Search Results

Search found 23804 results on 953 pages for 'void pointer'.

Page 200/953 | < Previous Page | 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207  | Next Page >

  • Java: "implements Runnable" vs. "extends Thread"

    - by goosefraba19
    From what time I've spent with threads in Java, I've found these two ways to write threads. public class ThreadA implements Runnable { public void run() { //Code } } //with a "new Thread(threadA).start()" call public class ThreadB extends Thread { public ThreadB() { super("ThreadB"); } public void run() { //Code } } //with a "threadB.start()" call Is there any significant difference in these two blocks of code?

    Read the article

  • How do I search the MediaStore for a specific directory instead of entire external storage?

    - by Nick Lopez
    In my app I have an option that allows users to browse for audio files on their phone to add to the app. I am having trouble however with creating a faster way of processing the query code. Currently it searches the entire external storage and causes the phone to prompt a force close/wait warning. I would like to take the code I have posted below and make it more efficient by either searching in a specific folder on the phone or by streamlining the process to make the file search quicker. I am not sure how to do this however. Thanks! public class BrowseActivity extends DashboardActivity implements OnClickListener, OnItemClickListener { private List<Sound> soundsInDevice = new ArrayList<Sound>(); private List<Sound> checkedList; private ListView browsedList; private BrowserSoundAdapter adapter; private long categoryId; private Category category; private String currentCategoryName; private String description; // private Category newCategory ; private Button doneButton; @Override protected void onCreate(Bundle savedInstanceState) { super.onCreate(savedInstanceState); requestWindowFeature(Window.FEATURE_NO_TITLE); setContentView(R.layout.activity_browse); checkedList = new ArrayList<Sound>(); browsedList = (ListView) findViewById(android.R.id.list); doneButton = (Button) findViewById(R.id.doneButton); soundsInDevice = getMediaSounds(); if (soundsInDevice.size() > 0) { adapter = new BrowserSoundAdapter(this, R.id.browseSoundName, soundsInDevice); } else { Toast.makeText(getApplicationContext(), getString(R.string.no_sounds_available), Toast.LENGTH_SHORT) .show(); } browsedList.setAdapter(adapter); browsedList.setOnItemClickListener(this); doneButton.setOnClickListener(this); } private List<Sound> getMediaSounds() { List<Sound> mediaSoundList = new ArrayList<Sound>(); ContentResolver cr = getContentResolver(); String[] projection = {MediaStore.Audio.Media._ID, MediaStore.Audio.Media.DISPLAY_NAME, MediaStore.Audio.Media.TITLE, MediaStore.Audio.Media.DATA, MediaStore.Audio.Media.DURATION}; final Uri uri = MediaStore.Audio.Media.EXTERNAL_CONTENT_URI; Log.v("MediaStore.Audio.Media.EXTERNAL_CONTENT_URI", "" + uri); final Cursor cursor = cr.query(uri, projection, null, null, null); int n = cursor.getCount(); Log.v("count", "" + n); if (cursor.moveToFirst()) { do { String soundName = cursor .getString(cursor .getColumnIndexOrThrow(MediaStore.Audio.Media.DISPLAY_NAME)); Log.v("soundName", "" + soundName); String title = cursor .getString(cursor .getColumnIndexOrThrow(MediaStore.Audio.Media.TITLE)); Log.v("title", "" + title); String path = cursor.getString(cursor .getColumnIndexOrThrow(MediaStore.Audio.Media.DATA)); Log.v("path", "" + path); Sound browsedSound = new Sound(title, path, false, false, false, false, 0); Log.v("browsedSound", "" + browsedSound); mediaSoundList.add(browsedSound); Log.v("mediaSoundList", "" + mediaSoundList.toString()); } while (cursor.moveToNext()); } return mediaSoundList; } public class BrowserSoundAdapter extends ArrayAdapter<Sound> { public BrowserSoundAdapter(Context context, int textViewResourceId, List<Sound> objects) { super(context, textViewResourceId, objects); } @Override public View getView(final int position, View convertView, ViewGroup parent) { ViewHolder viewHolder; View view = convertView; LayoutInflater inflater = getLayoutInflater(); if (view == null) { view = inflater.inflate(R.layout.list_item_browse, null); viewHolder = new ViewHolder(); viewHolder.soundNameTextView = (TextView) view .findViewById(R.id.browseSoundName); viewHolder.pathTextView = (TextView) view .findViewById(R.id.browseSoundPath); viewHolder.checkToAddSound = (CheckBox) view .findViewById(R.id.browse_checkbox); view.setTag(viewHolder); } else { viewHolder = (ViewHolder) view.getTag(); } final Sound sound = soundsInDevice.get(position); if (sound.isCheckedState()) { viewHolder.checkToAddSound.setChecked(true); } else { viewHolder.checkToAddSound.setChecked(false); } viewHolder.soundNameTextView.setText(sound.getName()); viewHolder.pathTextView.setText(sound.getUri()); viewHolder.checkToAddSound .setOnClickListener(new OnClickListener() { @Override public void onClick(View v) { CheckBox cb = (CheckBox) v .findViewById(R.id.browse_checkbox); boolean checked = cb.isChecked(); boolean newValue = checked; updateView(position, newValue); doneButtonStatus(checkedList.size()); } }); return view; } } // Adapter view holder class private class ViewHolder { private TextView soundNameTextView; private TextView pathTextView; private CheckBox checkToAddSound; } // done button On Click @Override public void onClick(View view) { boolean status = getIntent().getBooleanExtra("FromAddCat", false); Log.v("for add category","enters in if"); if(status){ Log.v("for add category","enters in if1"); currentCategoryName = getIntent().getStringExtra("categoryName"); description = getIntent().getStringExtra("description"); boolean existCategory = SQLiteHelper.getCategoryStatus(currentCategoryName); if (!existCategory) { category = new Category(currentCategoryName, description, false); category.insert(); category.update(); Log.v("for add category","enters in if2"); } }else{ categoryId = getIntent().getLongExtra("categoryId",-1); category = SQLiteHelper.getCategory(categoryId); } for (Sound checkedsound : checkedList) { checkedsound.setCheckedState(false); checkedsound.insert(); category.getSounds().add(checkedsound); final Intent intent = new Intent(this, CategoriesActivity.class); finish(); startActivity(intent); } } @Override public void onItemClick(AdapterView<?> arg0, View view, int position, long arg3) { boolean checked = true; boolean newValue = false; CheckBox cb = (CheckBox) view.findViewById(R.id.browse_checkbox); if (cb.isChecked()) { cb.setChecked(!checked); newValue = !checked; } else { cb.setChecked(checked); newValue = checked; } updateView(position, newValue); doneButtonStatus(checkedList.size()); } private void doneButtonStatus(int size) { if (size > 0) { doneButton.setEnabled(true); doneButton.setBackgroundResource(R.drawable.done_button_drawable); } else { doneButton.setEnabled(false); doneButton.setBackgroundResource(R.drawable.done_btn_disabled); } } private void updateView(int index, boolean newValue) { System.out.println(newValue); Sound sound = soundsInDevice.get(index); if (newValue == true) { checkedList.add(sound); sound.setCheckedState(newValue); } else { checkedList.remove(sound); sound.setCheckedState(newValue); } } }

    Read the article

  • Large memory chunk not garbage collected

    - by Niels
    In a hunt for a memory-leak in my app I chased down a behaviour I can't understand. I allocate a large memory block, but it doesn't get garbage-collected resulting in a OOM, unless I explicit null the reference in onDestroy. In this example I have two almost identical activities that switch between each others. Both have a single button. On pressing the button MainActivity starts OOMActivity and OOMActivity returns by calling finish(). After pressing the buttons a few times, Android throws a OOMException. If i add the the onDestroy to OOMActivity and explicit null the reference to the memory chunk, I can see in the log that the memory is correctly freed. Why doesn't the memory get freed automatically without the nulling? MainActivity: package com.example.oom; import android.app.Activity; import android.content.Intent; import android.os.Bundle; import android.view.View; import android.view.View.OnClickListener; import android.widget.Button; public class MainActivity extends Activity implements OnClickListener { private int buttonId; @Override protected void onCreate(Bundle savedInstanceState) { super.onCreate(savedInstanceState); System.gc(); Button OOMButton = new Button(this); OOMButton.setText("OOM"); buttonId = OOMButton.getId(); setContentView(OOMButton); OOMButton.setOnClickListener(this); } @Override public void onClick(View v) { if (v.getId() == buttonId) { Intent leakIntent = new Intent(this, OOMActivity.class); startActivity(leakIntent); } } } OOMActivity: public class OOMActivity extends Activity implements OnClickListener { private static final int WASTE_SIZE = 20000000; private byte[] waste; private int buttonId; protected void onCreate(Bundle savedInstanceState) { super.onCreate(savedInstanceState); Button BackButton = new Button(this); BackButton.setText("Back"); buttonId = BackButton.getId(); setContentView(BackButton); BackButton.setOnClickListener(this); waste = new byte[WASTE_SIZE]; } public void onClick(View view) { if (view.getId() == buttonId) { finish(); } } }

