Search Results

Search found 1998 results on 80 pages for 'reply'.

Page 2/80 | < Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >

• negative time for a ping echo reply

  - by Mario

  I was happily pinging in the net when suddenly: Pinging X with 32 bytes of data: Reply from .235: bytes=32 time=1444ms TTL=41 Reply from .235: bytes=32 time=1767ms TTL=41 Reply from .235: bytes=32 time=1531ms TTL=41 Reply from .235: bytes=32 time=-1198187ms TTL=41 Ping statistics for .235: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 1444ms, Maximum = -1198187ms, Average = 1073443462ms A negative time for the reply. I checked wireshark and it had the same values: Time delta from previous displayed frame: -1198.187867000 seconds Time since reference or first frame: -1179.935038000 seconds I didn't change the time of the machine while pinging. This was made in my local network at home, from a XP VM in windows 7. So I blame the VM (virtualbox). But I was wondering if this strange behaviour (to me) could have a reason, or if any of you have seen this before. Thank you bye.

  Read the article

• BI für schnelle Analysen: Ein Erfolgsprojekt für die DAB bank, durchgeführt von Riverland Reply

  - by A & C Redaktion

  Zufriedene Kunden sind die beste Marketingstrategie. Deshalb bieten wir spezialisierten Partnern die Möglichkeit, professionelle Anwenderberichte über eigene erfolgreiche Oracle Projekte erstellen zu lassen. Hier im Blog präsentieren wir Ihnen in loser Folge Referenzberichte, mit denen Partner bereits erfolgreich werben. Heute: Der Oracle Partner Riverland Reply und sein Business-Intelligence-Projekt für die DAB bank Für die Direkt Anlage Bank, kurz DAB, sind BI-Lösungen längst zu einem wichtigen Steuerungstool geworden. Dabei müssen Datenströme aus verschiedenen Quellen zuverlässig gesteuert werden können. Um die neuesten CRM- und Business Intelligence-Funktionalitäten nutzen zu können, entschied sich die DAB bank für ein Upgrade auf Siebel CRM 8.1.1.7 mit CTI sowie die Integration von Oracle Business Intelligence 11g. Um ihren Wunsch nach Vereinfachung und Vereinheitlichung umzusetzen, fand die DAB in der Münchner Riverland Reply GmbH einen zuverlässigen Partner, der auf technische Beratung, Implementierung und Systemintegration in den Bereichen Prozesse, Businesslösungen und Technologien spezialisiert ist. Die Bedienbarkeit konnte deutlich verbessert werden, was die Prozessabläufe erleichtert. Den Datenzugriff erleichtert nun eine einheitliche Umgebung, und die Reporting-, Visualisierungs-, Such- und Collaboration-Funktionen sind in einem BI-Tool zusammengeführt. Details zum genauen Projektverlauf und den spezifischen Anforderungen finden Sie hier im Anwenderbericht der DAB. Die Möglichkeit, sich und ihre Arbeit gewinnbringend zu präsentieren, können alle spezialisierten Partner nutzen, die ein repräsentatives Oracle Projekt abgeschlossen haben. Erfahrene Fachjournalisten interviewen sowohl Partner als auch Endkunde und erstellen einen ausführlichen, ansprechend aufbereiteten Bericht. Die Veröffentlichung erfolgt über verschiedene Marketing-Kanäle. Natürlich können die Partner die Anwenderberichte auch für eigene Marketingzwecke nutzen, z. B. für Veranstaltungen. Haben Sie Interesse? Dann wenden Sie sich an Frau Renate Mayer. Wir benötigen von Ihnen einige Eckdaten wie Kundenname, Ansprechpartner und eingesetzte Oracle Produkte, eine Beschreibung des Projektes in drei-vier Sätzen sowie Ihren Ansprechpartner im Haus. Und dann: Lassen Sie Ihre gute Arbeit für sich sprechen!

