Search Results

Search found 58245 results on 2330 pages for 'asp net authentication'.

Page 187/2330 | < Previous Page | 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194  | Next Page >

  • How to check if the tab page is dirty and prompt the user to save before navigating away using ajaxtoolkit tab control in ASP.NET

    Step 1: Put a hidden variable in Update panel <asp:HiddenField ID="hfIsDirty" runat="server" Value="0" /> Step 2: Put the following code in ajaxcontrol tool kit tabcontainer OnClientActiveTabChanged="ActiveTabChanged" Copy the following script in the aspx page. <script type="text/javascript">       //Trigger Server side post back for the Tab container       function ActiveTabChanged(sender, e) {           __doPostBack('<%= tcBaseline.ClientID %>', '');       }       //Sets the dirty flag if the page is dirty       function setDirty() {           var hf = document.getElementById("<%=hfIsDirty.ClientID%>");           if (hf != null)               hf.value = 1;       }       //Resets the dirty flag after save       function clearDirty() {           var hf = document.getElementById("<%=hfIsDirty.ClientID%>");           hf.value = 0;       }       function showMessage() { return "page is dirty" }       function setControlChange() {           if (typeof (event.srcElement) != 'undefined')           { event.srcElement.onchange = setDirty; }       }       function checkDirty() {           var tc = document.getElementById("<%=tcBaseline.ClientID%>");           var hf = document.getElementById("<%=hfIsDirty.ClientID%>");           if (hf.value == "1") {               var conf = confirm("Do you want o loose unsaved changes? Please Cancel to stay on page or OK to continue ");               if (conf) {                   clearDirty();                   return true;               }               else {                   var e = window.event;                   e.cancelBubble = true;                   if (e.stopPropagation) e.stopPropagation();                   return false;               }           }           else               return true;       }       document.body.onclick = setControlChange;       document.body.onkeyup = setControlChange;       var onBeforeUnloadFired = false;       // Function to reset the above flag.       function resetOnBeforeUnloadFired() {           onBeforeUnloadFired = false;       }       function doBeforeUnload() {           var hf = document.getElementById("<%=hfIsDirty.ClientID%>");           // If this function has not been run before...           if (!onBeforeUnloadFired) {               // Prevent this function from being run twice in succession.               onBeforeUnloadFired = true;               // If the form is dirty...               if (hf.value == "1") {                   event.returnValue = "If you continue you will lose any changes that you have made to this record.";               }           }           window.setTimeout("resetOnBeforeUnloadFired()", 1000);       }       if (window.body) {           window.body.onbeforeunload = doBeforeUnload;       }       else           window.onbeforeunload = doBeforeUnload;   </script> Step 3: Here is how the tabcontrol should look like <asp:UpdatePanel ID="upTab" runat="server" UpdateMode="conditional">                     <ContentTemplate>                         <ajaxtoolkit:TabContainer ID="tcBaseline" runat="server" Height="400px" OnClientActiveTabChanged="ActiveTabChanged">                             <ajaxtoolkit:TabPanel ID="tpPersonalInformation" runat="server">                                 <HeaderTemplate>                                     <asp:Label ID="lblPITab" runat="server" Text="<%$ Resources:Resources, Baseline_Tab_PersonalInformation %>"                                         onclick="checkDirty();"></asp:Label>                                 </HeaderTemplate>                                 <ContentTemplate>                                     <asp:PlaceHolder ID="PlaceHolder1" runat="server"></asp:PlaceHolder> </ContentTemplate>                             </ajaxtoolkit:TabPanel> span.fullpost {display:none;}

    Read the article

  • Macedonian Code Camp 2011

    - by hajan
    Autumn was filled with lot of conferences, events, speaking engagements and many interesting happenings in Skopje, Macedonia. First at October 20, I was speaking at Microsoft Vizija 9 on topic ASP.NET MVC3 and Razor. One week ago, November 15 I was speaking for first time on topic not related to web development (but still deployment of web apps was part of the demos) on topic “Cloud Computing – Windows Azure” at Microsoft BizSpark Bootcamp. The next event, which is the biggest event by the number of visitors and number of tracks is the Code Camp 2011 event. After we opened the registrations for the event, we sold out (free) 600 tickets in the first 15 hours! We all got astonished by the extremely big number of responses we’ve got… In this event, I can freely say that we expect about 700 attendees to come, and we already have 900+ registered. The event will be held at Saturday, 26 November 2011. At Code Camp 2011, I will speak on topic ASP.NET MVC Best Practices. There are many interesting things to say on this presentation, I will mainly focus on Tips, Tricks, Guidelines and other Practices that I have been using in real-life projects developed by using ASP.NET MVC Framework, with special focus on ASP.NET MVC3 and the next release, ASP.NET MVC4 Developer Preview. There are big number of known local and regional speakers, including 7 MVPs. You can find more info about this event at the official event website: http://codecamp.mkdot.net As for my session, if you have some interesting trick or good practice you have been using in your ASP.NET MVC projects, you can freely share it with me… If I find it interesting and if it’s not part of the current practices I have included for the presentation (I can’t tell you which ones for now… *secret* ;))… I will consider including it in the presentation. Stay tuned for more info soon… Regards, Hajan

    Read the article

  • .NET 2.0 "not installed" after upgrade to Windows 7

    - by Greg B
    I Recently upgraded to Windows 7 (Business) RTM from Vista Business and everything is going great, it fixed the BSOD I was getting and the performance of my laptop is improved. However; during the upgrade, something seems to have gone awry with my .NET 2.0 installation. When attempting to install FlashDevelop, I get the following error from the installer package You need to install Maicrtosoft.NET 2.0 runtime before installing FlasgDevelop. You Have . I have a previous release of FD installed from before the upgrade and this still works fine. So I gave up on the new version of FD and got on with my day. Then I tried to install the Microsoft SQL Server Database Publishing Wizard 1.1 and that says I am missing a couple of prerequisites, one of which is .NET 2.0. When I download the .NET 2.0 runtime the installer fails, telling me that This product is already installed as part of the operating system. Does anyone have any idea how to make my computer recognise that .NET 2 is in fact installed. UPDATE I've checked Windows Features and everything relating to .NET is already installed. I've also been through my list of installed programs looking for .NET to in an attempt to uninstall it but it isn't there. In fact, the only thing that looks like a .NET distro that I am able to uninstall is the 3.5 Compact Framework.

    Read the article

  • vb.net and mysql connectivity [closed]

    - by kalpana
    I have used adodb using odbc database connectivity for connecting vb.net to mysql. I have fetched table values into recordset. I want to fetch only one column values (for example, table name-login, column name-password and values in password column are "manage","sales","general"). I want to fetch these values in text boxes. I have written code but it's not working. Dim conn As New ADODB.Connection Dim res As New ADODB.Recordset conn.Open("test", "root", "root") res = conn.Execute("select password from login") textbox1.text=res(0).value textbox2.text=res(1).value textbox3.text=res(2).value I am getting data in textbox1 but other data is not getting inserted into textbox2 and textbox3..I am getting error i.e (1) Item cannot be found in the collection corresponding to the requested name or ordinal.

    Read the article

  • Why there is perception that VB.NET is good for small to medium size application and not for enterprise class project?

    - by Gens
    I love VB.NET very much. Coding VB.NET with Visual Studio is just like typing messages. Smooth, fast and simple. Any error will be notified instantly. The OO capability of VB.NET is good enough. But often in any .Net languages discussion, there is perception that VB.NET is good for small to medium size application and not for large scale project? Why there is such perception? Or am I missing anything regarding to VB.NET?

    Read the article

  • How to check if the tab page is dirty and prompt the user to save before navigating away using ajaxtoolkit tab control in ASP.NET

    Step 1: Put a hidden variable in Update panel <asp:HiddenField ID="hfIsDirty" runat="server" Value="0" /> Step 2: Put the following code in ajaxcontrol tool kit tabcontainer OnClientActiveTabChanged="ActiveTabChanged" Copy the following script in the aspx page. <script type="text/javascript">       //Trigger Server side post back for the Tab container       function ActiveTabChanged(sender, e) {           __doPostBack('<%= tcBaseline.ClientID %>', '');       }       //Sets the dirty flag if the page is dirty       function setDirty() {           var hf = document.getElementById("<%=hfIsDirty.ClientID%>");           if (hf != null)               hf.value = 1;       }       //Resets the dirty flag after save       function clearDirty() {           var hf = document.getElementById("<%=hfIsDirty.ClientID%>");           hf.value = 0;       }       function showMessage() { return "page is dirty" }       function setControlChange() {           if (typeof (event.srcElement) != 'undefined')           { event.srcElement.onchange = setDirty; }       }       function checkDirty() {           var tc = document.getElementById("<%=tcBaseline.ClientID%>");           var hf = document.getElementById("<%=hfIsDirty.ClientID%>");           if (hf.value == "1") {               var conf = confirm("Do you want o loose unsaved changes? Please Cancel to stay on page or OK to continue ");               if (conf) {                   clearDirty();                   return true;               }               else {                   var e = window.event;                   e.cancelBubble = true;                   if (e.stopPropagation) e.stopPropagation();                   return false;               }           }           else               return true;       }       document.body.onclick = setControlChange;       document.body.onkeyup = setControlChange;       var onBeforeUnloadFired = false;       // Function to reset the above flag.       function resetOnBeforeUnloadFired() {           onBeforeUnloadFired = false;       }       function doBeforeUnload() {           var hf = document.getElementById("<%=hfIsDirty.ClientID%>");           // If this function has not been run before...           if (!onBeforeUnloadFired) {               // Prevent this function from being run twice in succession.               onBeforeUnloadFired = true;               // If the form is dirty...               if (hf.value == "1") {                   event.returnValue = "If you continue you will lose any changes that you have made to this record.";               }           }           window.setTimeout("resetOnBeforeUnloadFired()", 1000);       }       if (window.body) {           window.body.onbeforeunload = doBeforeUnload;       }       else           window.onbeforeunload = doBeforeUnload;   </script> Step 3: Here is how the tabcontrol should look like <asp:UpdatePanel ID="upTab" runat="server" UpdateMode="conditional">                     <ContentTemplate>                         <ajaxtoolkit:TabContainer ID="tcBaseline" runat="server" Height="400px" OnClientActiveTabChanged="ActiveTabChanged">                             <ajaxtoolkit:TabPanel ID="tpPersonalInformation" runat="server">                                 <HeaderTemplate>                                     <asp:Label ID="lblPITab" runat="server" Text="<%$ Resources:Resources, Baseline_Tab_PersonalInformation %>"                                         onclick="checkDirty();"></asp:Label>                                 </HeaderTemplate>                                 <ContentTemplate>                                     <asp:PlaceHolder ID="PlaceHolder1" runat="server"></asp:PlaceHolder> </ContentTemplate>                             </ajaxtoolkit:TabPanel> span.fullpost {display:none;}

    Read the article

  • How To Use Google Authenticator and Other Two-Factor Authentication Apps Without a Smartphone

    - by Chris Hoffman
    Google, Dropbox, LastPass, Battle.net, Guild Wars 2 – all these services and more offer two-factor authentication apps that work on smartphones. If you don’t have a supported device, you can run an alternative application on your computer. When you log in, you’ll need to enter a time-based code from the app. Two-factor authentication prevents people who know your password – but don’t have the app and its security key – from logging in. How To Delete, Move, or Rename Locked Files in Windows HTG Explains: Why Screen Savers Are No Longer Necessary 6 Ways Windows 8 Is More Secure Than Windows 7

    Read the article

  • .NET developer needs FoxPro advice

    - by katit
    We have a prospect with FoxPro 2.6 (whatever it means) system. Our product integrates with other systems by the means of triggers (usually). We would place couple of triggers on X system and then just pull collected data for our use. This way there is no need to customize customers product and it works great(almost real time - we poll for changes every 30 seconds). Question: Can I put triggers on FoxPro 2.6? Can access FoxPro from .NET? Any catches/caveats?

    Read the article

  • Programatically clicking a HTML button by vb.net [closed]

    - by Chauhdry King
    I have to click a HTML button programatically which is on the 3rd page of the website. The button is without id. It has just name type and value. The HTML code of the button is given below <FORM NAME='form1' METHOD='post' action='/dflogin.php'> <INPUT TYPE='hidden' NAME='txtId' value='E712050-15'><INPUT TYPE='hidden' NAME='txtassId' value='1'><INPUT TYPE='hidden' NAME='txtPsw' value='HH29'><INPUT TYPE='hidden' NAME='txtLog' value='0'><h6 align='right'><INPUT TYPE='SUBMIT' NAME='btnSub' value='Next' style='background-color:#009900; color:#fff;'></h6></FORM> I am using the following code to click it Dim i As Integer Dim allButtons As HtmlElementCollection allButtons = WebBrowser1.Document.GetElementsByTagName("input") i = 0 For Each webpageelement As HtmlElement In allButtons i += 1 If i = 5 Then webpageelement.InvokeMember("click") End If Next But I am not able to click it. I am using the vb.net 2008 platform. Can anyone tell me the solution to click it?

    Read the article

  • How can I disable Kerberos authentication for only the root of my site?

    - by petRUShka
    I have Kerberos-based authentication and I want to disable it on only root url: http://mysite.com/. And I want it to continue to work fine on any other page like http://mysite.com/page1. I have such things in my .htaccess: AuthType Kerberos AuthName "Domain login" KrbAuthRealms DOMAIN.COM KrbMethodK5Passwd on Krb5KeyTab /etc/httpd/httpd.keytab require valid-user I want to turn it off only for root URL. As workaround it is possible to turn off using .htaccess in virtual host config. Unfortunately I don't know how to do it. Part of my vhost.conf: <Directory /home/user/www/current/public/> Options -MultiViews +FollowSymLinks AllowOverride All Order allow,deny Allow from all </Directory> UPD. I'm using Apache/2.2.3 (Linux/SUSE) I tried to use such version of .htaccess: SetEnvIf Request_URI ^/$ rootdir=1 Allow from env=rootdir Satisfy Any AuthType Kerberos AuthName "Domain login" KrbAuthRealms DOMAIN.COM KrbMethodK5Passwd on Krb5KeyTab /etc/httpd/httpd.keytab require valid-user Unfortunately such config turn Kerberos AuthType for all URLs. I tried to place first 3 lines SetEnvIf Request_URI ^/$ rootdir=1 Allow from env=rootdir Satisfy Any after main block, but it didn't help me.

    Read the article

  • Getting Apache to serve same directory with different authentication over SSL?

    - by Lasse V. Karlsen
    I have set up VisualSVN server, a Subversion server that internally uses Apache, to serve my subversion repositories. I've managed to integrate WebSVN into it as well, and just now was able to get it to serve my repositories through WebSVN without having to authenticate, ie. no username or password prompt comes up. This is good. However, with this set up there is apparently no way for me to authenticate to WebSVN at all, which means all my private repositories are now invisible as far as WebSVN goes. I noticed there is a "Listen 81" directive in the .conf file, since I'm running the server on port 81 instead of 80, so I was wondering if I could set up a https:// connection to a different port, that did require authentication? The reason I need access to my private repositories is that I have linked my bug tracking system to the subversion repositories, so if I click a link in the bug tracking system, it will take me to diffs for the relevant files in WebSVN, and some products are in private repositories. Here's my Location section for WebSVN: <Location /websvn/> Options FollowSymLinks SVNListParentPath on SVNParentPath "C:/Repositories/" SVNPathAuthz on AuthName "Subversion Repository" AuthType Basic AuthBasicProvider file AuthUserFile "C:/Repositories/htpasswd" AuthzSVNAccessFile "C:/Repositories/authz" Satisfy Any Require valid-user </Location> Is there any way I can set up a separate section for a different port, say 8100, that does not have the Satisfy Any directive there, which is what enable anonymous access. Note that a different sub-directory on the server is acceptable as well, so /websvn_secure/, if I can make a location section for that and effectively serve the same content only without the Satisfy Any directive, that'd be good too.

    Read the article

  • Is it possible to configure simultaneous authentication against 2 different AD domains by IIS 7?

    - by just3ws
    Basically, I need to be able to attempt to authenticate against two different AD domains from IIS. I'd like to be able to automatically query both AD's and whichever comes back with an authentication wins. The users are completely separate and will only exist in their respective domain.         IIS           |           |   /-------------\   |                 |  ------        ------  AD1         AD2  JoeU        AmyU  JillU         JohnU So, if IIS requests to authenticate JoeU it will query both domains. JoeU will be found in AD1 so we can ignore whatever response comes back from AD2. Is this even possible using stock IIS 7? Is there a middleware or something to allow this type of configuration on IIS 7? Would this be a job for some kind of middleware sitting between IIS and the AD domains?

    Read the article

  • Active Directory + IIS + SQL + ASP.NET

    - by Amira Elsayed Ismail
    I have sent the following question to stackoverflow website I have installed Windows server 2008 r2 on a virtual machine, Can I install Active directory with domain controller + IIS + SQL server on the same machine? I want to make web application and this web application will authenticate users from Active Directory, the web application should be published on the server IIS and the users should access it remotely from their home using domain name of my machine, Someone tell me that its very wrong to have IIS and Active directory on the same machine I got the following Answer You can't use ActiveDirectory over the internet. At least not without something like a VPN as a middle man. Their home computers will not be joined to the domain, so there is no pass-through authentication. Yes, it's a bad idea to put AD on the web server. Why is too complex to get into in an answer here. Suffice it to say that even if you did do this, it's probably would not work the way you are thinking it should. It's not impossible to do this. For instance, many of the Microsoft "Small Businesss" products put IIS, AD, and SQL Server on the same server. But, you kind of have to know what you're doing to configure it securely. Then I add the following comment Thanks for ur reply.so what you think about the best way to do this as I didn't do anything like that before should I install active directory on a machine and IIS on another machine ? and what about SQL should I add it to the same server of active directory ? I didn't mentioned also that it will be Microsoft dynamics server that will access some information about work and i have to read data from axapta also ? also what is VPN and how can I use it to let users access my web application anywhere ? Sorry for my long questions and thanks in advance so please if anyone can help I will be thankful

    Read the article

  • What benefits can I get upgrading my ASP.NET (Webform) + DAL(EF) + Repository + BLL structure to MVC?

    - by Etienne
    I'm in the process of defining an approach that may best fit our needs for a big web application development. For now, I'm thinking going with an ASP.NET Architecture with a DAL using Entity Framework, a Repository concept to not access DAL directly from BLL and a BLL that call the repository and make every manipulations necessary to prepare data to push in a presentation layer (.aspx files). I don't plan to use ASP.Net controls and prefer to keep things simple and lightweight using plain html, jQuery UI controls and do most of the server calls with jQuery Ajax. Sometimes, when needed, I plan to use handlers (.ashx) to call BLL methods that will return JSON or HTML to client for dynamic stuff. My solution also has a test project that Mock the Repository with in-memory data to not repose on database for testing BLL methods... It may be usefull to add that we will build a big application over this architecture with hundreds of tables and store procedures with a lot of reading and writing to database. My question is, having this architecture in mind, Is there any evident advantages that I can obtain by using an MVC3 project instead of the described architecture base on Webform? Do you see any problem in this architecture that may cause us problem during the next steps of development? I know the MVC pattern for using it in others projects with Django... but the Microsoft MVC implementation look so much more complex and verbose than Django MVC and it's why I'm hesitating (or waiting for a little push?) right now before jumping into it... We are in a real project with deadlines and don't want to slow the development process without any real benefits.