    Read the article

  • Annotate anonymous inner class

    - by Scobal
    Is there a way to annotate an anonymous inner class in Java? In this example could you add a class level annotation to Class2? public void method1() { add(new Class2() { public void method3() {} }); }

    Read the article

  • MSTest Not Finding New Tests

    - by Blake Blackwell
    Using VS2010, I can't seem to add additional test methods. If I set up my project like this [TestMethod] public void Test1() { Assert.AreNotEqual(0,1); } [TestMethod] public void Test2() { Assert.AreNotEqual(0,1); } The only test that shows up in my Test View is Test1. How do I make sure Test2 gets in to that list?

    Read the article

  • Creating instance in java class

    - by aladine
    Please advise me the difference between two ways of declaration of java constructor public class A{ private static A instance = new A(); public static A getInstance() { return instance; } public static void main(String[] args) { A a= A.getInstance(); } } AND public class B{ public B(){}; public static void main(String[] args) { B b= new B(); } } Thanks

    Read the article

  • Testing local scoped object with mockito without refactoring

    - by supertonsky
    Say I have the following code: public class ClassToTest { AnotherClass anotherClass; public void methodToTest( int x, int y ) { int z = x + y anotherClass.receiveSomething( z ); } } public class AnotherClass { public void receiveSomething( int z ) {.. do something.. } } I want to make assertion on the value of the variable z. How do I do this? Variables x, y, and z could be some other Java class types, and I just used "int" for simplicity.

    Read the article

  • Implementation of interface when using child class of a parent class in method of interface

    - by dotnetdev
    I don't have access to my dev environment, but when I write the below: interface IExample void Test (HtmlControl ctrl); class Example : IExample { public void Test (HtmlTextArea area) { } I get an error stating the methods in the class implementation don't match the interface - so this is not possible. HtmlTextArea is a child class of HtmlControl, is there no way this is possible? I tried with .NET 3.5, but .NET 4.0 may be different (I am interested in any solution with either framework). Thanks

    Read the article

  • C# BestPractice: Private var and Public Getter/Setter or Public Var

    - by Desiny
    What are the advantages and differences between the below two coding styles... public void HelloWorld () { private string _hello; public string Hello { get { return _hello; } set { _hello = value; } } } or public void HelloWorld () { public string Hello { get; set; } } My preference is for short simple code, but interested to hear opinions as I see many developers who insist on the long route.

    Read the article

  • c++ template function compiles in header but not implementation

    - by flies
    I'm trying to learn templates and I've run into this confounding error. I'm declaring some functions in a header file and I want to make a separate implementation file where the functions will be defined. Here's the code that calls the header (dum.cpp): #include <iostream> #include <vector> #include <string> #include "dumper2.h" int main() { std::vector<int> v; for (int i=0; i<10; i++) { v.push_back(i); } test(); std::string s = ", "; dumpVector(v,s); } now, here's a working header file (dumper2.h): #include <iostream> #include <string> #include <vector> void test(); template <class T> void dumpVector( std::vector<T> v,std::string sep); template <class T> void dumpVector(std::vector<T> v, std::string sep) { typename std::vector<T>::iterator vi; vi = v.begin(); std::cout << *vi; vi++; for (;vi<v.end();vi++) { std::cout << sep << *vi ; } std::cout << "\n"; return; } with implentation (dumper2.cpp): #include <iostream> #include "dumper2.h" void test() { std::cout << "!olleh dlrow\n"; } the weird thing is that if I move the code that defines dumpVector from the .h to the .cpp file, I get the following error: g++ -c dumper2.cpp -Wall -Wno-deprecated g++ dum.cpp -o dum dumper2.o -Wall -Wno-deprecated /tmp/ccKD2e3G.o: In function `main': dum.cpp:(.text+0xce): undefined reference to `void dumpVector<int>(std::vector<int, std::allocator<int> >, std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >)' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make: *** [dum] Error 1 So why does it work one way and not the other? Clearly the compiler can find test(), so why can't it find dumpVector?

    Read the article

  • How to ensure structures are completly initialized (by name) in GCC?

    - by Steven Spark
    How do I ensure each and every field of my structures are initialized in GCC when using designated initializers? (I'm especially interested in function pointers.) (I'm using C not C++.) Here is an example: typedef struct { int a; int b; } foo_t; typedef struct { void (*Start)(void); void (*Stop)(void); } bar_t; foo_t fooo = { 5 }; foo_t food = { .b=4 }; bar_t baro = { NULL }; bar_t bard = { .Start = NULL }; -Wmissing-field-initializers does not help at all. It works for fooo only in GCC (mingw 4.7.3, 4.8.1), and clang does only marginally better (no warnings for food and bard). I'm sure there is a reason for not producing warnings for designated initializer (even when I explicitly ask for them) but I want/need them. I do not want to initialize structures based on order/position because that is more error prone (for example swapping Start and Stop won't even give any warning). And neither gcc nor clang will give any warning that I failed to explicitly initialize a field (when initializing by name). I also don't want to litter my code with if(x.y==NULL) lines for multiple reasons, one of which is I want compile time warnings and not runtime errors. At least splint will give me warnings on all 4 cases, but unfortunately I cannot use splint all the time (it chokes on some of the code (fails to parse some C99, GCC extensions)). Note: If I'm using a real function instead of NULL GCC will also show a warning for baro (but not bard). I searched google and stack overflow but only found related questions and have not found answer for this specific problem. The best match I have found is 'Ensure that all elements in a structure are initialized' Ensure that all elements in a structure are initialized Which asks pretty much the same question, but has no satisfying answer. Is there a better way dealing with this that I have not mentioned? (Maybe other code analysis tool? Preferably something (free) that can be integrated into Eclipse or Visual Studio...)

    Read the article

  • [picker dismissModalViewControllerAnimated:YES]; not working

    - by shishir.bobby
    I am using - (void)imagePickerController:(UIImagePickerController *)picker didFinishPickingMediaWithInfo:(NSDictionary *)info { } for imagepicker and using [picker dismissModalViewControllerAnimated:YES]; in iPad to dismiss the picker. also i tried using - (void)imagePickerControllerDidCancel:(UIImagePickerController *)picker;{ [picker dismissModalViewControllerAnimated:YES]; } to dismiss the picker once it done the work. BUt its not dimissing it. when i tap anywhere in the screen, than only it gets dismiss. What i am doing wrong to dismiss the imagepicker? Many thnkas

    Read the article

  • [iPhone Obj-C] How to move a label with the wave of the iPhone?

    - by Didi
    The code below is from the book Beginning iPhone 3 Development, chapter 15, using the accelerometer to control a ball. I want to use a label instead of the ball, and only move in the x direction. However, I donno how to revise the code to achieve this goal. Can anyone please help me? THX so much!!!! (id)initWithCoder:(NSCoder *)coder { if (self = [super initWithCoder:coder]) { self.image = [UIImage imageNamed:@"ball.png"]; self.currentPoint = CGPointMake((self.bounds.size.width / 2.0f) + (image.size.width / 2.0f), (self.bounds.size.height / 2.0f) + (image.size.height / 2.0f)); ballXVelocity = 0.0f; ballYVelocity = 0.0f; } return self; } (id)initWithFrame:(CGRect)frame { if (self = [super initWithFrame:frame]) { // Initialization code } return self; } (void)drawRect:(CGRect)rect { // Drawing code [image drawAtPoint:currentPoint]; } (void)dealloc { [image release]; [acceleration release]; [super dealloc]; } //#pragma mark - - (CGPoint)currentPoint { return currentPoint; } - (void)setCurrentPoint:(CGPoint)newPoint { previousPoint = currentPoint; currentPoint = newPoint; if (currentPoint.x < 0) { currentPoint.x = 0; //ballXVelocity = 0; ballXVelocity = - (ballXVelocity / 2.0); } if (currentPoint.y < 0){ currentPoint.y = 0; //ballYVelocity = 0; ballYVelocity = - (ballYVelocity / 2.0); } if (currentPoint.x > self.bounds.size.width - image.size.width) { currentPoint.x = self.bounds.size.width - image.size.width; //ballXVelocity = 0; ballXVelocity = - (ballXVelocity / 2.0); } if (currentPoint.y > self.bounds.size.height - image.size.height) { currentPoint.y = self.bounds.size.height - image.size.height; //ballYVelocity = 0; ballYVelocity = - (ballYVelocity / 2.0); } CGRect currentImageRect = CGRectMake(currentPoint.x, currentPoint.y, currentPoint.x + image.size.width, currentPoint.y + image.size.height); CGRect previousImageRect = CGRectMake(previousPoint.x, previousPoint.y, previousPoint.x + image.size.width, currentPoint.y + image.size.width); [self setNeedsDisplayInRect:CGRectUnion(currentImageRect, previousImageRect)]; } (void)draw { static NSDate *lastDrawTime; if (lastDrawTime != nil) { NSTimeInterval secondsSinceLastDraw = -([lastDrawTime timeIntervalSinceNow]); ballYVelocity = ballYVelocity + -(acceleration.y * secondsSinceLastDraw); ballXVelocity = ballXVelocity + acceleration.x * secondsSinceLastDraw; CGFloat xAcceleration = secondsSinceLastDraw * ballXVelocity * 500; CGFloat yAcceleration = secondsSinceLastDraw * ballYVelocity * 500; self.currentPoint = CGPointMake(self.currentPoint.x + xAcceleration, self.currentPoint.y +yAcceleration); } // Update last time with current time [lastDrawTime release]; lastDrawTime = [[NSDate alloc] init]; }

