Search Results

Search found 43978 results on 1760 pages for 'select case'.

Page 218/1760 | < Previous Page | 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225  | Next Page >

  • Status corresponding to Minimum value

    - by Lijo
    Hi Team, I am using SQL Server 2005. I have a table as given below. There can be multiple cancellations for each FundingID. I want to select the FundingCancellationReason corrersponding to minimum date for each funding. I wrote a query as follows. It is an SQL error 1) Could you please help me to avoid the SQL Error? 2) Is there any better logic to achieve the same? CREATE TABLE #FundingCancellation( [FundingCancellationID] INT IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL, [FundingID] INT , FundingCancellationDt SMALLDATETIME , FundingCancellationReason VARCHAR(50) ) SELECT FundingID, MIN(FundingCancellationDt), ( SELECT FundingCancellationReason FROM #FundingCancellation FC2 WHERE FC1.FundingID = FC2.FundingID AND FC2.FundingCancellationDt = MIN(FundingCancellationDt) ) [Reason Corresponding Minimum Date] FROM #FundingCancellation FC1 GROUP BY FundingID -- An aggregate may not appear in the WHERE clause unless it is in a subquery contained in a HAVING clause or a select list, and the column being aggregated is an outer reference. I have seen the similar approach working in a somewhat complex query. So I believe tehre will be a way to correct my query Thanks Lijo

    Read the article

  • Which MySql line is faster:

    - by Camran
    I have a classified_id variable which matches one document in a MySql table. I am currently fetching the information about that one record like this: SELECT * FROM table WHERE table.classified_id = $classified_id I wonder if there is a faster approach, for example like this: SELECT 1 FROM table WHERE table.classified_id = $classified_id Wont the last one only select 1 record, which is exactly what I need, so that it doesn't have to scan the entire table but instead stops searching for records after 1 is found? Or am I dreaming this? Thanks

    Read the article

  • Is is faster to filter and get data or filter then get data ?

    - by remi bourgarel
    Hi I have this kind of request : SELECT myTable.ID, myTable.Adress, -- 20 more columns of all kind of type FROM myTable WHERE EXISTS(SELECT * FROM myLink WHERE myLink.FID = myTable.ID and myLink.FID2 = 666) myLink has a lot of rows. Do you think it's faster to do like this : SELECT myLink.FID INTO @result FROM myLink WHERE myLink.FID2 = 666 UPDATE @result SET Adress = myTable.Adress, -- 20 more columns of all kind of type FROM myTable WHERE myTable.ID = @result.ID

    Read the article

  • Dimensions of a collection, and how to traverse it in an efficient, elegant manner

    - by Bruce Ferguson
    I'm trying to find an elegant way to deal with multi-dimensional collections in Scala. My understanding is that I can have up to a 5 dimensional collection using tabulate, such as in the case of the following 2-Dimensional array: val test = Array.tabulate[Double](row,col)(_+_) and that I can access the elements of the array using for(i<-0 until row) { for(j<-0 until col) { test(i)(j) = 0.0 } } If I don't know a priori what I'm going to be handling, what might be a succinct way of determining the structure of the collection, and spanning it, without doing something like: case(Array(x)) => for(i<-1 until dim1) { test(i) = 0.0 } case(Array(x,y)) => for(i<-1 until dim1) { for(j<-1 until dim2) { test(i)(j) = 0.0 } } case(Array(x,y,z)) => ... The dimensional values n1, n2, n3, etc... are private, right? Also, would one use the same trick of unwrapping a 2-D array into a 1-D vector when dealing with n-Dimensional objects if I want a single case to handle the traversal? Thanks in advance Bruce

    Read the article

  • How to combine these three sql queries into one?