  Read the article

• BI für schnelle Analysen: Ein Erfolgsprojekt für die DAB bank, durchgeführt von Riverland Reply

  - by A & C Redaktion

  Zufriedene Kunden sind die beste Marketingstrategie. Deshalb bieten wir spezialisierten Partnern die Möglichkeit, professionelle Anwenderberichte über eigene erfolgreiche Oracle Projekte erstellen zu lassen. Hier im Blog präsentieren wir Ihnen in loser Folge Referenzberichte, mit denen Partner bereits erfolgreich werben. Heute: Der Oracle Partner Riverland Reply und sein Business-Intelligence-Projekt für die DAB bank Für die Direkt Anlage Bank, kurz DAB, sind BI-Lösungen längst zu einem wichtigen Steuerungstool geworden. Dabei müssen Datenströme aus verschiedenen Quellen zuverlässig gesteuert werden können. Um die neuesten CRM- und Business Intelligence-Funktionalitäten nutzen zu können, entschied sich die DAB bank für ein Upgrade auf Siebel CRM 8.1.1.7 mit CTI sowie die Integration von Oracle Business Intelligence 11g. Um ihren Wunsch nach Vereinfachung und Vereinheitlichung umzusetzen, fand die DAB in der Münchner Riverland Reply GmbH einen zuverlässigen Partner, der auf technische Beratung, Implementierung und Systemintegration in den Bereichen Prozesse, Businesslösungen und Technologien spezialisiert ist. Die Bedienbarkeit konnte deutlich verbessert werden, was die Prozessabläufe erleichtert. Den Datenzugriff erleichtert nun eine einheitliche Umgebung, und die Reporting-, Visualisierungs-, Such- und Collaboration-Funktionen sind in einem BI-Tool zusammengeführt. Details zum genauen Projektverlauf und den spezifischen Anforderungen finden Sie hier im Anwenderbericht der DAB. Die Möglichkeit, sich und ihre Arbeit gewinnbringend zu präsentieren, können alle spezialisierten Partner nutzen, die ein repräsentatives Oracle Projekt abgeschlossen haben. Erfahrene Fachjournalisten interviewen sowohl Partner als auch Endkunde und erstellen einen ausführlichen, ansprechend aufbereiteten Bericht. Die Veröffentlichung erfolgt über verschiedene Marketing-Kanäle. Natürlich können die Partner die Anwenderberichte auch für eigene Marketingzwecke nutzen, z. B. für Veranstaltungen. Haben Sie Interesse? Dann wenden Sie sich an Frau Renate Mayer. Wir benötigen von Ihnen einige Eckdaten wie Kundenname, Ansprechpartner und eingesetzte Oracle Produkte, eine Beschreibung des Projektes in drei-vier Sätzen und Ihren Ansprechpartner im Haus. Und dann: Lassen Sie Ihre gute Arbeit für sich sprechen!

  Read the article

• Change reply-to in evolution

  - by ?????? ????????

  I am getting in my inbox on gmail mail from multiple addresses. When I get e-mails in gmail I can choose reply-to address. Is there such a possibility in Evolution? I know that in the advanced settings, you can specify the return address for the account, but how to make sure that there was a list of multiple addresses and be able to choose just one? Or maybe there is a possibility that at once expose the return address for letters?

  Read the article

• Linux Questions Zero Reply Drive

  <b>Linux Questions:</b> "One of the main goals of LQ is to help members get questions about Linux answered. One way we help facilitate this is with the "Zero Reply" functionality, which allows you to easily find threads with no replies."

  Read the article

• Should I reply this email? [closed]

  - by y26jin

  As a university student with 4 month internship experience in telecommunication corp before,I received one email from one of the mobile & wireless related company saying I have met all sorts of pre-selection requirements and my resume has been proceeded to the hiring manager in charge of this position.I am interested in this position and I was wondering if I should reply this email now...any thoughts or suggestions?

  Read the article

• Ein starker Partner: Riverland Reply

  - by Alliances & Channels Redaktion

  Unsere Oracle Partner in Deutschland sind national und international erfolgreich im Geschäft und punkten bei ihren Kunden mit maßgeschneiderten Lösungen. Sie stehen für durchdachte, stimmige IT-Konzepte, hohe Service-Kompetenz und vor allem für konsequente Qualität. Dabei ist jeder Partner einzigartig: jeder hat sein eigenes Erfolgsrezept mit Oracle entwickelt, jeder verfügt über besondere Experten und eigene Business Values. Daher ist auch jeder Oracle Partner auf seine Weise spezialisiert. Hier wollen wir Ihnen in einer neuen Serie einige ausgewählte Partner vorstellen, die uns Einblicke in ihre Arbeit, ihre Strategie und in spezielle Kompetenzen sowie Referenzen im Oracle Umfeld geben. Heute spricht unser A&C Kollege Jens Schrepfer mit Herrn Alexander Doubek vom Partner Riverland Reply über dessen Erfolgsmodell. Film ab! &lt;/ifra<span id="XinhaEditingPostion"></span>

