Search Results

Search found 98 results on 4 pages for 'valgrind'.

Page 2/4 | < Previous Page | 1 2 3 4  | Next Page >

  • C program runs in Cygwin but not Linux (Malloc)

    - by Shawn
    I have a heap allocation error that I cant spot in my code that is picked up on vanguard/gdb on Linux but runs perfectly on a Windows cygwin environment. I understand that Linux could be tighter with its heap allocation than Windows but I would really like to have a response that discovers the issue/possible fix. I'm also aware that I shouldn't typecast malloc in C but it's a force of habit and doesn't change my problem from happening. My program actually compiles without error on both Linux & Windows but when I run it in Linux I get a scary looking result: malloc.c:3074: sYSMALLOc: Assertion `(old_top == (((mbinptr) (((char *) &((av)-bins[((1) - 1) * 2])) - __builtin_offsetof (struct malloc_chunk, fd)))) && old_size == 0) || ((unsigned long) (old_size) = (unsigned long)((((__builtin_offsetof (struct malloc_chunk, fd_nextsize))+((2 * (sizeof(size_t))) - 1)) & ~((2 * (sizeof(size_t))) - 1))) && ((old_top)-size & 0x1) && ((unsigned long)old_end & pagemask) == 0)' failed. Aborted Attached snippet from my code that is being pointed to as the error for review: /* Main */ int main(int argc, char * argv[]) { FILE *pFile; unsigned char *buffer; long int lSize; pFile = fopen ( argv[1] , "r" ); if (pFile==NULL) {fputs ("File error on arg[1]",stderr); return 1;} fseek (pFile , 0 , SEEK_END); lSize = ftell (pFile); rewind (pFile); buffer = (char*) malloc(sizeof(char) * lSize+1); if (buffer == NULL) {fputs ("Memory error",stderr); return 2;} bitpair * ppairs = (bitpair *) malloc(sizeof(bitpair) * (lSize+1)); //line 51 below calcpair(ppairs, (lSize+1)); /* irrelevant stuff */ fclose(pFile); free(buffer); free(ppairs); } typedef struct { long unsigned int a; //not actual variable names... Yes I need them to be long unsigned long unsigned int b; long unsigned int c; long unsigned int d; long unsigned int e; } bitpair; void calcpair(bitpair * ppairs, long int bits); void calcPairs(bitpair * ppairs, long int bits) { long int i, top, bot, var_1, var_2; int count = 0; for(i = 0; i < cs; i++) { top = 0; ppairs[top].e = 1; do { bot = count; count++; } while(ppairs[bot].e != 0); ppairs[bot].e = 1; var_1 = bot; var_2 = top; calcpair * bp = &ppairs[var_2]; bp->a = var_2; bp->b = var_1; bp->c = i; bp = &ppairs[var_1]; bp->a = var_2; bp->b = var_1; bp->c = i; } return; } gdb reports: free(): invalid pointer: 0x0000000000603290 * valgrind reports the following message 5 times before exiting due to "VALGRIND INTERNAL ERROR" signal 11 (SIGSEGV): Invalid read of size 8 ==2727== at 0x401043: calcPairs (in /home/user/Documents/5-3/ubuntu test/main) ==2727== by 0x400C9A: main (main.c:51) ==2727== Address 0x5a607a0 is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd

    Read the article

  • Possible memory leak problem

    - by MaiTiano
    I write two pieces of c programs like following, during memcheck process using Valgrind, a lot of mem leak information is given. int GetMemory(int framewidth, int frameheight, int SR/*, int blocksize*//*,int ALL_REF_NUM*/) { //int i,j; int memory_size = 0; //int refnum = ALL_REF_NUM; int input_search_range = SR; memory_size += get_mem2D(&curFrameY, frameheight, framewidth); memory_size += get_mem2D(&curFrameU, frameheight>>1, framewidth>>1); memory_size += get_mem2D(&curFrameV, frameheight>>1, framewidth>>1); memory_size += get_mem3D(&prevFrameY, refnum, frameheight, framewidth);// to allocate reference frame buffer accoding to the reference frame number memory_size += get_mem3D(&prevFrameU, refnum, frameheight>>1, framewidth>>1); memory_size += get_mem3D(&prevFrameV, refnum, frameheight>>1, framewidth>>1); memory_size += get_mem2D(&mpFrameY, frameheight, framewidth); memory_size += get_mem2D(&mpFrameU, frameheight>>1, framewidth>>1); memory_size += get_mem2D(&mpFrameV, frameheight>>1, framewidth>>1); memory_size += get_mem2D(&searchwindow, input_search_range*2 + blocksize, input_search_range*2 + blocksize);// to allocate search window according to the searchrange /*memory_size +=*/ get_mem1D(/*&SAD_cost, height, width*/); // memory_size += get_mem2D(&searchwindow, 80, 80);// if searchrange is 32, then only 32+1+32+15 pixels is needed in each row and col, therefore the range of // search window is enough to be set to 80 ! memory_size += get_mem2Dint(&all_mv, height/blocksize, width/blocksize); return 0; } void FreeMemory(int refno) { free_mem2D(curFrameY); free_mem2D(curFrameU); free_mem2D(curFrameV); free_mem3D(prevFrameY,refno); free_mem3D(prevFrameU,refno); free_mem3D(prevFrameV,refno); free_mem2D(mpFrameY); free_mem2D(mpFrameU); free_mem2D(mpFrameV); free_mem2D(searchwindow); free_mem1D(); free_mem2Dint(all_mv); } void free_mem1D() { free(SAD_cost); } Now I hope to make sure where are the possible problems in my program? Here I may post some valgrind information to let you know about the actual error information. ==29105== by 0x804A906: main (me_search.c:1480) ==29105== ==29105== ==29105== HEAP SUMMARY: ==29105== in use at exit: 124,088 bytes in 18 blocks ==29105== total heap usage: 37 allocs, 21 frees, 749,276 bytes allocated ==29105== ==29105== 272 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss record 1 of 18 ==29105== at 0x402425F: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:467) ==29105== by 0x804A296: get_mem2D (me_search.c:1315) ==29105== by 0x804885E: GetMemory (me_search.c:117) ==29105== by 0x804A757: main (me_search.c:1456) ==29105== ==29105== 352 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss record 2 of 18 ==29105== at 0x4024F20: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:236) ==29105== by 0x409537E: __fopen_internal (iofopen.c:76) ==29105== by 0x409544B: fopen@@GLIBC_2.1 (iofopen.c:107) ==29105== by 0x804A660: main (me_search.c:1439) ==29105== ==29105== 584 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss record 3 of 18 ==29105== at 0x402425F: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:467) ==29105== by 0x804A296: get_mem2D (me_search.c:1315) ==29105== by 0x8048724: GetMemory (me_search.c:106) ==29105== by 0x804A757: main (me_search.c:1456) ==29105== ==29105== 584 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss record 4 of 18 ==29105== at 0x402425F: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:467) ==29105== by 0x804A296: get_mem2D (me_search.c:1315) ==29105== by 0x8048747: GetMemory (me_search.c:107) ==29105== by 0x804A757: main (me_search.c:1456) ==29105== ==29105== 584 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss record 5 of 18 ==29105== at 0x402425F: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:467) ==29105== by 0x804A296: get_mem2D (me_search.c:1315) ==29105== by 0x8048809: GetMemory (me_search.c:114) ==29105== by 0x804A757: main (me_search.c:1456) ==29105== ==29105== 584 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss record 6 of 18 ==29105== at 0x402425F: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:467) ==29105== by 0x804A296: get_mem2D (me_search.c:1315) ==29105== by 0x804882C: GetMemory (me_search.c:115) ==29105== by 0x804A757: main (me_search.c:1456) ==29105== ==29105== 584 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 7 of 18 ==29105== at 0x402425F: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:467) ==29105== by 0x804A296: get_mem2D (me_search.c:1315) ==29105== by 0x804A4F8: get_mem3D (me_search.c:1393) ==29105== by 0x804879B: GetMemory (me_search.c:110) ==29105== by 0x804A757: main (me_search.c:1456) ==29105== ==29105== 584 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 8 of 18 ==29105== at 0x402425F: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:467) ==29105== by 0x804A296: get_mem2D (me_search.c:1315) ==29105== by 0x804A4F8: get_mem3D (me_search.c:1393) ==29105== by 0x80487C9: GetMemory (me_search.c:111) ==29105== by 0x804A757: main (me_search.c:1456) ==29105== ==29105== 1,168 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss record 9 of 18 ==29105== at 0x402425F: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:467) ==29105== by 0x804A296: get_mem2D (me_search.c:1315) ==29105== by 0x8048701: GetMemory (me_search.c:105) ==29105== by 0x804A757: main (me_search.c:1456) ==29105== ==29105== 1,168 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss record 10 of 18 ==29105== at 0x402425F: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:467) ==29105== by 0x804A296: get_mem2D (me_search.c:1315) ==29105== by 0x80487E6: GetMemory (me_search.c:113) ==29105== by 0x804A757: main (me_search.c:1456) ==29105== ==29105== 1,168 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 11 of 18 ==29105== at 0x402425F: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:467) ==29105== by 0x804A296: get_mem2D (me_search.c:1315) ==29105== by 0x804A4F8: get_mem3D (me_search.c:1393) ==29105== by 0x804876D: GetMemory (me_search.c:109) ==29105== by 0x804A757: main (me_search.c:1456) ==29105== ==29105== 6,336 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 12 of 18 ==29105== at 0x4024F20: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:236) ==29105== by 0x804A25C: get_mem1D (me_search.c:1295) ==29105== by 0x8048866: GetMemory (me_search.c:119) ==29105== by 0x804A757: main (me_search.c:1456)

    Read the article

  • Template Parameter Initialization

    - by isurulucky
    Hi, I wrote some C++ code in which I used Templates. Since I used templates, I could not initialize a couple of template class variables. I got an warning message from valgrind saying Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialized value(s). So is there a way to get around this and/or initialize template variables?? I couldn't think of a way to do it because even if I initailize them as NULL, when I use string data type a run time failure occurres. Thank You!

    Read the article

  • Need help in understanding kcachedgrind output

    - by hap497
    Hi, I am using valgrind callgrind to profile a program on gtk. And then I use kcachedgrind to read the result. I have captured an update a screenshot of kcachedgrind here: http://i41.tinypic.com/168spk0.jpg. It said the function gtk_moz_embed_new() costed '15.61%'. But I dont understand how is that possible. the function gtk_moz_embed_new() literally has 1 line: and it is just calling a g_object_new(). GtkWidget * gtk_moz_embed_new(void) { return GTK_WIDGET(g_object_new(GTK_TYPE_MOZ_EMBED, NULL)); } Can you please help understanding the result or how to use kcachedgrind. Thank you.

    Read the article

  • Parse file to hash in Ruby

    - by Taschetto
    I'm a ruby newcomer who's trying to read a text file (a Valgrind simulation output) like this: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Profile data file 'temp/gt_1024_2_16.out' -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I1 cache: 1024 B, 16 B, 2-way associative D1 cache: 32768 B, 64 B, 8-way associative LL cache: 3145728 B, 64 B, 12-way associative Profiled target: bash run.sh Events recorded: Ir I1mr ILmr Dr D1mr DLmr Dw D1mw DLmw Events shown: Ir I1mr ILmr Dr D1mr DLmr Dw D1mw DLmw Event sort order: Ir I1mr ILmr Dr D1mr DLmr Dw D1mw DLmw Thresholds: 99 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Include dirs: User annotated: Auto-annotation: off -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ir I1mr ILmr Dr D1mr DLmr Dw D1mw DLmw -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1,894,017 246,981 2,448 519,124 4,691 2,792 337,817 1,846 1,672 PROGRAM TOTALS // other data I want to extract the PROGRAM TOTALS table and put it into a hash. Something like... myHash = { :Ir => 1894017, :I1mr => 246981, ILmr => 2448, ..., DLmw => 1672 } What are the best options for doing this? Could the CSV classes help me out? Thanks a bunch.

    Read the article

  • Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value - freeing a linked list

    - by user720491
    I want to free a linked list in C. All is working fine, but Valgrind is telling me Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s) at 0x401400: mtf_destroy Here's the code: list_elt *head; void mtf_init() { list_elt *current; head = malloc(sizeof(list_elt)); current = head; for (int i = 0; i < LIST_SIZE-1; i++) { current->value = (BYTE) i; current->next = malloc(sizeof(list_elt)); current = current->next; } current->value = LIST_SIZE-1; } void mtf_destroy(list_elt *elt) { if (elt->next != NULL) mtf_destroy(elt->next); free(elt); } How can I solve this? Thanks!

    Read the article

  • Can't figure out where race condition is occuring

    - by Nik
    I'm using Valgrind --tool=drd to check my application that uses Boost::thread. Basically, the application populates a set of "Book" values with "Kehai" values based on inputs through a socket connection. On a seperate thread, a user can connect and get the books send to them. Its fairly simple, so i figured using a boost::mutex::scoped_lock on the location that serializes the book and the location that clears out the book data should be suffice to prevent any race conditions. Here is the code: void Book::clear() { boost::mutex::scoped_lock lock(dataMutex); for(int i =NUM_KEHAI-1; i >= 0; --i) { bid[i].clear(); ask[i].clear(); } } int Book::copyChangedKehaiToString(char* dst) const { boost::mutex::scoped_lock lock(dataMutex); sprintf(dst, "%-4s%-13s",market.c_str(),meigara.c_str()); int loc = 17; for(int i = 0; i < Book::NUM_KEHAI; ++i) { if(ask[i].changed > 0) { sprintf(dst+loc,"A%i%-21s%-21s%-21s%-8s%-4s",i,ask[i].price.c_str(),ask[i].volume.c_str(),ask[i].number.c_str(),ask[i].postTime.c_str(),ask[i].status.c_str()); loc += 77; } } for(int i = 0; i < Book::NUM_KEHAI; ++i) { if(bid[i].changed > 0) { sprintf(dst+loc,"B%i%-21s%-21s%-21s%-8s%-4s",i,bid[i].price.c_str(),bid[i].volume.c_str(),bid[i].number.c_str(),bid[i].postTime.c_str(),bid[i].status.c_str()); loc += 77; } } return loc; } The clear() function and the copyChangedKehaiToString() function are called in the datagetting thread and data sending thread,respectively. Also, as a note, the class Book: struct Book { private: Book(const Book&); Book& operator=(const Book&); public: static const int NUM_KEHAI=10; struct Kehai; friend struct Book::Kehai; struct Kehai { private: Kehai& operator=(const Kehai&); public: std::string price; std::string volume; std::string number; std::string postTime; std::string status; int changed; Kehai(); void copyFrom(const Kehai& other); Kehai(const Kehai& other); inline void clear() { price.assign(""); volume.assign(""); number.assign(""); postTime.assign(""); status.assign(""); changed = -1; } }; std::vector<Kehai> bid; std::vector<Kehai> ask; tm recTime; mutable boost::mutex dataMutex; Book(); void clear(); int copyChangedKehaiToString(char * dst) const; }; When using valgrind --tool=drd, i get race condition errors such as the one below: ==26330== Conflicting store by thread 1 at 0x0658fbb0 size 4 ==26330== at 0x653AE68: std::string::_M_mutate(unsigned int, unsigned int, unsigned int) (in /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6.0.8) ==26330== by 0x653AFC9: std::string::_M_replace_safe(unsigned int, unsigned int, char const*, unsigned int) (in /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6.0.8) ==26330== by 0x653B064: std::string::assign(char const*, unsigned int) (in /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6.0.8) ==26330== by 0x653B134: std::string::assign(char const*) (in /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6.0.8) ==26330== by 0x8055D64: Book::Kehai::clear() (Book.h:50) ==26330== by 0x8094A29: Book::clear() (Book.cpp:78) ==26330== by 0x808537E: RealKernel::start() (RealKernel.cpp:86) ==26330== by 0x804D15A: main (main.cpp:164) ==26330== Allocation context: BSS section of /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6.0.8 ==26330== Other segment start (thread 2) ==26330== at 0x400BB59: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:633) ==26330== by 0xC59565: pthread_mutex_unlock (in /lib/libc-2.5.so) ==26330== by 0x805477C: boost::mutex::unlock() (mutex.hpp:56) ==26330== by 0x80547C9: boost::unique_lock<boost::mutex>::~unique_lock() (locks.hpp:340) ==26330== by 0x80949BA: Book::copyChangedKehaiToString(char*) const (Book.cpp:134) ==26330== by 0x80937EE: BookSerializer::serializeBook(Book const&, std::string const&) (BookSerializer.cpp:41) ==26330== by 0x8092D05: BookSnapshotManager::getSnaphotDataList() (BookSnapshotManager.cpp:72) ==26330== by 0x8088179: SnapshotServer::getDataList() (SnapshotServer.cpp:246) ==26330== by 0x808870F: SnapshotServer::run() (SnapshotServer.cpp:183) ==26330== by 0x808BAF5: boost::_mfi::mf0<void, RealThread>::operator()(RealThread*) const (mem_fn_template.hpp:49) ==26330== by 0x808BB4D: void boost::_bi::list1<boost::_bi::value<RealThread*> >::operator()<boost::_mfi::mf0<void, RealThread>, boost::_bi::list0>(boost::_bi::type<void>, boost::_mfi::mf0<void, RealThread>&, boost::_bi::list0&, int) (bind.hpp:253) ==26330== by 0x808BB90: boost::_bi::bind_t<void, boost::_mfi::mf0<void, RealThread>, boost::_bi::list1<boost::_bi::value<RealThread*> > >::operator()() (bind_template.hpp:20) ==26330== Other segment end (thread 2) ==26330== at 0x400B62A: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:580) ==26330== by 0xC59535: pthread_mutex_lock (in /lib/libc-2.5.so) ==26330== by 0x80546B8: boost::mutex::lock() (mutex.hpp:51) ==26330== by 0x805473B: boost::unique_lock<boost::mutex>::lock() (locks.hpp:349) ==26330== by 0x8054769: boost::unique_lock<boost::mutex>::unique_lock(boost::mutex&) (locks.hpp:227) ==26330== by 0x8094711: Book::copyChangedKehaiToString(char*) const (Book.cpp:113) ==26330== by 0x80937EE: BookSerializer::serializeBook(Book const&, std::string const&) (BookSerializer.cpp:41) ==26330== by 0x808870F: SnapshotServer::run() (SnapshotServer.cpp:183) ==26330== by 0x808BAF5: boost::_mfi::mf0<void, RealThread>::operator()(RealThread*) const (mem_fn_template.hpp:49) ==26330== by 0x808BB4D: void boost::_bi::list1<boost::_bi::value<RealThread*> >::operator()<boost::_mfi::mf0<void, RealThread>, boost::_bi::list0>(boost::_bi::type<void>, boost::_mfi::mf0<void, RealThread>&, boost::_bi::list0&, int) (bind.hpp:253) For the life of me, i can't figure out where the race condition is. As far as I can tell, clearing the kehai is done only after having taken the mutex, and the same holds true with copying it to a string. Does anyone have any ideas what could be causing this, or where I should look? Thank you kindly.

    Read the article

  • Need help in reading callgrind output

    - by n179911
    Hi, I have run callgrind with my application like this "valgrind --tool=callgrind MyApplication" and then call 'callgrind_annotate --auto=yes ./callgrind.out.2489' I see output like 768,097,560 PROGRAM TOTALS -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ir file:function -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 18,624,794 /build/buildd/eglibc-2.11.1/elf/dl-lookup.c:do_lookup_x [/lib/ld-2.11.1.so] 18,149,492 /src/js/src/jsgc.cpp:JS_CallTracer'2 [/src/firefox-debug-objdir/js/src/libmozjs.so] 16,328,897 /src/layout/style/nsCSSDataBlock.cpp:nsCSSExpandedDataBlock::DoAssertInitialState() [/src/firefox-debug-objdir/toolkit/library/libxul.so] 13,376,634 /build/buildd/eglibc-2.11.1/nptl/pthread_getspecific.c:pthread_getspecific [/lib/libpthread-2.11.1.so] 13,005,623 /build/buildd/eglibc-2.11.1/malloc/malloc.c:_int_malloc [/lib/libc-2.11.1.so] 10,404,453 ???:0x0000000000009190 [/usr/lib/libpangocairo-1.0.so.0.2800.0] 10,358,646 /src/xpcom/io/nsFastLoadFile.cpp:NS_AccumulateFastLoadChecksum(unsigned int*, unsigned char const*, unsigned int, int) [/src/firefox-debug-objdir/toolkit/library/libxul.so] 8,543,634 /src/js/src/jsscan.cpp:js_GetToken [/src/firefox-debug-objdir/js/src/libmozjs.so] 7,451,273 /src/xpcom/typelib/xpt/src/xpt_arena.c:XPT_ArenaMalloc [/src/firefox-debug-objdir/toolkit/library/libxul.so] 7,335,131 ???:g_type_check_instance_is_a [/usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0.2400.0] I have a few questions: What does the number on the right mean? Does it mean it spend accumulative that long in calling the function on the right? How can I tell how many times that function has been called and Does that include the time spend in calling the functions called by that function? What does line with ??? mean? e.g. ???:0x0000000000009190 [/usr/lib/libpangocairo-1.0.so.0.2800.0] Thank you.

    Read the article

  • Difference in behaviour( gcc and MSVC++ )

    - by Prasoon Saurav
    Consider the following code. #include <stdio.h> #include <vector> #include <iostream> struct XYZ { int X,Y,Z; }; std::vector<XYZ> A; int rec(int idx) { int i = A.size(); A.push_back(XYZ()); if (idx >= 5) return i; A[i].X = rec(idx+1); return i; } int main(){ A.clear(); rec(0); puts("FINISH!"); } I couldn't figure out the reason why the code gives segmentation fault on Linux(IDE used: Code::Blocks) whereas on Windows(IDE used : MSVC++) it doesn't. When I used valgrind just to check what actually the problem was, I got this output. I got Invalid write of size 4 at four different places. Then why didn't the code crash when I used MSVC++? Am I missing something?

    Read the article

  • Difference in behaviour (GCC and Visual C++)

    - by Prasoon Saurav
    Consider the following code. #include <stdio.h> #include <vector> #include <iostream> struct XYZ { int X,Y,Z; }; std::vector<XYZ> A; int rec(int idx) { int i = A.size(); A.push_back(XYZ()); if (idx >= 5) return i; A[i].X = rec(idx+1); return i; } int main(){ A.clear(); rec(0); puts("FINISH!"); } I couldn't figure out the reason why the code gives a segmentation fault on Linux (IDE used: Code::Blocks) whereas on Windows (IDE used: Visual C++) it doesn't. When I used Valgrind just to check what actually the problem was, I got this output. I got Invalid write of size 4 at four different places. Then why didn't the code crash when I used Visual C++? Am I missing something?

    Read the article

  • C++ Program Always Crashes While doing a std::string assign

    - by bbazso
    I have been trying to debug a crash in my application that crashes (i.e. asserts a * glibc detected free(): invalid pointer: 0x000000000070f0c0 **) while I'm trying to do a simple assign to a string. Note that I'm compiling on a linux system with gcc 4.2.4 with an optimization level set to -O2. With -O0 the application no longer crashes. E.g. std::string abc; abc = "testString"; but if I changed the code as follows it no longer crashes std::string abc("testString"); So again I scratched my head! But the interesting pattern was that the crash moved later on in the application, AGAIN at another string. I found it weird that the application was continuously crashing on a string assign. A typical crash backtrace would look as follows: #0 0x00007f2c2663bfb5 in raise () from /lib64/libc.so.6 (gdb) bt #0 0x00007f2c2663bfb5 in raise () from /lib64/libc.so.6 #1 0x00007f2c2663dbc3 in abort () from /lib64/libc.so.6 #2 0x00000000004d8cb7 in people_streamingserver_sighandler (signum=6) at src/peoplestreamingserver.cpp:487 #3 <signal handler called> #4 0x00007f2c2663bfb5 in raise () from /lib64/libc.so.6 #5 0x00007f2c2663dbc3 in abort () from /lib64/libc.so.6 #6 0x00007f2c26680ce0 in ?? () from /lib64/libc.so.6 #7 0x00007f2c270ca7a0 in std::string::assign (this=0x7f2c21bc8d20, __str=<value optimized out>) at /home/bbazso/ThirdParty/sources/gcc-4.2.4/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/basic_string.h:238 #8 0x00007f2c21bd874a in PEOPLESProtocol::GetStreamName (this=<value optimized out>, pRawPath=0x2342fd8 "rtmp://127.0.0.1/mp4:pop.mp4", lStreamName=@0x7f2c21bc8d20) at /opt/trx-HEAD/gcc/4.2.4/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.2.4/../../../../include/c++/4.2.4/bits/basic_string.h:491 #9 0x00007f2c21bd9daa in PEOPLESProtocol::SignalProtocolCreated (pProtocol=0x233a4e0, customParameters=@0x7f2c21bc8de0) at peoplestreamer/src/peoplesprotocol.cpp:240 This was really weird behavior and so I started to poke around further in my application to see if there was some sort of memory corruption (either heap or stack) error that could be occurring that could be causing this weird behavior. I even checked for ptr corruptions and came up empty handed. In addition to visual inspection of the code I also tried the following tools: Valgrind using both memcheck and exp-ptrcheck electric fence libsafe I compiled with -fstack-protector-all in gcc I tried MALLOC_CHECK_ set to 2 I ran my code through lint checks as well as cppcheck (to check for mistakes) And I stepped through the code using gdb So I tried a lot of stuff and still came up empty handed. So I was wondering if it could be something like a linker issue or a library issue of some sort that could be causing this problem. Are there any know issues with the std::string that make is susceptible to crashing in -O2 or maybe it has nothing to do with the optimization level? But the only pattern that I can see thus far in my problem is that it always seems to crash on a string and so I was wondering if anyone knew of any issues that my be causing this type of behavior. Thanks a lot!

    Read the article

  • mem-leak freeing g_strdup

    - by Mike
    I'm trying to free g_strdup but I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong. Using valgrind --tool=memcheck --leak-check=yes ./a.out I keep getting: ==4506== 40 bytes in 10 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 2 of 9 ==4506== at 0x4024C1C: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195) ==4506== by 0x40782E3: g_malloc (in /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.2200.3) ==4506== by 0x4090CA8: g_strdup (in /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.2200.3) ==4506== by 0x8048722: add_inv (dup.c:26) ==4506== by 0x80487E6: main (dup.c:47) ==4506== 504 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 4 of 9 ==4506== at 0x4023E2E: memalign (vg_replace_malloc.c:532) ==4506== by 0x4023E8B: posix_memalign (vg_replace_malloc.c:660) ==4506== by 0x408D61D: ??? (in /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.2200.3) ==4506== by 0x408E5AC: g_slice_alloc (in /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.2200.3) ==4506== by 0x4061628: g_hash_table_new_full (in /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.2200.3) ==4506== by 0x40616C7: g_hash_table_new (in /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.2200.3) ==4506== by 0x8048795: main (dup.c:42) I've tried different ways to freed but no success so far. I'll appreciate any help. Thanks BTW: It compiles and runs fine. #include <stdio.h> #include <string.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <glib.h> #include <stdint.h> struct s { char *data; }; static GHashTable *hashtable1; static GHashTable *hashtable2; static void add_inv(GHashTable *table, const char *key) { gpointer old_value, old_key; gint value; if(g_hash_table_lookup_extended(table,key, &old_key, &old_value)){ value = GPOINTER_TO_INT(old_value); value = value + 2; /*g_free (old_key);*/ } else { value = 5; } g_hash_table_replace(table, g_strdup(key), GINT_TO_POINTER(value)); } static void print_hash_kv (gpointer key, gpointer value, gpointer user_data){ gchar *k = (gchar *) key; gchar *h = (gchar *) value; printf("%s: %d \n",k, h); } int main(int argc, char *argv[]){ struct s t; t.data = "bar"; int i,j; hashtable1 = g_hash_table_new(g_str_hash, g_str_equal); hashtable2 = g_hash_table_new(g_str_hash, g_str_equal); for(i=0;i<10;i++){ add_inv(hashtable1, t.data); add_inv(hashtable2, t.data); } /*free(t.data);*/ /*free(t.data);*/ g_hash_table_foreach (hashtable1, print_hash_kv, NULL); g_hash_table_foreach (hashtable2, print_hash_kv, NULL); g_hash_table_destroy(hashtable1); g_hash_table_destroy(hashtable2); return 0; }

    Read the article

  • How do I get callgrind to dump source line information?

    - by Jeremybub
    I'm trying to profile a shared library on GNU/Linux which does real-time audio processing, so performance is important. I run another program which hooks it up to the audio input and output of my system, and profile that with callgrind. Looking at the results in KCacheGrind, I get great information about what functions are taking up most of my time. However, it won't let me look at the line by line information, and instead says I need to compile it with debugging symbols and run the profiling again. The program which I am profiling is not compiled with debug symbols, but the library is. And I know this, because interestingly, source code annotations for cachegrind work fine. When I run callgrind, it says the default is to dump source line information, but it just isn't doing that. Is there some way I could force it to, or figure out what's stopping it?

    Read the article

  • pthread_create followed by pthread_detach still results in possibly lost error in Valgrind.

    - by alesplin
    I'm having a problem with Valgrind telling me I have some memory possible lost: ==23205== 544 bytes in 2 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 156 of 265 ==23205== at 0x6022879: calloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so) ==23205== by 0x540E209: allocate_dtv (in /lib/ld-2.12.1.so) ==23205== by 0x540E91D: _dl_allocate_tls (in /lib/ld-2.12.1.so) ==23205== by 0x623068D: pthread_create@@GLIBC_2.2.5 (in /lib/libpthread-2.12.1.so) ==23205== by 0x758D66: MTPCreateThreadPool (MTP.c:290) ==23205== by 0x405787: main (MServer.c:317) The code that creates these threads (MTPCreateThreadPool) basically gets an index into a block of waiting pthread_t slots, and creates a thread with that. TI becomes a pointer to a struct that has a thread index and a pthread_t. (simplified/sanitized): for (tindex = 0; tindex < NumThreads; tindex++) { int rc; TI = &TP->ThreadInfo[tindex]; TI->ThreadID = tindex; rc = pthread_create(&TI->ThreadHandle,NULL,MTPHandleRequestsLoop,TI); /* check for non-success that I've omitted */ pthread_detach(&TI->ThreadHandle); } Then we have a function MTPDestroyThreadPool that loops through all the threads we created and cancels them (since the MTPHandleRequestsLoop doesn't exit). for (tindex = 0; tindex < NumThreads; tindex++) { pthread_cancel(TP->ThreadInfo[tindex].ThreadHandle); } I've read elsewhere (including other questions here on SO) that detaching a thread explicitly would prevent this possibly lost error, but it clearly isn't. Any thoughts?

    Read the article

  • Need help in using svn on ubuntu 9.10

    - by michael
    Hi, I have install svn on ubuntu 9.10. But when I try to use svn to checkout code for an open source project, i get this error: $ svn co svn://svn.valgrind.org/valgrind/trunk valgrind svn: Berkeley DB error for filesystem '/home/svn/repos/valgrind/db' while opening 'nodes' table: Cannot allocate memory svn: bdb: Lock table is out of available locker entries Can you please tell me how to fix it? Thank you.

    Read the article

  • Query about running a program through valgrind and getting false results comparing to other systems.

    - by FILIaS
    Yesterday i posted this: What's the problem with this code? [hashtable in C] and paxdiablo offered to help me. He posted a sample of code and asked me to run it through valgrind on my machine. This code normally generates: 12,4 But on my machine, i get 24,8. The doubled! I'm just curious why is that happening. Hope sb has a good explaination. I post also paxdiablo's code (for anyone who cant find it.) #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> typedef struct HashTable { int size ; struct List *head; struct List *tail; } HashTable; typedef struct List { char *number; char *name; int time; struct List *next; } List; #define size_of_table 211 HashTable *createHashTable(void) { HashTable *new_table = malloc(sizeof(*new_table)*size_of_table); //line 606 printf ("%d\n", sizeof(*new_table)); printf ("%d\n", sizeof(new_table)); if (new_table == NULL) { return NULL; } int i=0; for(i; i<size_of_table; i++) { new_table[i].size=0; new_table[i].head=NULL; new_table[i].tail=NULL; } return new_table; } int main(void) { HashTable *x = createHashTable(); free (x); return 0; }

    Read the article

  • Detecting use after free() on windows.

    - by The Rook
    I'm trying to detect "Use after free()" bugs, otherwise known as "Dangling pointers". I know Valgrind can be used to detect "Use after free" bugs on the *nix platform, but what about windows? What if I don't have the source? Is there a better program than Valgrind for detecting all dangling pointers in a program? A free and open source would be preferred , but I'll use a commercial solution if it will get the job done.