    Read the article

  • C# Why does code compile fine when there is an ambiguous virtual method?

    - by Jimbo
    I have a class (Class B) that inherits another class (Class A) that contains virtual methods. Mistakenly, I omitted the override keyword when declaring a (supposed to be) overriding method in Class B. Class A public class ClassA{ public virtual void TestMethod(){ } } Class B public class ClassB : ClassA{ public void TestMethod(){ } } The code compiled without a problem. Can anyone explain why?

    Read the article

  • C++ constructor problem, values not being set

    - by 2Real
    Hi, I'm new to C++ and I'm trying to figure out this problem I'm having with my constructor for one of my classes. What happens is... all my variables are initialized properly except two (health and type). #pragma once #include <irrlicht.h> #include <vector> #include <cassert> using namespace irr; using namespace core; using namespace scene; enum { PLAYER = 0, NPC = 1, SOLDIER = 2, CHAINGUNNER = 3 }; class Model { public: Model(void); Model(int id, std::vector<ISceneNode*> modelVec, int modType); ~Model(void); std::vector<int> path; std::vector<ISceneNode*> model; int endNode; int type; int animate; int health; u32 lastAnimation; private: int mId; }; #include "Model.h" Model::Model(void) { //assert(false); } Model::Model(int id, std::vector<ISceneNode*> modelVec, int modType) { path = std::vector<int>(); model = modelVec; endNode = 0; type = modType; animate = 0; health = 100; lastAnimation = 0; mId = id; } Model::~Model(void) {} I create a model with Model soldier(id, model, SOLDIER) Everything is set properly except type and health. I've tried many different things, but I cannot figure out my problem. I'm not sure but the default constructor is being called. It doesn't make sense because I make no called to that constructor. Thanks,

    Read the article

  • C# Attributes Aren't Supposed to Inherit

    - by Adam
    Since attributes don't inherit in C# (at least I didn't think they did) - how does the following code still display the Hello popup when the MyTestMethod test is run: [TestClass] public class BaseTestClass { [TestInitialize] public void Foo() { System.Windows.Forms.MessageBox.Show("Hello"); } } [TestClass] public class TestClass : BaseTestClass { [TestMethod] public void MyTestMethod() { Assert.IsTrue(true); } }

    Read the article

  • Beginner question about getting reference to cin

    - by John C
    I'm having problems wrapping my head around this. I have a function void foo(istream& input) { input = cin; } This fails (I'm assuming because cin isn't supposed to be "copyable". however, this works void foo(istream& input) { istream& baz = cin; } Is there a reason that I can get a reference to cin in baz but I cannot assign it to input? Thanks

    Read the article

  • How do I get a array to just count how many numbers there are instead of counting the value of each number?

