Search Results

Search found 23804 results on 953 pages for 'void pointer'.

Page 179/953 | < Previous Page | 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186  | Next Page >

  • ASP.NET MVC and ApplicationPath

    - by user93422
    Question is about paths and domains: I have an out-of-the box ASP.NET MVC project (generated by "File-New Project"). On LogOn page it does: return Redirect("~/Account/LogOn");. I have a domain name: mycompany.com, and following file structure on the server: /Root /MyApp (this is where my app goes into) Default.aspx ... I have set up following domain pointer: mycompany.com -> \MyApp When I go to mycompany.com I get an error, something about can't find mycompany.com/MyApp/MyApp/Account/LogOn Question: Where does second /MyApp path element comes from? Note: If I don't use domain pointer and deploy the site to the root - everything works just fine. Note: My hosting provider is webhost4life.com.

    Read the article

  • How to create a container that holds different types of function pointers in C++?

    - by Alex
    I'm doing a linear genetic programming project, where programs are bred and evolved by means of natural evolution mechanisms. Their "DNA" is basically a container (I've used arrays and vectors successfully) which contain function pointers to a set of functions available. Now, for simple problems, such as mathematical problems, I could use one type-defined function pointer which could point to functions that all return a double and all take as parameters two doubles. Unfortunately this is not very practical. I need to be able to have a container which can have different sorts of function pointers, say a function pointer to a function which takes no arguments, or a function which takes one argument, or a function which returns something, etc (you get the idea)... Is there any way to do this using any kind of container ? Could I do that using a container which contains polymorphic classes, which in their turn have various kinds of function pointers? I hope someone can direct me towards a solution because redesigning everything I've done so far is going to be painful.

    Read the article

  • May volatile be in user defined types to help writing thread-safe code

    - by David Rodríguez - dribeas
    I know, it has been made quite clear in a couple of questions/answers before, that volatile is related to the visible state of the c++ memory model and not to multithreading. On the other hand, this article by Alexandrescu uses the volatile keyword not as a runtime feature but rather as a compile time check to force the compiler into failing to accept code that could be not thread safe. In the article the keyword is used more like a required_thread_safety tag than the actual intended use of volatile. Is this (ab)use of volatile appropriate? What possible gotchas may be hidden in the approach? The first thing that comes to mind is added confusion: volatile is not related to thread safety, but by lack of a better tool I could accept it. Basic simplification of the article: If you declare a variable volatile, only volatile member methods can be called on it, so the compiler will block calling code to other methods. Declaring an std::vector instance as volatile will block all uses of the class. Adding a wrapper in the shape of a locking pointer that performs a const_cast to release the volatile requirement, any access through the locking pointer will be allowed. Stealing from the article: template <typename T> class LockingPtr { public: // Constructors/destructors LockingPtr(volatile T& obj, Mutex& mtx) : pObj_(const_cast<T*>(&obj)), pMtx_(&mtx) { mtx.Lock(); } ~LockingPtr() { pMtx_->Unlock(); } // Pointer behavior T& operator*() { return *pObj_; } T* operator->() { return pObj_; } private: T* pObj_; Mutex* pMtx_; LockingPtr(const LockingPtr&); LockingPtr& operator=(const LockingPtr&); }; class SyncBuf { public: void Thread1() { LockingPtr<BufT> lpBuf(buffer_, mtx_); BufT::iterator i = lpBuf->begin(); for (; i != lpBuf->end(); ++i) { // ... use *i ... } } void Thread2(); private: typedef vector<char> BufT; volatile BufT buffer_; Mutex mtx_; // controls access to buffer_ };

    Read the article

  • How do I specify the block object / predicate required by NSDictionary's keysOfEntriesPassingTest ?

    - by Todd
    For learning (not practical -- yet) purposes, I'd like to use the following method on an NSDictionary to give me back a set of keys that have values using a test I've defined. Unfortunately have no idea how to specify the predicate. NSDictionary keysOfEntriesPassingTest: - (NSSet *)keysOfEntriesPassingTest:(BOOL (^)(id key, id obj, BOOL *stop))predicate Let's say for example all my values are NSURLs, and I'd like to get back all the URLs that are on port 8080. Here's my stab at coding that -- though it doesn't really make sense to me that it'd be correct: NSSet * mySet = [myDict keysOfEntriesPassingTest:^(id key, id obj, BOOL *stop) { if( [[obj port] isEqual: [NSNumber numberWithInt: 8080]]) { return key; }] And that's because I get back the following compiler error: incompatible block pointer types initializing 'void (^)(struct objc_object *, struct objc_object *, BOOL *)', expected 'BOOL (^)(struct objc_object *, struct objc_object *, BOOL *)' What am I missing? I'd appreciate a pointer at some docs that go into more detail about the "Block object" that the predicate is supposed to be. Thanks!

    Read the article

  • C: How come an array's address is equal to its value?

    - by Alexandre
    In the following bit of code, pointer values and pointer addresses differ as expected. But array values and addresses don't! How can this be? Output my_array = 0022FF00 &my_array = 0022FF00 pointer_to_array = 0022FF00 &pointer_to_array = 0022FEFC ... #include <stdio.h> int main() { char my_array[100] = "some cool string"; printf("my_array = %p\n", my_array); printf("&my_array = %p\n", &my_array); char *pointer_to_array = my_array; printf("pointer_to_array = %p\n", pointer_to_array); printf("&pointer_to_array = %p\n", &pointer_to_array); printf("Press ENTER to continue...\n"); getchar(); return 0; }

    Read the article

  • Objective-C member variable assignment?

    - by Alex
    I have an objective-c class with member variables. I am creating getters and setters for each one. Mostly for learning purposes. My setter looks like the following: - (void) setSomething:(NSString *)input { something = input; } However, in C++ and other languages I have worked with in the past, you can reference the member variable by using the this pointer like this->something = input. In objective-c this is known as self. So I was wondering if something like that is possible in objective-c? Something like this: - (void) setSomething:(NSString *)input { [self something] = input; } But that would call the getter for something. So I'm not sure. So my question is: Is there a way I can do assignment utilizing the self pointer? If so, how? Is this good practice or is it evil? Thanks!

    Read the article

  • Exception_Record in python2.5 problem

    - by amir
    I'm using Python2.5 & the following code produce 2 errors. Can any body help me? class EXCEPTION_RECORD(Structure): _fields_ = [ ("ExceptionCode", DWORD), ("ExceptionFlags", DWORD), ("ExceptionRecord", POINTER(EXCEPTION_RECORD)), ("ExceptionAddress", LPVOID), ("NumberParameters", DWORD), ("ExceptionInformation", ULONG_PTR * EXCEPTION_MAXIMUM_PARAMETERS)] Python Error: Traceback (most recent call last): File "E:\Python25\my_debugger_defines.py", line 70, in <module> class EXCEPTION_RECORD(Structure): File "E:\Python25\my_debugger_defines.py", line 74, in EXCEPTION_RECORD ("ExceptionRecord", POINTER(EXCEPTION_RECORD)), NameError: name 'EXCEPTION_RECORD' is not defined Microsoft Document: The EXCEPTION_RECORD structure describes an exception. typedef struct _EXCEPTION_RECORD { // exr DWORD ExceptionCode; DWORD ExceptionFlags; struct _EXCEPTION_RECORD *ExceptionRecord; PVOID ExceptionAddress; DWORD NumberParameters; DWORD ExceptionInformation[EXCEPTION_MAXIMUM_PARAMETERS]; } EXCEPTION_RECORD; Thanks in advance

    Read the article

  • 'whatever' has no declared type

    - by mihirpmehta
    i am developing parser using bison...in my grammar i am getting this error Here is a code extern NodePtr CreateNode(NodeType, ...); extern NodePtr ReplaceNode(NodeType, NodePtr); extern NodePtr MergeSubTrees(NodeType, ...); ................... NodePtr rootNodePtr = NULL; /* pointer to the root of the parse tree */ NodePtr nodePtr = NULL; /* pointer to an error node */ ........................... NodePtr mainMethodDecNodePtr = NULL; ................ /* YYSTYPE */ %union { NodePtr nodePtr; } i am getting this error whenever i use like $$.nodePtr or $1.nodePtr ... I am getting Parser.y:1302.32-33: $1 of `Expressi on' has no declared type

    Read the article

  • Virtual class problem

    - by ugur
    What i think about virtual class is, if a derived class has a public base, let's say, class base, then a pointer to derived can be assigned to a variable of type pointer to base without use of any explicit type conversion. But what if, we are inside of base class then how can we call derived class's functions. I will give an example: class Graph{ public: Graph(string); virtual bool addEdge(string,string); } class Direct:public Graph{ public: Direct(string); bool addEdge(string,string); } Direct::Direct(string filename):Graph(filename){}; When i call constructor of Direct class then it calls Graph. Now lets think Graph function calls addedge. Graph(string str){ addedge(str,str); } When it calls addedge, even if the function is virtual, it calls Graph::edge. What i want is, to call Direct::addedge. How can it be done?

