Search Results

Search found 639 results on 26 pages for 'signing'.

Page 2/26 | < Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >

  • Signing redistributed files

    - by Garan
    In order to submit a desktop application for the Windows 8 app store, you need to digitally sign any driver or .exe associated with the application. However, the application I was trying to submit contains several files that are redistributions of other companies' software, and some of these are not signed. My application was rejected on these grounds. Is it legal (or ethical) to sign other companies' work so that we can submit our application? I think it might be considered some form of false representation but I'm not sure.

    Read the article

  • How to send credentials to linkedIn website and get oauth_verifier without signing in again [closed]

    - by akash kumar
    I am facing a problem sending credentials to another website so that I can login the user (automatically, not clicked on sign in here) and get an oauth_verifier value. I want to send the email address and the password through a form (submit button) from my website (e.g. a Liferay portal) to another website (e.g. LinkedIn), so that it automatically returns an oauth_verifier to my website. That means I don't want the user of my website to submit his email and password to LinkedIn again. My goal is to take the email and password of the user in my website and show the user his LinkedIn connection, message, job posting (again, in my website, not LinkedIn). I dont want the user redirected to the LinkedIn website to sign in there and then come back to my website. I have taken a consumer key and a secret key from LinkedIn for my web aplication. I am using the LinkedIn API and getting oauth_verifier for access token but in order to login, I have to take user to LinkedIn to sign in, while I want it to happen in the backend.

    Read the article

  • Trouble signing Code of Conduct

    - by Lionthinker
    So I've spent quite some time trying to sign this code of conduct and am on the verge of abandoning it. Got right to the sign the txt file stage https://launchpad.net/codeofconduct/1.1/+sign but now I get an error and am just tired of fighting with Ubuntu. It has to do with the clearsign thing in the terminal. See below $ gpg --clearsign UbuntuCodeofConduct-1.1.txt You need a passphrase to unlock the secret key for user: "Leon Gert Marincowitz (for launchpad) <[email protected]>" 2048-bit RSA key, ID 715FBC94, created 2012-06-16 gpg: can't open `UbuntuCodeofConduct-1.1.txt': No such file or directory gpg: UbuntuCodeofConduct-1.1.txt: clearsign failed: file open error

    Read the article

  • Issues signing up for Windows Azure free trial and pay as you go service

    - by Robert Greiner
    I get the following error when trying to sign up for the Azure 90-day free trial: We can't authorize the payment method. Please make sure the information is correct, or use another payment method. If you continue to get this message, please contact your financial institution. I've tried three different cards, two credit and one debit. Those cards are issued from two different banks. I've also tried the cards on two separate accounts. Someone from my work also confirmed that he could not sign up for the free trial either. Has anyone else had this problem? I haven't really seen much help searching Google and the support staff doesn't seem interested in helping people sign up for free accounts.

    Read the article

  • Creating deterministic key pairs in javascript for use in encrypting/decrypting/signing messages

    - by SlickTheNick
    So I have been searching everywhere and havn't been able to find anything with the sufficient information I need.. so Im a bit stumped on this one at the moment What I am trying to do is create a public/private key pair (like PGP) upon a users account creation, based on their passphrase and a random seed. The public key would be saved on the server, and ideally the private key would never be seen by the server whatsoever. The user could then sign in, and send a message to another user. Before the message is sent, the senders key pair would be re-generated on the fly based on their credentials (and maybe a password prompt) and used to encrypt the message. The receiver would then use their own re-generated private key to decrypt said message. The server itself should never see any plaintext passwords, private keys or readable messages. Bit unsure how on how I could go about implementing this. Iv been looking into PGP, specifically openPGP.js. The main trouble I am having is being able to regenerate the key-pair based off a specific seed. PGP seems to have a random output even if the inputs are the same. Storing the private key in a cookie or in HTML5 storage or something also isnt really an option, too unreliable. Can anyone point me in the right direction?

    Read the article

  • Ubuntu One Client 3.02 for windows - Authentication Failure signing in with existing account

    - by steigerj
    I have logged into ubuntu one using a browser successfully. But using the very same login email address and password in the windows client 3.02 gets me an 'authentication failed' message. I am 100% sure I used the same email address and password. My password does not contain any non-ascii characters. Someone suggested to use an older version of the client. Where could i possibly download a complete installer?

    Read the article

  • How do I export a PFX Code Signing Key to SPC and PVK under Windows 7?

    - by Greg Finzer
    I have a code signing key in PFX format that I need to export into SPC and PVK files. I tried to install the OpenSSL from Shining light but the install fails under Windows 7. http://www.shininglightpro.com/products/Win32OpenSSL.html Here are the instructions I am using from Comodo as a basis: https://support.comodo.com/index.php?_m=knowledgebase&_a=viewarticle&kbarticleid=1089 Anyone know of an alternate way to do this?