    - by Chad Loos
    //This is the output of the program *** start of 276 2D Arrays_03.cpp program *** Number Count Total 1 3 3 2 6 9 3 15 24 4 6 30 5 9 39 *** end of 276 2D Arrays_03.cpp program *** #include <iostream> #include <string> #include <iomanip> using namespace std; const int COLUMN_SIZE = 13; int main(void) { const int ROW_SIZE = 3; const int COUNT_SIZE = 5; void countValues(const int[][COLUMN_SIZE], const int, int[]); void display(const int [], const int); int numbers[ROW_SIZE][COLUMN_SIZE] = {{1, 3, 4, 5, 3, 2, 3, 5, 3, 4, 5, 3, 2}, {2, 1, 3, 4, 5, 3, 2, 3, 5, 3, 4, 5, 3}, {3, 4, 5, 3, 2, 1, 3, 4, 5, 3, 2, 3, 5}}; int counts[COUNT_SIZE] = {0}; string choice; cout << "*** start of 276 2D Arrays_03.cpp program ***" << endl; cout << endl; countValues(numbers, ROW_SIZE, counts); display(counts, COUNT_SIZE); cout << endl; cout << endl; cout << "*** end of 276 2D Arrays_03.cpp program ***" << endl << endl; cin.get(); return 0; } // end main() This is the function where I need to count each of the values. I know how to sum rows and cols, but I'm not quite sure of the code to just tally the values themselves. void countValues(const int numbers[][COLUMN_SIZE], const int ROW_SIZE, int counts[]) This is what I have so far. { for (int index = 0; index < ROW_SIZE; index++) counts[index]; {

    Read the article

  • What Design Pattern is this?

    - by 01
    I know that everything we do in programming can be described as design pattern(even abstract method has design pattern called template method) public class Guicer extends AbstractModule { private static Injector injector = Guice.createInjector(new Guicer()); public static void setInjector(Injector injector) { Guicer.injector = injector; } public static T getInstance(Class c) { return injector.getInstance(c); } @Override protected void configure() { } } What design patterns are used in this code?

    Read the article

  • Where to define exception classes, inside classes or on a higher level?

    - by rve
    Should exception classes be part of the class which may throw them or should they exist on a higher level? For example : class Test { public: class FooException: public ExceptionBase { }; void functionThrowingFooException(); }; or class FooException: public ExceptionBase { }; class Test { public: void functionThrowingFooException(); }; (functionThrowingFooException() is the only function to ever throw a FooException)

    Read the article

  • onDateSet does not get called from DatePickerDialog on tablet

    - by cit
    I am using a DatePickerDialog to prompt the user for a date. It works fine in the simulator and on my Samsung Galaxy Nexus, but onDateSet does not get called on my Samsung Galaxy Tab 2. I noticed, that the dialog is bigger and shows a calendar besides the normal spin view. Can that be the problem? Here is some code: import java.util.Calendar; import java.util.Date; import android.app.DatePickerDialog; import android.app.Dialog; import android.content.DialogInterface; import android.content.Intent; import android.os.Bundle; import android.support.v4.app.DialogFragment; import android.widget.DatePicker; import com.cbit.gtbetapp.R; import com.cbit.gtbetapp.gui.racedata.MeetingDataActivity; import com.cbit.gtbetapp.gui.racedata.MeetingListFragment; import com.cbit.gtbetapp.logic.Utility; public class DatePickerFragment extends DialogFragment implements DatePickerDialog.OnDateSetListener { protected Date date = null; @Override public Dialog onCreateDialog(Bundle savedInstanceState) { // Use the current date as the default date in the picker final Calendar c = Utility.getToday(); int year = c.get(Calendar.YEAR); int month = c.get(Calendar.MONTH); int day = c.get(Calendar.DAY_OF_MONTH); date = c.getTime(); // Create a new instance of DatePickerDialog and return it DatePickerDialog dialog = new DatePickerDialog(getActivity(), this, year, month, day) { @Override public void onDateChanged(DatePicker view, int year, int month, int day) { super.onDateChanged(view, year, month, day); setTitle(getString(R.string.date_picker_title)); } }; dialog.setTitle(getString(R.string.date_picker_title)); dialog.setButton(DatePickerDialog.BUTTON_POSITIVE, getString(android.R.string.ok), new DialogInterface.OnClickListener() { @Override public void onClick(DialogInterface dialog, int which) { dialog.cancel(); Intent intent = new Intent(getActivity(), MeetingDataActivity.class); intent.setFlags(Intent.FLAG_ACTIVITY_CLEAR_TOP); intent.putExtra(MeetingListFragment.EXTRA_DATE, date.getTime()); startActivity(intent); } }); dialog.setButton(DatePickerDialog.BUTTON_NEGATIVE, getString(R.string.button_cancel), new DialogInterface.OnClickListener() { @Override public void onClick(DialogInterface dialog, int which) { dialog.cancel(); } }); return dialog; } public void onDateSet(DatePicker view, int year, int month, int day) { Calendar c = Calendar.getInstance(); c.clear(); c.set(Calendar.YEAR, year); c.set(Calendar.MONTH, month); c.set(Calendar.DAY_OF_MONTH, day); date = c.getTime(); } } What could cause this? A bug in the tablet? Am I missing something? Can anyone think of a workaround? Thanks a lot!

