Search Results

Search found 2859 results on 115 pages for 'apt'.

Page 23/115 | < Previous Page | 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30  | Next Page >

  • Upgrading only certain packages via the getdeb repo

    - by intuited
    I'm a bit confused about how getdeb.net works now. The last time I got a package from there was a while ago; at that point the procedure was that you would just download a .deb for each package that you wanted to install/upgrade and then install it using dpkg -i. However the inexorable march of progress has lent its trumpets to this system as well, and getdeb installs are now done via their repo, which is registered with apt in /etc/apt/sources.list.d, after you install a single package that makes the changes to the apt database. I've installed that package, and I've discovered that aptitude dist-upgrade now wants to upgrade a lot of packages on my system that weren't ready for upgrades prior to the installation of the getdeb package. If I rename the file /etc/apt/sources.list.d/getdeb.list to something with a different extension, then do aptitude update && aptitude dist-upgrade, it stops wanting to upgrade packages. So I gather that the default behaviour is now to upgrade all packages to the version available at getdeb. This is not particularly appropriate, since these packages are not as well tested as the officially released versions. Is there a config setting somewhere that will prevent upgrading packages to versions from the getdeb repo unless this action is specifically selected? I'd like to be able to pick and choose what packages are upgraded via getdeb.

    Read the article

  • Can't install mplayer or vlc on ubuntu

    - by mirko4
    I am trying to install Mplayer or VLC player on ubuntu feisty but i can't do it. I try with apt-get: Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done You might want to run `apt-get -f install' to correct these: The following packages have unmet dependencies: mplayer: Depends: libasound2 (> 1.0.16) but 1.0.13-1ubuntu5 is to be installed Depends: libavcodec51 (>= 0.svn20080206-8) but it is not going to be installed or libavcodec-unstripped-51 (>= 0.svn20080206-8) but it is not installable Depends: libavformat52 (>= 0.svn20080206-8) but it is not going to be installed or libavformat-unstripped-52 (>= 0.svn20080206-8) but it is not installable Depends: libavutil49 (>= 0.svn20080206-8) but it is not going to be installed or libavutil-unstripped-49 (>= 0.svn20080206-8) but it is not installable Depends: libcaca0 (>= 0.99.beta14-1) but 0.99.beta11.debian-2build1 is to be installed Depends: libcdparanoia0 (>= 3.10.2+debian) but 3.10+debian~pre0-4build1 is to be installed Depends: libcucul0 (>= 0.99.beta14-1) but 0.99.beta11.debian-2build1 is to be installed Depends: libfaad0 (>= 2.6.1) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libfribidi0 (>= 0.10.9) but 0.10.7-4build1 is to be installed Depends: libgif4 (>= 4.1.6) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libjack0 (>= 0.109.2) but it is not going to be installed Depends: liblzo2-2 but it is not going to be installed Depends: libopenal1 but it is not going to be installed Depends: libpostproc51 (>= 0.svn20080206-8) but it is not going to be installed or libpostproc-unstripped-51 (>= 0.svn20080206-8) but it is not installable Depends: libspeex1 (>= 1.2~beta3-1) but 1.1.12-3 is to be installed Depends: libsvga1 Depends: libswscale0 (>= 0.svn20080206-8) but it is not going to be installed or libswscale-unstripped-0 (>= 0.svn20080206-8) but it is not installable Depends: mplayer-skin python-apt: Depends: libapt-inst-libc6.7-6-1.1 Depends: libapt-pkg-libc6.7-6-4.6 scim-gtk2-immodule: Depends: libscim8c2a (>= 1.4.6) but 1.4.4-7ubuntu1 is to be installed scim-modules-socket: Depends: libscim8c2a (>= 1.4.6) but 1.4.4-7ubuntu1 is to be installed E: Unmet dependencies. Try 'apt-get -f install' with no packages (or specify a solution). I try apt-get -f install but it doesn't work neither. What to do please help me ?!

    Read the article

  • NFS server generating "invalid extent" on EXT4 system disk?

    - by Stephen Winnall
    I have a server running Xen 4.1 with Oneiric in the dom0 and each of the 4 domUs. The system disks of the domUs are LVM2 volumes built on top of an mdadm RAID1. All the domU system disks are EXT4 and are created using snapshots of the same original template. 3 of them run perfectly, but one (called s-ub-02) keeps on being remounted read-only. A subsequent e2fsck results in a single "invalid extent" diagnosis: e2fsck 1.41.14 (22-Dec-2010) /dev/domu/s-ub-02-root contains a file system with errors, check forced. Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes Inode 525418 has an invalid extent (logical block 8959, invalid physical block 0, len 0) Clear<y>? yes Pass 2: Checking directory structure Pass 3: Checking directory connectivity Pass 4: Checking reference counts Pass 5: Checking group summary information /dev/domu/s-ub-02-root: 77757/655360 files (0.3% non-contiguous), 360592/2621440 blocks The console shows typically the following errors for the system disk (xvda2): [101980.903416] EXT4-fs error (device xvda2): ext4_ext_find_extent:732: inode #525418: comm apt-get: bad header/extent: invalid extent entries - magic f30a, entries 12, max 340(340), depth 0(0) [101980.903473] EXT4-fs (xvda2): Remounting filesystem read-only I have created new versions of the system disk. The same thing always happens. This, and the fact that the disk is ultimately on a RAID1, leads me to preclude a hardware disk error. The only obvious distinguishing feature of this domU is the presence of nfs-kernel-server, so I suspect that. Its exports file looks like this: /exports/users 192.168.0.0/255.255.248.0(rw,sync,no_subtree_check) /exports/media/music 192.168.0.0/255.255.248.0(rw,sync,no_subtree_check) /exports/media/pictures 192.168.0.0/255.255.248.0(rw,sync,no_subtree_check) /exports/opt 192.168.0.0/255.255.248.0(rw,sync,no_subtree_check) /exports/users and /exports/opt are LVM2 volumes from the same volume group as the system disk. /exports/media is an EXT2 volume. (There is an issue where clients see /exports/media/pictures as being a read-only volume, which I mention for completeness.) With the exception of the read-only problem, the NFS server appears to work correctly under light load for several hours before the "invalid extent" problem occurs. There are no helpful entries in /var/log. All of a sudden, no more files are written, so you can see when the disk was remounted read-only, but there is no indication of what the cause might be. Can anyone help me with this problem? Steve

    Read the article

  • dpkg crashing while trying to install a package

    - by Jonathan
    While attempting to install a package via apt-get the following. The first error I get is: E: dpkg was interrupted, you must manually run 'sudo dpkg --configure -a' to correct the problem. And, if I run that command the box spins out of control and I get the following in /var/log/syslog Aug 29 20:21:08 ip-10-202-191-4 kernel: [20571563.398546] ------------[ cut here ]------------ Aug 29 20:21:08 ip-10-202-191-4 kernel: [20571563.398552] WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-3.0.0/arch/x86/xen/multicalls.c:182 xen_mc_flush+01c0() Aug 29 20:21:08 ip-10-202-191-4 kernel: [20571563.398561] Modules linked in: acpiphp Aug 29 20:21:08 ip-10-202-191-4 kernel: [20571563.398568] Pid: 31063, comm: java Tainted: G D W 3.0.0-14-virtual #23-Ubuntu Aug 29 20:21:08 ip-10-202-191-4 kernel: [20571563.398576] Call Trace: Aug 29 20:21:08 ip-10-202-191-4 kernel: [20571563.398580] [<c0648265>] ? printk+0x2d/0x2f Aug 29 20:21:08 ip-10-202-191-4 kernel: [20571563.398586] [<c0150462>] warn_slowpath_common+0x72/0xa0 Aug 29 20:21:08 ip-10-202-191-4 kernel: [20571563.398593] [<c0104883>] ? xen_mc_flush+0x1b3/0x1c0 Aug 29 20:21:08 ip-10-202-191-4 kernel: [20571563.398599] [<c0104883>] ? xen_mc_flush+0x1b3/0x1c0 Aug 29 20:21:08 ip-10-202-191-4 kernel: [20571563.398605] [<c01504b2>] warn_slowpath_null+0x22/0x30 Aug 29 20:21:08 ip-10-202-191-4 kernel: [20571563.398611] [<c0104883>] xen_mc_flush+0x1b3/0x1c0 Aug 29 20:21:08 ip-10-202-191-4 kernel: [20571563.398617] [<c0104e7a>] ? xen_extend_mmu_update+0x4a/0x70 Aug 29 20:21:08 ip-10-202-191-4 kernel: [20571563.398624] [<c0106565>] xen_set_pud_hyper+0x75/0x80 Aug 29 20:21:08 ip-10-202-191-4 kernel: [20571563.398630] [<c01065b9>] xen_set_pud+0x49/0x60 Aug 29 20:21:08 ip-10-202-191-4 kernel: [20571563.398636] [<c0132105>] pud_populate+0x45/0x60 Aug 29 20:21:08 ip-10-202-191-4 kernel: [20571563.398642] [<c0208a24>] __pmd_alloc+0x74/0x90 Aug 29 20:21:08 ip-10-202-191-4 kernel: [20571563.398648] [<c0208cb7>] handle_mm_fault+0x277/0x2c0 Aug 29 20:21:08 ip-10-202-191-4 kernel: [20571563.398655] [<c065f45b>] do_page_fault+0x15b/0x4a0 Aug 29 20:21:08 ip-10-202-191-4 kernel: [20571563.401923] [<c020ba24>] ? remove_vma+0x44/0x60 Aug 29 20:21:08 ip-10-202-191-4 kernel: [20571563.401923] [<c020d9b6>] ? sys_mmap_pgoff+0x106/0x1c0 Aug 29 20:21:08 ip-10-202-191-4 kernel: [20571563.401923] [<c065f300>] ? vmalloc_fault+0x190/0x190 Aug 29 20:21:08 ip-10-202-191-4 kernel: [20571563.401923] [<c065c79f>] error_code+0x67/0x6c Aug 29 20:21:08 ip-10-202-191-4 kernel: [20571563.401923] ---[ end trace 0b105e2a179ad013 ]---

    Read the article

  • Tomcat6 Manager Webapp is 404 on apt-get install on Ubuntu 10.10

    - by Noel
    http://localhost:8080/manager/html gives a 404 error on apt-get install of tomcat6 (6.0.28 on JVM 1.6.0_20-b20 on 2.6.35-27-generic amd64). http://localhost:8080/host-manager/html works. Lists one Host name, localhost. cat /usr/share/tomcat6/conf/tomcat-users.xml <tomcat-users> <role rolename="admin"/> <role rolename="manager" /> <user username="tomcatuser" password="Password1" roles="admin,manager"/> </tomcat-users> cat /usr/share/tomcat6/conf/Catalina/localhost/manager.xml <Context path="/manager" docBase="/usr/share/tomcat6-admin/manager" antiResourceLocking="false" privileged="true" /> <role name="manager" /> <user name="manager" password="Password1" roles="manager" /> <user name="tomcatuser" password="Password1" roles="manager" /> Those two files are the only documentation I've seen on how to setup the Manager webapp, and they seem to be compliant with the requirements.

    Read the article

  • upgrade glibc on RHEL4 without breaking anything

    - by SpliFF
    I have a static version of wkhtmltopdf which requires glibc-2.4 wkhtmltopdf: /lib/tls/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.4' not found (required by wkhtmltopdf) I have apt installed with the DAG repos. Other than that the server is pretty stock standard except for Coldfusion MX7. My question is, is it safe to just "apt update glibc"? Will the updated glibc clobber the old one or will they co-exist? Should I "apt upgrade" the whole server? I'm pretty sure everything else (Apache2, Postgres8, etc) will handle the upgrade but Coldfusion concerns me due to its proprietry nature.

    Read the article

  • Nothing happens when trying to upgrade from Linux Mint 12 to 13

    - by Ares
    I am trying to upgrade from Linux Mint 12 to 13 using apt-get. After running the following commands, nothing seems to happen. I am fairly new to linux, what am I doing wrong? user@olympus /etc/default $ sudo apt-get dist-upgrade Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Calculating upgrade... Done 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. user@olympus /etc/default $ sudo apt-get upgrade Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.

    Read the article

  • apt-get install phpmyadmin on debian doesn't install /etc/phpmyadmin/apache.conf

    - by Christian Nikkanen
    I'm trying to install phpmyadmin on my webserver, using this guide: http://www.howtoforge.com/ubuntu_debian_lamp_server I did that once, and it worked like a dream, but I hated the looks of phpmyadmin (maybe the oldest layout ever) and decided to delete it, and didn't know that deleting is done with apt-get remove phpmyadmin and did in phpmyadmin directory rm * and thought that it's done. However, as I can't find the debian build of phpmyadmin anywhere, I want to install it again, but when I add Include /etc/phpmyadmin/apache.conf to /etc/apache2/apache2.conf, and restart apache, it give's me this error: apache2: Syntax error on line 73 of /etc/apache2/apache2.conf: Could not open configuration file /etc/phpmyadmin/apache.conf: No such file or directory Action 'configtest' failed. The Apache error log may have more information. failed! No matter how I try, I always get this error, and phpmyadmin isn't there.

    Read the article

  • apticron, apt-get dist-upgrade and aptitude

    - by Kai
    I'm confused, on my debian server I've gotten the daily "updates available" message by apticron. I normally then just use aptitude to install the upgrades. Today I got a message which shows two upgrades. But they don't show up in aptitude. When I do a apt-get dist-upgrade they show up as "NEW" packages to be installed. aptitude dist-upgrade seems to ignore them. Can anyone explain to me why this is happening and how to get rid of the messages (It doesn't seem like I really need the new packages)

    Read the article

  • can't install sun jdk on ubuntu karmic 9.10

    - by pstanton
    i've just started using a new ec2 install of ubuntu karmic 9.10 and my first task was to install the jdk. when running apt-get install sun-java6-jdk i get the following: Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Package sun-java6-jdk is not available, but is referred to by another package. This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or is only available from another source E: Package sun-java6-jdk has no installation candidate i've tried apt-get update as well as adding deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ karmic universe to /etc/apt/sources.list any ideas fellas?

    Read the article

  • nginx 1.2.3 installed but remains at 1.1.19

    - by Nyxynyxx
    I've installed nginx 1.2.3 by adding a new ppa sudo add-apt-repository ppa:nginx/stable sudo apt-get update sudo apt-get install nginx However, nginx -v still gives me 1.1.19. What happened? Output The following packages will be upgraded: nginx 1 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 46 not upgraded. Need to get 61.8 kB of archives. After this operation, 3,072 B of additional disk space will be used. Get:1 http://ppa.launchpad.net/nginx/stable/ubuntu/ precise/main nginx all 1.2.3-0ubuntu0ppa3~precise [61.8 kB] Fetched 61.8 kB in 0s (89.7 kB/s) (Reading database ... 79914 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to replace nginx 1.1.19-1 (using .../nginx_1.2.3-0ubuntu0ppa3~precise_all.deb) ... Unpacking replacement nginx ... Setting up nginx (1.2.3-0ubuntu0ppa3~precise) ... root@precise64:/var/www/apadment# nginx -v nginx version: nginx/1.1.19

    Read the article

  • Minimal Lunix distribution with sshd and apt

    - by Sergey Mikhanov
    When I signed up for my Debian Linux VPS hosting and first logged on and invoked ps, there was the only user process running: sshd. As I can see, this was minimal Linux with only two things installed and configured: sshd and apt (plus all dependencies, of course). I want to build (or use existing) similar Linux distro, any advice on how to build (or pick) one? Googling "minimum linux", or "linux with sshd only" usually brings up Debian's netinstall, which is not what I want. Thanks in advance.

    Read the article

  • Minimal Linux distribution with sshd and apt

    - by Sergey Mikhanov
    When I signed up for my Debian Linux VPS hosting and first logged on and invoked ps, there was the only user process running: sshd. As I can see, this was minimal Linux with only two things installed and configured: sshd and apt (plus all dependencies, of course). I want to build (or use existing) similar Linux distro, any advice on how to build (or pick) one? Googling "minimum linux", or "linux with sshd only" usually brings up Debian's netinstall, which is not what I want. Thanks in advance.

    Read the article

  • Failed to download repository information Check your Internet connection

    - by Luca Brazza
    I need to check if I have updates for Ubuntu. I think it is 11.05 As you can see this is what it says: Failed to download repository information Check your Internet connection. Details: W:Failed to fetch cdrom://Ubuntu 12.04 LTS _Precise Pangolin_ - Release amd64 (20120425)/dists/precise/main/binary-amd64/Packages Please use apt-cdrom to make this CD-ROM recognized by APT. apt-get update cannot be used to add new CD-ROMs , W:Failed to fetch cdrom://Ubuntu 12.04 LTS _Precise Pangolin_ - Release amd64 (20120425)/dists/precise/restricted/binary-amd64/Packages Please use apt-cdrom to make this CD-ROM recognized by APT. apt-get update cannot be used to add new CD-ROMs , W:Failed to fetch cdrom://Ubuntu 12.04 LTS _Precise Pangolin_ - Release amd64 (20120425)/dists/precise/main/binary-i386/Packages Please use apt-cdrom to make this CD-ROM recognized by APT. apt-get update cannot be used to add new CD-ROMs , W:Failed to fetch cdrom://Ubuntu 12.04 LTS _Precise Pangolin_ - Release amd64 (20120425)/dists/precise/restricted/binary-i386/Packages Please use apt-cdrom to make this CD-ROM recognized by APT. apt-get update cannot be used to add new CD-ROMs , W:Failed to fetch http://ppa.launchpad.net/ferramroberto/java/ubuntu/dists/precise/main/source/Sources 404 Not Found , W:Failed to fetch http://ppa.launchpad.net/ferramroberto/java/ubuntu/dists/precise/main/binary-i386/Packages 404 Not Found , E:Some index files failed to download. They have been ignored, or old ones used instead.

    Read the article

  • Rosegarden plugin list is empty

    - by Wes
    I've just installed rosegarden through apt. I've also installed jack and a low latency kernel through a PPA https://launchpad.net/~abogani/+archive/ppa. I've started jack-server and through the control panel I can see its wiring things through rosegarden. I've also tried installing qsynth and dssi both through apt. However I can't see any plug ins in the synth plug-in list. Therefore I'm unable to test if this works. I've tried launching qsynth before rosegarden and I've tried a few things however I just can't see any plugins. Does anyone know how to get this to work? I'm using ubuntu 11.04 or 11.10 I think. sudo apt-get install rosegarden -o APT::Install-Suggests=true synaptic sudo apt-get install synaptic synaptic sudo synaptic synaptic sudo apt-add-repository ppa:abogani/ppa sudo apt-get install linux-lowlatency sudo apt-get install dssi sudo apt-get install alsa-firmware-loaders alsa-tools alsa-tools-gui alsa-firmware sudo apt-get install alsa-firmware-loaders alsa-tools alsa-tools-gui sudo apt-get install blop caps cmt fil-plugins rev-plugins swh-plugins tap-plugins sudo apt-get install blepvco mcp-plugins omins

    Read the article

  • Help finding missing mumble-server dependencies

    - by Otoris
    I'm trying to install the mumble-server package using apt-get install mumble-server on Ubuntu 11.10 Server Edition on Rackspace Cloud. Problem is it can't find dependencies it should have found because they exist on launchpad.net? Dependencies message: Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: mumble-server : Depends: libavahi-compat-libdnssd1 (>= 0.6.16) but it is not installable Depends: libprotobuf7 but it is not installable Depends: libqt4-dbus (>= 4:4.5.3) but it is not installable Depends: libqt4-network (>= 4:4.5.3) but it is not installable Depends: libqt4-sql (>= 4:4.5.3) but it is not installable Depends: libqt4-xml (>= 4:4.5.3) but it is not installable Depends: libqtcore4 (>= 4:4.7.0~beta1) but it is not installable Depends: libqt4-sql-sqlite but it is not installable E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages. Any ideas on if I might be missing sources? I've been googling around and haven't found anyone else in this situation or anyone else not able to install the aforementioned packages. Thanks for your time! sources.list: deb http://mirror.rackspace.com/ubuntu/ oneiric restricted deb-src http://mirror.rackspace.com/ubuntu/ oneiric restricted ## Major bug fix updates produced after the final release of the ## distribution. deb http://mirror.rackspace.com/ubuntu/ oneiric-updates restricted deb-src http://mirror.rackspace.com/ubuntu/ oneiric-updates restricted ## N.B. software from this repository is ENTIRELY UNSUPPORTED by the Ubuntu ## team. Also, please note that software in universe WILL NOT receive any ## review or updates from the Ubuntu security team. deb http://mirror.rackspace.com/ubuntu/ oneiric universe deb-src http://mirror.rackspace.com/ubuntu/ oneiric universe deb http://mirror.rackspace.com/ubuntu/ oneiric-updates universe deb-src http://mirror.rackspace.com/ubuntu/ oneiric-updates universe ## N.B. software from this repository is ENTIRELY UNSUPPORTED by the Ubuntu ## team, and may not be under a free licence. Please satisfy yourself as to ## your rights to use the software. Also, please note that software in ## multiverse WILL NOT receive any review or updates from the Ubuntu ## security team. deb http://mirror.rackspace.com/ubuntu/ oneiric multiverse deb-src http://mirror.rackspace.com/ubuntu/ oneiric multiverse deb http://mirror.rackspace.com/ubuntu/ oneiric-updates multiverse deb-src http://mirror.rackspace.com/ubuntu/ oneiric-updates multiverse ## Uncomment the following two lines to add software from the 'backports' ## repository. ## N.B. software from this repository may not have been tested as ## extensively as that contained in the release, although it includes ## newer versions of some applications which may provide useful features. ## Also, please note that software in backports WILL NOT receive any review ## or updates from the Ubuntu security team. # deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ oneiric-backports restricted universe multiverse # deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ oneiric-backports restricted universe multiverse ## Uncomment the following two lines to add software from Canonical's ## 'partner' repository. This software is not part of Ubuntu, but is ## offered by Canonical and the respective vendors as a service to Ubuntu ## users. # deb http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu oneiric partner # deb-src http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu oneiric partner deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu oneiric-security restricted deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu oneiric-security restricted deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu oneiric-security universe deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu oneiric-security universe deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu oneiric-security multiverse deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu oneiric-security multiverse # Cool Kid Webmin/Usermin Here Brah deb http://download.webmin.com/download/repository sarge contrib deb http://webmin.mirror.somersettechsolutions.co.uk/repository sarge contrib

    Read the article

  • sudo apt-get install -f doesn't fix broken packages. And now?

    - by Du Oliveira
    $ sudo apt-get install -f [sudo] password for ...: Lendo listas de pacotes... Pronto Construindo árvore de dependências Lendo informação de estado... Pronto Corrigindo dependências... Pronto Os seguintes pacotes foram instalados automaticamente e já não são necessários: python-pyasn1 libconfig++8 python-twisted-runner linux-headers-3.0.0-12 libvamp-sdk2 python-twisted-mail libgnomecanvasmm-2.6-1c2a python-twisted-lore python-twisted-conch python-twisted-news python-twisted-words python-twisted libffado2 linux-headers-3.0.0-12-generic libaubio2 Use 'apt-get autoremove' para removê-los. Os pacotes extra a seguir serão instalados: libmpeg3cine Os NOVOS pacotes a seguir serão instalados: libmpeg3cine 0 pacotes atualizados, 1 pacotes novos instalados, 0 a serem removidos e 0 não atualizados. 2 pacotes não totalmente instalados ou removidos. É preciso baixar 0 B/2.573 kB de arquivos. Depois desta operação, 6.762 kB adicionais de espaço em disco serão usados. Você quer continuar [S/n]? S (Lendo banco de dados ... 317732 ficheiros e directórios actualmente instalados.) Desempacotando libmpeg3cine (de .../libmpeg3cine_1%3a2.2-0.3~ppa1~oneiric1_i386.deb) ... dpkg: erro processando /var/cache/apt/archives/libmpeg3cine_1%3a2.2-0.3~ppa1~oneiric1_i386.deb (--unpack): a tentar sobre-escrever '/usr/bin/mpeg3cat', que também está no pacote mpeg3-utils 1.5.4-5ubuntu1 Erros foram encontrados durante o processamento de: /var/cache/apt/archives/libmpeg3cine_1%3a2.2-0.3~ppa1~oneiric1_i386.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) .....:~$ apt-get autoremove E: Não foi possível abrir arquivo de trava /var/lib/dpkg/lock - open (13: Permissão negada) E: Não foi possível travar o diretório administrativo (/var/lib/dpkg/), você é root?

    Read the article

  • W: Duplicate sources.list entry : You may want to run apt-get update to correct these problems [closed]

    - by Peter Schriver
    Possible Duplicate: W: Duplicate sources.list entry http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-updates/main i386 Packages W: Duplicate sources.list entry http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ quantal-updates/multiverse i386 Packages (/var/lib/apt/lists/us.archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_quantal-updates_multiverse_binary-i386_Packages) W: You may want to run apt-get update to correct these problems I keep getting this message and sudo apt-get update doesn't fix it. I am running 64-bit 12.10. Is there a way to correct this problem?

    Read the article

  • Ubuntu server apt-get says "(-5 - No address associated with hostname)"

    - by Srini
    I have a ubuntu 12.04 server. Running sudo apt-get update on it produces errors like this: W: Failed to fetch http://au.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise-backports/main/binary-i386/Packages Something wicked happened resolving 'au.archive.ubuntu.com:http' (-5 - No address associated with hostname) I am able to ping all the other hosts on the network and also Google's DNS 8.8.8.8. But am unable to ping www.google.com. So, I'm guessing something is wrong with my DNS setup, but not sure what. I use static IP and my /etc/network/interfaces looks like this: auto eth0 iface eth0 inet static address 192.168.1.50 netmask 255.255.255.0 network 192.168.1.0 broadcast 192.168.0.255 gateway 192.168.1.1 #dns-nameserver 203.12.160.35 203.12.160.36 #nameserver 203.12.160.35 203.12.160.36 My /etc/resolv.conf and /etc/resolvconf/resolv.conf.d/base are both empty and my /etc/resolvconf/resolv.conf.d/original says: nameserver 192.168.1.1 Any help would be greatly appreciated. P.S. I've googled it a bit and the common resolution is to switch to DHCP which I don't want to do since this is my home server. Thanks Srini

    Read the article

  • how to resolve error in ubuntu

    - by Bipul
    i m using ubuntu 9.04. when i m running any command like sudo apt-get update ,i get following error message"E: Type 'l.com/ubuntu' is not known on line 45 in source list /etc/apt/sources.list E: The list of sources could not be read. ".due to this problem i m not able to download anything.please help

    Read the article

  • Differences between "apache"'s installations

    - by JustTrying
    Using Ubuntu 12.04, are there any differences between installing Apache httpd using sudo apt-get install apache2 (as the guide of Ubuntu says - https://help.ubuntu.com/12.04/serverguide/httpd.html ) or following the steps on the Apache documentation (http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/install.html#overview)? I tried both ways; in the first case (using apt-get) the server seems to work - I open a browser page and I got it. In the second case I need other packages (apr, apr-util and pcre) and so I abandoned the attempt.

    Read the article

  • Easily view a list of changes of upgraded packages.

    - by D Connors
    So, let's say I run sudo apt-get upgrade on my Lucid Lynx and it upgrades a couple of packages I'm interested in. Is there a command to run that will open some kind of info or manual that tells me what changes were made in this new version of the package? For instance, if run the apt-get upgrade and it installs a new version of empathy. Do I have to go over to their site to review the changes made in this version, or is there a quicker command line way?

    Read the article

  • Help with Bash script

    - by Andrew
    #!/bin/bash if [ "$(Which gimp)" != ""] then { if [ "$(gimp -version)" != 2.8 ] then { sudo apt-get remove gimp sudo add-apt-repository ppa:otto-kesselgulasch/gimp sudo apt-get update sudo apt-get install gimp } else echo You already have gimp 2.8 fi } else { sudo add-apt-repository ppa:otto-kesselgulasch/gimp sudo apt-get update sudo apt-get install gimp } fi I am trying to make a gimp 2.8 installer in bash Please help me?

    Read the article

  • sudo apt-get install python.pip python-dev Gives Error

    - by user2539745
    I am learning Django from http://gettingstartedwithdjango.com/ and I have windows 7 32-bit. The tutorial asked to install virtualbox and vagrant(tutorial had precise64 and it had issues in my pc so I installed precise32) so I did it. Now the tutorial asked to do sudo apt-get install python-dev python.pip so I did it but it gave me this error > vagrant@precise32:~$ sudo apt-get install python.pip python-dev Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Note, selecting 'python-pip' for regex 'python.pip' Note, selecting 'python-pipeline' for regex 'python.pip' The following extra packages will be installed: libexpat1 libexpat1-dev libpython2.7 python-pkg-resources python-setuptools python-support python2.7 python2.7-dev python2.7-minimal Suggested packages: python-distribute python-distribute-doc python2.7-doc binfmt-support The following NEW packages will be installed: libexpat1-dev libpython2.7 python-dev python-pip python-pipeline python-pkg-resources python-setuptools python-support python2.7-dev The following packages will be upgraded: libexpat1 python2.7 python2.7-minimal 3 upgraded, 9 newly installed, 0 to remove and 63 not upgraded. Need to get 34.7 MB/35.7 MB of archives. After this operation, 42.0 MB of additional disk space will be used. Do you want to continue [Y/n]? y Err (http removed)us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-updates/main python2.7 i386 2.7 .3-0ubuntu3.1 404 Not Found [IP: 91.189.91.15 80] Err (http removed)us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-updates/main python2.7-minimal i386 2.7.3-0ubuntu3.1 404 Not Found [IP: 91.189.91.15 80] Err (http removed)us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-updates/main libpython2.7 i386 2.7.3-0ubuntu3.1 404 Not Found [IP: 91.189.91.15 80] Err (http removed)us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-updates/main python2.7-dev i386 2.7.3-0ubuntu3.1 404 Not Found [IP: 91.189.91.15 80] Failed to fetch (http removed)us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/p/python2.7/python 2.7_2.7.3-0ubuntu3.1_i386.deb 404 Not Found [IP: 91.189.91.15 80] Failed to fetch (http removed)us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/p/python2.7/python 2.7-minimal_2.7.3-0ubuntu3.1_i386.deb 404 Not Found [IP: 91.189.91.15 80] Failed to fetch (http removed)us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/p/python2.7/libpyt hon2.7_2.7.3-0ubuntu3.1_i386.deb 404 Not Found [IP: 91.189.91.15 80] Failed to fetch (http removed)us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/p/python2.7/python 2.7-dev_2.7.3-0ubuntu3.1_i386.deb 404 Not Found [IP: 91.189.91.15 80] E: Unable to fetch some archives, maybe run apt-get update or try with --fix-mis sing? Please help what should I do ??

    Read the article

  • update from debian lenny to squeeze

    - by Daniel
    I'm trying to update from debian lenny to squeeze on my 64bit root server and did the following so far: modifying sources.list apt-get update apt-get upgrade apt-get install linux-image-2.6-amd64 The last step leads to the following error-output: Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: linux-image-2.6-amd64: Depends: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64 but it is not going to be installed E: Broken packages UPDATE: here's my sources.list deb ftp://mirror.hetzner.de/debian/packages squeeze main contrib non-free deb ftp://mirror.hetzner.de/debian/security squeeze/updates main contrib non-free deb http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian squeeze main non-free contrib deb-src http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian squeeze main non-free contrib deb http://security.debian.org/ squeeze/updates main contrib non-free deb-src http://security.debian.org/ squeeze/updates main contrib non-free How can I fix that safely? thx

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30  | Next Page >