Search Results

Search found 6580 results on 264 pages for 'boost foreach'.

Page 227/264 | < Previous Page | 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234  | Next Page >

  • Display attribute from XML using PHP

    - by user560411
    Hello. I need to display the id attribute of CD from the following XML file. I display correctly everything except the id. Any help would be appreciate. display code <?php $doc = new DOMDocument(); $doc->load( 'insert.xml' ); $CATEGORIES = $doc->getElementsByTagName( "CD" ); foreach( $CATEGORIES as $CD ) { $TITLES = $CD->getElementsByTagName( "TITLE" ); $TITLE = $TITLES->item(0)->nodeValue; $BANDS= $CD->getElementsByTagName( "BAND" ); $BAND= $BANDS->item(0)->nodeValue; $YEARS = $CD->getElementsByTagName( "YEAR" ); $YEAR = $YEARS->item(0)->nodeValue; echo "<b>$TITLE - $BAND - $YEAR\n</b><br>"; } ?> XML <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> <MY_CD> <CATEGORIES> <CD id="3231"> <TITLE>NEVER MIND THE BOLLOCKS</TITLE> <BAND>SEX PISTOLS</BAND> <YEAR>1977</YEAR> </CD> <CD id="2453"> <TITLE>NEVERMIND</TITLE> <BAND>NIRVANA</BAND> <YEAR>1991</YEAR> </CD> </CATEGORIES> </MY_CD>

    Read the article

  • Creating a image viewer window controll.

    - by Scott Chamberlain
    I am learning GDI+ and I am trying to make a display window with scroll bars (so I can only see part of the image at a time and I can scroll around it). I have read through the basics of GDI+ from several books but I have not found any good tutorials online or in books available to me about doing more advanced things like this. Any recommendations on guides or example code on how do do this? Here is what I have so far protected override void OnPaint(PaintEventArgs e) { base.OnPaint(e); if (Label != null) { using (Bitmap drawnLabel = new Bitmap(Label.LabelHeight, Label.LableLength, System.Drawing.Imaging.PixelFormat.Format1bppIndexed)) using (Graphics drawBuffer = Graphics.FromImage(drawnLabel)) { drawBuffer.ScaleTransform(_ImageScaleFactor, _ImageScaleFactor); foreach (Epl2.IDrawableCommand cmd in Label.Collection) { cmd.Paint(drawBuffer); } drawBuffer.ResetTransform(); } } } I would like to paint this in to a PictureBox I have on the control and control what is shown by a VScrollBar and HScrollBar but I don't know how to do that step. P.S. Label is a custom class that I have in my namespace, it is a object that represents a label you would print from a label printer.

    Read the article

  • Cakephp 2.2 Blog Tutorial undefined constant errors

    - by user1741925
    Have copy pasted the code from Blog tutorial in cakephp 2.2 but its not working. Getting the following errors. Notice (8): Use of undefined constant Html Notice (8): Use of undefined constant Form Notice (8): Use of undefined constant posts Notice (8): Use of undefined constant all Notice (8): Undefined index: all Below is the code for PostsController and index.ctp. <?php class PostsController extends AppController { public $helpers = array(’Html’, ’Form’); public function index() { $this->set(’posts’, $this->Post->find(’all’)); } public function view($id = null) { $this->Post->id = $id; $this->set(’post’, $this->Post->read()); } } ?> index.ctp <h1>Blog posts</h1> <table> <tr> <th>Id</th> <th>Title</th> <th>Created</th> </tr> <?php foreach ($posts as $post): ?> <tr> <td><?php echo $post[’Post’][’id’]; ?></td> <td> <?php echo $post[’Post’][’title’]; ?> </td> <td><?php echo $post[’Post’][’created’]; ?></td> </tr> <?php endforeach; ?> <?php unset($post); ?> </table>

    Read the article

  • Binding Events rather than using onclick

    - by Abs
    Hello all, I have been told its better to bind events to elements rather than having onclicks with functions everywhere. I agree with this as it devolves more from the HTML which means cleaner and easier to debug code. But I am having trouble doing this! I loop through some data with PHP (see below) and I currently use onclick to call a function. How can I bind this onclick event to many elements using JQuery. <?php foreach($main_tags as $key=>$value){ ?> <li> <a id="<?php echo $key; ?>" href="#" onclick="tag_search('<?php echo $key; ?>'); return false;"> <?php echo $key; ?> <span class="num-active"> <?php echo $value; ?> </span> </a> </li> <?php } ?> Thanks all for any help

    Read the article

  • How to remove the link if value is 0 using asp.net mvc

    - by kumar
    i have this code.. <table class="dashboard-table"> <thead> <tr> <th>&nbsp;</th> <th>Worked</th> </tr> </thead> <% foreach (var e in Model.ExceptionsByType) { %> <tr> <td> <%=Html.ActionLink(e.ExceptionTypeName, "VirtualScrollingDataRequested", Model.exceptionCategory.GetControllerName(), new { C_EXCPT_TYPE = e.ExceptionTypeID, GUI_SPEC_STAT_DSPL = 2, C_EXCPT_CATG = Model.exceptionCategory.Id, @ASSET_CLASS = string.Empty, @INST_MNEM = string.Empty, @_lock = "ALL" }, new { @title = e.BuildGridTitle(2, e.ExceptionTypeName) })%> </td> <td class="number"> <%=e.WorkedExceptions %> </td> </tr> <% } %> </table> e.WorkedExceptions is the count of exceptions.. I need to to the condition here if the e.workedexceptions == 0 I need to remove the link? please can any body hlep me out? thanks

    Read the article

  • Entityframework duplicate record on second insert

    - by Delysid
    I am building an application for recipe/meal planning, and i have come across a problem i cant seem to figure out. i have a table for units of measure, where i keep the used units in, i only want unique units in here (for grocery list calculation and so forth) but if i use a unit from the table on a recipe, the first time it is okay, nothing is inserted in units of measure, but the second time i get a "duplicate". i suspect it has something to do with entitykey, because the primary key is identity column on the sql server (2008 r2) for some reason it works to change the objectstate on some objects (courses, see code) and that does not generate a duplicate, but that does not work on the unit of measure my insert methods looks like this : public recipe Create(recipe recipe) { using (RecipeDataContext ctx = new RecipeDataContext()) { foreach (recipe_ingredient rec_ing in recipe.recipe_ingredient) { if (rec_ing.ingredient.ingredient_id == 0) { ingredient ing = (from _ing in ctx.ingredients where _ing.name == rec_ing.ingredient.name select _ing).FirstOrDefault(); if (ing != null) { rec_ing.ingredient_id = ing.ingredient_id; rec_ing.ingredient = null; } } if (rec_ing.unit_of_measure.unit_of_measure_id == 0) { unit_of_measure _uom = (from dbUom in ctx.unit_of_measure where dbUom.unit == rec_ing.unit_of_measure.unit select dbUom).FirstOrDefault(); if (_uom != null) { rec_ing.unit_of_measure_id = _uom.unit_of_measure_id; rec_ing.unit_of_measure = null; } } ctx.Recipes.AddObject(recipe); //for some reason it works to change object state of this, and not generate a duplicate ctx.ObjectStateManager.ChangeObjectState(recipe.courses[0], EntityState.Unchanged); } ctx.SaveChanges(); } return recipe; } My datamodel looks like this : http://i.imgur.com/NMwZv.png

    Read the article

  • Make a router like zend

    - by Vahan
    I have a url http://*.com/branch/module/view/id/1/cat/2/etc/3. It becomes. array ( 'module'=>'branch', 'controller'=>'module', 'action'=>'view' ); next I need to get the params. Ihave this array. /*function getNextSegments($n,$segments) { return array_slice ( $q = $this->segments, $n + 1 ); } $params = getNextSegments(3); */ array ( 0 => 'id', 1 => '1', 2 => 'cat', 3 => '2', 4 => 'etc', 5 => '3' );//params And i wanna convert it to this one: array ( 'id'=1, 'cat'=2, 'etc'=3, ); How i can do this using php function. I know I can do using for or foreach, but I think php has such function , but i cant find it :(. Thank you. class A { protected function combine($params) { $count = count ( $params ); $returnArray = array (); for($i = 0; $i < $count; $i += 2) { $g = $i % 2; if ($g == 0 or $g > 0) { if (isset ( $params [$i] ) and isset ( $params [$i + 1] )) $returnArray [$params [$i]] = $params [$i + 1]; } } return $returnArray; } } This works normaly. If anybody has better login for this please help. Thank you again.

    Read the article

  • C# Dictionary Loop Enhancment

    - by Toto
    Hi, I have a dictionary with around 1 milions items. I am constantly looping throw the dictionnary : public void DoAllJobs() { foreach (KeyValuePair<uint, BusinessObject> p in _dictionnary) { if(p.Value.MustDoJob) p.Value.DoJob(); } } The execution is a bit long, around 600 ms, I would like to deacrese it. Here is the contraints : MustDoJob values mostly stay the same beetween two calls to DoAllJobs() 60-70% of the MustDoJob values == false From time to times MustDoJob change for 200 000 pairs. Some p.Value.DoJob() can not be computed at the same time (COM object call) Here, I do not need the key part of the _dictionnary objet but I really do need it somewhere else I wanted to do the following : Parallelizes but I am not sure is going to be effective due to 4. Sorts the dictionnary since 1. and 2. (and stop want I find the first MustDoJob == false) but I am wondering what 3. would result in I did not implement any of the previous ideas since it could be a lot of job and I would like to investigate others options before. So...any ideas ?

    Read the article

  • How to pass values from array into mysql with php

    - by moustafa
    my original code is this <tr> <th> <label for="user_level"> User Level: * <?php echo isset($valid_user_level) ? $valid_user_level : NULL; ?> </label> </th> </tr> <td> <select name="user_level" id="user_level" class="sel"> <option value="">Select one…</option> <option value="1">User</option> <option value="5">Admin</option> </select> </td> this give me the option to select one of choice from the drop down menu i.e. user and when user is selected and the submit button is pressed this will insert the value 1 into the database which will when the user logs in tell the system that they are are normal user. I want to change the code to the following <tr> <td> <select name="user_level" id="user_level" class="sel"> <option value="">Select one…</option> <?php if(!empty($level)) { foreach($level as $value) { echo "<option value='{$value}'"; echo getSticky(2,'user_level',$value); echo ">{$value}</option>"; } } ?> </select> </td> </tr> With this being my array query $level = array('User','Admin'); How can I pass the values of 1 for user level and 5 for admin in this code so when the user is selected it inouts 1 into the database?

    Read the article

  • Why is it possible to enumerate a LinqToSql query after calling Dispose() on the DataContext?

    - by DanM
    I'm using the Repository Pattern with some LinqToSql objects. My repository objects all implement IDisposable, and the Dispose() method does only thing--calls Dispose() on the DataContext. Whenever I use a repository, I wrap it in a using person, like this: public IEnumerable<Person> SelectPersons() { using (var repository = _repositorySource.GetNew<Person>(dc => dc.Person)) { return repository.GetAll(); } } This method returns an IEnumerable<Person>, so if my understanding is correct, no querying of the database actually takes place until Enumerable<Person> is traversed (e.g., by converting it to a list or array or by using it in a foreach loop), as in this example: var persons = gateway.SelectPersons(); // Dispose() is fired here var personViewModels = ( from b in persons select new PersonViewModel { Id = b.Id, Name = b.Name, Age = b.Age, OrdersCount = b.Order.Count() }).ToList(); // executes queries In this example, Dispose() gets called immediately after setting persons, which is an IEnumerable<Person>, and that's the only time it gets called. So, a couple questions: How does this work? How can a disposed DataContext still query the database for results when I walk the IEnumerable<Person>? What does Dispose() actually do? I've heard that it is not necessary (e.g., see this question) to dispose of a DataContext, but my impression was that it's not a bad idea. Is there any reason not to dispose of it?

    Read the article

  • Telling me my stored procedure isn't declared

    - by Scott
    Here is where the error is occuring in the stack: public static IKSList<DataParameter> Search(int categoryID, int departmentID, string title) { Database db = new Database(DatabaseConfig.CommonConnString, DatabaseConfig.CommonSchemaOwner, "pkg_data_params_new", "spdata_params_search"); db.AddParameter("category_id", categoryID); db.AddParameter("department_id", departmentID); db.AddParameter("title", title, title.Length); DataView temp = db.Execute_DataView(); IKSList<DataParameter> dps = new IKSList<DataParameter>(); foreach (DataRow dr in temp.Table.Rows) { DataParameter dp = new DataParameter(); dp.Load(dr); dps.Add(dp); } return dps; } And here is the error text: ORA-06550: line 1, column 38: PLS-00302: component 'SPDATA_PARAMS_SEARCH' must be declared ORA-06550: line 1, column 7: PL/SQL: Statement ignored Description: An unhandled exception occurred during the execution of the current web request. Please review the stack trace for more information about the error and where it originated in the code. Exception Details: System.Data.OracleClient.OracleException: ORA-06550: line 1, column 38: PLS-00302: component 'SPDATA_PARAMS_SEARCH' must be declared ORA-06550: line 1, column 7: PL/SQL: Statement ignored Source Error: Line 161: db.AddParameter("title", title, title.Length); Line 162: Line 163: DataView temp = db.Execute_DataView(); Line 164: Line 165: IKSList dps = new IKSList(); My webconfig is pointing to the correct place and everything so idk where this is coming from.

    Read the article

  • Why does p:panelGrid not work with ui:repeat?

    - by CycDemo
    If I use as below, I get no error, no output. Why does p:panelGrid not work with ui:repeat? Note : I don't want to use c:forEach because of the I already face a lot of JSF issue. <p:panelGrid> <ui:repeat value="#{MyBean.dataList}" var="data"> <p:row> <p:column> <h:outputText value="#{data.name}"/> </p:column> <p:column> <h:outputText value="#{data.description}"/> </p:column> </p:row> </ui:repeat> </p:panelGrid> MyBean.java public List<Data> getDataList(){ List<Data> result = new ArrayList<Data>(); result.add(new Data("Name 1", "Description 1")); result.add(new Data("Name 2", "Description 2")); result.add(new Data("Name 3", "Description 3")); result.add(new Data("Name 4", "Description 4")); return result; } Expected output with primefaces

    Read the article

  • How can I pass an array resulting from a Perl method by reference?

    - by arareko
    Some XML::LibXML methods return arrays instead of references to arrays. Instead of doing this: $self->process_items($xml->findnodes('items/item')); I want to do something like: $self->process_items(\$xml->findnodes('items/item')); So that in process_items() I can dereference the original array instead of creating a copy: sub process_items { my ($self, $items) = @_; foreach my $item (@$items) { # do something... } } I can always store the results of findnodes() into an array and then pass the array reference to my own method, but let's say I want to try a reduced version of my code. Is that the correct syntax for passing the method results or should I use something different? Thanks! EDIT: Now suppose I want to change process_items() to process_item() so I can do stuff on a single element of the referenced array inside a loop. Something like: $self->process_item($_) for ([ $xml->findnodes('items/item') ]); This doesn't work as process_item() is executed only once because a single value is passed to the for loop (the reference to the array from findnodes()). What's the proper way of using $_ in this case?

