doesn't seem to work. Warning: mysql_query() expects parameter 1 to be string, object given in C:\xampp\xampp\htdocs\mobi\mainmenu.php on line 564 Any idea's what wrong? Thanks!

  Read the article

• mySQL one-to-many query

  - by Stomped

  I've got 3 tables that are something like this (simplified here ofc): users user_id user_name info info_id user_id rate contacts contact_id user_id contact_data users has a one-to-one relationship with info, although info doesn't always have a related entry. users has a one-to-many relationship with contacts, although contacts doesn't always have related entries. I know I can grab the proper 'users' + 'info' with a left join, is there a way to get all the data I want at once? For example, one returned record might be: user_id: 5 user_name: tom info_id: 1 rate: 25.00 contact_id: 7 contact_data: 555-1212 contact_id: 8 contact_data: 555-1315 contact_id: 9 contact_data: 555-5511 Is this possible with a single query? Or must I use multiple?

  Read the article

• Problem importing mysql triggers generated from mysqldump

  - by OM The Eternity

  I am using phpmyadmin for using the mysqldump query, but as per my requirement i have to create a new database which is clone of the previous one, now in this case when i import the main DB it contain all the trigger information as well with the DB name mentioned in it.. As i import this DB to new one my triggers get imported as well but the trigger_schema are not changed as per new DB.. What could be done to get resolve this problem?

  Read the article

• Multiple many-to-many JOINs in a single mysql query without Cartesian Product

  - by VWD

  At the moment I can get the results I need with two seperate SELECT statements SELECT COUNT(rl.refBiblioID) FROM biblioList bl LEFT JOIN refList rl ON bl.biblioID = rl.biblioID GROUP BY bl.biblioID SELECT GROUP_CONCAT( CONCAT_WS( ':', al.lastName, al.firstName ) ORDER BY al.authorID ) FROM biblioList bl LEFT JOIN biblio_author ba ON ba.biblioID = bl.biblioID JOIN authorList al ON al.authorID = ba.authorID GROUP BY bl.biblioID Combining them like this however SELECT GROUP_CONCAT( CONCAT_WS( ':', al.lastName, al.firstName ) ORDER BY al.authorID ), COUNT(rl.refBiblioID) FROM biblioList bl LEFT JOIN biblio_author ba ON ba.biblioID = bl.biblioID JOIN authorList al ON al.authorID = ba.authorID LEFT JOIN refList rl ON bl.biblioID = rl.biblioID GROUP BY bl.biblioID causes the author result column to have duplicate names. How can I get the desired results from one SELECT statement without using DISTINCT? With subqueries?

  Read the article

• mysql query: SELECT DISTINCT column1, GROUP BY column2

  - by Adam

  Right now I have the following query: SELECT name, COUNT(name), time, price, ip, SUM(price) FROM tablename WHERE time >= $yesterday AND time <$today GROUP BY name And what I'd like to do is add a DISTINCT by column 'ip', i.e. SELECT DISTINCT ip FROM tablename So my final output would be all the columns, from all the rows that where time is today, grouped by name (with name count for each repeating name) and no duplicate ip addresses. What should my query look like? (or alternatively, how can I add the missing filter to the output with php)? Thanks in advance.

  Read the article

• Mysql : Count Posts and Group by date

  - by Oguz

  Hello , I am not very good at sql , generally I use php to do my complicated tasks , But in this task , there are lots of data , so using php for counting posts is very slow. So I want a sql which counts post by date , but my date column in table is php's time stamp.I will crate post number x date chart

  Read the article

• mysql result set joining existing table

  - by Yang

  is there any way to avoid using tmp table? I am using a query with aggregate function (sum) to generate the sum of each product: the result looks like this: product_name | sum(qty) product_1 | 100 product_2 | 200 product_5 | 300 now i want to join the above result to another table called products. so that i will have a summary like this: product_name | sum(qty) product_1 | 100 product_2 | 200 product_3 | 0 product_4 | 0 product_5 | 300 i know 1 way of doing this is the dump the 1st query result to a temp table then join it with products table. is there a better way?

  Read the article

• Problem with WHERE columnName = Data in MySQL query in C#

  - by Ryan Sullivan

  I have a C# webservice on a Windows Server that I am interfacing with on a linux server with PHP. The PHP grabs information from the database and then the page offers a "more information" button which then calls the webservice and passes in the name field of the record as a parameter. So i am using a WHERE statement in my query so I only pull the extra fields for that record. I am getting the error: System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException:Invalid column name '42' Where 42 is the value from the name field from the database. my query is string selectStr = "SELECT name, castNotes, triviaNotes FROM tableName WHERE name =\"" + show + "\""; I do not know if it is a problem with my query or something is wrong with the database, but here is the rest of my code for reference. NOTE: this all works perfectly when I grab all of the records, but I only want to grab the record that I ask my webservice for. public class ktvService : System.Web.Services.WebService { [WebMethod] public string moreInfo(string show) { string connectionStr = "MyConnectionString"; string selectStr = "SELECT name, castNotes, triviaNotes FROM tableName WHERE name =\"" + show + "\""; SqlConnection conn = new SqlConnection(connectionStr); SqlDataAdapter da = new SqlDataAdapter(selectStr, conn); DataSet ds = new DataSet(); da.Fill(ds, "tableName"); DataTable dt = ds.Tables["tableName"]; DataRow theShow = dt.Rows[0]; string response = "Name: " + theShow["name"].ToString() + "Cast: " + theShow["castNotes"].ToString() + " Trivia: " + theShow["triviaNotes"].ToString(); return response; } }

  Read the article

• Mysql eliminate user based on conditions

  - by Dustin

  I asked this last week over the weekend and it got buried in the archives before anyone could answer. So forgive me if you've already seen this. I teach classes and want to be able to select those students who have taken one class, but not another class. I have two tables: lessons_slots which is the table for every class such as: -------------------- -ID name slots- -1 basics 10 - -2 advanced 10 - -3 basics 10 - --------------------- The other table is class_roll, which holds enrollment info, such as: -------------------- -sID classid firstname lastname- -1 1 Jo Schmo -2 1 Person Two ... -13 2 Jo Schmo --------------------- What I want to do, I select everyone who has not had the advanced class (for example). I've tried doing SELECT * FROM lessons_slots LEFT JOIN class_roll ON lessons_slots.ID = class_roll.classid WHERE lessons_slots.name != 'advanced' But that doesn't work...All it does is eliminate that row, without eliminating the user. I want Jo Schmo, for example, to not show up in the results. Any ideas?

  Read the article

• Fast data retrieval in MySQL

  - by trojanwarrior3000

  I have a table of users - It contains around millions of rows (user-id is the primary key). I just want to retrieve user-id and their joining date. Using SELECT user-id, joining-date FROM users requires lot of time. Is there a fast way to query/retrieve the same data from this table?

  Read the article

• MySQL: updating a row and deleting the original in case it becomes a duplicate

  - by Silvio Donnini

  I have a simple table made up of two columns: col_A and col_B. The primary key is defined over both. I need to update some rows and assign to col_A values that may generate duplicates, for example: UPDATE `table` SET `col_A` = 66 WHERE `col_B` = 70 This statement sometimes yields a duplicate key error. I don't want to simply ignore the error with UPDATE IGNORE, because then the rows that generate the error would remain unchanged. Instead, I want them to be deleted when they would conflict with another row after they have been updated I'd like to write something like: UPDATE `table` SET `col_A` = 66 WHERE `col_B` = 70 ON DUPLICATE KEY REPLACE which unfortunately isn't legal in SQL, so I need help finding another way around. Also, I'm using PHP and could consider a hybrid solution (i.e. part query part php code), but keep in mind that I have to perform this updating operation many millions of times. thanks for your attention, Silvio Reminder: UPDATE's syntax has problems with joins with the same table that is being updated

  Read the article

• PHP Serialize Function - Adding serialized data to mysql and then fetch and display

  - by Abhilash Shukla

  I want to know whether the PHP serialize function is 100% secure, also if we store serialized data into a database and want to do something after fetching it, will it be a nice way. For example:- I have a website with different user privileges, now i want to store the permissions settings for a particular privilege to my database (This data i want to store is to be done through php serialize function), now when a user logs in i want to fetch this data and set the privilege for the customer. Now i am ok to do this thing, what i want to know is, whether it is the best way to do or something more efficient can be done. Also, i was going through php manual and found this code, can anybody explain me a bit what's happening in this code:- [Specially why base64_encode is used?] <?php mySerialize( $obj ) { return base64_encode(gzcompress(serialize($obj))); } myUnserialize( $txt ) { return unserialize(gzuncompress(base64_decode($txt))); } ?> Also if somebody can provide me their own code to show me to do this thing in the most efficient manner. Thanks.

  Read the article

• Mysql Left Join Null Result

  - by Ozzy

  I have this query SELECT articles.*, users.username AS `user` FROM `articles` LEFT JOIN `users` ON articles.user_id = users.id ORDER BY articles.timestamp Basically it returns the list of articles and the username that the article is associated to. Now if there is no entry in the users table for a particular user id, the users var is NULL. Is there anyway to make it that if its null it returns something like "User Not Found"? or would i have to do this using php?

  Read the article

• Sha1 mysql proper settings

  - by Doodle

  What are the proper settings for storing a password that has been run through sha1?

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180  | Next Page >