    - by lam3r4370
    How to combine these two sql queries into one? SELECT DISTINCT * FROM rss WHERE MATCH(content,title) AGAINST ('$filter') SELECT COUNT(content) FROM rss WHERE MATCH(content,title) AGAINST ('$filters') And if the result is 0 from the above query - SELECT DISTINCT * FROM rss WHERE content LIKE '%$filters%' OR title LIKE '%$filters%'; $filter .= $row['filter']; $filters = $row['filter']; $filters may be more than one keyword

    Read the article

  • question in sql server 2005 Proc

    - by bassam
    i have this Proc CREATE Proc [dbo].Salse_Ditail -- Add the parameters for the stored procedure here @Report_Form varchar(1) , @DateFrom datetime , @DateTo datetime , @COMPANYID varchar(3), @All varchar(1) , @All1 varchar(1) , @All2 varchar(1) , @All3 varchar(1) , @All4 varchar(1) , @All5 varchar(1) , @Sector varchar(10), @Report_Parameter nvarchar(max) as BEGIN -- SET NOCOUNT ON added to prevent extra result sets from -- interfering with SELECT statements. DECLARE @STRWhere nvarchar(max) IF @All5=0 AND @All4=0 AND @All3=0 AND @All2=0 AND @All1=0 and @All=1 set @STRWhere= N'and Sector_id = @Sector' if @Report_Form =1 or @Report_Form =3 or @Report_Form =4 SELECT RETURNREASONCODEID, SITE,SITE_NAME,Factory_id,Factory_Name,Sector_id,sector_name,Customer_name, Customer_id,ITEMID,ITEMNAME,SALESMANID,SALESMAN_NAME,Net_Qty,Net_Salse,Gross_Sales,Gross_Qty, NETWEIGHT_Gross,NETWEIGHT_salse_Gross,NETWEIGHT_NET,NETWEIGHT_salse_NET,Return_Sales,Free_Good, CollectionAmount FROM hal_bas_new_rep WHERE DATAAREAID =@COMPANYID AND INVOICEDATE >= @DateFrom AND INVOICEDATE <= @DateTo and Report_Activti = @Report_Form if @Report_Form =2 SELECT RETURNREASONCODEID , RETURNREASONDESC, SITE , SITE_NAME , Factory_id , Factory_Name , Sector_id , sector_name , Customer_name , Customer_id , ITEMID , ITEMNAME , SALESMANID , SALESMAN_NAME , Return_Sales FROM dbo.hal_bas_new_rep WHERE DATAAREAID =@COMPANYID AND INVOICEDATE >= @DateFrom AND INVOICEDATE <= @DateTo and Report_Activti = @Report_Form and RETURNREASONCODEID in ( SELECT Val FROM dbo.fn_String_To_Table(@Report_Parameter,',',1) ) /* @STRWhere question how i can but the virble here */ end GO i want to but virble put a variable under where Expression and from this function buc I have many function i want to add if any one have answer pls send me

    Read the article

  • How to Deal with SET ANSI_NULLS ON or OFF ?

    - by Shantanu Gupta
    I want to call this procedure that sends one value that can be NULL or any int value. SELECT DomainName, DomainCode FROM Tags.tblDomain WHERE SubDomainId =@SubDomainId I simply want to use this single query rather than what i m doing right now in below given code. I searched for this how could i do this then i got this Link. According to this I have to set ANSI_NULLS OFF I am not able to set this inside this procedure before executing my sql query and then reset it again after doing this. ALTER PROCEDURE [Tags].[spOnlineTest_SubDomainSelect] @SubDomainId INT AS BEGIN -- SET NOCOUNT ON added to prevent extra result sets from -- interfering with SELECT statements. SET NOCOUNT ON; -- Insert statements for procedure here IF @SubDomainId IS NULL SELECT DomainName, DomainCode FROM Tags.tblDomain WHERE SubDomainId IS NULL ELSE SELECT DomainName, DomainCode FROM Tags.tblDomain WHERE SubDomainId =@SubDomainId END What will be the better practice to do deal with ANSI_NULLS or Using If Else

    Read the article

  • getting complete sql query in jython

    - by kdev
    result=sqlstring.executeQuery("select distinct table_name,owner from all_tables ") rs.append(str(i)+' , '+result.getString("table_name")+' , '+result.getString("owner")) If i want to display the query select * from all_tables or ' select count(*) from all_tables' how can i get the output to display . Please suggest thanks

    Read the article

  • Rails activerecord includes. How to access the included columns?