    Read the article

  • Detecting use after free() on windows. (dangling pointers)

    - by The Rook
    I'm trying to detect "Use after free()" bugs, otherwise known as "Dangling pointers". I know Valgrind can be used to detect "Use after free" bugs on the *nix platform, but what about windows? What if I don't have the source? Is there a better program than Valgrind for detecting all dangling pointers in a program? A free and open source would be preferred , but I'll use a commercial solution if it will get the job done.

    Read the article

  • Memory leak in Qt signal and slots

    - by Ajay
    Hello, I am running valgrind on my Qt code,and even on successful exit of the application, get the following report from valgrind 8,832 bytes in 92 blocks are still reachable in loss record 12 of 12 at 0x4025390: operator new(unsigned int) (vg_replace_malloc.c:214) ==3339== by 0x4B75F05: QMutex::QMutex(QMutex::RecursionMode) (qmutex.cpp:123) ==3339== by 0x4B77602: QMutexPool::get(void const*) (qmutexpool.cpp:137) ==3339== by 0x4CA0EC2: signalSlotLock(QObject const*) (qobject.cpp:112) ==3339== by 0x4CA3939: QMetaObjectPrivate::connect(QObject const*, int, QObject const*, int, int, int*) (qobject.cpp:2900) ==3339== by 0x4CA5C00: QObject::connect(QObject const*, char const*, QObject const*, char const*, Qt::ConnectionType) (qobject.cpp:2599) I disconnect all signal connections and also delete the objects. The above mentioned leak increases if i increase the amount of signal and slot connections? Can anybody help with this?

    Read the article

  • realloc()ing memory for a buffer used in recv()

    - by Hristo
    I need to recv() data from a socket and store it into a buffer, but I need to make sure get all of the data so I have things in a loop. So to makes sure I don't run out of room in my buffer, I'm trying to use realloc to resize the memory allocated to the buffer. So far I have: // receive response int i = 0; int amntRecvd = 0; char *pageContentBuffer = (char*) malloc(4096 * sizeof(char)); while ((amntRecvd = recv(proxySocketFD, pageContentBuffer + i, 4096, 0)) > 0) { i += amntRecvd; realloc(pageContentBuffer, 4096 + sizeof(pageContentBuffer)); } However, this doesn't seem to be working properly since Valgrind is complaining "valgrind: the 'impossible' happened:". Any advice as to how this should be done properly? Thanks, Hristo

    Read the article

  • How can I find out how much memory an object (rather the instance of an object) of a C++ class consu

    - by Shadow
    Hi, I am developing a Graph-class, based on boost-graph-library. A Graph-object contains a boost-graph, so to say an adjacency_list, and a map. When monitoring the total memory usage of my program, it consumes quite a lot (checked with pmap). Now, I would like to know, how much of the memory is exactly consumed by a filled object of this Graph-class? With filled I mean when the adjacency_list is full of vertices and edges. I found out, that using sizeof() doesn't bring me far. Using valgrind is also not an alternative as there is quite some memory allocation done previously and this makes the usage of valgrind impractical for this purpose. I'm also not interested in what other parts of the program cost in memory, I want to focus on one single object. Thank you.

    Read the article

  • How can I find out how much memory an instance of a C++ class consumes?

    - by Shadow
    Hi, I am developing a Graph-class, based on boost-graph-library. A Graph-object contains a boost-graph, so to say an adjacency_list, and a map. When monitoring the total memory usage of my program, it consumes quite a lot (checked with pmap). Now, I would like to know, how much of the memory is exactly consumed by a filled object of this Graph-class? With filled I mean when the adjacency_list is full of vertices and edges. I found out, that using sizeof() doesn't bring me far. Using valgrind is also not an alternative as there is quite some memory allocation done previously and this makes the usage of valgrind impractical for this purpose. I'm also not interested in what other parts of the program cost in memory, I want to focus on one single object. Thank you.

    Read the article

  • How can I find out how much memory an object of a C++ class consumes?

    - by Shadow
    Hi, I am developing a Graph-class, based on boost-graph-library. A Graph-object contains a boost-graph, so to say an adjacency_list, and a map. When monitoring the total memory usage of my program, it consumes quite a lot (checked with pmap). Now, I would like to know, how much of the memory is exactly consumed by a filled object of this Graph-class? With filled I mean when the adjacency_list is full of vertices and edges. I found out, that using sizeof() doesn't bring me far. Using valgrind is also not an alternative as there is quite some memory allocation done previously and this makes the usage of valgrind impractical for this purpose. I'm also not interested in what other parts of the program cost in memory, I want to focus on one single object. Thank you.

    Read the article

  • How to profiling my C++ application on linux

    - by richard
    HI, I would like to profile my c++ application on linux. I would like to find out how much time my application spent on CPU processing vs time spent on block by IO/being idle. I know there is a profile tool call valgrind on linux. But it breaks down time spent on each method, and it does not give me an overall picture of how much time spent on CPU processing vs idle? Or is there a way to do that with valgrind. Thank you.

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 1 2 3 4  | Next Page >