  Read the article

• Ein starker Partner: Riverland Reply

  - by Alliances & Channels Redaktion

  Unsere Oracle Partner in Deutschland sind national und international erfolgreich im Geschäft und punkten bei ihren Kunden mit maßgeschneiderten Lösungen. Sie stehen für durchdachte, stimmige IT-Konzepte, hohe Service-Kompetenz und vor allem für konsequente Qualität. Dabei ist jeder Partner einzigartig: jeder hat sein eigenes Erfolgsrezept mit Oracle entwickelt, jeder verfügt über besondere Experten und eigene Business Values. Daher ist auch jeder Oracle Partner auf seine Weise spezialisiert. Hier wollen wir Ihnen in einer neuen Serie einige ausgewählte Partner vorstellen, die uns Einblicke in ihre Arbeit, ihre Strategie und in spezielle Kompetenzen sowie Referenzen im Oracle Umfeld geben. Heute spricht unser A&C Kollege Jens Schrepfer mit Herrn Alexander Doubek vom Partner Riverland Reply über dessen Erfolgsmodell. Film ab!

  Read the article

• Preventing 'Reply-All' to Exchange Distribution Groups

  - by Larold

  This is another question in a short series regarding a challenging Exchange project my co-workers have been asked to implement. (I'm helping even though I'm primarily a Unix guy because I volunteered to learn powershell and implement as much of the project in code as I could.) Background: We have been asked to create many distribution groups, say about 500+. These groups will contain two types of members. (Apologies if I get these terms wrong.) One type will be internal AD users, and the other type will be external users that I create Mail Contact entries for. We have been asked to make it so that a "Reply All" is not possible to any messages sent to these groups. I don't believe that is 100% possible to enforce for the following reasons. My question is - is my following reasoning sound? If not, please feel free to educate me on if / how things can properly be implemeneted. Thanks! My reasoning on why it's impossible to prevent 100% of potential reply-all actions: An interal AD user could put the DL in their To: field. They then click the '+' to expand the group. The group contains two external mail contacts. The message is sent to everyone, including those external contacts. External user #1 decides to reply-all, and his mail goes to, at least, external user #2, which wouldn't even involve our Exchange mail relays. An internal AD user could place the DL in their Outlook To: field, then click the '+' button to expand the DL. They then fire off an email to everyone that was in the group. (But the individual addresses are listed in the 'To:' field.) Because we now have a message sent to multiple recipients in the To: field, the addresses have been "exposed", and anyone is free to reply-all, and the messages just get sent to everyone in the To: field. Even if we try to set a Reply-To: field for all of these DLs, external mail clients are not obligated to abide by it, or force users to abide by it. Are my two points above valid? (I admit, they are somewhat similar.) Am I correct to tell our leadership "It is not possible to prevent 100% of the cases where someone will want to Reply-All to these groups UNLESS we train the users sending emails to these groups that the Bcc: field is to be used at all times." I am dying for any insight or parts of the equation I'm not seeing clearly. Thank you!!!

  Read the article

• Ping from windows 7 get no reply but sets errorlevel to 0

  - by Doron

  From a Windows 7 machine, I ping an IP address of a turned-off machine. C:\>ping 192.168.1.222 Pinging 192.168.1.222 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 192.168.1.222: Destination host unreachable. Reply from 192.168.1.222: Destination host unreachable. Reply from 192.168.1.222: Destination host unreachable. Ping statistics for 192.168.1.222: Packets: Sent = 3, Received = 3, Lost = 0 (0% loss) Even though there is no reply, the errorlevel is set to 0. What I am trying to do, is figure out if a remote machine is replying to ping. One of my tests is to turn off the machine and ping it. For some reason, ping sets errorlevel to 0.

  Read the article

• automatic reply rule within Outlook

  - by jherlitz

  My plan is to add a automatic reply to all incoming emails for a exchange mailbox. I created a rule that would check all incoming and created the template reply. Created it so it would match a server rule so outlook would not have to be open. If I send an email from my work account on the same exchange server, it works and sends the reply I created. With outlook open or closed. However, when I send email from outside the company, (my personal email), it does not get a reply. What the heck is going on there? I think the issue is within the selection of who the email is too. I have tried "only to me" "where my name is in TO or CC" as well as "sent to people or distribution list". So any ideas of why this isn't working. I thought this question was a super user question as appose to server fault. Thank you,

  Read the article

• mutt: open reply to a message

  - by Prof. MAAD

  Hi! I am trying to find a way in mutt to jump to my reply to a mail. To be precise: I have a mail from someone else open in mutt and I replied to that mail - a copy of that reply is in the sent folder. Now I want mutt to show me that reply, when I press some key while reading the original message. Is there a way to accomplish this? Thanks in advance, Prof. MAAD

  Read the article

• Stop YOUR emails from starting those company-wide Reply All email threads

  - by deadlydog

  You know you’ve seen it before; somebody sends out a company-wide email (or email to a large diverse audience), and a couple people or small group of people start replying-all back to the email with info/jokes that is only relative to that small group of people, yet EVERYBODY on the original email list has to suffer their inbox filling up with what is essentially spam since it doesn’t pertain to them or is something they don’t care about. A co-worker of mine made an ingenious off-hand comment to me one day of how to avoid this, and I’ve been using it ever since.  Simply place the email addresses of everybody that you are sending the email to in the BCC field (not the CC field), and in the TO field put your email address.  So everybody still gets the email, and they are easily able to reply back to you about it.  Note though, that the people you send the email to will not be able to see everyone else that you sent it to. Obviously you might not want to use this ALL the time; there are some times when you want a group discussion to occur over email.  But for those other times, such as when sending a NWR email about the car you are selling, asking everyone what a good local restaurant near by is, collecting personal info from people, or sharing a handy program or trick you learnt about (such as this one ), this trick can save everybody frustration and avoid wasting their time.  Trust me, your coworkers will thank you; mine did

  Read the article

• Can I set Outlook to always Reply to All?

  - by Andrew

  This may be hidden in the options somewhere but a glance through didn't find it: Is it at all possible to set Outlook so that a click on the "Reply" button (or, as I do, hitting Ctrl-R) will always reply-to-all, rather than reply to one? Or, I suppose, a basic switch of the reply buttons so that the default is reply-to-all, and, for example, I could hit Ctrl-Shift-R instead to reply to one? It's annoying me to constantly have to hit reply-to-all when that's all I do, and I sometimes forget to do it.

  Read the article

• Conditionally Rewrite Email Headers (From & Reply-To) Exchange 2010

  - by NorthVandea

  I have a client who maintains Company A (with email addresses %username%@companyA.com) and they own the domain companyB.com however there is no "infrastructure" (no Exchange server) set up specifically for companyB.com. My client needs to be able to have the end users within it's company (companyA.com) add a specific word or phrase to the Subject (or Body) line of the Outgoing email (they are only concerned with outgoing, incoming is a non-issue in this case) that triggers the Exchange 2010 servers to rewrite the header From and Reply-To [email protected] with [email protected] but this re-write should ONLY occur if the user places the key word/phrase in the Subject (or Body). I have attempted using Transport Rules and the New-AddressRewriteEntry cmdlet however each seems to have a limitation. From what I can tell Transport Rules cannot re-write the From/Reply-To fields and New-AddressRewriteEntry cannot be conditionally triggered based on message content. So to recap: User sends email outside the organization: From and Reply-To remain [email protected] User sends email outside the organization WITH "KeyWord" in the Subject or Body: From and Reply-To change to [email protected] automatically. Anyone know how this could be done WITHOUT coding a new Mail Agent? I don't have the programming knowledge to code a custom Agent... I can use any function of Exchange Management Shell or Console. Alternatively if anyone knows of a simple add-on program that could do this that would be good too. Any help would be greatly appreciated! Thank you!!!

  Read the article

• Extract reply to addresses from all emails in an outlook folder

  - by RodH257

  I've got to send a bulk email out to a bunch of people in reply to emails they sent me. I've got all the original emails stored in a single outlook folder. I want to extract all of the reply-to addresses from the emails in that folder so I can send an email to all of them. http://thetechieguy.wordpress.com/2008/04/22/extracting-email-address-from-outlook-2007-folder/ shows you how to export the FROM address of these emails, however a large amount of them came from a web service that sends emails 'on behalf of' the person I'm trying to mail to. So I need the reply-to address, and the export wizard doesn't do that. Does anyone have a tip on how to do this? This is Outlook 2007 on Exchange 2010.