    Read the article

  • What signing method to use for public open-source projects?

    - by Irchi
    I'm publishing an open-source library on CodePlex, and want the dll files to have strong names so that they can be added to GAC. What's the best option for signing? Should I use SNK? If so, everyone have access to the key. I don't have a problem with everyone having access, but is it a good approach? Should I use PFX? If so, does it mean that other people downloading the source code are not able to build the solution? What I like to do is that I am the only one person to have access to the key, so that the signed assemblies also have a level of authenticity, but meanwhile don't prevent other developers to download, build, or change the source code for themselves, and be able to post changes for the main project.

    Read the article

  • Invalid Code Signing Entitlements - application-identifier

    - by user1144797
    I have just tried to upload Mac app to app store. But Apple said just error. Invalid Code Signing Entitlements. Your application bundle's signature contains code signing entitlements that are not supported on MAC OS X. Specifically, key 'application-identifier' in '(My app name).app/Contents/MacOS/(My app name) is not supported. My XCode is 4.2 and I didn't check Enable Entitlements. Please help me!!!

    Read the article

  • Is there a FAST way to export and install an app on my phone, while signing it with my own keystore?

    - by Alexei Andreev
    So, I've downloaded my own application from the market and installed it on my phone. Now, I am trying to install a temporary new version from Eclipse, but here is the message I get: Re-installation failed due to different application signatures. You must perform a full uninstall of the application. WARNING: This will remove the application data! Please execute 'adb uninstall com.applicationName' in a shell. Launch canceled! Now, I really really don't want to uninstall the application, because I will lose all my data. One solution I found is to Export my application, creating new .apk, and then install it via HTC Sync (probably a different program based on what phone you have). The problem is this takes a long time to do, since I need to enter the password for the keystore each time and then wait for HTC Sync. It's a pain in the ass! So the question is: Is there a way to make Eclipse automatically use my keystore to sign the application (quickly and automatically)? Or perhaps to replace debug keystore with my own? Or perhaps just tell it to remember the password, so I don't have to enter it every time...? Or some other way to solve this problem?

    Read the article

  • Windows 8 keeps signing out

    - by bill weaver
    Ran into a strange problem with Windows 8 Pro. Last night i installed Windows 8 Pro as an upgrade on a Sony Vaio laptop that had Windows 7 Pro on it. The install seemed to go okay. Then once installed, live tiles seem to work, native/Metro apps will start okay, but pretty soon after going into an app or settings, the screen flashes a few times and we're back to the lock screen. Signing in appears to do a full login. I've tried this with a local account and with a live.com account. This is someone else's laptop, so we decided to let it breathe, in case the install was still settling in. Well, they say today it's doing the same thing. Open the music app, and within a minute it's back to signon/lock screen. However, they can go to the actual Desktop and run Zune to play music, and it seems happy. In the past, i've installed retail Windows 8 Pro clean on a homebrew system, as an upgrade on a Dell laptop with a zillion apps and drivers, neither with any problems. Also, i've had the consumer preview and release candidate installed as well, no problems. Any ideas on what's going on here?

    Read the article

  • Internal Code Signing: Key Distribution, or Certificate Server?

    - by Myrddin Emrys
    I should first note that we have nobody in IT with significant familiarity with self-signed certification. We have a moderately sprawling network (one forest, many locations), and we are now rolling out internal code signing; until now users have run untrusted code, or we even disabled(!) the warnings. Intranet applications, scripts, and sites will now be signed with self certification. I am aware of two obvious ways we can deploy this: Distributing the keys directly via a group policy, and setting up a cert server. Can someone explain the trade-offs between these two methods? How many certs before the group policy method is unwieldy? Are they large enough that remote users will have issues? Does the group policy method distribute duplicates on every login? Is there a better method I am not aware of? I can find a lot of documentation on certifications and various ways to create them, but I have not been able to find something that summarizes the difference between the distribution methods and what criteria make one or the other superior.

    Read the article

  • Code Signing Services

    - by bogdan
    I'm developing a System Preference Pane that runs a background application. I'm planning on codesigning the background application and I'll be using the kill flag of codesign (http://gemma.apple.com/mac/library/documentation/Darwin/Reference/ManPages/man1/codesign.1.html). From my understanding, this kill flag will not allow the background application to be run if it's signature doesn't match. My problem with this approach is that it doesn't provide any feedback to the user and, for somewhat reason, the application gets corrupted, it will refuse to launch without any information. I'd like to use the Code Signing Service from the System Preference Pane to check the validity of the background application. However, I couldn't find how to use it to check the validity of an external file. Is this possible using the Code Signing Service or should I NSTask codesign directly? My application is targeted for 10.6 so it doesn't matter which I use. Thank you!