    - by Lee Quarella
    I my User has_many :event_patrons and EventPatron belongs_to :user. I would like to slap together the user with one specific event patron with something like this sql statement: SELECT * FROM `users` INNER JOIN `event_patrons` ON `event_patrons`.`user_id` = `users`.`id` WHERE `event_patrons`.`event_id` = 1 So in rails I tried this: User.all(:joins => :event_patrons, :condidions => {:event_patrons => {:event_id => 1}}) But that gives me SELECT users.* instead of SELECT *: SELECT `users`* FROM `users` INNER JOIN `event_patrons` ON `event_patrons`.`user_id` = `users`.`id` WHERE `event_patrons`.`event_id` = 1 I then tried to switch the :joins with :include and got a whole jumbled mess that still returned me only the columns in User and none from EventPatron. What am I missing?

    Read the article

  • While Loop in TSQL with Sum totals

    - by RPS
    I have the following TSQL Statement, I am trying to figure out how I can keep getting the results (100 rows at a time), store them in a variable (as I will have to add the totals after each select) and continue to select in a while loop until no more records are found and then return the variable totals to the calling function. SELECT [OrderUser].OrderUserId, ISNULL(SUM(total.FileSize), 0), ISNULL(SUM(total.CompressedFileSize), 0) FROM ( SELECT DISTINCT TOP(100) ProductSize.OrderUserId, ProductSize.FileInfoId, CAST(ProductSize.FileSize AS BIGINT) AS FileSize, CAST(ProductSize.CompressedFileSize AS BIGINT) AS CompressedFileSize FROM ProductSize WITH (NOLOCK) INNER JOIN [Version] ON ProductSize.VersionId = [Version].VersionId ) AS total RIGHT OUTER JOIN [OrderUser] WITH (NOLOCK) ON total.OrderUserId = [OrderUser].OrderUserId WHERE NOT ([OrderUser].isCustomer = 1 AND [OrderUser].isEndOrderUser = 0 OR [OrderUser].isLocation = 1) AND [OrderUser].OrderUserId = 1 GROUP BY [OrderUser].OrderUserId

    Read the article

  • Why did the following linq to sql query generate a subquery?

    - by Xaisoft
    I did the following query: var list = from book in books where book.price > 50 select book; list = list.Take(50); I would expect the above to generate something like: SELECT top 50 id, title, price, author FROM Books WHERE price > 50 but it generates: SELECT [Limit1].[C1] as [C1] [Limit1].[id] as [Id], [Limit1].[title] as [title], [Limit1].[price] as [price], [Limit1].[author] FROM (SELECT TOP (50) [Extent1].[id] as as [Id], [Extent1].[title] as [title], [Extent1].[price] as [price], [Extent1].[author] as [author] FROM Books as [Extent1] WHERE [Extent1].[price] > 50 ) AS [Limit1] Why does the above linq query generate a subquery and where does the C1 come from?

    Read the article

  • what's wrong with this code?

    - by user329820
    Hi this is my code which will not work correctly ! what is wrong with its data type :( thanks CREATE TABLE T1 (A INTEGER NOT NULL); CREATE TABLE T3 (A SMALLINT NOT NULL); INSERT T1 VALUES (32768.5); SELECT * FROM T1; INSERT T3 SELECT * FROM T1; SELECT * FROM T3;

    Read the article

  • How to output items in Order in MySQL?

    - by RailsRor
    I have a column called "menu_order" which has no default value. When I select the contents of this column using the following select statement: SELECT * FROM categories ORDER BY menu_order ASC It lists the category items that have nothing as their menu order first and then the one's that have 1's and 2's and 3's. Is there any way to prevent SQL from take nothing to come before numbers when I am trying to list things in order? So for example, if I have: cat_name | menu_order ---------------------- Lunch | 1 Dinner | And I perform my query, the output should be: Lunch Dinner Not: Dinner Lunch

    Read the article

  • MVC Html.DropDownList closes prematurely in IE7

    - by Jon
    I'm using ASP.NET MVC with jquery. I have a couple of dropdownlists. When I select one via mouse click and then scroll down over the items using the mouse/cursor, the list closes before a selection can be made, before the mouse can be clicked. This doesn't happen when I open them and then up/down arrow to select an item. It doesn't happen all of the time, but a lot. Just to try something different, I added a jquery "select" control with hardcoded values (options) and it displays the same behavior. Any ideas? <%: Html.DropDownList("Accounts", (IEnumerable)ViewData["Accounts"], "-- Select an account --")% Thank you

    Read the article

  • error in fill datagrid whit query

    - by Amir Tavakoli
    i have a data-gride-view and i add my query to this when write my query i catch this error: The schema returned by the new query differs from the base query and this my query: SELECT B.SettingKey, 'SysSettingsDep' AS TableName, B.SettingValue, B.SettingDesc FROM SysCustomer AS A INNER JOIN SysSettingsDep AS B ON A.SettingKey = B.SettingKey UNION SELECT C.SettingKey, 'SysSettingsMachine' AS TableName, C.SettingValue, C.SettingDesc FROM SysCustomer AS A INNER JOIN SysSettingsMachine AS C ON A.SettingKey = C.SettingKey UNION SELECT D.SettingKey, 'SysSettings' AS TableName, D.SettingValue, D.SettingDesc FROM SysCustomer AS A INNER JOIN SysSettings AS D ON A.SettingKey = D.SettingKey help me to solve this, tnx

    Read the article

  • Changing set_timezone does not always take effect

    - by LearneR
    I have two table table-1 id date-time ----------------------- 1 2012-12-13 15:20:13 table-2 id date-time ----------------------- 1 2012-12-13 15:20:13 Now i am selecting the record with mysql set_timezone function Case-1 SET time_zone='+00:00'; SELECT `date-time` FROM `table-1`; // 2012-12-13 09:50:13 Case-2 SET time_zone='+00:00'; SELECT `date-time` FROM `table-2`; // 2012-12-13 15:20:13 ---Not converting to specified timezone In case-1 it's giving converted date-time, but not in Case-2. What would be the issue?

    Read the article

  • Problem in using xpath with xslt having distint values

    - by AB
    I have XML like, <items> <item> <products> <product>laptop</product> <product>charger</product> <product>Cam</product> </products> </item> <item> <products> <product>laptop</product> <product>headphones</product> <product>Photoframe</product> </products> </item> <item> <products> <product>laptop</product> <product>charger</product> <product>Battery</product> </products> </item> </items> and I am using xslt on it //can't change xpath as getting it from somewhere else <xsl:param name="xparameter" select="items/item[products/product='laptop' and products/product='charger']"></xsl:param> <xsl:template match="/"> <xsl:for-each select="$xparameter"> <xsl:for-each select="products/product[not(.=preceding::product)]"> <xsl:sort select="."></xsl:sort> <xsl:value-of select="." ></xsl:value-of>, </xsl:for-each> </xsl:for-each> </xsl:template> I want the output to be laptop charger cam Battery But I m not getting the result as I m expecting...distinct values is working fine ..something is getting wrong when I am adding that and claus

    Read the article

  • How can I pass a type as a parameter in scala?

    - by rsan
    I'm having a really hard time trying to figure out how can I store or pass a type in scala. What I want to achive is something like this: abstract class Foo( val theType : type ) object Foo{ case object Foo1 extends Foo(String) case object Foo2 extends Foo(Long) } So at some point I can do this: theFoo match{ case String => "Is a string" case Long => "Is a long" } and when obtaining the object being able to cast it: theFoo.asInstanceOf[Foo1.theType] Is this possible? If is possible, is a good aproach? What I'm trying to achieve ultimately is writing a pseudo schema for byte stream treatment. E.g if I have an schema Array(Foo1,Foo1,Foo2,Foo3,Foo1) I could parse Arrays of bytes that complain with that schema, if at some point I have a different stream of bytes I could just write a new schema Array(Foo3, Foo4, Foo5) without having to reimplement parsing logic. Regards,