    Read the article

  • Invoking static methods containing Generic Parameters using Reflection.

    - by AJP
    While executing the following code i gets this error "Late bound operations cannot be performed on types or methods for which ContainsGenericParameters is true." class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { MethodInfo MI = typeof(MyClass).GetMethod("TestProc"); MI.MakeGenericMethod(new [] {typeof(string)}); MI.Invoke(null, new [] {"Hello"}); } } class MyClass { public static void TestProc<T>(T prefix) { Console.WriteLine("Hello"); } } Please help.

    Read the article

  • what causes a bad token on iPhone- NSLog(@"token:%@",[devToken description]); crashes

    - by Grant M
    I am getting a bad token passed to me in - (void)application:(UIApplication *)app didRegisterForRemoteNotificationsWithDeviceToken:(NSData *)devToken this code crashes on my iPhone but not my clients. - (void)application:(UIApplication *)app didRegisterForRemoteNotificationsWithDeviceToken:(NSData *)devToken { NSLog(@"token:%@",[devToken description]); } I think something is wrong with my stored notifications settings on my iPhone but I can't find a way to delete them. deleting the app does not seem to do it.

    Read the article

  • C++ header file and function declaration ending in "= 0"

    - by Adam
    hi, I have the following code inside the .h file and I'm not sure what does the assignment statement do and how is it called properly? virtual void yield() = 0; I thought that the function returns a value of 0 by default but since this function returns void I am a little bit confused. Can anyone comment on this and maybe say how can I refer to this assignment, I mean how is it called in C++ jargon? Thanks.

    Read the article

  • Update View at runtime in Android

    - by seretur
    The example is pretty straightforward: i want to let the user know about what the app is doing by just showing a text (canvas.drawText()). Then, my first message appears, but not the other ones. I mean, i have a "setText" method but it doesn't updates. onCreate(Bundle bundle) { super.onCreate(bundle); setContentView(splash); // splash is the view class loadResources(); splash.setText("this"); boundWebService(); splash.setText("that"): etc(); splash.setText("so on"); } The view's text drawing works by doing just a drawText in onDraw();, so setText changes the text but doesn't show it. Someone recommended me replacing the view with a SurfaceView, but it would be alot of trouble for just a couple of updates, SO... how the heck can i update the view dinamically at runtime? It should be quite simple, just showing a text for say 2 seconds and then the main thread doing his stuff and then updating the text... Thanks! Update: I tried implementing handler.onPost(), but is the same story all over again. Let me put you the code: package coda.tvt; import android.app.Activity; import android.graphics.Canvas; import android.graphics.Paint; import android.os.Bundle; import android.view.View; import android.widget.TextView; import android.widget.Toast; public class ThreadViewTestActivity extends Activity { Thread t; Splash splash; /** Called when the activity is first created. */ @Override public void onCreate(Bundle savedInstanceState) { super.onCreate(savedInstanceState); setContentView(R.layout.main); splash = new Splash(this); t = new Thread(splash); t.start(); splash.setTextow("OA"); try { Thread.sleep(4000); } catch (InterruptedException e) { } splash.setTextow("LALA"); } } And: public class Splash implements Runnable { Activity activity; final Handler myHandler = new Handler(); public Splash(Activity activity) { this.activity=activity; } @Override public void run() { // TODO Auto-generated method stub } public synchronized void setTextow(final String textow) { // Wrap DownloadTask into another Runnable to track the statistics myHandler.post(new Runnable() { @Override public void run() { TextView t = (TextView)activity.findViewById(R.id.testo); t.setText(textow); t.invalidate(); } }); } } Although splash is in other thread, i put a sleep on the main thread, i use the handler to manage UI and everything, it doesn't changes a thing, it only shows the last update.

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207  | Next Page >