    Read the article

  • VIrtual class problem

    - by ugur
    What i think about virtual class is, if a derived class has a public base, let's say, class base, then a pointer to derived can be assigned to a variable of type pointer to base without use of any explicit type conversion. But what if, we are inside of base class then how can we call derived class's functions. I will give an example: class Graph{ public: Graph(string); virtual bool addEdge(string,string); } class Direct:public Graph{ public: Direct(string); bool addEdge(string,string); } Direct::Direct(string filename):Graph(filename){}; When i call constructor of Direct class then it calls Graph. Now lets think Graph function calls addedge. Graph(string str){ addedge(str,str); } When it calls addedge, even if the function is virtual, it calls Graph::edge. What i want is, to call Direct::addedge. How can it be done?

    Read the article

  • While loop in IL - why stloc.0 and ldloc.0?

    - by Michael Stum
    I'm trying to understand how a while loop looks in IL. I have written this C# function: static void Brackets() { while (memory[pointer] > 0) { // Snipped body of the while loop, as it's not important } } The IL looks like this: .method private hidebysig static void Brackets() cil managed { // Code size 37 (0x25) .maxstack 2 .locals init ([0] bool CS$4$0000) IL_0000: nop IL_0001: br.s IL_0012 IL_0003: nop // Snipped body of the while loop, as it's not important IL_0011: nop IL_0012: ldsfld uint8[] BFHelloWorldCSharp.Program::memory IL_0017: ldsfld int16 BFHelloWorldCSharp.Program::pointer IL_001c: ldelem.u1 IL_001d: ldc.i4.0 IL_001e: cgt IL_0020: stloc.0 IL_0021: ldloc.0 IL_0022: brtrue.s IL_0003 IL_0024: ret } // end of method Program::Brackets For the most part this is really simple, except for the part after cgt. What I don't understand is the local [0] and the stloc.0/ldloc.0. As far as I see it, cgt pushes the result to the stack, stloc.0 gets the result from the stack into the local variable, ldloc.0 pushes the result to the stack again and brtrue.s reads from the stack. What is the purpose of doing this? Couldn't this be shortened to just cgt followed by brtrue.s?

    Read the article

  • const correctness

    - by ra170
    I was going through: C++ FAQs about inheritance and decided to implement it (just to learn it) #include "Shape.h" void Shape::print() const { float a = this->area(); // area() is pure virtual ... } now, everything (well, almost) works as described in item: faq:23.1 except that print() is const and so it can't access the "this" pointer, as soon as you take out const, it works. Now, C++ FAQs have been around for a while and are usually pretty good. Is this a mistake? Do they have typo or am I wrong? If I'm wrong, I would like to know how is it possible to access the "this" pointer in a const function.

    Read the article

  • C++: set of C-strings

    - by Nicholas
    I want to create one so that I could check whether a certain word is in the set using set::find However, C-strings are pointers, so the set would compare them by the pointer values by default. To function correctly, it would have to dereference them and compare the strings. I could just pass the constructor a pointer to the strcmp() function as a comparator, but this is not exactly how I want it to work. The word I might want to check could be part of a longer string, and I don't want to create a new string due to performance concerns. If there weren't for the set, I would use strncmp(a1, a2, 3) to check the first 3 letters. In fact, 3 is probably the longest it could go, so I'm fine with having the third argument constant. Is there a way to construct a set that would compare its elements by calling strncmp()? Code samples would be greatly appreciated.

    Read the article

  • How to maintain the state of button cutom listview in android

    - by Akshay
    I have custom ListView with three TextView three Button and three Chronometer. And the situation is I am loading the ListView properly.But while loading ListView I am disabling some button in the ListView by checking one parameter. Up to this point ListView is showing it's row properly. But when I am scrolling the ListView at that time previously enabled Button are getting disabled.What I am doing wrong I am not getting can one please point out my mistake Or any suggestion. Here is my Adapter class. public class OrderSmartKitchenAdapter extends BaseAdapter { private int flagDeliveryComplete = 0; private int flagPreparationComplete = 0; private int flagPreparationStarted = 0; private List<OrderitemdetailsBO> list = new ArrayList<OrderitemdetailsBO(); private int orderStatus; public OrderSmartKitchenAdapter() { // TODO Auto-generated constructor stub } public void setOrderList(List<OrderitemdetailsBO> orderList) { this.list = orderList; } @Override public int getCount() { // TODO Auto-generated method stub Log.i("OrderItemList Size :-", Integer.toString(list.size())); return list.size(); } @Override public Object getItem(int position) { // TODO Auto-generated method stub return null; } @Override public long getItemId(int position) { // TODO Auto-generated method stub return 0; } @Override public View getView(final int position, View convertView,ViewGroup parent) { // TODO Auto-generated method stub final ViewHolder viewHolder ; if (convertView == null) { layoutInflater = LayoutInflater.from(myContext); convertView = layoutInflater.inflate(R.layout.table_row_view,null); viewHolder = new ViewHolder(); viewHolder.txtTableNumber = (TextView) convertView.findViewById(R.id.txtTableNumber); viewHolder.txtMenuItem = (TextView) convertView.findViewById(R.id.txtMenuItem); viewHolder.txtQuantity = (TextView) convertView.findViewById(R.id.txtQuantity); viewHolder.txtOrderAcceptanceTime = (TextView) convertView.findViewById(R.id.txtOrderAcceptanceTime); viewHolder.txtElapsedTimeOfOrderAcceptance = (Chronometer) convertView.findViewById(R.id.txtElapsedTimeOfOrderAcceptance); viewHolder.btnPreparationStart = (Button) convertView.findViewById(R.id.btnPreparationStart); viewHolder.btnPreparationStart.setTag(position); viewHolder.txtElapsedTimeForPreparation = (Chronometer) convertView.findViewById(R.id.txtElapsedTimeForPrepatration); viewHolder.btnPreparationComplete = (Button) convertView.findViewById(R.id.btnPreparationCompleted); viewHolder.btnPreparationComplete.setTag(position); viewHolder.txtElapsedTimeForDeliveryComplete = (Chronometer) convertView.findViewById(R.id.txtElapsedTimeForCompleation); viewHolder.btnDeliveryComplete = (Button) convertView.findViewById(R.id.btnOrderComplete); viewHolder.btnDeliveryComplete.setTag(position); convertView.setTag(viewHolder); } else{ viewHolder = (ViewHolder)convertView.getTag(); viewHolder.btnDeliveryComplete.setTag(position); viewHolder.btnPreparationComplete.setTag(position); viewHolder.btnPreparationStart.setTag(position); } if (list.get(position) != null) { OrderitemdetailsBO orderitemdetailsBO = new OrderitemdetailsBO(); orderitemdetailsBO = list.get(position); viewHolder.txtTableNumber.setText(orderitemdetailsBO.getOrderitemid().toString()); viewHolder.txtMenuItem.setText(orderitemdetailsBO.getMenuitemname().toString()); viewHolder.txtQuantity.setText(orderitemdetailsBO.getQuantity().toString()); Log.i("Table Number :-", Long.toString(orderitemdetailsBO.getOrderitemid())); Log.i("Menu Name :-", orderitemdetailsBO.getMenuitemname().toString()); Log.i("Quantity", orderitemdetailsBO.getQuantity().toString()); Date acceptTime = new Date(); acceptTime = orderitemdetailsBO.getOrderdatetime(); viewHolder.txtOrderAcceptanceTime.setText(DateUtil.getDateAsString(acceptTime,"HH:mm")); Log.i("Order Accept Time :-", acceptTime.getMinutes() + ":"+ acceptTime.getSeconds()); orderStatus = orderitemdetailsBO.getOrderstatus(); Date preparationStartTime = new Date(); preparationStartTime = orderitemdetailsBO.getPreparationstarttime(); if(preparationStartTime != null) { Log.i("OrderSmartKitchenActivity", "2 Order Acceptance Time :-" + "Menu Item id "+ orderitemdetailsBO.getOrderitemid() + " Preparation Start time " + orderitemdetailsBO.getPreparationstarttime() ); viewHolder.txtElapsedTimeOfOrderAcceptance.stop(); Log.i("Preparation Start Time :-",preparationStartTime.getMinutes() + ":" + preparationStartTime.getSeconds()); viewHolder.txtElapsedTimeOfOrderAcceptance.setText(DateUtil.getDateAsString(preparationStartTime,"MM:ss")); viewHolder.txtElapsedTimeOfOrderAcceptance.stop(); viewHolder.btnPreparationStart.setEnabled(false); viewHolder.btnPreparationStart.setClickable(false); viewHolder.btnPreparationStart.setBackgroundColor(Color.LTGRAY); } else { Long n = acceptTime.getTime(); Log.i("OrderSmartKitchenActivity", "Order Acceptance Time :-" + "Menu Item id "+ orderitemdetailsBO.getOrderitemid() + " Acceptance time" + Long.toString(n) + " Preparation Start time " + orderitemdetailsBO.getPreparationstarttime() ); // Calculate Time difference viewHolder.txtElapsedTimeOfOrderAcceptance.setBase(SystemClock.elapsedRealtime() - System.currentTimeMillis() + n); viewHolder.txtElapsedTimeOfOrderAcceptance.getBase(); viewHolder.txtElapsedTimeOfOrderAcceptance.start(); viewHolder.txtElapsedTimeOfOrderAcceptance.setFormat("%s"); } viewHolder.btnPreparationStart.setOnClickListener(new OnClickListener() { @Override public void onClick(final View v) { // TODO Auto-generated method stub if (flagPreparationStarted == 0) { flagPreparationStarted++; v.startAnimation(playAnimation()); handler.postDelayed(new Runnable() { @Override public void run() { // TODO Auto-generated method stub v.clearAnimation(); Date currentTime = new Date(); // Set Preparation Start Time. viewHolder.txtElapsedTimeOfOrderAcceptance.stop(); Date setTime = new Date(currentTime.getTime() * 1000); OrderitemdetailsBO orderitemdetailsBO = list.get(position); orderitemdetailsBO.setPreparationstarttime(setTime); String orderDetails = "2"; String getPosition = Integer.toString(position); viewHolder.btnPreparationStart.setBackgroundColor(Color.LTGRAY); new sendOrderStatusToServer().execute(orderDetails,getPosition); } }, 5000); } else { handler.removeCallbacksAndMessages(null); v.clearAnimation(); flagPreparationStarted = 0; Log.i("Handler Removed. :-", "Here"); } } }); String preparationTime = orderitemdetailsBO.getOrderpreparationtime(); if(preparationTime != null && orderStatus == order_preparationComplete) { viewHolder.txtElapsedTimeForPreparation.setText(preparationTime); viewHolder.txtElapsedTimeForPreparation.stop(); viewHolder.btnPreparationComplete.getTag(position); viewHolder.btnPreparationComplete.setEnabled(false); viewHolder.btnPreparationComplete.setClickable(false); viewHolder.btnPreparationComplete.setBackgroundColor(Color.LTGRAY); } else if( orderStatus == order_preparationStart || orderStatus == orderReceived || orderStatus == order_delivered){ Long n = acceptTime.getTime(); Log.i("Preparation Start Time :-", Long.toString(n)); viewHolder.txtElapsedTimeForPreparation.setBase(SystemClock.elapsedRealtime() - System.currentTimeMillis() + n); viewHolder.txtElapsedTimeForPreparation.getBase(); viewHolder.txtElapsedTimeForPreparation.start(); viewHolder.txtElapsedTimeForPreparation.setFormat("%s"); } viewHolder.btnPreparationComplete.setOnClickListener(new OnClickListener() { @Override public void onClick(final View v) { // TODO Auto-generated method if (flagPreparationComplete == 0) { flagPreparationComplete++; v.startAnimation(playAnimation()); handler.postDelayed(new Runnable() { @Override public void run() { // TODO Auto-generated method stub v.clearAnimation(); OrderitemdetailsBO orderitemdetailsBO = list.get(position); Date date = orderitemdetailsBO.getPreparationstarttime(); if(date != null) { viewHolder.txtElapsedTimeForPreparation.stop(); Date currentTime = new Date(); Calendar calendar = Calendar.getInstance(); int minute = calendar.get(Calendar.MINUTE); int second = calendar.get(Calendar.SECOND); orderitemdetailsBO.setOrderpreparationtime(calendar.get(Calendar.MINUTE) +":" +calendar.get(Calendar.SECOND)); String orderDetails = "3"; String getPosition = Integer.toString(position); viewHolder.btnPreparationComplete.setBackgroundColor(Color.LTGRAY); new sendOrderStatusToServer().execute(orderDetails,getPosition); } else { Toast.makeText(myContext, "Please Enter Preparation Start Time.", Toast.LENGTH_LONG).show(); } } }, 5000); } else { handler.removeCallbacksAndMessages(null); v.clearAnimation(); flagPreparationComplete = 0; } } }); String deleveredTime = orderitemdetailsBO.getOrderdeliverytime(); if(deleveredTime != null && orderStatus == order_delivered) { Date delevered = new Date(Long.parseLong(deleveredTime)); viewHolder.txtElapsedTimeForPreparation.setText(DateUtil.getDateAsString(delevered,"MM:ss")); Log.i("Preparation Start Time :-", delevered.getMinutes()+":"+delevered.getSeconds()); viewHolder.txtElapsedTimeForPreparation.stop(); viewHolder.btnDeliveryComplete.getTag(position); viewHolder.btnDeliveryComplete.setEnabled(false); viewHolder.btnDeliveryComplete.setClickable(false); viewHolder.btnDeliveryComplete.setBackgroundColor(Color.LTGRAY); } else if(orderStatus == 3 || orderStatus == 2 || orderStatus == 1) { Long n = acceptTime.getTime(); Log.i("Preparation Start Time :-", Long.toString(n)); viewHolder.txtElapsedTimeForDeliveryComplete.setTag(list.get(position)); viewHolder.txtElapsedTimeForDeliveryComplete.setBase(SystemClock.elapsedRealtime() - System.currentTimeMillis() + n); viewHolder.txtElapsedTimeForDeliveryComplete.getBase(); viewHolder.txtElapsedTimeForDeliveryComplete.start(); viewHolder.txtElapsedTimeForDeliveryComplete.setFormat("%s"); } viewHolder.btnDeliveryComplete.setOnClickListener(new OnClickListener() { @Override public void onClick(final View v) { // TODO Auto-generated method stub if (flagDeliveryComplete == 0) { flagDeliveryComplete++; v.startAnimation(playAnimation()); handler.postDelayed(new Runnable() { @Override public void run() { // TODO Auto-generated method stub v.clearAnimation(); OrderitemdetailsBO orderitemdetailsBO = list.get(position); Date date = orderitemdetailsBO.getPreparationstarttime(); String preparationComplete = orderitemdetailsBO.getOrderpreparationtime(); if(date != null && preparationComplete != null ) { Date currentTime = new Date(); Calendar calendar = Calendar.getInstance(); viewHolder.txtElapsedTimeForDeliveryComplete.stop(); orderitemdetailsBO.setOrderdeliverytime(calendar.get(Calendar.MINUTE) +":"+calendar.get(Calendar.SECOND)); String orderDetails = Integer.toString(order_delivered); String getPosition = Integer.toString(position); viewHolder.btnDeliveryComplete.setBackgroundColor(Color.LTGRAY); new sendOrderStatusToServer().execute(orderDetails,getPosition); } else { Toast.makeText(myContext, "Please Enter Preparation Start Time & Preparation Complete Time.", Toast.LENGTH_LONG).show(); } } }, 5000); } else { handler.removeCallbacksAndMessages(null); v.clearAnimation(); flagDeliveryComplete = 0; } } }); } return convertView; } } private static class ViewHolder { protected TextView txtTableNumber; protected TextView txtMenuItem; protected TextView txtQuantity; protected TextView txtOrderAcceptanceTime; protected Chronometer txtElapsedTimeOfOrderAcceptance; protected Button btnPreparationStart; protected Chronometer txtElapsedTimeForPreparation; protected Button btnPreparationComplete; protected Chronometer txtElapsedTimeForDeliveryComplete; protected Button btnDeliveryComplete; }

