Search Results

Search found 59964 results on 2399 pages for 'asp net mvc views'.

Page 274/2399 | < Previous Page | 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281  | Next Page >

• how to clear jqgrid when i click button in asp.net mvc

  - by sandeep

  hi ,i am new to jqgrid , i'm placing the code what i did .my question is that when i click html button i need to refresh the grid value with new values?how i pass paramateres to controller? thanks in advance jQuery(document).ready(function() { $("#btnSearch").click(function() { jqGridContainer.dir. var StateId = document.getElementById('StateId').value; var CityId = document.getElementById('CityId').value; var HName = document.getElementById('HospitalName').value; alert(CityId); alert(StateId); alert(HName); if (StateId 0 && CityId == '' && HName == '') { CityId = 0; HName = 'Default'.toString(); alert("elseif0" + HName.toString()); } else if (CityId 0 && StateId == '') { alert("elseif1"); alert("Please Select State..") } else if (CityId 0 && StateId 0 && HName == '') { alert("elseif2"); alert(CityId); alert(StateId); HName = "Default"; } else { alert("else"); StateId = 0; CityId = 0; HName = "Default"; } // $("#Submit1").click(function() { // //{ function gridReload() { // //var customer = $(this).val(); // $('#list').setGridParam({ url: '/Claim/DynamicGridData/?StateId=' + StateId + '&CityId=' + CityId + '&hospname=' + HName, page: 1 // }).trigger("reloadGrid"); // Submit1.trigger("reloadGrid"); jQuery("#list").jqGrid({ url: '/Claim/DynamicGridData/?StateId=' + StateId + '&CityId=' + CityId + '&hospname=' + HName, datatype: 'json', mtype: 'GET', colNames: ['Id', 'HospitalName', 'Address', 'City', 'District', 'FaxNumber', 'PhoneNumber'], colModel: [{ name: 'HospitalId', index: 'HospitalId', width: 40, align: 'left' }, { name: 'HospitalName', index: 'HospitalName', width: 40, align: 'left' }, { name: 'Address1', Address: 'Address1', width: 300 }, { name: 'CityName', index: 'CityName', width: 100 }, { name: 'DistName', index: 'DistName', width: 100 }, { name: 'FaxNo', index: 'FaxNo', width: 100 }, { name: 'ContactNo1', index: 'PhoneNumber', width: 100 } ], jsonReader: { repeatitems: true, id: "0" }, pager: jQuery('#pager'), rowNum: 10, rowList: [5, 10, 20, 50], // sortname: 'Id,', sortname: '1', sortorder: "asc", viewrecords: true, //multiselect: true, //multikey: "ctrlKey", imgpath: '/scripts/themes/coffee/images', caption: 'Hospital Search', width: 700, height: 250 }); }); });

  Read the article

• Spring MVC handle button event in list

  - by GigaPr

  Hi, i created a list of Users <div class="usersList"> <c:forEach items="${users}" var="user"> <div class="listElementAction"> <c:out value="${user.id}"/> </div> <div class="listElement"> <c:out value="${user.firstName}"/> </div> <div class="listElement"> <c:out value="${user.lastName}"/> </div> <div class="listElement"> <c:out value="${user.username}"/> </div> <div class="listElementAction"> <input type="button" name="Edit" title="Edit" value="Edit" /> </div> <div class="listElementAction"> <input type="image" src="images/delete.png" name="image" value="${user.id}" alt="Delete" onclick="return confirm('Do you want to delete ${user.username}?')" > </div> <br /> </c:forEach> </div> and my controler looks like this public class UsersController implements Controller { private UserServiceImplementation userServiceImplementation; public ModelAndView handleRequest(HttpServletRequest request, HttpServletResponse response) throws ServletException, IOException { ModelAndView modelAndView = new ModelAndView("users"); modelAndView.addObject("users", this.userServiceImplementation.get()); return modelAndView; } public UserServiceImplementation getUserServiceImplementation() { return userServiceImplementation; } public void setUserServiceImplementation(UserServiceImplementation userServiceImplementation) { this.userServiceImplementation = userServiceImplementation; } } How can i handle the delete and edit button event?

