Search Results

Search found 11922 results on 477 pages for 'css animations'.

Page 247/477 | < Previous Page | 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254  | Next Page >

  • 2 Column Layout - Main Link Display

    - by Allyson Aguilar
    I have a basic HTML page with a 2 column layout. I created a menu page on the sidebar column and when a link is chosen from the menu I want to display it in the main section of the index.html page. I tried doing this with iframes but its basically creating a duplicate of the index page. Help! I guess I can't post a picture because I'm new to this but I basically have an index page and then a farm with a duplicate of my index page.

    Read the article

  • Is possible use 'div id' as name of array?

    - by rflfn
    Please view this jsfiddle jsfiddle.net/rflfn/uS4jd/ This is other try jsfiddle.net/rflfn/T3ZT6/ I'm using SMOF to developper Wordpress theme, I need make one function to change some values when link is clicked, but when I make array with name of div, the array returns null value... <a class="button" id="settext1">Some Link</a> <br /> <a class="button" id="settext2">Another Link</a> <br /> <a class="button" id="settext3">Link 3</a> <br /> JQ: $(document).ready(function(){ // var col_settext1 = new Array(); // <-- I need make this array with name of DIV cliked col_settext1['field_id1']='#FF0000'; col_settext1['field_id2']='#00FFFF'; // var txt_settext1 = new Array(); // <-- I need make this array with name of DIV cliked txt_settext1['field_id3']='Some Text Here'; txt_settext1['field_id4']='Another Text Here'; // var txt_settext2 = new Array(); // <-- I need make this array with name of DIV cliked txt_settext2['field_id5']='Some Text Here'; // var col_settext2 = new Array(); // <-- I need make this array with name of DIV cliked col_settext2['field_id6']='Another Text Here'; // var chk_settext2 = new Array(); // <-- I need make this array with name of DIV cliked chk_settext2['field_id7']="checked"; }); $('.button').click(function(){ $myclass = this.id; $col = 'col_' + $myclass; $txt = 'txt_' + $myclass; $chk = 'chk_' + $myclass; // Based I clicked on the link 'settext1', Here I have this: // col_settext1 // txt_settext1 // chk_settext1 // THE PROBLEM ARE HERE! $col = new Array(); // <--- Here I use name of DIV as Array, but the value is lost... $txt = new Array(); $chk = new Array(); // Test... alert($col); // <--- Here no have any value :( alert($col[1]); // <--- Here no have any value :( for (id in $col) { // 'id' is value of array --> col_settext1['field_id1']='#FF0000'; // do function based on array values... // just example: alert(id); } for (id in $txt) { // 'id' is value of array --> txt_settext1['field_id1']='#FF0000'; // do function based on array values... } for (id in $chk) { // 'id' is value of array --> chk_settext1['field_id1']='#FF0000'; // do function based on array values... } }); Is possible use name of the div as array name? Any suggestion or any other method to solve this problem is welcome.

    Read the article

  • Extend footer wrap to width of page.

    - by hawkeye126
    I've made a footer wrap outside the content wrap (which everything else is in). I would like to make the footer wrap extend to fill the width of the page and I would like it to be fixed on the bottom. Here's the code: footerWrap { background-color:#000; width: auto; } footer { margin: auto; text-align:center; width:965px; height:150px; background-color:#000; border:#000 inset medium; } The website is item9andthemadhatters.com please let me know if you need any other code or info. Thanks!! update: html { padding:0; height:100%; width: 100%; } body{ margin: -1px 0 0 0; background-color:#FFF; font-family: calibri; background-image:url(images/item9HeaderSideFiller.gif); background-repeat: repeat-x; padding:0; height:100%; width: 100%; } wrap { width: 965px; margin:auto auto; min-height:462px; max-height:4000 px; footerWrap { background-color:#000; position:absolute; bottom:0; width:100% } footer { margin: auto; text-align:center; width:965px; height:150px; background-color:#000; } }

    Read the article

  • Unordered list appears higher than div

    - by LordArmadillo
    I am trying to create a simple page, which I normally can without any trouble. However, the unordered list appears higher up the page than the div. I do know a solution for this, however I cannot remember it. The page goes like this: <style> ul.menu { list-style-type: none; margin:150; margin-bottom:30px; padding:0; display: block; width: 708px; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; } li.menu { float:left; display: block; width: 118px; } a.menu:link,a.menu:visited { color:black; display:block; border:1px solid black; background-color:#FFFF00; width:118px; text-align:center; text-decoration:none; font-family:"Courier New", Courier, monospace } a.menu:hover { background-color:#FFBB11; } </style> <div id="head"> My images here & such</div> <ul class="menu"> <li class="menu"> <a class="menu">Main</a> </li> </ul> Normally I welcome suggestions to change my code, but I have a deadline today! So, quick & simple help would be appreciated! Thanks! LordArmadillo

    Read the article

  • Trouble with Perfect Scrollbar jQuery

    - by coolpup
    I'm using the Perfect Scrollbar jQuery app (http://www.yuiazu.net/perfect-scrollbar/) for this site: http://thehummingbirdplace.com/ The scrollbar shows up when you hover over the News section, but it won't scroll down to reveal the content. I've used this scrollbar before successfully, so I'm stumped as to what is different now. I haven't been able to replicate this on a simpler page, when I experiment on another page it either works or just vanishes, so I'm not sure why it is successfully showing up, yet not scrolling on the main page. Any help would be appreciated!!

    Read the article

  • optgroup class gets applied to all sub-options in FF, why?

    - by Camran
    I have an optgroup like this: <optgroup label="Eller välj Län" title="Eller välj Län" style="background-color:#FC9;"> <option value="Blekinge Län">Blekinge</option> <option value="Dalarna Län">Dalarna</option> <option value="Gotlands Län">Gotland</option> </optgroup> Problem is, only in Firefox, the class applies to all options inside the optgroup. I need it to apply only to the optgroup label... Any ideas why? Thanks

    Read the article

  • Background text in a Bootstrap WELL

    - by patrick
    I have a problem putting a text in the background of a Bootstrap well. I first posted the problem in this question, but that was a too simple representation of my problem. I'm looking for an effect created in this jFiddle, a text in the background of a menu. The example works how I want to to work, but when I put this in a Bootstrap Well I get this (http://jsfiddle.net/aBqw8/21/). The background text disappears, it's probably behind the Well. When I remove the background color from the well I can see the text. If I remove the "position:relative" from the span it shows the title, but then it interferes with the menu, which is what I am trying to avoid. Thanks for your help!

    Read the article

  • jQuery removeClass(), how it works

    - by centro
    I have images on my page. User can add more images onto the page by clicking a button. New images are added asynchronously. Initially, each image on page use a special class to be used when the image is loaded. After the image is loaded, that class is removed. Each image being loaded has the class imageLoading: <img class="imageLoading" scr="someimage.png"> After those images are loaded, I remove that class (simplified code without details): $('img.imageLoading') .each(function(){ $(this) .load(function(){ $(this) .removeClass('imageloading'); });}); Visually, I see that style is removed. But when I run the query again: $('img.imageLoading') I see via debugging that all images, not just loading ones, are returned, i.e. it works like I didn't remove the class for the images that were already loaded. I had a look into the page source, and I saw that actually in HTML the class was not removed, though removeClass() was called. Is that behavior by design that all visual changes are applied but the class attribute is not removed in HTML code? If so, how it can be workarounded in this case. Or, probably, I missed something.

    Read the article

  • jQuery date calculator - show/hide IMG

    - by utopicam
    I have a problem with the following code. I tried changing many things (symbols, classes, imgs in the code) but this is killing me and I have no idea how to fix it. Sorry it's so specific, when solved I'll change the title to something more useful. I have two images. My jquery has to calculate the day and show one image or the other depending on that (using a class with display:none). My month has 24 days (it's a xmas thing). This is what I have so far: <script type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function(){ var currentTime = new Date() var day = currentTime.getDate(); if (day > 24){ day = 1; } $(".calDate").each(function(){ var curDate = $(this).attr("date"); if (curDate < day){ $(this).addClass("xMasPast"); } else if(curDate==day){ $(this).addClass("xMasActive"); } else { $(this).addClass("xMasInactive"); } }); $(".calDate2").each(function(){ var curDate = $(this).attr("date"); if (curDate > day){ $(this).addClass("xMasInactive"); } else if(curDate==day){ $(this).addClass("xMasActive"); } else { $(this).addClass("xMasActive"); } }); }); </script> But it's showing all the images. What am I missing? (any ideas on making the code simpler are more than welcomed). Thanks for your help! Update: simplified HTML <div><img src="day21.png" which="21"/></a></div> <img id="bola21" class="calDate2" src="day21.png"/>