    Read the article

  • .apk signing fails even with Sun JDK (java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: com.android.jarutils.DebugKeyP

    - by ianweller
    I'm having an interesting problem signing my Android application, whether or not I'm using a debug key. Regardless of the JDK I have installed to /usr/bin/{java,keytool,jarsigner} (OpenJDK or Sun's JDK) it will always give the following output after compiling successfully: -package-debug-sign: [apkbuilder] Creating RemoteNotify-debug-unaligned.apk and signing it with a debug key... BUILD FAILED /home/ianweller/AndroidSDK/platforms/android-7/templates/android_rules.xml:281: The following error occurred while executing this line: /home/ianweller/AndroidSDK/platforms/android-7/templates/android_rules.xml:152: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: com.android.jarutils.DebugKeyProvider The application was built and signed just fine by Eclipse with the ADT plugin (even without Sun's JDK installed). I'm on Fedora 12. I'm wanting to get my code out of Eclipse and move it into a git repository, but being unable to build it from ant will not allow this to happen.

    Read the article

  • Code signing issues.

    - by abc
    i have purchased a certificate from godaddy, i have that in .pfx format. i tried to convert it into .cer using IE and ff. using converted .cer file when i try to sign midlet. i am getting following error message "The KeyStore does not contain private key associated with this alias !!" "Cannot sign" how to get work done?

    Read the article

  • signing the web server certificate with the CA key

    - by user1064786
    I have problem in running the command below using openssl-0.9.8e and apache in Ubuntu 11.10. do you have any idea to resolve it? first i was receiving this error: No such file or directory:bss_file.c:169:fopen('openssl.cnf','rb') then i copied my modified openssl.cnf file in the /etc/ssl/ directory. now i receive an error regarding -in option: openssl ca -days 3650 –in server/requests/ciise.concordia.ca.csr –cert ./CA/ConcordiaCA.crt –keyfile ./CA/ConcordiaCA.key –out ./server/certificates/ciise.concordia.ca.crt -config openssl.cnf unknown option –in I also copied ciise.concordia.ca.csr in the upper directory, but the problem still persists I would appreciate any help:)

    Read the article

  • RPM issues after signing JDK 1.6 64-bit

    - by organicveggie
    I'm trying to sign the Java JDK 1.6u21 64-bit RPM on CentOS 5.5 for use with Spacewalk and I'm running into problems. It seems to sign okay, but then when I check the signature it seems to be missing the key I just used to sign it. Yet RPM shows the key in it's list... # rpm --addsign jdk-6u21-linux-amd64.rpm Enter pass phrase: Pass phrase is good. jdk-6u21-linux-amd64.rpm: gpg: WARNING: standard input reopened gpg: WARNING: standard input reopened # rpm --checksig -v jdk-6u21-linux-amd64.rpm jdk-6u21-linux-amd64.rpm: Header V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID ecfd98a5 MD5 digest: OK (650e0961e20d4a44169b68e8f4a1691b) V3 DSA signature: OK, key ID ecfd98a5 Yet I have the key imported (edited for privacy): # rpm -qa gpg-pubkey* |grep ecfd98a5 gpg-pubkey-ecfd98a5-4caa4a4c # rpm -qi gpg-pubkey-ecfd98a5-4caa4a4c Name : gpg-pubkey Relocations: (not relocatable) Version : ecfd98a5 Vendor: (none) Release : 4caa4a4c Build Date: Mon 04 Oct 2010 10:20:49 PM CDT Install Date: Mon 04 Oct 2010 10:20:49 PM CDT Build Host: localhost Group : Public Keys Source RPM: (none) Size : 0 License: pubkey Signature : (none) Summary : gpg(FirstName LastName <[email protected]>) Description : -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- Version: rpm-4.4.2.3 (NSS-3) ...key goes here... =gKjN-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- And I'm definitely running a 64-bit version of CentOS: # uname -a Linux spacewalk.mycompany.corp 2.6.18-194.11.4.el5 #1 SMP Tue Sep 21 05:04:09 EDT 2010 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux Without a valid signature, Spacewalk refuses to install the RPM unless I completely disable signature checking. I have tried this with two different keys and two different users on the same machine without any success. Any bright ideas?