  Read the article

• IIS6 Front Page Extension: Set Reply-To in Webbot mailers

  - by hurikhan77

  We are running some old legacy IIS6 websites with frontpage extensions. The contact forms (using webbot frontpage extension) use the administrators email address as from address which is pretty cumbersome as our customers tend to click just reply in the requests they receive and we always get these mails and have to bother about them. How do you set a reply-to per webbot form? Or how do you set a from or reply-to globally per IIS6 vhost? In the HTML code it looks like this: <!--webbot bot="SaveResults" S-Email-Format="TEXT/PRE" S-Email-Address="[email protected]" ... --> But this is the recipient address. Additional question: Will it be sufficient to just change this code? Or do I need to apply settings elsewhere?

  Read the article

• Here it is: SCO's Reply to Novell's Response to Motion for New Trial - Updated, as text

  <b>Groklaw:</b> "I know some of you wondered if SCO had given up and faced reality and wasn't going to file. Hah! Nevah happen."

  Read the article

• Automatic Reply Out of Hours

  - by Inbr3d

  Is there a way i can use a rule or "timer" of some sort to turn on out of office, or enable an auto reply for 1 mailbox (Sales mailbox) within a time period. Reason: We deal with all timezones, we only open 6am-8pm. critical sales are sometimes lost the automatic reply will involve a telephone number for emergency sales. (yes, spam i know) I wish the auto reply to come from "[email protected]" if this is possible. I've lokekd at transport rules, cant see anything. I cant word my question well enough for google to give an answer.

  Read the article

• Setting reply priority on Wifi network with QoS?

  - by Omega

  When using a Station and Access Point that support QoS over Wifi, is it possible to set the priority (= Traffic Identifier = TID = QoS channel) of the reply? For example when sending a ICMP ping request using a high priority (= QoS channel), is it possible to force the station to use that same priority (= QoS channel) when sending the reply? A related question: Is it possible to force the station into using a different QoS channel?

  Read the article

• Setting reply priority on Wifi network with QoS?

  - by Omega

  When using a Station and Access Point that support QoS over Wifi, is it possible to set the priority (= Traffic Identifier = TID = QoS channel) of the reply? For example when sending a ICMP ping request using a high priority (= QoS channel), is it possible to force the station to use that same priority (= QoS channel) when sending the reply? A related question: Is it possible to force the station into using a different QoS channel?

  Read the article

• Squid: The request or reply is too large

  - by Ueli

  I have done a reverse proxy with an Apache in the background (on the same server). All works great but I can't open one page. I get the error "The request or reply is too large." In my cache.log contains: 2010/12/09 15:28:29| WARNING: http.c:971: HTTP header too large 2010/12/09 15:29:03| ctx: enter level 0: 'http://server/admin/cms/nav' 2010/12/09 15:29:03| httpProcessReplyHeader: Too large reply header 2010/12/09 15:29:03| ctx: exit level 0 In my squid.conf i disabled the limitations of the request and reply header, without success: reply_body_max_size 0 allow all request_body_max_size 0 Does someone know why that don't work? Thank you very much. Squid Version: Squid Cache: Version 2.7.STABLE3 configure options: '--prefix=/usr' '--exec_prefix=/usr' '--bindir=/usr/sbin' '--sbindir=/usr/sbin' '--libexecdir=/usr/lib/squid' '--sysconfdir=/etc/squid' '--localstatedir=/var/spool/squid' '--datadir=/usr/share/squid' '--enable-async-io' '--with-pthreads' '--enable-storeio=ufs,aufs,coss,diskd,null' '--enable-linux-netfilter' '--enable-arp-acl' '--enable-epoll' '--enable-removal-policies=lru,heap' '--enable-snmp' '--enable-delay-pools' '--enable-htcp' '--enable-cache-digests' '--enable-underscores' '--enable-referer-log' '--enable-useragent-log' '--enable-auth=basic,digest,ntlm,negotiate' '--enable-negotiate-auth-helpers=squid_kerb_auth' '--enable-carp' '--enable-follow-x-forwarded-for' '--with-large-files' '--with-maxfd=65536' 'amd64-debian-linux' 'build_alias=amd64-debian-linux' 'host_alias=amd64-debian-linux' 'target_alias=amd64-debian-linux' 'CFLAGS=-Wall -g -O2' 'LDFLAGS=' 'CPPFLAGS='