    Read the article

  • Horizontally spacing a row of images evenly

    - by Tesla
    I have a few rows of images like so <div class="row"> <img src="image.jpg" alt=""> <img src="image.jpg" alt=""> <img src="image.jpg" alt=""> <img src="image.jpg" alt=""> <img src="image.jpg" alt=""> </div> Each image has a different width, and there is also a different number of images on each row (4-6). I want to space the images evenly in the row, the row has a fixed width of 960px. I could do this by calculating the total empty space for each row and then dividing it among the images for a margin, but I was hoping there was something simpler that I could apply to every row instead of having to calculate and code a separate one for each row.

    Read the article

  • Prevent <img> tags in HTML from wrapping

    - by IL CARTOLAiO
    Hi all, I have a javascript that dynamically creates many <img> tags, and appends them to various divs. I want to prevent these images from wrapping; when the screen resolution is not enough to contain them the browser should create horizontal scroll-bars. Sorry for this bad English.

    Read the article

  • browser scroll not going at bottom of toggle?

    - by metal-gear-solid
    I 'm using this code to make a toogle effect at bottom of the page. it's working but toogle div going under the fold but browser do not to scroll at bottom following the toogle area <script type="text/javascript"> jQuery.noConflict(); jQuery(document).ready(function() { // toggles the slickbox on clicking the noted link jQuery('a#sm_toggle').click(function() { jQuery('#sitemapContainer').slideToggle(400); return false; }); }); </script>

    Read the article

  • How do I make a shrinkable scrollbar?

    - by diadem
    What I want: <div style="overflow:scroll;width:100%;height:50%;"> &nbsp; <div style="height:500px;width:400px;border:solid 3px red;"> </div> </div> <div style="overflow:scroll;width:100%;HEIGHT:50%;"> &nbsp; <div style="height:500px;width:400px;border:solid 3px red;"> </div> </div> Notice how if I shrink the height of the window the scrollbars shrink. This is the functionality I want. The issue: I want to make something similar to the above, only with a fixed height of 100 pixels for the top div. If I do this in practice the bottom scrollbar no longer shrinks as I shrink the page - the system adds an outer scrollbar to manage both sections. I don't want this, I want to retain the behavior seen above. How do I do this?

    Read the article

  • Is there a way to have element behind a div (links) clickable in areas where the div is "transparent

    - by Adam
    I have a block element that is positioned absolutely and some other elements on page that are positioned fixed. The effect is the block on top floats over the page which works well. The links in the elements at the bottom underneath are not clickable. They shouldn't be when the content of the div is over them, but when the "marginal" areas which are transparent are over the links they are visible, but clicks only register to the covering div. The problem only happens when the padding covers the div. But if I just rely on the margin the bottom margin is ignored by browser so the scroll doesn't go high enough up. To solve this I resort to padding at the bottom. This is the problem. Is there a clean way around this? I realize I could have the underneath elements doubled and place on top, but opacity set to 0. That is an undesirable solution however. Sample of the problem: <!DOCTYPE html> <html lang='en' xml:lang='en' xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'> <head> <style> #top, #bottom { position: fixed; border: 1 px solid #333; background-color: #eee; left: 100px; padding: 8px; } #top { top: 0; z-index: 1; } #bottom { bottom: 0; z-index: 2; } #contentWrapper { position: absolute; margin: 100px 0 0 0; /* Padding is used to make sure the scroll goes up further on the page */ padding: 0 0 100px 0; width: 600px; z-index: 3; } #content { border: 1 px solid #333; background-color: #eee; height: 1000px; } </style> </head> <body> <div id='top'><a href="#">Top link</a></div> <div id='bottom'><a href="#">Bottom link</a></div> <div id='contentWrapper'> <div id='content'>Some content</div> </div> </body> </html>

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254  | Next Page >