Search Results

Search found 49727 results on 1990 pages for 'multiple select query'.

Page 192/1990 | < Previous Page | 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199  | Next Page >

  • Sql inline query with parameters. Parameter is not read when the query is executed.

    - by fzshah76
    Hi All: I am having a problem with my sql query in c#, basically it's inline query with parameters, but when I run it it tells me that parameter 1 or parameter 2 is not there here is my query declared on top of the page as public: public const string InsertStmtUsersTable = "insert into Users (username, password, email, userTypeID, memberID, CM7Register) " + "Values(@username, @password, @email, @userTypeID, @memberID,@CM7Register ); select @@identity"; this is my code for assigning the parameters, I know I am having problem so I am assigning the params twice: Username =(cmd.Parameters["@username"].Value = row["username"].ToString()) as string; cmd.Parameters["@username"].Value = row["username"].ToString(); In 1 methopd it calls this query and tries to insert to table, here is the code: Result = Convert.ToInt32(SqlHelper.ExecuteScalar(con, CommandType.Text,InsertStmtUsersTable)); Exact error message is: Must declare the variable '@username'.

    Read the article

  • LInq to sql query

    - by Mohit
    Hi, I have a sql query as follows: Declare @DivisionNo INT SET @DivisionNo = 5117 SELECT distinct CASE WHEN ISNULL([DivisionNo],'') < @DivisionNo THEN @DivisionNo ELSE [DivisionNo] END as DivisionNo --,[RecordID] ,[AcctCat] ,[AcctCatDesc] ,[CostCode] ,[CostCodeDesc] FROM [dbo].[vw_eSchdl_AcctCat_CostCode] WHERE DivisionNo = @DivisionNo UNION SELECT distinct CASE WHEN ISNULL([DivisionNo],'') < @DivisionNo THEN @DivisionNo ELSE [DivisionNo] END as DivisionNo --,[RecordID] ,[AcctCat] ,[AcctCatDesc] ,[CostCode] ,[CostCodeDesc] FROM [dbo].[vw_eSchdl_AcctCat_CostCode] WHERE AcctCat not in ( SELECT [AcctCat] FROM [dbo].[vw_eSchdl_AcctCat_CostCode] WHERE DivisionNo = @DivisionNo) How can I duplicate it using linq to sql? Thanks

    Read the article

  • SQL Server Cursor data as result of stored procedure

    - by Dmitry Borovsky
    Hello, I have a stored procedure DECLARE cursor FOR SELECT [FooData] From [FooTable]; OPEN cursor ; FETCH NEXT FROM cursor INTO @CurrFooData; WHILE @@FETCH_STATUS = 0 BEGIN SELECT @CurrFooData AS FooData; INSERT INTO Bar (BarData) VALUES(@CurrFooData); FETCH NEXT FROM cursor INTO @CurrFooData; END; CLOSE cursor DEALLOCATE cursor But in result I have a lot of tables, not one. How can I return one table with 'FooData' column and all '@CurrFooData' rows?

    Read the article

  • Avoid MySQL multi-results from SP with Execute

    - by hhyhbpen
    Hi, i have an SP like BEGIN DECLARE ... CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE tmptbl_found (...); PREPARE find FROM" INSERT INTO tmptbl_found (SELECT userid FROM ( SELECT userid FROM Soul WHERE .?.?. ORDER BY .?.?. ) AS left_tbl LEFT JOIN Contact ON userid = Contact.userid WHERE Contact.userid IS NULL LIMIT ?) "; DECLARE iter CURSOR FOR SELECT userid, ... FROM Soul ...; ... l:LOOP FETCH iter INTO u_id, ...; ... EXECUTE find USING ...,. . .,u_id,...; ... END LOOP; ... END// and it gives multi-results. Besides it's inconvenient, if i get all this multi-results (which i really don't need at all), about 5 (limit's param) for each of the hundreds of thousands of records in Soul, i'm afraid it will take all my memory (and all in vain). Also, i noticed, if i do prepare from an empty string, it still has multi-results... At least how to get rid of them in the execute statement? And i would like to have a recipe to avoid ANY output from SP, for any possible statement (i also have a lot of "update ..."s and "select ... into "s inside, if they can produce multi's). Tnx for any help...

    Read the article

  • how can i pass parameter to linq query

    - by girish
    i want to pass parameter to linq query... public IEnumerable GetPhotos() { PhotoDBDataContext db = new PhotoDBDataContext(); var tProduct = db.Photos; var query = from p in db.Photos orderby p.PhotoId descending select new { p.Album, p.AlbumId, p.Description, p.Photographer, p.PhotographerId, p.PhotoId, p.Tags, p.Thumbnail, p.Url }; return query; } in above example "orderby p.PhotoId descending" is used, i want to use parameter in place of p.PhotoId is it possible...

    Read the article

  • Filemaker XSL Select Column By Name

    - by Kevin Sylvestre
    I am looking to export from Filemaker using column names (instead of positions). Currently I export the following XSL stylesheet that exports by position with: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> <xsl:stylesheet version="1.0" xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform" xmlns:fm="http://www.filemaker.com/fmpxmlresult" exclude-result-prefixes="fm" > <xsl:output method="xml" version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" indent="yes"/> <xsl:template match="/"> <people> <xsl:for-each select="fm:FMPXMLRESULT/fm:RESULTSET/fm:ROW"> <person> <name> <xsl:value-of select="fm:COL[01]/fm:DATA"/> </name> <location> <xsl:value-of select="fm:COL[02]/fm:DATA"/> </location> </person> </xsl:for-each> </people> </xsl:template> </xsl:stylesheet> Any ideas? Thanks.

    Read the article

  • CakePHP - get last query run

    - by Phantz
    I want to get the last query CakePHP ran. I can't turn debug on in core.php and I can't run the code locally. I need a way to get the last sql query and log it to the error log without effecting the live site. This query is failing but is being run. something like this would be great: $this->log($this->ModelName->lastQuery); Thanks in advance.

    Read the article

  • Query a stored procedure for it's parameter names and types

    - by ho1
    Is there any easy way to query a stored procedure (Oracle - PL/SQL) for what parameters it expects? I know that I can query USER_SOURCE to get the whole procedure but I'd then have to parse the whole procedure, and if the parameter is of type [table].[column]%TYPE I'd then have to query the table schema as well. Either using just sql or via ODP.Net.

    Read the article

  • GROUP BY ID range?

    - by d0ugal
    Given a data set like this; +-----+---------------------+--------+ | id | date | result | +-----+---------------------+--------+ | 121 | 2009-07-11 13:23:24 | -1 | | 122 | 2009-07-11 13:23:24 | -1 | | 123 | 2009-07-11 13:23:24 | -1 | | 124 | 2009-07-11 13:23:24 | -1 | | 125 | 2009-07-11 13:23:24 | -1 | | 126 | 2009-07-11 13:23:24 | -1 | | 127 | 2009-07-11 13:23:24 | -1 | | 128 | 2009-07-11 13:23:24 | -1 | | 129 | 2009-07-11 13:23:24 | -1 | | 130 | 2009-07-11 13:23:24 | -1 | | 131 | 2009-07-11 13:23:24 | -1 | | 132 | 2009-07-11 13:23:24 | -1 | | 133 | 2009-07-11 13:23:24 | -1 | | 134 | 2009-07-11 13:23:24 | -1 | | 135 | 2009-07-11 13:23:24 | -1 | | 136 | 2009-07-11 13:23:24 | -1 | | 137 | 2009-07-11 13:23:24 | -1 | | 138 | 2009-07-11 13:23:24 | 1 | | 139 | 2009-07-11 13:23:24 | 0 | | 140 | 2009-07-11 13:23:24 | -1 | +-----+---------------------+--------+ How would I go about grouping the results by day 5 records at a time. The above results is part of the live data, there is over 100,000 results rows in the table and its growing. Basically I want to measure the change over time, so want to take a SUM of the result every X records. In the real data I'll be doing it ever 100 or 1000 but for the data above perhaps every 5. If i could sort it by date I would do something like this; SELECT DATE_FORMAT(date, '%h%i') ym, COUNT(result) 'Total Games', SUM(result) as 'Score' FROM nn_log GROUP BY ym; I can't figure out a way of doing something similar with numbers. The order is sorted by the date but I hope to split the data up every x results. It's safe to assume there are no blank rows. Doing it above with the data you could do multiple selects like; SELECT SUM(result) FROM table LIMIT 0,5; SELECT SUM(result) FROM table LIMIT 5,5; SELECT SUM(result) FROM table LIMIT 10,5; Thats obviously not a very good way to scale up to a bigger problem. I could just write a loop but I'd like to reduce the number of queries.

    Read the article

  • Select statement with multiple 'where' fields using same value without duplicating text

    - by kdbdallas
    I will start by saying that I don't think what I want can be done, but that said, I am hoping I am wrong and someone knows more than me. So here is your chance... Prove you are smarter than me :) I want to do a search against a SQLite table looking for any records that "are similar" without having to write out the query in long hand. To clarify this is how I know I can write the query: select * from Articles where title like '%Bla%' or category like '%Bla%' or post like '%Bla%' This works and is not a huge deal if you are only checking against a couple of columns, but if you need to check against a bunch then your query can get really long and nasty looking really fast, not to mention the chance for typos. (ie: 'Bla%' instead of '%Bla%') What I am wondering is if there is a short hand way to do this? *This next code does not work the way I want, but just shows kind of what I am looking for select * from Articles where title or category or post like '%Bla%' Anyone know if there is a way to specify that multiple 'where' columns should use the same search value without listing that same search value for every column? Thanks in advance!

    Read the article

  • wordpress generating slow mysql queries - is it index problem?

    - by tash
    Hello Stack Overflow I've got very slow Mysql queries coming up from my wordpress site. It's making everything slow and I think this is eating up CPU usage. I've pasted the Explain results for the two most frequently problematic queries below. This is a typical result - although very occasionally teh queries do seem to be performed at a more normal speed. I have the usual wordpress indexes on the database tables. You will see that one of the queries is generated from wordpress core code, and not from anything specific - like the theme - for my site. I have a vague feeling that the database is not always using the indexes/is not using them properly... Is this right? Does anyone know how to fix it? Or is it a different problem entirely? Many thanks in advance for any help anyone can offer - it is hugely appreciated Query: [wp-blog-header.php(14): wp()] SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.* FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND wp_posts.post_type = 'post' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish' OR wp_posts.post_status = 'private') ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 0, 6 id select_type table type possible_keys key key_len ref rows Extra 1 SIMPLE wp_posts ref type_status_date type_status_date 63 const 427 Using where; Using filesort Query time: 34.2829 (ms) 9) Query: [wp-content/themes/LMHR/index.php(40): query_posts()] SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.* FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND wp_posts.ID NOT IN ( SELECT tr.object_id FROM wp_term_relationships AS tr INNER JOIN wp_term_taxonomy AS tt ON tr.term_taxonomy_id = tt.term_taxonomy_id WHERE tt.taxonomy = 'category' AND tt.term_id IN ('217', '218', '223', '224') ) AND wp_posts.post_type = 'post' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish' OR wp_posts.post_status = 'private') ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 0, 6 id select_type table type possible_keys key key_len ref rows Extra 1 PRIMARY wp_posts ref type_status_date type_status_date 63 const 427 Using where; Using filesort 2 DEPENDENT SUBQUERY tr ref PRIMARY,term_taxonomy_id PRIMARY 8 func 1 Using index 2 DEPENDENT SUBQUERY tt eq_ref PRIMARY,term_id_taxonomy,taxonomy PRIMARY 8 antin1_lovemusic2010.tr.term_taxonomy_id 1 Using where Query time: 70.3900 (ms)

    Read the article

  • giving a query as part of a uri in autobench

    - by Deepika
    I am using autobench for doing becnhmark. An example of autobench command is as shown below. autobench --single_host --host1 testhost.foo.com --uri1 /index.html --quiet --timeout 5 --low_rate 20 --high_rate 200 --rate_step 20 --num_call 10 --num_conn 5000 --file bench.tsv** The uri which I have to specify has a query attached to it. When I run the command which has the query, I get the following result dem_req_rate req_rate_localhost con_rate_localhost min_rep_rate_localhost avg_rep_rate_localhost max_rep_rate_localhost stddev_rep_rate_localhost resp_time_localhost net_io_localhost errors_localhost 200 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 101 400 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 101 600 0 60 0 0 0 0 0 0 101 800 0 80 0 0 0 0 0 0 101 1000 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 101 1200 0 120 0 0 0 0 0 0 101 1400 0 140 0 0 0 0 0 0 101 1600 0 160 0 0 0 0 0 0 101 1800 0 180 0 0 0 0 0 0 101 2000 0 200 0 0 0 0 0 0 101 The query request, response are all zeroes. Can anybody please tell me how to give a query as part of the uri? Thank you in advance

    Read the article

  • Nhibernate generate plain sql query instead of execution statement

    - by Wei Ma
    Using SQL profiler, I was able to find the query generated from Nhibernate was executed in the EXEC sp_executesql N'select ...' fashion. I am wondering if there is any way to force Nhibernate to generate the plain Select ... statement instead. The reason I want this is because apparently SQL Server generated different execution plans for them, and in my scenario, the plain "select ..." runs MUCH faster.

    Read the article

  • LINQ count query returns a 1 instead of a 0

    - by user335810
    I have the following view:- CREATE VIEW tbl_adjudicator_result_view AS SELECT a.adjudicator_id, sar.section_adjudicator_role_id, s.section_id, sdr.section_dance_role_id, d.dance_id, c.contact_id, ro.round_id, r.result_id, c.title, c.first_name, c.last_name, d.name, r.value, ro.type FROM tbl_adjudicator a INNER JOIN tbl_section_adjudicator_role sar on sar.section_adjudicator_role2adjudicator = a.adjudicator_id INNER JOIN tbl_section s on sar.section_adjudicator_role2section = s.section_id INNER JOIN tbl_section_dance_role sdr on sdr.section_dance_role2section = s.section_id INNER JOIN tbl_dance d on sdr.section_dance_role2dance = d.dance_id INNER JOIN tbl_contact c on a.adjudicator2contact = c.contact_id INNER JOIN tbl_round ro on ro.round2section = s.section_id LEFT OUTER JOIN tbl_result r on r.result2adjudicator = a.adjudicator_id AND r.result2dance = d.dance_id When I run the following query directly against the db I get 0 in the count column where there is no result select adjudicator_id, first_name, COUNT(result_id) from tbl_adjudicator_result_view arv where arv.round_id = 16 group by adjudicator_id, first_name However when I use LINQ query I always get 1 in the Count Column var query = from arv in db.AdjudicatorResultViews where arv.round_id == id group arv by new { arv.adjudicator_id, arv.first_name} into grp select new AdjudicatorResultViewGroupedByDance { AdjudicatorId = grp.Key.adjudicator_id, FirstName = grp.Key.first_name, Count = grp.Select(p => p.result_id).Distinct().Count() }; What do I need to change in the View / Linq query.

    Read the article

  • How to get unique values when using a UNION mysql query

    - by Roland
    I have 2 sql queries that return results, both contain a contract number, now I want to get the unique values of contract numbers HEre's the query (SELECT contractno, dsignoff FROM campaigns WHERE clientid = 20010490 AND contractno != '' GROUP BY contractno,dsignoff) UNION (SELECT id AS contractno,signoffdate AS dsignoff FROM contract_details WHERE clientid = 20010490) So for example, if the first query before the union returns two results with contract no 10, and the sql query after the union also returns 10, then we have 3 rows in total, however because contractno of all three rows is 10, I need to have only one row returned, Is this possible?

    Read the article

  • javascript to select text from web page

    - by phil swenson
    I'm trying to write a bookmarklet that grabs any selected text on a web page and sends it to my website. It should (hopefully) work in Chrome, FFX, Safari, and IE. I did a search and found a function, but it doesn't appear to work. Here is the code: <html> <body> <div onClick=getSelText()>Click</div> <div>please select me</div> </body> <script language=javascript> function getSelText(){ var txt = 'nothing'; if (window.getSelection){ txt = "1" + window.getSelection(); } else if (document.getSelection) { txt = "2" + document.getSelection(); } else if (document.selection) { txt = "3" + document.selection.createRange().text; } else return; alert("selected text = " + txt); } </script> </html> when I select the text in the div "please select me" and hit the click div, I just get "selected text = 1" thanks

    Read the article

  • a query is inserted from PHPMYAdmin but not from PHP

    - by iyad al aqel
    i'm writing a php code to insert form values in a forum values $dbServer = mysql_connect("localhost" , "root", "") ; if(!$dbServer) die ("Unable to connect"); mysql_select_db("kfumWonder"); $name= $_POST['name'] ; $password= md5($_POST['password']); $email= $_POST['email'] ; $major= $_POST['major'] ; $dateOfBirth=$_POST['dateOfBirth'] ; $webSite = $_POST['website']; $joinDate= date("Y m d") ; $query = "INSERT INTO user (name, password, email, major, dob, website, join_date) Values ('$name', '$password', '$email', '$major', '$dateOfBirth', '$webSite' , '$joinDate')" ; //echo $query ; $result = mysql_query($query) ; if (! $result ) echo " no results " ; this works perfectly fine when i took the printed query and run it in PHPMyAdmin but when i run this code nothing happens , any ideas !?

    Read the article

  • Wordpress Database SQL query help needed

    - by i-CONICA
    Hi, I've written a PHP script to access the latest item from the wordpress database, which it does. But I need to use it twice, once for the latest item from a specific category, and another from a differerent category... But right now I cannot figure out how to put the query together. The post has a post_parent, which in another table, called wp_term_relationships, is referred to as object_id, and has a term_taxonomy_id, which then relates to a different table, called wp_terms where the term_taxonomy_id is now term_id and then you have the category slug name available to select... I really cannot understand how this query would work though. I've made a really crap mock up of it, to try to "visually" explain what i'm trying to do... SELECT * FROM wp_posts WHERE post_status = 'publish' AND (SELECT term_taxonomy_id FROM wp_term_relationships WHERE object_id = post_parent) AND (SELECT slug FROM wp_terms WHERE term_id = term_taxonomy_id) ORDER BY ID DESC LIMIT 1 Really would appreciate some help... Thanks.

    Read the article

  • Invalid SQL Query

    - by svovaf
    I have the next query that in my opinion is a valid one, but I keep getting error telling me that there is a proble on "WHERE em.p4 = ue.p3" - Unknown column 'ue.p3' in 'where clause'. This is the query: SELECT DISTINCT ue.p3 FROM table1 AS ue INNER JOIN table2 AS e ON ue.p3 = e.p3 WHERE EXISTS( SELECT 1 FROM ( SELECT (COUNT(*) >= 1) AS MinMutual FROM table4 AS smm WHERE smm.p1 IN ( SELECT sem.p3 FROM table3 AS sem INNER JOIN table2 AS em ON sem.p3 = em.p3 WHERE em.p4 = ue.p3 AND sem.type = 'friends' AND em.p2 = 'normal' ) AND smm.p5 IN ( 15000,15151 ) ) AS Mutual WHERE Mutual.MinMutual = TRUE) LIMIT 11 If I execute the sub-query which is inside the EXISTS function, everything is O.K. PLEASE HELP!

    Read the article

  • pl/sql Oracle syntax

    - by Paul
    I have a query in pl/sql that i need to migrate to ms sql. select count(*) from table1 t1 where (conditions1) and (conditions2) and variable = t1.column1(+) Could anyone tell me what the (+) after the column means ? (is it sort of a sum ?)

    Read the article

  • What are the advantages of a query using a derived table(s) over a query not using them?

    - by AspOnMyNet
    I know how derived tables are used, but I still can’t really see any real advantages of using them. For example, in the following article http://techahead.wordpress.com/2007/10/01/sql-derived-tables/ the author tried to show benefits of a query using derived table over a query without one with an example, where we want to generate a report that shows off the total number of orders each customer placed in 1996, and we want this result set to include all customers, including those that didn’t place any orders that year and those that have never placed any orders at all( he’s using Northwind database ). But when I compare the two queries, I fail to see any advantages of a query using a derived table ( if nothing else, use of a derived table doesn't appear to simplify our code, at least not in this example): Regular query: SELECT C.CustomerID, C.CompanyName, COUNT(O.OrderID) AS TotalOrders FROM Customers C LEFT OUTER JOIN Orders O ON C.CustomerID = O.CustomerID AND YEAR(O.OrderDate) = 1996 GROUP BY C.CustomerID, C.CompanyName Query using a derived table: SELECT C.CustomerID, C.CompanyName, COUNT(dOrders.OrderID) AS TotalOrders FROM Customers C LEFT OUTER JOIN (SELECT * FROM Orders WHERE YEAR(Orders.OrderDate) = 1996) AS dOrders ON C.CustomerID = dOrders.CustomerID GROUP BY C.CustomerID, C.CompanyName Perhaps this just wasn’t a good example, so could you show me an example where benefits of derived table are more obvious? thanx

    Read the article

  • return only the last select results from stored procedure

    - by Madalina Dragomir
    The requirement says: stored procedure meant to search data, based on 5 identifiers. If there is an exact match return ONLY the exact match, if not but there is an exact match on the not null parameters return ONLY these results, otherwise return any match on any 4 not null parameters... and so on My (simplified) code looks like: create procedure xxxSearch @a nvarchar(80), @b nvarchar(80)... as begin select whatever from MyTable t where ((@a is null and t.a is null) or (@a = t.a)) and ((@b is null and t.b is null) or (@b = t.b))... if @@ROWCOUNT = 0 begin select whatever from MyTable t where ((@a is null) or (@a = t.a)) and ((@b is null) or (@b = t.b))... if @@ROWCOUNT = 0 begin ... end end end As a result there can be more sets of results selected, the first ones empty and I only need the last one. I know that it is easy to get the only the last result set on the application side, but all our stored procedure calls go through a framework that expects the significant results in the first table and I'm not eager to change it and test all the existing SPs. Is there a way to return only the last select results from a stored procedure? Is there a better way to do this task ?

    Read the article

  • Getting counts of 0 from a query with a double group by

    - by Maltiriel
    I'm trying to write a query that gets the counts for a table (call it item) categorized by two different things, call them type and code. What I'm hoping for as output is the following: Type Code Count 1 A 3 1 B 0 1 C 10 2 A 0 2 B 13 2 C 2 And so forth. Both type and code are found in lookup tables, and each item can have just one type but more than one code, so there's also a pivot (aka junction or join) table for the codes. I have a query that can get this result: Type Code Count 1 A 3 1 C 10 2 B 13 2 C 2 and it looks like (with join conditions omitted): SELECT typelookup.name, codelookup.name, COUNT(item.id) FROM typelookup LEFT OUTER JOIN item JOIN itemcodepivot RIGHT OUTER JOIN codelookup GROUP BY typelookup.name, codelookup.name Is there any way to alter this query to get the results I'm looking for? This is in MySQL, if that matters. I'm not actually sure this is possible all in one query, but if it is I'd really like to know how. Thanks for any ideas.

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199  | Next Page >