    Read the article

  • DKIMPROXY signing wrong domain

    - by user64566
    Just.... wont sign a thing... The dkimproxy_out.conf: # specify what address/port DKIMproxy should listen on listen 127.0.0.1:10028 # specify what address/port DKIMproxy forwards mail to relay 127.0.0.1:10029 # specify what domains DKIMproxy can sign for (comma-separated, no spaces) domain tinymagnet.com,hypnoenterprises.com # specify what signatures to add signature dkim(c=relaxed) signature domainkeys(c=nofws) # specify location of the private key keyfile /etc/postfix/dkim/private.key # specify the selector (i.e. the name of the key record put in DNS) selector mail The direct connection straight to the server, making it clear that this is a problem with dkimproxy and not postfix... mmxbass@hypno1:~$ telnet localhost 10028 Trying 127.0.0.1... Connected to localhost.localdomain. Escape character is '^]'. 220 hypno1.hypnoenterprises.com ESMTP Postfix (Debian/GNU) EHLO hypno1.hypnoenterprises.com 250-hypno1.hypnoenterprises.com 250-PIPELINING 250-SIZE 250-ETRN 250-STARTTLS 250-AUTH PLAIN LOGIN 250-AUTH=PLAIN LOGIN 250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES 250-8BITMIME 250 DSN MAIL FROM:<[email protected]> 250 2.1.0 Ok RCPT TO:<[email protected]> 250 2.1.5 Ok DATA 354 End data with <CR><LF>.<CR><LF> SUBJECT:test . 250 2.0.0 Ok: queued as B62A78D94F QUIT 221 2.0.0 Bye Now lets look at the mail headers as reported by myiptest.com: From [email protected] Thu Dec 23 18:57:14 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: [email protected] Delivery-date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 18:57:14 +0000 Received: from [184.82.95.154] (helo=hypno1.hypnoenterprises.com) by myiptest.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PVqLi-0004YR-5f for [email protected]; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 18:57:14 +0000 Received: from hypno1.hypnoenterprises.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by hypno1.hypnoenterprises.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 878418D902 for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 13:57:26 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple; d=hypnoenterprises.com; h= from:to:subject:date:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id; s=mail; bh=uoq1oCgLlTqpdD X/iUbLy7J1Wic=; b=HxBKTGjzTpZSZU8xkICtARCKxqriqZK+qHkY1U8qQlOw+S S1wlZxzTeDGIOgeiTviGDpcKWkLLTMlUvx8dY4FuT8K1/raO9nMC7xjG2uLayPX0 zLzm4Srs44jlfRQIjrQd9tNnp35Wkry6dHPv1u21WUvnDWaKARzGGHRLfAzW4= Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by hypno1.hypnoenterprises.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A04A8D945 for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 13:57:26 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at hypno1.hypnoenterprises.com Received: from hypno1.hypnoenterprises.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hypno1.hypnoenterprises.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ua7BnnzmIaUO for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 13:57:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from phoenix.localnet (c-76-23-245-211.hsd1.ma.comcast.net [76.23.245.211]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hypno1.hypnoenterprises.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 48A0D8D90D for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 13:57:25 -0500 (EST) From: Joshua Pech To: [email protected] Subject: test Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 13:57:25 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.32-5-amd64; KDE/4.4.5; x86_64; ; ) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: DomainKey-Status: no signature Received-SPF: pass (myiptest.com: domain of tinymagnet.com designates 184.82.95.154 as permitted sender) Notice how the dkim signature specifies the d=hypnoenterprises.com.... why?

    Read the article

  • DEBIAN repository signing: a step-by-step guide.

    - by jldupont
    I've got many DEBIAN repository for my projects (e.g. EPAPI, erlang-dbus etc.). It seems that now Synaptic wants those to be signed for the packages to appear by default. For the DEBIAN kung-fu masters out there, please provide me with a step-by-step guide to achieving this, please. I've googled a lot but I am still a bit confused on the subject. update: I use a Launchpad PPA now... saves me from all this trouble.

    Read the article

  • What to sign when signing a message with ws-security

    - by Heavy Bytes
    I am adding security to my web service and chose to sign the Timestamp and Token. While reading docs I found a lot of examples where they sign the Body of the SOAP message. My question is: what is best to sign? From what I understand signing the Body could lead to performance issues if the Body is pretty large. Thanks.

    Read the article

  • a valid signing identity matching this profile could not be found in your keychain

    - by riteshkumar1905
    Hi i am a admin in apple developer and my profile my profile is deleted. now when we create new provisioning profile it give error "valid signing identity matching this profile could not be found in your keychain ". certificate request in keychain is resisted with my profile. I am also developed new certificate request with new apple devlopper profile but this also give same problem. how its solved plz tell me.

    Read the article

  • Midlet signing issue

    - by abc
    Hello please check this. its not reposting . its just to focus more number of people on the problem. http://superuser.com/questions/135198/code-signing-issues

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >