Search Results

Search found 58985 results on 2360 pages for 'value object'.

Page 186/2360 | < Previous Page | 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193  | Next Page >

  • Calling function from an object with event listener

    - by Mirat Can Bayrak
    i have a view model something like this: CANVAS = getElementById... RemixView = function(attrs) { this.model = attrs.model; this.dragging = false; this.init(); }; RemixView.prototype = { init: function() { CANVAS.addEventListener("click", this.handleClick); }, handleClick: function(ev) { var obj = this.getHoveredObject(ev); }, getHoveredObject: function(ev) {} ... ... } rv = new RemixView() the problem is my when clickHandler event fired, this object is being equal to CANVAS object, not RemixView. So i get error that says: this.getHoveredObject is not a function What is correct approach at that stuation?

    Read the article

  • Javascript: Retrieve Object Property Names

    - by Jason
    I'm trying to write a function that needs to know the property names of an object being passed in, like so: var data = { "key1":"value1", "key2":"value2", etc} ^ i want the string value "key1" How do I retrieve the string "key1" from data? I know I can set a property dynamically like data[prop]=value but i want to know what prop is from an object passed in. If that doesn't make sense I suppose I could try to explain more. Thanks! I eventually want to do something like: for (var i = 0; i<data.length; i++) { var name = data[i].getPropertyName() <--- not a real function // do stuff }

    Read the article

  • Call Generic method using runtime type and cast return object

    - by markpirvine
    I'm using reflection to call a generic method with a type determined at runtime. My code is as follows: Type tType = Type.GetType(pLoadOut.Type); MethodInfo method = typeof(ApiSerialiseHelper).GetMethod("Deserialise", new Type[] { typeof(string) }); MethodInfo generic = method.MakeGenericMethod(tType); generic.Invoke(obj, new object[] { pLoadOut.Data }); This works ok. However the generic.Invoke method returns an object, but what I would like is the type determined at runtime. Is this possible with this approach, or is there a better option? Mark

    Read the article

  • get look up a string given a func<T,object> param

    - by Sammy
    given this code namespace GridTests { public class Grid<T> { IEnumerable<T> DataSource { get; set; } IList<Column> Columns = new List<Column>(); class Column { public string DisplayText { get; set; } Func<T, object> Rowdata { get; set; } } } } I need to be able to loop through the columns collection and get the Rowdata's object value using the DisplayText. Thanks

    Read the article

  • display data from tables that contain a null value

    - by user2631662
    I need the code below to say - if myReader reads a null entry a new method is called. At the moment it will not display data from tables that contain a null value conDataBase.Open(); myReader = cmdDataBase.ExecuteReader(); while (myReader.Read()) { if (myReader["Code_CodeID"] != DBNull.Value) { string sFirst = myReader["First"].ToString(); string sLast = myReader["Last"].ToString(); string sAdd1 = myReader["Address1"].ToString(); string sCode = myReader["Code"].ToString(); txtFirst.Text = sFirst; txtSecond.Text = sLast; txtadd1.Text = sAdd1; txtDeviceIMEI.Text = sCode; } } } else { //go to a new method } }

    Read the article

  • Object changed while deserialization

    - by neoms21
    I'm serializing an object and storing the serialized value in db and getting the deserialization to work fine as well after getting values from db. But problem occurs if the existing object is modified and a new property is added in the class. Then while deserializing it looks for that property in serialized text and upon not finding it there, I get the following error System.Runtime.Serialization.SerializationException: Member 'temp' was not found. Is there any way I can know if new property was not there while serialization and can skip that? I'm using custom serialization.

    Read the article

  • XElement return node value

    - by theDawckta
    I have an XElement that looks like this; <VideoFiles> <VideoFileInfo> <VideoType>1000</VideoType> <FormatCode>1000</FormatCode> <Url>http://www.idontwantthisvalue.com</Url> </VideoFileInfo> <VideoFileInfo> <VideoType>WMVOriginal</VideoType> <FormatCode>1004</FormatCode> <Url>http://www.iwanthitsvalue.com</Url> </VideoFile> I need to grab the value that has a sibling with a value of 1004. Can anyone help on this?

    Read the article

  • how to select a value from a listbox?

    - by udaya
    Hi I am having a list box like this ,the list box is populated from the database <td bgcolor="#FFFFCC"> <select name="listbox" id="FriendmailId" size="3" > <option value="0">Select User From List</option> <? foreach($searchfriend as $row) {?> <option value=""><?=$row['dEmailID'];?></option> <? } ?> </select> </td> The values are listed in the list box ....but the problem is when i select a item it is highted but not really selected why it is so

    Read the article

  • Check If Stored Procedure Returns Value

    - by Eric
    Hello all, I am using Linq 2 Sql in VS 2010, and I have the following stored procedure to check a username and password ALTER PROCEDURE dbo.CheckUser ( @username varchar(50), @password varchar(50) ) AS SELECT * FROM Users Where UserName=@username AND Password=@password The problem I'm having is that it throws an exception if the username and password are incorrect. I'd like to perform a check to see if there is a return value, rather than using try/catch to determine whether the procedure returned a value. Should I do this check in code (C#)? Or is there a way to do it in SQL? Thanks.

    Read the article

  • try finally block around every Object.Create?

    - by max
    Hi, I have a general question about best practice in OO Delphi. Currently, I but a try finally block around everywhere, where I create an object, to free that object after usage (to avoid memory leaks). E.g.: aObject := TObject.Create; try aOBject.AProcedure(); ... finally aObject.Free; end; instead of: aObject := TObject.Create; aObject.AProcedure(); .. aObject.Free; To you think, it is good practice, or too much overhead? And what about the performance?

    Read the article

  • Roll back changes to object if invalid

    - by hhravn
    How do i roll back changes to an attached object in nhibernate? We have a validation before update/save (example simplified).. var setting = Get("key") setting.Value = "helo" //for whatever reason, this particular //setting cannot have its value saved to the database ... Verify(setting); //throws base.Update(setting); but since the object is attached, any changes already happened in the session, even if the validation throws, and never reaches Update. What is the proper way to handle this?

    Read the article

  • getResponseHeader('last-modified'); does not change value

    - by telexper
    var page = 'data/appointments/<? echo $_SESSION['name']; ?><? echo $_SESSION['last']; ?>App.html'; var lM; function checkModified(){ $.get(page, function(a,a,x){ var mod = x.getResponseHeader('last-modified'); alert (lM); alert ("page" +mod); }); } when i alert the last-modified from my page, it outputs the same value, even when when i deleted all my cookies and cache , deleted the file from the server and replace it. it still outputs one value Tue , Oct 23, 2012 3:37:41 GMT

    Read the article

  • Javascript Image object without instantiating

    - by user276027
    This question is about javascript performance. Consider 3 examples for illustration: function loadImgA() { new Image().src="http://example.com/image.gif" } function loadImgA1() { Image().src="http://example.com/image.gif" } function loadImgB() { var testImg = new Image(); testImg.src="http://example.com/image.gif" } Now the point is I don't really need to manipulate the the image object after it was created, hence loadImgA(). The question is, what happens if nothing is assigned to the return value of the new Image() constructor - in that case I can actually skip the 'new' keyword as in loadImgA1()? Does the object then live outside the function or somehow affects memory usage? Other implications, differences? I reckon not, as no real instance was actually created? To put this into perspective, I only need to get the http request for image through. No preloading or other advanced image manipulation. What would be the preferred method from the above?

    Read the article

  • how to visualize (value, count) dataset with thousands data points

    - by user510040
    I have a file with 2 numeric columns: value and count. File may have 5000 rows. I do plot(value, count) to find the shape of distribution. But because there are too many data points the picture is not very clear. Do you know better visualization approach? Probably histograms or barplot with grouping close values on x axis will be the better way to look on data? I cannot figure out the syntax of using histogram or barplot for my case.

    Read the article

  • is it right way( safe) to assign post data value directly by name attibute value to a variable in

    - by I Like PHP
    i m working in PHP since one year, but now a days i got this way to assign post data value directly using name attribute . i m really curious to know the documentation about it.please refere me link regarding this . i explain by example here is my form <form method="post" action=""> <input type="text" name="userName" id="userName"> <input type="submit" name="doit" value="submit"> </form> to get the post data i always use $somevar=mysql_real_escape_string($_POST['userName']); but now i see another way $somevar= "userName"; i just want to know that is it safe n easy way??

    Read the article

  • how to declare object variable name in loop

    - by user3717895
    public class Node{ Node p,l,r; int height; String s; { /** class body**/ } } String[] S=new String[5000]; int i=0; while (i<5000){ Node x=new Node(); x=S[i]; } I want to make 5000 Node object. above code assign same variable name x every time but i want different variable name . then how to declare 5000 class variable name without declaring it manually. is there something by which i can create 5000 Node class object with ease.

    Read the article

  • Which is the good way to update object in EF6

    - by TrieuH
    I have searched and find 2 way to update object in EF var attachedEntity = _context.EntityClasses.Local.First(t => t.Id == entity.Id); //We have it in the context, need to update. if (attachedEntity != null) { var attachedEntry = _context.Entry(attachedEntity); attachedEntry.CurrentValues.SetValues(entity); } else { ////If it's not found locally, we can attach it by setting state to modified. ////This would result in a SQL update statement for all fields ////when SaveChanges is called. var entry = _context.Entry(entity); entry.State = EntityState.Modified; } _context.SaveChanges(); And other way is seem more easy var entity = _context.EntityClasses.FirstOrDefault(t => t.Id == entity.Id); _context.Entry(entity ).EntityState.Modified _context.SaveChanges(); What is best way to update object? NOTE: the performence is importance with me

    Read the article

  • Java Basics: create class object

    - by user1767853
    In C++: class Rectangle { int x, y; public: void set_values (int,int); int area () {return (x*y);} }; int main () { Rectangle rect; rect.set_values (3,4); } In Java: class Rectangle { int x, y; void set_values (int x,int y); int area () {return (x*y);} } public static void main(String[] args) { Rectangle rect=new Rectangle(3,4); } In C++ compiler will create rect object & reserve memory 4 bytes. I want to know How Java is creating object?

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193  | Next Page >