    Read the article

  • Remove duplicates in entries, scala way

    - by andersbohn
    I have a list of entries stating a production value in a given interval. Entries stating the exact same value at a later time adds no information and can safely be left out. case class Entry(minute:Int, production:Double) val entries = List(Entry(0, 100.0), Entry(5, 100.0), Entry(10, 100.0), Entry(20, 120.0), Entry(30, 100.0), Entry(180, 0.0)) Experimenting with the scala 2.8 collection functions, so far I have this working implementation: entries.foldRight(List[Entry]()) { (entry, list) => list match { case head :: tail if (entry.production == head.production) => entry :: tail case head :: tail => entry :: list case List() => entry :: List() } } res0: List[Entry] = List(Entry(0,100.0), Entry(20,120.0), Entry(30,100.0), Entry(180,0.0)) Any comments? Am I missing out on some scala magic?

    Read the article

  • Refreshing <div> and load data from php

    - by forgatn
    I have on my page and there is a tag where is some and values filled from mySQL DB. I need some JavaScript I think. When I select one option, I want to display in this propriate DATAs which are in DB. without refreshing whole page. Can you tell me how to do it, if you know that please?:) <div id="country1" class="tabcontent"> <label>Choose protocol</label> <SELECT name="cisloprot"> <?php $con = mysql_connect("localhost", "root", "123456"); $sql = "SELECT kod FROM prot GROUP BY kod"; $rs = mysql_query($sql,$con); while ($r = mysql_fetch_array($rs)) { echo "<OPTION VALUE=".$r['kod'].">".$r['kod']."</OPTION>"; } ?> </SELECT> </div>

    Read the article

  • How does Zend_Db_Table_Select work?

    - by jwhat
    I'm trying to figure out how to use Zend_Db_Table_Abstract correctly. I want to return just the name column from my query. Can you please explain what's wrong with the following code? class Model_DbTable_Foo extends Zend_Db_Table_Abstract { protected $_name = 'foo'; public function getFooById($id) { $select = $this->select(true)->columns('name')->where('id=' . $id); $row = $this->fetchRow($select); print_r($row->toArray()); } }

    Read the article

  • Passing arguments and conditions to model in codeigniter

    - by stormdrain
    I'm adding some models to a project, and was wondering if there is a "best practice" kind of approach to creating models: Does it make sense to create a function for each specific query? I was starting to do this, then had the idea of creating a generic function that I could pass parameters to. e.g: Instead of function getClients(){ return $this->db->query('SELECT client_id,last FROM Names ORDER BY id DESC'); } function getClientNames($clid){ return $this->db->query('SELECT * FROM Names WHERE client_id = '.$clid); } function getClientName($nameID){ return $this->db->query('SELECT * FROM Names WHERE id ='.$nameID); } } Something like function getNameData($args,$cond){ if($cond==''){ $q=$this->db->query('SELECT '.$args.' FROM Names'); return $q; }else{ $q=$this->db->query('SELECT '.$args.' FROM Names WHERE '.$cond); return $q; } } where I can pass the fields and conditions (if applicable) to the model. Is there a reason the latter example would be a bad idea? Thanks!

    Read the article

  • An Alternative to Views?

    - by Abs
    Hello all, I am just reading this article and I came across this: Filter: Remove any functions in the WHERE clause, don't include views in your Transact-SQL code, may need additional indexes. If I do not use views, what are the alternatives? I mean, in my situation, I want to select some data from a table and then use a few other select queries to work on the subset of data from the first select query? How can I do this efficiently? Thanks all

    Read the article

  • Reading Excel file with C# - Choose sheet

    - by Dänu
    Hey Guys I'm reading an excel file with C# and OleDB (12.0). There I have to specify the select statement with the name of the sheet I wish to read ([Sheet1$]). this.dataAdapter = new OleDbDataAdapter("SELECT * FROM [Sheet1$]", connectionString); Is it possible to select the first sheet, no matter what name? Thank you.

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225  | Next Page >