    Read the article

  • Regardig Vb.net [closed]

    - by user68999
    hi everyone i am making a project for school management and manage all the record of student so I'm using VB.net 2008 and sql server 2008. i have a problem when i enter student date of birth in text box with date&time picker in database. but i want in the search option enter the date from date&time picker and get age of all the student data in data-view grid. like student are 10 year old, 11 year old etc. so how it can possible please help..........?

    Read the article

  • Best sites to find good .NET Developers

    - by Mag20
    I am looking for good sites to post a position for a .NET developer. I already tried: Craig's list got about 10 resumes, but most couldn't answer our technical questions StackOverflow Careers no responses What sites did you have success with finding good developers? UPDATE 1: Wanted to provide some more information: My company is in NJ. We are a small startup. Less then 10 people. Monster, Dice, CareerBuilder all charge like $500 a month per posting. Seems a bit much. Also only Dice is specifically targeting technical positions. With monster and career builder I am a bit worried about having to go through hundreds of resumes that don't apply.

    Read the article

  • Is there a better way to consume an ASP.NET Web API call in an MVC controller?

    - by davidisawesome
    In a new project I am creating for my work I am creating a fairly large ASP.NET Web API. The api will be in a separate visual studio solution that also contains all of my business logic and database interactions, Model classes as well. In the test application I am creating (which is asp.net mvc4), I want to be able to hit an api url I defined from the control and cast the return JSON to a Model class. The reason behind this is that I want to take advantage of strongly typing my views to a Model. This is all still in a proof of concept stage, so I have not done any performance testing on it, but I am curious if what I am doing is a good practice, or if I am crazy for even going down this route. Here is the code on the client controller: public class HomeController : Controller { protected string dashboardUrlBase = "http://localhost/webapi/api/StudentDashboard/"; public ActionResult Index() //This view is strongly typed against User { //testing against Joe Bob string adSAMName = "jBob"; WebClient client = new WebClient(); string url = dashboardUrlBase + "GetUserRecord?userName=" + adSAMName; //'User' is a Model class that I have defined. User result = JsonConvert.DeserializeObject<User>(client.DownloadString(url)); return View(result); } . . . } If I choose to go this route another thing to note is I am loading several partial views in this page (as I will also do in subsequent pages). The partial views are loaded via an $.ajax call that hits this controller and does basically the same thing as the code above: Instantiate a new WebClient Define the Url to hit Deserialize the result and cast it to a Model Class. So it is possible (and likely) I could be performing the same actions 4-5 times for a single page. Is there a better method to do this that will: Let me keep strongly typed views. Do my work on the server rather than on the client (this is just a preference since I can write C# faster than I can write javascript).

    Read the article

  • Tomcat and ASP site under IIS6 with SSL

    - by Rafe
    I've been working on migrating our companies' website from it's original server to a new one and am having two different but possibly related problems. The box this is sitting on is a Windows 2003 server x64 running IIS 6. The Tomcat version is 5.5.x as it was the version the original deployment was built on. There are two other sites on the server one in plain HTML, another in PHP and the one I am trying to migrate is a combination of Java and ASP (the introductory/sign in pages being Java as well as many reports used for our clients and the administration pages being in ASP) First of all I can only access the site if I enter the ip followed by :8080 (xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:8080). The original setup had an index.html file in the root of the site with a bit of javascript in the header that pointed the site to 'www.mysite.com/app/public' but if I try going directly to the site without the 8080 I get a 'page not found error' and the javascript redirector causes the same problem because it doesn't add the 8080 into the URL even though on the original site the 8080 wasn't present so I don't understand why it would need it now. The js redirect looks like this: <script language="JavaScript"> <!-- location.href = "/app/public/" location.replace("/app/public/"); //--> </script> When setting the site up I used the command line to unbind IIS from all of the ip's on the system (there are 12 ip's on this box) because I was led to believe Tomcat wanted to use localhost which wasn't accessible. I'm not sure if this was the right thing to do but I'm throwing it in for the sake of completeness. And actually, at this point trying to go to localhost from the server itself throws up a 'could not connect to localhost' error. If I go to localhost:8080 I get the tomcat welcome page. If I do localhost:8080/app/public I get the intro page to our website. So I'm not sure what I'm even looking at in this case, that is what the proper behavior should be. The second part of the problem is that if I do go to either the ip or localhost such as above (localhost:8080/app/public) and click on our login link it is supposed to transfer me to our login page yet instead I receive a 'could not connect' error and the url has changed to localhost:8443/app/secure. From my research I see that port 8443 is Tomcats SSL port and the server.xml alludes to it as follows: <Connector port="8080" maxHttpHeaderSize="8192" maxThreads="150" minSpareThreads="25" maxSpareThreads="75" enableLookups="false" redirectPort="8443" acceptCount="100" connectionTimeout="20000" disableUploadTimeout="true" /> I have an SSL certificate assigned to the site via IIS and was under the impression that by default Tomcat allowed IIS to handle secure connections but apparently something is munged because it's not working. There is another section in the server.xml that reads like this: <Connector port="8009" enableLookups="false" redirectPort="443" protocol="AJP/1.3" /> Which I'm not sure what it is for although port 443 is the SSL port that IIS uses so I'm confused as to what this is supposed to be doing. Another question I have is when does the isap_redirector actually come into play? How does it know when to try and serve pages through Tomcat and when not to? I've hunted around the 'net for an answer and have yet to find a clear dialogue on the subject. Anyone have any pointers as to where to look for a solution to all of this?

    Read the article

  • How to build a .Net app which runs on desktop and as a Windows Service

    - by Mike
    Ok, I hope this is not too much confusing (with my poor English). I want to build a small .Net 4.0 app which monitors several other applications on a Windows Server OR on a regular Windows PC. It will have a WPF GUI with a variety of graphical controls. The app will be used in the following scenarios: If installed on a PC it should run as a “normal” single Windows desktop app If installed on a Server, it should run as a Windows Service. To use/manage the app it must have the same WPF GUI as in scenario 1 and the GUI should be run on the Server or on a remote PC At the moment I consider to write the application logic and connect it to the WPF GUI using a self-hosted WCF Data Service IN BOTH SCENARIOS. Since I’m not a pro developer I suppose it’s possible that I've missed something ;-) Will this work? Are there other/better solutions? Any answer or comment is highly appreciated.

    Read the article

  • Security settings for this service require 'Basic' Authentication

    - by Jake Rutherford
    Had an issue calling WCF service today. The following exception was being thrown when service was called:WebHost failed to process a request. Sender Information: System.ServiceModel.ServiceHostingEnvironment+HostingManager/35320229 Exception: System.ServiceModel.ServiceActivationException: The service '/InteliChartVendorCommunication/VendorService.svc' cannot be activated due to an exception during compilation.  The exception message is: Security settings for this service require 'Basic' Authentication but it is not enabled for the IIS application that hosts this service..Ensured Basic authentication was indeed enabled in IIS before getting stumped on what actual issue could be. Turns out it was CustomErrors setting. Value was set to "off" vs "Off". Would have expected different exception from .NET (i.e. web.config parse exception) but it works now either way.

    Read the article

  • RSpec + Selenium tests for .NET on Windows

    - by John
    I'm a Rails developer doing TDD on a Mac with RSpec, Capybara and Selenium webdriver. Now I have been asked by my company to use this approach for a .NET on Windows environment. What is the best way of doing this? I could just install Ruby and use RSPEC, Capybara and Selenium webdriver for integration testing. But what about unit tests? I also looked at NSpec, but I'm not sure if I can combine that with Capybara or Selenium for integration tests. What would be a good approach here?

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194  | Next Page >