Search Results

Search found 103627 results on 4146 pages for 'google code'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 221/4146 | < Previous Page | 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228  | Next Page >

  • Des hackers exploiteraient le référencement de Google sur le faux-positif de McAfee pour diffuser le

    Mise à jour du 26/04/10 Les requêtes sur le faux-positif de McAfee utilisées pour diffuser des malwares D'après un concurrent de McAfee, des hackers insèreraient des liens malicieux dans le référencement de Google Le faux-positif de McAfee - qui a bloqué des milliers de PC suite à une mauvaise mise à jour (lire ci-avant) - aurait donné des idées aux hackers. Un des concurrents de McAfee, Sophos, affirme que des cybercriminels utiliseraient leurs connaissances des techniques de référencement de Google pour exploiter cette affaire et propager leurs propres malwares. Le principe est simple. Un utilisateur a...

    Read the article

  • Des hackers exploiteraient le référencement de Google sur le faux-positif de McAfee pour diffuser le

    Mise à jour du 26/04/10 Les requêtes sur le faux-positif de McAfee utilisées pour diffuser des malwares D'après un concurrent de McAfee, des hackers insèreraient des liens malicieux dans le référencement de Google Le faux-positif de McAfee - qui a bloqué des milliers de PC suite à une mauvaise mise à jour (lire ci-avant) - aurait donné des idées aux hackers. Un des concurrents de McAfee, Sophos, affirme que des cybercriminels utiliseraient leurs connaissances des techniques de référencement de Google pour exploiter cette affaire et propager leurs propres malwares. Le principe est simple. Un utilisateur a...

    Read the article

  • Does a prose to code compiler exist?

    - by Raynos
    I have seen some horrible code in my time including people virtually duplicating the code in comments // add 4 to x x+=4; // for each i in 0 to 9 for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) { // multiply x by i x *= i; } Taking this concept further, I'm curious whether prose to code compilers exist. Is there a valid use case for English prose to code? Do compilers exist that do this? The distinction between this and auto generated code, is that auto generated code is generally always a subset of a project. Can we have complete projects auto generated from english prose? I realise that this might overlap with the concept of declarative languages.

    Read the article

  • Aw, Snap! in Google Chrome [on hold]

    - by D. S. Schneider
    Just wondering if anyone else's experiencing the "Aw, Snap!" bug in Google Chrome. I'm developing a brand new engine which occasionaly triggers this bug and as far as I know, there's nothing one can do to find out what actually triggered the issue. I've also tested my engine with Firefox, which runs just fine. Anyway, just wanted to know if someone else is facing this while developing games for Google Chrome and has a clue about what can be done to avoid it. I'm using plain JavaScript and the audio and canvas elements from HTML5. Thanks!

    Read the article

  • why not use unmanaged safe code in c#

    - by user613326
    There is an option in c# to execute code unchecked. It's generally not advised to do so, as managed code is much safer and it overcomes a lot of problems. However I am wondering, if you're sure your code won't cause errors, and you know how to handle memory then why (if you like fast code) follow the general advice? I am wondering this since I wrote a program for a video camera, which required some extremely fast bitmap manipulation. I made some fast graphical algorithms myself, and they work excellent on the bitmaps using unmanaged code. Now I wonder in general, if you're sure you don't have memory leaks, or risks of crashes, why not use unmanaged code more often ? PS my background: I kinda rolled into this programming world and I work alone (I do so for a few years) and so I hope this software design question isn't that strange. I don't really have other people out there like a teacher to ask such things.

    Read the article

  • Java serait un "Roi légèrement enrhumé", un cadre de Google appelle Oracle à le remettre d'aplomb

    Java serait un "Roi légèrement enrhumé" Pour un cadre de Google qui appelle Oracle à le remettre d'aplomb Josh Blosh, "Chief Java Architect" chez Google, vient de participer au Red Hat Middleware 2020. Lors d'une intervention particulièrement remarquée, il a regretté que la plate-forme Java soit « restée sans maître à bord (rudderless) depuis plusieurs années ». D'après lui, un malaise durable se serait même emparé de la communauté. La principale explication tiendrait au fait que « les disputes techniques et liées aux licences », particulièrement préjudiciables, ont « sapé l'énergie de la communauté et provoqué beaucoup de mauvaise presse »

    Read the article

  • Green IT : Microsoft et Google peuvent mieux faire, selon le rapport annuel de Greenpeace

    Green IT : Microsoft et Google peuvent mieux faire, selon le rapport annuel de Greenpeace Quand les écolos mettent leur nez dans le milieu de l'informatique, certaines firmes se font tapper sur les doigts. De bons points ont cependant été accordés à Cisco et Ericsson, qui sont arrivés en première position des entreprises informatiques ayant le moins d'impact sur les changements climatiques. Malgré son lobbying en faveur des énergies propres et ses investissements dans les énergies renouvelables, Google obtient un mauvais résultat et se place à la 6éme position. Greenpeace a publié en début de semaine sont Cool IT Leaderboard annuel. Si la première place a été attribuée à Cisco, c'est à cause de ...