  Read the article

• How do I get a hold of the Reply-To header and remunge it in postfix

  - by Mikhail

  I have a legacy application that emails via php. 5% of the emails aren't going through. The solution is to route all email through a fancy verified mail server like Amazon's SES. I am having some trouble implementing this functionality. It seems this guy had a similar problem. My question is where in postfix can I set a filter that will take as input the the message headers, so that I can manually set the From field and the Reply-To field to [email protected] and [email protected], respectively. Where whatever_php_wants is dictated by the php program and the users registration email. I know where to set the noreply portion, but I don't know the exact place in postfix's configuration files where I can intercept complete emails and pass them to a script. Edit So I want emails to look like: FROM: [email protected] REPLY-TO: the_users_address@their_email_service.com

  Read the article

• DHCP reply packets do not make it into KVM instance in OpenStack

  - by Lorin Hochstein

  I'm running a KVM instance inside of OpenStack, and it isn't getting an IP address from the DHCP server. Using tcpdump, I can see the request and reply packets on vnet0 of the compute host: # tcpdump -i vnet0 -n port 67 or port 68 tcpdump: WARNING: vnet0: no IPv4 address assigned tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol decode listening on vnet0, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 65535 bytes 19:44:56.176727 IP 0.0.0.0.68 > 255.255.255.255.67: BOOTP/DHCP, Request from fa:16:3e:46:f6:11, length 300 19:44:56.176785 IP 0.0.0.0.68 > 255.255.255.255.67: BOOTP/DHCP, Request from fa:16:3e:46:f6:11, length 300 19:44:56.177315 IP 10.40.0.1.67 > 10.40.0.3.68: BOOTP/DHCP, Reply, length 319 19:45:02.179834 IP 0.0.0.0.68 > 255.255.255.255.67: BOOTP/DHCP, Request from fa:16:3e:46:f6:11, length 300 19:45:02.179904 IP 0.0.0.0.68 > 255.255.255.255.67: BOOTP/DHCP, Request from fa:16:3e:46:f6:11, length 300 19:45:02.180375 IP 10.40.0.1.67 > 10.40.0.3.68: BOOTP/DHCP, Reply, length 319 However, if I do the same thing on eth0 inside the KVM instance, I only see the request packets, not the reply packets. What would prevent the packets from making it from vnet0 of the host to eth0 of the guest? My host is running Ubuntu 12.04 and my guest is running CentOS 6.3. Note that I have added this rule in my iptables, but it doesn't resolve the issue: -A POSTROUTING -p udp -m udp --dport 68 -j CHECKSUM --checksum-fill The instance corresponds to vnet0 and is connected via br100: # brctl show bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces br100 8000.54781a8605f2 no eth1 vnet0 vnet1 virbr0 8000.000000000000 yes Here's the full iptables-save: # Generated by iptables-save v1.4.12 on Tue Apr 2 19:47:27 2013 *nat :PREROUTING ACCEPT [8323:2553683] :INPUT ACCEPT [7993:2494942] :OUTPUT ACCEPT [6158:461050] :POSTROUTING ACCEPT [6455:511595] :nova-compute-OUTPUT - [0:0] :nova-compute-POSTROUTING - [0:0] :nova-compute-PREROUTING - [0:0] :nova-compute-float-snat - [0:0] :nova-compute-snat - [0:0] :nova-postrouting-bottom - [0:0] -A PREROUTING -j nova-compute-PREROUTING -A OUTPUT -j nova-compute-OUTPUT -A POSTROUTING -j nova-compute-POSTROUTING -A POSTROUTING -j nova-postrouting-bottom -A POSTROUTING -s 192.168.122.0/24 ! -d 192.168.122.0/24 -p tcp -j MASQUERADE --to-ports 1024-65535 -A POSTROUTING -s 192.168.122.0/24 ! -d 192.168.122.0/24 -p udp -j MASQUERADE --to-ports 1024-65535 -A POSTROUTING -s 192.168.122.0/24 ! -d 192.168.122.0/24 -j MASQUERADE -A nova-compute-snat -j nova-compute-float-snat -A nova-postrouting-bottom -j nova-compute-snat COMMIT # Completed on Tue Apr 2 19:47:27 2013 # Generated by iptables-save v1.4.12 on Tue Apr 2 19:47:27 2013 *mangle :PREROUTING ACCEPT [7969:5385812] :INPUT ACCEPT [7905:5363718] :FORWARD ACCEPT [158:48190] :OUTPUT ACCEPT [6877:8647975] :POSTROUTING ACCEPT [7035:8696165] -A POSTROUTING -o virbr0 -p udp -m udp --dport 68 -j CHECKSUM --checksum-fill -A POSTROUTING -p udp -m udp --dport 68 -j CHECKSUM --checksum-fill COMMIT # Completed on Tue Apr 2 19:47:27 2013 # Generated by iptables-save v1.4.12 on Tue Apr 2 19:47:27 2013 *filter :INPUT ACCEPT [2196774:15856921923] :FORWARD ACCEPT [0:0] :OUTPUT ACCEPT [2447201:1170227646] :nova-compute-FORWARD - [0:0] :nova-compute-INPUT - [0:0] :nova-compute-OUTPUT - [0:0] :nova-compute-inst-19 - [0:0] :nova-compute-inst-20 - [0:0] :nova-compute-local - [0:0] :nova-compute-provider - [0:0] :nova-compute-sg-fallback - [0:0] :nova-filter-top - [0:0] -A INPUT -j nova-compute-INPUT -A INPUT -i virbr0 -p udp -m udp --dport 53 -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -i virbr0 -p tcp -m tcp --dport 53 -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -i virbr0 -p udp -m udp --dport 67 -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -i virbr0 -p tcp -m tcp --dport 67 -j ACCEPT -A FORWARD -j nova-filter-top -A FORWARD -j nova-compute-FORWARD -A FORWARD -d 192.168.122.0/24 -o virbr0 -m state --state RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT -A FORWARD -s 192.168.122.0/24 -i virbr0 -j ACCEPT -A FORWARD -i virbr0 -o virbr0 -j ACCEPT -A FORWARD -o virbr0 -j REJECT --reject-with icmp-port-unreachable -A FORWARD -i virbr0 -j REJECT --reject-with icmp-port-unreachable -A OUTPUT -j nova-filter-top -A OUTPUT -j nova-compute-OUTPUT -A nova-compute-FORWARD -i br100 -j ACCEPT -A nova-compute-FORWARD -o br100 -j ACCEPT -A nova-compute-inst-19 -m state --state INVALID -j DROP -A nova-compute-inst-19 -m state --state RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT -A nova-compute-inst-19 -j nova-compute-provider -A nova-compute-inst-19 -s 10.40.0.1/32 -p udp -m udp --sport 67 --dport 68 -j ACCEPT -A nova-compute-inst-19 -s 10.40.0.0/16 -j ACCEPT -A nova-compute-inst-19 -p tcp -m tcp --dport 22 -j ACCEPT -A nova-compute-inst-19 -p icmp -j ACCEPT -A nova-compute-inst-19 -j nova-compute-sg-fallback -A nova-compute-inst-20 -m state --state INVALID -j DROP -A nova-compute-inst-20 -m state --state RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT -A nova-compute-inst-20 -j nova-compute-provider -A nova-compute-inst-20 -s 10.40.0.1/32 -p udp -m udp --sport 67 --dport 68 -j ACCEPT -A nova-compute-inst-20 -s 10.40.0.0/16 -j ACCEPT -A nova-compute-inst-20 -p tcp -m tcp --dport 22 -j ACCEPT -A nova-compute-inst-20 -p icmp -j ACCEPT -A nova-compute-inst-20 -j nova-compute-sg-fallback -A nova-compute-local -d 10.40.0.3/32 -j nova-compute-inst-19 -A nova-compute-local -d 10.40.0.4/32 -j nova-compute-inst-20 -A nova-compute-sg-fallback -j DROP -A nova-filter-top -j nova-compute-local COMMIT # Completed on Tue Apr 2 19:47:27 2013

  Read the article

• Persist header data across reply emails

  - by mickyjtwin

  Am trying to determine the best way to persist information from an originating email, through to a reply back. Essentially, it is to pass a GUID from the original email (c#), whereby when the receiver replies back, that GUID is also sent back for reference. I have tried setting the MessageID, whereby using Outlook, the In-Reply-To value is set with the original ID, however using some webclient email systems, that value is not created on reply. Is there another way to sent this info through email headers?

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >