Search Results

Search found 20221 results on 809 pages for 'browser plugin'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 175/809 | < Previous Page | 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182  | Next Page >

  • Accessing ASP.NET Development Server from another pc on the network

    - by Paul Knopf
    I would like to test my web app in other browsers. I have installed Virtual PC to do just that. the ASP.NET development server does not allow remote connections so the virtual pc (another computer on the network) cannot access the website. I found this post that was started but there was no solution. I understand that using localhost will not work. I heard about using the machines ip, but how do I get that correct ip? Look at my lynksys router admin? If I were to get as far as getting my IP, im sure that the asp.net dev server does not allow remote connections. How do I enable it to do so?

    Read the article

  • How does IE8 handle xml header.

    - by markovuksanovic
    I was wondering where I can find some information how IE8 actually handles xml header... for example how is handling <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> different to <?xml version="1.0"?>. One other questions would be how FF handles those header. How is that different to IE8. I am almost 100% sure that they handle them differently but am still doing some research. /Marko

    Read the article

  • Safari 5 vs. Safari 4 : Are there any compatibility differences?

    - by Cole
    I recently obtained a Mac so I could test our sites on Safari and Firefox for Mac OS. Now that Safari 5 is out, I'm not sure what I should do about upgrading. I presume what works on Safari 5 works on Safari 4, but I can't be sure, and vice versa. So, I don't know if I should upgrade and test on Safari 5 or keep on with Safari 4. Are there any major differences between these two version in terms of CSS (2.1) handling or JavaScript? When do you think the majority of people will have Safari 5 instead of 4? All thoughts appreciated.

    Read the article

  • Future of IE9: Opacity + Performance

    - by chris_l
    I just tried the IE9 "Second Internet Explorer Platform Preview" - which supports CSS opacity now. That's nice, but I tried it with one of my website prototypes, and it's quite slow when scrolling etc. Admittedly, the prototype uses hundreds of images with opacity != 1, but everything is snappy with current versions of Firefox, Safari, Chrome and Opera. Does anybody know, if there are plans for IE9 to become faster in this area? Even rumours about this would be interesting in this case.

    Read the article

  • c# open webrowser in many tab

    - by tee
    how can i create tab tab1 open samsung.com tab2 open hp.com ... using System; using System.Collections.Generic; using System.ComponentModel; using System.Data; using System.Drawing; using System.Linq; using System.Text; using System.Windows.Forms; namespace browsergotosamsung { public partial class Form1 : Form { public Form1() { InitializeComponent(); } private void Form1_Load(object sender, EventArgs e) { webBrowser1.Navigate("http://www.samsung.com"); webBrowser2.Navigate("http://www.hp.com"); webBrowser3.Navigate("http://www.IBM.com"); } private void webBrowser1_DocumentCompleted(object sender, WebBrowserDocumentCompletedEventArgs e) { } private void webBrowser3_DocumentCompleted(object sender, WebBrowserDocumentCompletedEventArgs e) { } private void webBrowser2_DocumentCompleted(object sender, WebBrowserDocumentCompletedEventArgs e) { webBrowser2.Size } } }

    Read the article

  • Setting html controller to right side in firefox extension

    - by Yashwant Kumar Sahu
    Hi Expert, I am creating Mozilla extension. Here I need to set button controller right side in extension. Here I divide XUL file to div element. I have take a main div element and inside this i have take two more inner div. Then I have set one inner div style property float:left; and another div style property float:right. But this is not helpful for me. Here I also set Button CSS style property float:right which is inside the div which have property float:right. Awaiting for your response. Thanks in advance

    Read the article

  • Why does this Javascript work in FF3.6? new Date("2010-06-09T19:20:30+01:00");

    - by thegaw
    Here's the sample code: var d = new Date("2010-06-09T19:20:30+01:00"); document.write(d); On FF3.6 this will give you: Wed Jun 09 2010 14:20:30 GMT-0400 (EST) Other browers tested; Chrome 5, Safari 4, IE7 give: Invalid Date I know there is limited to no support for ISO8601 dates, but does anyone know what and/or where the difference is in FF3.6 that allows this to work? My thought is that FF is just stripping out what it doesn't understand while the others are not. Has anyone else seen this and/or getting different results from the test script?

    Read the article

  • Are these Mozilla-specific CSS styles doing anything?

    - by DisgruntledGoat
    I'm working with some CSS (from a Joomla template) like this: div#logo { -moz-background-clip: border; -moz-background-inline-policy: continuous; -moz-background-origin: padding; background: transparent url(../images/head.png) no-repeat scroll 0 0; ... } I've looked up some of those -moz- properties and they seem to be assigned their default values, and if I turn them off in Firebug nothing happens visibly. Would there be a reason to add them to a CSS file? Are they for an old version of Firefox perhaps?

    Read the article

  • Why does a checkbox remain checked in FF3 but not in IE, Chrome or ...

    - by sirrocco
    So - I have a checkbox <asp:CheckBox ID="chkOrder" runat="server" Visible='<%#IsCheckBoxVisible() %>' Checked="false" OnCheckedChanged="chkOrder_CheckedChanged" AutoPostBack="true" EnableViewState="false"></asp:CheckBox> the one above. Now, the checkbox is in a gridview and on databound - for all the rows in the gridview the checkbox is set to false. The problem is that the first checkbox is still true checked. In IE the problem doesn't exist, same for Chrome. I'm running out of options. Also if i use $("checkboxName").attr("checked"); // verified on jquery ready function. In FF it is true; IE false; Chrome false. Any tips? EDIT Now get ready for this : in the generated html - there is NO checked attribute. The diff between FF and IE is exactly the same. Another thing - the grid that contains the checkboxes has an ajax panel on it and when I page the grid, try to go to page 2 - the checkedChanged in codebehind is triggered.

    Read the article

  • What's the current (as of April 2010) state of affairs regarding <object> vs <embed> in HTML?

    - by rvdm
    The age old question. <object> vs <embed>. From what I gather, <object> is the XHTML-compliant way of doing things, while <embed> is for legacy support. I'm currently building a Flash application that will contain a pre-made embedding code for users to copy and paste, and I'm wondering if it's feasible to simply dump the <embed> tag altogether. Which browsers would be unable to load my application if I gave my users an <object>-only embed code? Thanks :)

    Read the article

  • 3 div independently relative and top aligned

    - by Knu
    I have 3 div top aligned that should be relative to a previous div (not between them so i can't use floats or position:inline-block either). If you set display:none on 2 divs the last one shouldn't move. I can't use position:absolute because there's a relative footer underneath. I tried using a wrapper but it can't work cause the height of the divs is not fixed. The height of the wrapper gets completely ignored anyway (by the following footer) unless Im using relative children. vertical-align:top doesn't work either. Any ideas?

    Read the article

  • what is the relation between actual pixels and html(css) pixels in blackberry?

    - by HelpMeToHelpYou
    I am implementing one phonegap application. here everything going fine but when i am talking device specifications like 1)BlackBerry Bold Touch 9900 Screen specifications are as following Body Dimensions 115 x 66 x 10.5 mm (4.53 x 2.60 x 0.41 in) Weight 130 g (4.59 oz) Keyboard QWERTY Display Type TFT capacitive touchscreen, 16M colors Size 640 x 480 pixels, 2.8 inches (~286 ppi pixel density) But when i test following function in java script function findScreenSize() { alert("width:"+window.innerWidth +"Height:"+ window.innerHeight); } it displaying SIZE width : 356 Height : 267 (356 x 267) 2)BlackBerry Bold Touch 9930 Screen specifications are as following Body Dimensions 115 x 66 x 10.5 mm (4.53 x 2.60 x 0.41 in) Weight 130 g (4.59 oz) Keyboard QWERTY - Touch-sensitive controls Display Type TFT capacitive touchscreen, 16M colors Size 640 x 480 pixels, 2.8 inches (~286 ppi pixel density) then i run same javaScript function i got following output it displaying SIZE width : 417 Height : 313 (417 x 313) why it is behaving like this ? Can anybody know relation between core pixel and HTML pixel please give answer

    Read the article

  • Memory leak in Mozilla when unloading stylesheets

    - by KaptajnKold
    I'm working with Mozilla v1.7.12 on a constrained device (a Motorola set-top box) trying to resolve some memory leaks. When I dynamically load a stylesheet which refers to some large images, I can see that the amount of consumed memory increases in correspondance with the size of the images. This is what I would expect. Then, when I remove the stylesheet from the DOM, I would expect the memory to be freed. However, this does not happen. This is a problem, because the web application I'm working on needs to be able to dynamically load and and unload stylesheets potentially many times in the lifetime of the page. My question therefore is this: Is what I'm seeing expected behavior or is it a known bug? Is there a way to work around this? I should point out that I've set the expires header to -1 on all the images in the stylesheet.

    Read the article

  • Production ready alternative to Microsoft Doloto (Javascript minifier/prefetcher)?

    - by usr
    As you surely know Microsoft Doloto is tool which profiles you javascript code as it actually runs on the page and splits it in to two files: one file will be statically included in the footer of the page which contains stubs for all functions and loads the actual implementations (in file 2) in the background (under the assumption that only very litte javascript is needed on page load so you can defer downloading the rest). I found Doloto not to be production ready, it meanwhile has been canceled afaik. Is there a working alternative?

    Read the article

  • Can anyone tell why Wordpress is adding this p tag?

    - by Elliott Samuel Lemberger
    Here's the page: http://www.gammagoochee.com/media/ WP is adding a p tag on line 55 between the end of my header and the beginning of my post content. I am using Raw HTML Pro, and the post starts with content surrounded by [raw] tags. There is no content between the last tag in my header, and the beginning of my post. This doesn't happen on my other site pages, and the only difference is that this page is using a template, but the template is the same in this part of the page. All the template does differently than the other site pages is add a sidebar. Anyone have any ideas whatsoever why WP is adding this p tag, and/or how I can prevent it? Thanks so much!

    Read the article

  • What is the best way to prevent a webpage coded completely in HTML (no PHP or any server side langua

    - by racl101
    I thought by placing these two lines that it would prevent the page from being cached but this is not the case between the head tags: <meta http-equiv="pragma" content="no-cache" /> <meta http-equiv="cache-control" content="no-cache" /> As already mentioned this is on server that doesn't support PHP (or any server side language, well, that's not true, it has cgi-bin folder that supports perl scripts but I don't know perl and have no time to engage in it.) What else could I do to prevent the page from caching? It caches on Firefox and IE (and not so much in Chrome or Safari.)

    Read the article

  • getting page info from a webpage while sharing facebook style

    - by user556167
    Hi all. I am writing an app to share a page to friends when browsing. To this end, I can get the url of the page to my app and display it on the screen. Could anyone tell me, how to improve this, to show the headline of the page and the picture of a page as it appears when a page is being shared to friends on facebook. Here is the code to get and display the url of the page: Intent intent = getIntent(); String action = intent.getAction(); String type = intent.getType(); String mNewLinkUrl=""; if (action != null && type != null && Intent.ACTION_SEND.equals(action) && "text/plain".equals(type)){ mNewLinkUrl = intent.getStringExtra(Intent.EXTRA_TEXT); } TextView ptext = (TextView) findViewById(R.id.pagetext); ptext.append("\n"+mNewLinkUrl); Any insight will be appreciated. //update 1 found a method: use Jsoup to download the html as a Document. And use Elements and Element to get the data. For eg, the following is the code to get the links in imports in the html page: Elements imports = doc.select("link[href]"); for (Element link : imports) { Log.d(TAG,"link.tagName()"+link.tagName()+"link.attr(abs:href)"+link.attr("abs:href") +"link.attr(rel)"+link.attr("rel")); } But I am not able to figure out what attributes facebook exactly gets. Can anyone help me in this? Thank you.

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182  | Next Page >