    Read the article

  • Make a PHP GET request from a PHP script and exit

    - by Abs
    Hello all, Is there something simpler than the following. I am trying to make a GET request to a PHP script and then exit the current script. I think this is a job for CURL but is there something simpler as I don't want to really worry about enabling the CURL php extension? In addition, will the below start the PHP script and then just come back and not wait for it to finish? //set GET variables $url = 'http://domain.com/get-post.php'; $fields = array( 'lname'=>urlencode($last_name), 'fname'=>urlencode($first_name) ); //url-ify the data for the GET foreach($fields as $key=>$value) { $fields_string .= $key.'='.$value.'&'; } rtrim($fields_string,'&'); //open connection $ch = curl_init(); //set the url, number of POST vars, POST data curl_setopt($ch,CURLOPT_URL,$url); curl_setopt($ch,CURLOPT_GET,count($fields)); curl_setopt($ch,CURLOPT_GETFIELDS,$fields_string); //execute GET $result = curl_exec($ch); //close connection curl_close($ch); I want to run the other script which contains functions when a condition is met so a simple include won't work as the if condition wraps around the functions, right? Please note, I am on windows machine and the code I am writing will only be used on a Windows OS. Thanks all for any help and advice

    Read the article

  • How can solve "Cross-thread operation not valid"?

    - by Phsika
    i try to start multi Thread but i can not it returns to me error: Cross-thread operation not valid: 'listBox1' thread was created to control outside access from another thread was. MyCodes: public DataTable dTable; public DataTable dtRowsCount; Thread t1; ThreadStart ts1; void ExcelToSql() { // SelectDataFromExcel(); ts1 = new ThreadStart(SelectDataFromExcel); t1 = new Thread(ts1); t1.Start(); } void SelectDataFromExcel() { string connectionString = @"Provider=Microsoft.ACE.OLEDB.12.0;Data Source=C:\Source\Addresses.xlsx;Extended Properties=""Excel 12.0;HDR=YES;"""; OleDbConnection excelConnection = new OleDbConnection(connectionString); string[] Sheets = new string[] { "Sayfa1"}; excelConnection.Open(); // This code will open excel file. OleDbCommand dbCommand; OleDbDataAdapter dataAdapter; // progressBar1.Minimum = 1; foreach (var sheet in Sheets) { dbCommand = new OleDbCommand("select * From[" + sheet + "$]", excelConnection); //progressBar1.Maximum = CountRowsExcel(sheet).Rows.Count; // progressBar2.Value = i + 1; System.Threading.Thread.Sleep(1000); **listBox1.Items.Add("Tablo ismi: "+sheet.ToUpper()+"Satir Adeti: "+CountRowsExcel(sheet).Rows.Count.ToString()+" ");** dataAdapter = new OleDbDataAdapter(dbCommand); dTable = new DataTable(); dataAdapter.Fill(dTable); dTable.TableName = sheet.ToUpper(); dTable.Dispose(); dataAdapter.Dispose(); dbCommand.Dispose(); ArrangedDataList(dTable); FillSqlTable(dTable, dTable.TableName); } excelConnection.Close(); excelConnection.Dispose(); }

    Read the article

  • jquery - DOM traversal question

    - by David
    Hi, Basically what I have here is a button that adds a new list item to an unordered list. Within this list item is a dropdown box (.formSelector) that when changed triggers an ajax call to get the values for another dropdown box (.fieldSelector) in the same list item. The problem is on this line: $(this).closest(".fieldSelector").append( If I change it to $(".fieldSelector").append( the second box updates correctly. The problem with this is that when I have multiple list items it updates every dropdown box on the page with the class fieldSelector, which is undesirable. How can I traverse the DOM to just pick the fieldSelector in the current list item? Any help is greatly appreciated. Complete code: $("button", "#newReportElement").click(function() { $("#reportElements").append("<li class=\"ui-state-default\"> <span class=\"test ui-icon ui-icon-arrowthick-2-n-s \"></span><span class=\"ui-icon ui-icon-trash deleteRange \"></span> <select name=\"form[]\" class=\"formSelector\"><? foreach ($forms->result() as $row) { echo "<option value='$row->formId'>$row->name</option>"; }?></select><select class=\"fieldSelector\" name=\"field[]\"></select></li>"); $(".deleteRange").button(); $('.formSelector').change(function() { var id = $(this).val(); var url = "<? echo site_url("report/formfields");?>" + "/" + id; var atext = "ids:"; $.getJSON(url, function(data){ $.each(data.items, function(i,item){ $(this).closest(".fieldSelector").append( $('<option></option>').val(item.formId).html(item.formLabel) ); }); }); }); return false; });

    Read the article

  • image list, listview,picturebox

    - by user548694
    I wanted to show my pics in picturebox. but also wanted to show a preview of pics. When user select a pic, it is shown in picbox but i have problem in resoulution. Here is my code private void openToolStripMenuItem_Click(object sender, EventArgs e) { ofd = new OpenFileDialog(); ofd.Title = "Open an Image File"; ofd.FileName = ""; ofd.Filter = "Image Files(*.jpg; *.jpeg; *.gif; *.bmp)|*.jpg; *.jpeg; *.gif; *.bmp"; if (ofd.ShowDialog() == DialogResult.OK) { DirectoryInfo dir = new DirectoryInfo(@"c:\pic"); foreach (FileInfo file in dir.GetFiles()) { this.imageList1.Images.Add(Image.FromFile(file.FullName)); } this.listView1.View = View.LargeIcon; this.imageList1.ImageSize = new Size(40, 40); this.listView1.LargeImageList = this.imageList1; for (int j=0; j < this.imageList1.Images.Count; j++) { ListViewItem item = new ListViewItem(); item.ImageIndex = j; listView1.Items.Add(item); ListViewItem item2 = new ListViewItem(); item2.SubItems.Add(j.ToString()); } private void listView1_SelectedIndexChanged(object sender, EventArgs e) { int i = this.listView1.FocusedItem.Index; this.PicBox1.Image = this.imageList1.Images[i]; } On click i see only image of resolution of (40,40) becuse i have set it this.imageList1.ImageSize = new Size(40, 40); and not orignal size. How can I have it. 2- I want to write also image names and index(image no) under each images. Its it possible. reagrsd,

    Read the article

  • update entire table with pdo

    - by MephDaddy
    I am working on a simple gaming ladder script. I am having little to no luck trying to find an effective way to reset my ladder information while leaving my table id and name fields intact. I am trying to get create a loop to update my entire table, similar to the way I draw my table. Shown below. ...... //Start displaying ladder with with team with most wins at the top echo "<TABLE border=1 width=500 align=center><TR>"; foreach($db->query('SELECT * FROM test ORDER BY win DESC , name ASC') as $row) { echo "<TR><TD>" . $row['name'] . "</TD><TD>" . $row['win'] . "</TD><TD>"; echo $row['loss'] . "</TD><TD>" . $row['battles'] . "</TD><TD>"; echo $row['score'] . "</TD></TR>"; } ...... I currently have a table with 6 fields(id,name,win,loss,battles,score). I want to reset the values of win,loss,battles, and score back to 0. While leaving id and name alone. Effective reseting my ladder for a new season to begin. The only way I have been able to complete this is to find out how many rows there are and run a for loop. It seems vary inefficient. Was hoping I could get some better insight as to how to go about this.

    Read the article

  • Looping through with dates

    - by Luke
    I have created a fixture generator for football/ soccer games... $totalRounds = $teams - 1; $matchesPerRound = $teams / 2; $rounds = array(); $roundDates = array(); $curTime = time(); for ($i = 1; $i <= $totalRounds; $i++) { $rounds[$i] = array(); $numDays = $i * 4; $roundDates[$i] = strtotime("+".$numDays." days",$curTime); } foreach($roundDates as $time) { for ($round = 0; $round < $totalRounds; $round++) { for ($match = 0; $match < $matchesPerRound; $match++) { $home = ($round + $match) % ($teams - 1); $away = ($teams - 1 - $match + $round) % ($teams - 1); // Last team stays in the same place while the others // rotate around it. if ($match == 0) { $away = $teams - 1; } $rounds[$round][$match] = "$user[$home]~$team[$home]@$user[$away]~$team[$away]~$time"; } } } In the code, for $i = 1, i thought that if you want the first date 4 days from now, the i must be 1, so 1 * 4 = 4. If i was 0, 0 * 4 equals 0. I assume this is correct thinking? Anyway the main question is, trying to generate the dates isn't working. When i created a fixture list for 4 users home and away, I got 12 fixtures. 10 of these had the same date on them, and the other 2 didnt have a date. Can anyone help me with this? Thanks

    Read the article

  • help with basic MVC project

    - by Shrewd Demon
    hi, i am creating a demo MVC project and i am getting a Null Object Reference error for the following code. <% foreach (var item in Model) { %> <tr> <td> <%= Html.ActionLink("Edit", "Edit", new { /* id=item.PrimaryKey */ }) %> | <%= Html.ActionLink("Details", "Details", new { /* id=item.PrimaryKey */ })%> | <%= Html.ActionLink("Delete", "Delete", new { /* id=item.PrimaryKey */ })%> </td> <td> <%= Html.Encode(item.ContactEmail) %> </td> <td> <%= Html.Encode(item.YourQuery) %> </td> </tr> <% } %> i get an error in the first line itself (var item in Model) coz i am getting the Model object as null. Can anyone please help me. thanks.

    Read the article

  • Should I change $_REQUEST to $_POST

    - by Scarface
    Hey guys quick question, I have a checkbox system where a list of items can be checked and deleted on the click of a button. I currently use request and it does the job but I was wondering if $_REQUEST was some sort of security risk or improper. If anyone has any advice I would appreciate it. Should I change to $_POST? If so, what is the best way to go about it? foreach ($_REQUEST as $key=>$value) { if (substr($key,0,3)==="img") { $id = substr($key,3); if(isset($_REQUEST['Delete'])) { $sql = 'SELECT file_name,username FROM images WHERE id=?'; $stmt = $conn->prepare($sql); $result=$stmt->execute(array($id)); while ($row = $stmt->fetch(PDO::FETCH_ASSOC)) { $image=$row['file_name']; $user=$row['username']; $myFile = "$user/images/$image"; unlink($myFile); } <input id=\"img".$id."\" name=\"img".$id."\" type=\"checkbox\">

    Read the article

  • GetLocalValueEnumerator() Not Returning All Properties

    - by a_hardin
    I am trying to perform validation in my WPF application using the solution in Detecting WPF Validation Errors. public static bool IsValid(DependencyObject parent) { // Validate all the bindings on the parent bool valid = true; LocalValueEnumerator localValues = parent.GetLocalValueEnumerator(); while (localValues.MoveNext()) { LocalValueEntry entry = localValues.Current; if (BindingOperations.IsDataBound(parent, entry.Property)) { Binding binding = BindingOperations.GetBinding(parent, entry.Property); foreach (ValidationRule rule in binding.ValidationRules) { ValidationResult result = rule.Validate(parent.GetValue(entry.Property), null); if (!result.IsValid) { BindingExpression expression = BindingOperations.GetBindingExpression(parent, entry.Property); System.Windows.Controls.Validation.MarkInvalid(expression, new ValidationError(rule, expression, result.ErrorContent, null)); valid = false; } } } } // Validate all the bindings on the children for (int i = 0; i != VisualTreeHelper.GetChildrenCount(parent); ++i) { DependencyObject child = VisualTreeHelper.GetChild(parent, i); if (!IsValid(child)) { valid = false; } } return valid; } The problem I am running into is that when I step through the code for a TextBox, I'm not getting the Text property. The only properties I get are "PageHeight", "Instance", and "UndoManagerInstance". Therefore, I can not Validate the rules for the binding on the TextBox. Does anyone have any idea why I wouldn't be getting the correct properties? Is there another way to force validaton on controls in WPF? I haven't been able to find anyone else who has had this problem. Update: The TextBoxes I am trying to validate are within a DataTemplate. I found that if I copy one of the TextBoxes and place it directly in the Window, I am able to get the data. Using Woodstock, I saw that the data source for the TextBoxes in the template is "ParentTemplate", but it's "Local" for the TextBox outside of the template. So, the question now is, how can I get the DependencyProperties for controls inside a DataTemplate?

    Read the article

  • Display error message at top of form

    - by moustafa
    Hello, I'm trying to get the following error to show when some once presses the submit button and has not filled in the required field/s. My PHP code is. <?php require_once("includes/database.php"); require_once("includes/functions.php"); if(isset($_POST['full_name'])) { $required = array('full_name','user_name','email','pwd','pwd2'); $missing = array(); $validation = array( 'full_name' => 'Please provide your full name', 'user_name' => 'Please provide your username', 'email' => 'Please provide your valid email address', 'pwd' => 'Please provide your password', 'pwd2' => 'Please confirm your password', 'userdup' => 'Username already registered', 'emaildup' => 'Email address already registered', 'mismatch' => 'Passwords do not match' ); //Sanitise and clean function $full_name = escape($_POST['full_name']); $user_name = escape($_POST['user_name']); $email = escape($_POST['email']); $pwd = escape($_POST['pwd']); $pwd2 = escape($_POST['pwd2']); foreach($_POST as $key => $value) { $value = trim($value); if(empty($value) && in_array($key,$required)) { array_push($missing,$key); } else { ${$key} = escape($value); } }

    Read the article

  • what's a good technique for building and running many similar unit tests?

    - by jcollum
    I have a test setup where I have many very similar unit tests that I need to run. For example, there are about 40 stored procedures that need to be checked for existence in the target environment. However I'd like all the tests to be grouped by their business unit. So there'd be 40 instances of a very similar TestMethod in 40 separate classes. Kinda lame. One other thing: each group of tests need to be in their own solution. So Business Unit A will have a solution called Tests.BusinessUnitA. I'm thinking that I can set this all up by passing a configuration object (with the name of the stored proc to check, among other things) to a TestRunner class. The problem is that I'm losing the atomicity of my unit tests. I wouldn't be able to run just one of the tests, I'd have to run all the tests in the TestRunner class. This is what the code looks like at this time. Sure, it's nice and compact, but if Test 8 fails, I have no way of running just Test 8. TestRunner runner = new TestRunner(config, this.TestContext); var runnerType = typeof(TestRunner); var methods = runnerType.GetMethods() .Where(x => x.GetCustomAttributes(typeof(TestMethodAttribute), false) .Count() > 0).ToArray(); foreach (var method in methods) { method.Invoke(runner, null); } So I'm looking for suggestions for making a group of unit tests that take in a configuration object but won't require me to generate many many TestMethods. This looks like it might require code-generation, but I'd like to solve it without that.

    Read the article

  • LinQ optimization

    - by Budda
    Here is a peace of code: void MyFunc(List<MyObj> objects) { MyFunc1(objects); foreach( MyObj obj in objects.Where(obj1=>obj1.Good)) { // Do Action With Good Object } } void MyFunc1(List<MyObj> objects) { int iGoodCount = objects.Where(obj1=>obj1.Good).Count(); BeHappy(iGoodCount); // do other stuff with 'objects' collection } Here we see that collection is analyzed twice and each time the value of 'Good' property is checked for each member: 1st time when calculating count of good objects, 2nd - when iterating through all good objects. It is desirable to have that optimized, and here is a straightforward solution: before call to MyFunc1 makecreate an additional temporary collection of good objects only (goodObjects, it can be IEnumerable); get count of these objects and pass it as an additional parameter to MyFunc1; in the 'MyFunc' method iterate not through 'objects.Where(...)' but through the 'goodObjects' collection. Not too bad approach (as far as I see), but additional parameter is required to be passed. Question: is there any LinQ out-of-the-box functionality that allows any caching during 1st Where().Count(), remembering a processed collection and use it in the next iteration? Any thoughts are welcome. Thanks.

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234  | Next Page >