    Read the article

  • Google remodèle les paramètres de confidentialité de Buzz, suite aux plaintes essuyées

    Mise à jour du 06.04.2010 par Katleen Google remodèle les paramètres de confidentialité de Buzz, suite aux plaintes essuyées Suite au mécontentement de certains de ses utilisateurs, allant jusqu'à une plainte aux Etats-Unis, Google Buzz va se doter d'une nouvelle page de réglage. Depuis hier, les usagers du service verront apparaître un écran de validation de leurs réglages utilisateurs, et ils devront confirmer ou modifier les paramètres concernant les informations personnelles qu'ils partagent via Buzz. Un peu comme les paramètres de confidentialité de Facebook, ce panneau de contrôle permettra de définir qui peut suivre le compte, la diffusion des données, les liens avec Pica...

    Read the article

  • Tor and Google Analytics - how to track?

    - by Jeremy French
    I make a lot of use of Google Analytics - Google has reasonable tracking for location of users so I can tell where users come from. I know it is not 100% but it gives an idea. In the wake of Prism it is possible that more people will make use of networks such as tor for anonymous browsing. I have no problem with this, people can wear tin foil hats while browsing my site for all I care, but it will lead to more erroneous stats. Is there any way to flag traffic as coming from TOR, so I can filter location reports not to include it, and to get an idea of the percentage of traffic which does use it? Has anyone actually tried this?

    Read the article

  • Releasing a project under GPL v2 or later without the source code of libraries

    - by Luciano Silveira
    I wrote a system in Java that I want to release under the terms of GPL v2 or later. I've used Apache Maven to deal with all the dependencies of the system, so I don't have the source code of any of the libraries used. I've already checked, all the libraries were released under GPL-compatible licenses (Apache v2, 3-clause BSD, MIT, LGPL v2 and v2.1). I have 3 questions about this scenario: 1) Can I release a package with only the binaries of code I wrote, not including the libraries, and distribute only the source code I wrote? 2) Can I release a package with all the binaries, including the libraries, and distribute only the source code I wrote? 3) Can I release a package with all the binaries, including the libraries, and distribute only the source code I wrote plus the source code of the libraries licensed under the LGPL license?

    Read the article

  • How do you handle measuring Code Coverage in JavaScript

    - by Dancrumb
    In order to measure Code Coverage for JavaScript unit tests, one needs to instrument the code, run the tests and then perform post-processing. My concern is that, as a result, you are unit testing code that will never be run in production. Since JavaScript isn't compiled, what you test should be precisely what you execute. So here's my question, how do you handle this? One thought I had was to run Unit Testing on the production code and use that for my pass fail. I would then create a shadow of my production code, with instrumentation and run my unit tests again; this would give me my code coverage stats. Has anyone come across a method that is a little more graceful than this?

    Read the article

  • Google Closure Compiler - what does the name mean?

    - by mikez302
    I am curious about the Google Closure Compiler. Why did they name it that? Does it have anything to do with lexical closures? EDIT: I tried researching it in the FAQ and documentation, as well as doing Google searches such as "closure compiler name". I couldn't find anything definite, hence the reason I am asking. I don't think I will get a profoundly helpful answer but I was hoping that I could at least satisfy my curiosity. I am not trying to solve a specific problem. I am just curious.

    Read the article

  • MODX based site has been compromised, and tagged by Google as malware

    - by JAG2007
    I'm the webmaster (inherited the site from the developer) for a site called kenbrook.org. The site is currently being tagged as malware infected by Google, and gives the following details: http://www.google.com/safebrowsing/diagnostic?site=kenbrook.org Sadly, this is the second time it has occurred. I posted the issue when it happened last year originally on Stackoverflow on this post, shortly after I inherited the site. At the time the fix was a simple removal of a few lines of code from a .js file, but I never did discover or resolve the vulnerability. The site is built on MODX, which neither I, nor the original builder, have any familiarity with. I've tried to check for security updates from MODX, but updating that software has been a real pain also. Sooo...what's my next step to getting this whole issue resolved? Or steps?

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228  | Next Page >