    Read the article

  • const TypedeffedIntPointer not equal to const int *

    - by dirk
    I have the following C++ code: typedef int* IntPtr; const int* cip = new int; const IntPtr ctip4 = cip; I compile this with Visual Studio 2008 and get the following error: error C2440: 'initializing' : cannot convert from 'const int *' to 'const IntPtr' Clearly my understanding of typedefs is not what is should be. The reason I'm asking, I'm storing a pointer type in a STL map. I have a function that returns a const pointer which I would like to use to search in the map (using map::find(const key_type&). Since const MyType* and const map<MyType*, somedata>::key_type is incompatible, I'm having problems. Regards Dirk

    Read the article

  • Virtual Function Implementation

    - by Gokul
    Hi, I have kept hearing this statement. Switch..Case is Evil for code maintenance, but it provides better performance(since compiler can inline stuffs etc..). Virtual functions are very good for code maintenance, but they incur a performance penalty of two pointer indirections. Say i have a base class with 2 subclasses(X and Y) and one virtual function, so there will be two virtual tables. The object has a pointer, based on which it will choose a virtual table. So for the compiler, it is more like switch( object's function ptr ) { case 0x....: X->call(); break; case 0x....: Y->call(); }; So why should virtual function cost more, if it can get implemented this way, as the compiler can do the same in-lining and other stuff here. Or explain me, why is it decided not to implement the virtual function execution in this way? Thanks, Gokul.

    Read the article

  • Is it safe to catch an access violation in this scenario?

    - by Eloff
    I've read a lot, including here on SO that suggests this is a very bad idea in general and that the only thing you can do safely is exit the program. I'm not sure that this is true. This is for a pooling memory allocator that hands off large allocations to malloc. During pool_free() a pointer needs to be checked it it belongs to a pool or was allocated with malloc. By rounding the address down to the nearest 1MB boundary, I get a pointer to the beginning of a block of memory in the pool, or undefined if malloc was used. In the first case I can easily verify that the block of memory belongs to the pool, but, if it does not I will either fail this verification, or I will get an access violation (note that this is a read-only process). Could I not catch this with SEH (Windows) or handle the signal (POSIX) and simply treat it as a failed verification? (i.e. this is only possible if malloc was used, so pass the ptr to free())

    Read the article

  • Is this a valid css?

    - by Pandiya Chendur
    I have a pager in my page with anchors in it... I use the following css... .page-numbers a { color:#808185; cursor:pointer; text-decoration:none;outline:none; } .page-numbers a:hover { text-decoration:underline; } .page-numbers a:visited { color:#808185;outline:none; } But my anchor tag doesn't seem to take the css above instead it uses the css below, a { color:#0077CC; cursor:pointer; text-decoration:none;outline:none; } a:hover { text-decoration:underline; } a:visited { color:#4A6B82;outline:none; } Which i have given in the top of my stylesheet... Any suggestion...

    Read the article

  • Resize an array of images with OpenCV

    - by amr
    I'm passing an array of images (IplImage**) to an object in C++ using OpenCV. I'm then trying to iterate over that array and resize them all to a fixed size (150x150) I'm doing it this way: for(int i = 0; i< this->numTrainingFaces; i++) { IplImage* frame_copy = cvCreateImage( cvSize(150,150), this->faceImageArray[0]->depth, this->faceImageArray[0]->nChannels ); cout << "Created image" << endl; cvResize(this->faceImageArray[i], frame_copy); cout << "Resized image" << endl; IplImage* grey_image = cvCreateImage( cvSize( frame_copy->width, frame_copy->height ), IPL_DEPTH_8U, 1 ); cout << "Created grey image" << endl; cvCvtColor( frame_copy, grey_image, CV_RGB2GRAY ); cout << "Converted image" << endl; this->faceImageArray[i] = grey_image; cvReleaseImage(&frame_copy); cvReleaseImage(&grey_image); } But I'm getting this output, and I'm not sure why: Created image Resized image Created grey image Converted image Created image OpenCV Error: Assertion failed (src.type() == dst.type()) in cvResize, file /build/buildd/opencv-2.1.0/src/cv/cvimgwarp.cpp, line 3102 terminate called after throwing an instance of 'cv::Exception' what(): /build/buildd/opencv-2.1.0/src/cv/cvimgwarp.cpp:3102: error: (-215) src.type() == dst.type() in function cvResize Aborted I'm basically just trying to replace the image in the array with the resized one in as few steps as possible. Edit: Revised my code as follows: for(int i = 0; i< this->numTrainingFaces; i++) { IplImage* frame_copy = cvCreateImage( cvSize(150,150), this->faceImageArray[i]->depth, this->faceImageArray[i]->nChannels ); cvResize(this->faceImageArray[i], frame_copy); IplImage* grey_image = cvCreateImage( cvSize( frame_copy->width, frame_copy->height ), IPL_DEPTH_8U, 1 ); cvCvtColor( frame_copy, grey_image, CV_RGB2GRAY ); faceImageArray[i] = cvCreateImage( cvSize(grey_image->width, grey_image->height), grey_image->depth, grey_image->nChannels); cvCopy(grey_image,faceImageArray[i]); cvReleaseImage(&frame_copy); cvReleaseImage(&grey_image); } Then later on I'm performing some PCA, and get this output: OpenCV Error: Null pointer (Null pointer to the written object) in cvWrite, file /build/buildd/opencv-2.1.0/src/cxcore/cxpersistence.cpp, line 4740 But I don't think my code has got to the point where I'm explicitly calling cvWrite, so it must be part of the library. I can give a full implementation if necessary - is there anything in my code that's going to create a null pointer?

    Read the article

  • Effective methods for reading and writing large files in C

    - by Bertholt Stutley Johnson
    I'm writing an application that deals with very large user-generated input files. The program will copy about 95 percent of the file, effectively duplicating it and switching a few words and values in the copy, and then appending the copy (in chunks) to the original file, such that each block (consisting of between 10 and 50 lines) in the original is followed by the copied and modified block, and then the next original block, and so on. The user-generated input conforms to a certain format, and it is highly unlikely that any line in the original file is longer than 100 characters long. Which would be the better approach? a) To use one file pointer and use variables that hold the current position of how much has been read and where to write to, seeking the file pointer back and forth to read and write; or b) To use multiple file pointers, one for reading and one for writing. I am mostly concerned with the efficiency of the program, as the input files will reach up to 25,000 lines, each about 50 characters long. Thanks!

    Read the article

  • Why must "stride" in the System.Drawing.Bitmap constructor be a multiple of 4?

    - by Gorchestopher H
    I am writing an application that requires me to take a proprietary bitmap format (an MVTec Halcon HImage) and convert it into a System.Drawing.Bitmap in C#. The only proprietary functions given to me to help me do this involve me writing to file, except for the use of a "get pointer" function. This function is great, it gives me a pointer to the pixel data, the width, the height, and the type of the image. My issue is that when I create my System.Drawing.Bitmap using the constructor: new System.Drawing.Bitmap(width, height, stride, format, scan) I need to specify a "stride" that is a multiple of 4. This may be a problem as I am unsure what size bitmap my function will be hit with. Supposing I end up with a bitmap that is 111x111 pixels, I have no way to run this function other than adding a bogus column to my image or subtracting 3 columns. Is there a way I can sneak around this limitation?

    Read the article

  • Is there an easy way to make `boost::ptr_vector` more debugger friendly in Visual Studio?

    - by Billy ONeal
    I'm considering using boost::ptr_container as a result of the responses from this question. My biggest problem with the library is that I cannot view the contents of the collection in the debugger, because the MSVC debugger doesn't recognize it, and therefore I cannot see the contents of the containers. (All the data gets stored as void * internally) I've heard MSVC has a feature called "debugger visualizers" which would allow the user to make the debugger smarter about these kinds of things, but I've never written anything like this, and I'm not hugely firmiliar with such things. For example, compare the behavior of boost::shared_ptr with MSVC's own std::tr1::shared_ptr. In the debugger (i.e. in the Watch window), the boost version shows up as a big mess of internal variables used for implementing the shared pointer, but the MSVC version shows up as a plain pointer to the object (and the shared_ptr's innards are hidden). How can I get started either using or implementing such a thing?

    Read the article

  • What is the difference between NULL in C++ and null in Java?

    - by Stephano
    I've been trying to figure out why C++ is making me crazy typing NULL. Suddenly it hits me the other day; I've been typing null (lower case) in Java for years. Now suddenly I'm programming in C++ and that little chunk of muscle memory is making me crazy. Wikiperipatetic defines C++ NULL as part of the stddef: A macro that expands to a null pointer constant. It may be defined as ((void*)0), 0 or 0L depending on the compiler and the language. Sun's docs tells me this about Java's "null literal": The null type has one value, the null reference, represented by the literal null, which is formed from ASCII characters. A null literal is always of the null type. So this is all very nice. I know what a null pointer reference is, and thank you for the compiler notes. Now I'm a little fuzzy on the idea of a literal in Java so I read on... A literal is the source code representation of a fixed value; literals are represented directly in your code without requiring computation. There's also a special null literal that can be used as a value for any reference type. null may be assigned to any variable, except variables of primitive types. There's little you can do with a null value beyond testing for its presence. Therefore, null is often used in programs as a marker to indicate that some object is unavailable. Ok, so I think I get it now. In C++ NULL is a macro that, when compiled, defines the null pointer constant. In Java, null is a fixed value that any non-primitive can be assigned too; great for testing in a handy if statement. Java does not have pointers, so I can see why they kept null a simple value rather than anything fancy. But why did java decide to change the all caps NULL to null? Furthermore, am I missing anything here?

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186  | Next Page >