  Read the article

• Setting objects (not users) inactive after period of time in asp.net mvc

  - by bastijn

  This question is mainly to verify my current idea. I have a series of objects which I want to be active for a specified amount of time. For instance objects like ads which are shown in the ad space only for the amount of time bought, objects in search results which should only pop up when active, and frontpage posts which should be set to inactive after a prespecified time. My current idea is to just give those type of objects a StartDate and EndDate and filter the search routines to only show results which fall in the range StartDate < currentDate < EndDate. Is this the normal structure or should there be some sort of auto-routine which routinely checks for objects which are "over-time" and set a property "inactive" to true or something. Seems like this approach is such a hassle since I need a checker which runs say, every 5 minutes, to scan all DB objects. Seems like a bad idea to me. So is the first structure the most commonly used or are there any other options? When searching on google or SO the search queries only return results setting users inactive.

  Read the article

• ASP.NET MVC IIS 7.5

  - by alinpopescu

  Hello, I have follwing erorr after I have published site in IIS 7.5 and i don't hnow what to do Description: An error occurred during the parsing of a resource required to service this request. Please review the following specific parse error details and modify your source file appropriately. Parser Error Message: Could not load type 'ProiectLicenta.MvcApplication'. Source Error: Line 1: <%@ Application Codebehind="Global.asax.cs" Inherits="ProiectLicenta.MvcApplication" Language="C#" %

  Read the article

• How to add a rich text box or use html and links in asp.net mvc 2?

  - by VJ

  Hi all I wanted to allow the users to enter html and links in textbox. How can I achieve something like this in ASP.NET MVC 2? I have something like this now... <div class="editor-field"> <%= Html.TextAreaFor(model => model.Description) %> <%= Html.ValidationMessageFor(model => model.Description) %> </div> I found this link - http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2238393/allow-html-in-text-boxes-asp-net-mvc But I am using ASP.NET MVC 2 and I am looking for something that MVC provides for this by default like a rich textbox or something and not just disable the validation.

  Read the article

• Custom Model Validator for MVC

  - by scottrakes

  I am trying to add a custom model validation at the property level but need to pass in two values. Below is my class definition and validation implementation. When it runs, the "value" in the IsValid method is always null. I can get this working at the class level but the property level is causing me issues. What am I missing? Event Class: public class Event { public int? EventID {get;set;} [ValidPURL("EventID", "PURLValue")] public string PURLValue { get; set; } ... } Validation Class [AttributeUsage(AttributeTargets.All, AllowMultiple = true, Inherited = true)] public sealed class ValidPURL : ValidationAttribute { private const string _defaultErrorMessage = "Web address already exist."; private readonly object _typeId = new object(); public ValidPURL(int eventID, string purlValue) : base(_defaultErrorMessage) { EventID = eventID; PURLValue = purlValue; } public int EventID { get; private set; } public string PURLValue { get; private set; } public override object TypeId { get { return _typeId; } } public override string FormatErrorMessage(string name) { return String.Format(CultureInfo.CurrentUICulture, ErrorMessageString, EventID, PURLValue); } public override bool IsValid(object value) { PropertyDescriptorCollection properties = TypeDescriptor.GetProperties(value); object eventIDValue = properties.Find(EventID, true /* ignoreCase */).GetValue(value); object purlValue = properties.Find(PURLValue, true /* ignoreCase */).GetValue(value); [Some Validation Logic against the database] return true; } } Thank for the help!

  Read the article

• ASP.NET MVC Cookie loses value when page is changed

  - by Jova

  When a user logs in to my site, I create a cookie with some info in it. However, whenever they change page from logging in, the cookie loses it's value. Cookie is still there but it's empty. I've checked my code and the cookie doesn't get rewritten by anything I've done. Does anyone have any idea to why the cookie becomes empty when the page is changed?

  Read the article

• Linking jQuery UI to the ASP.NET MVC 2 project

  - by Tx3

  What I am trying to accomplish is using jQuery UI dialog method from my own JavaScript source code file. I have this kind of links in the Site.Master <script src="/Scripts/jquery-1.4.2.js" type="text/javascript"></script> <script src="/Scripts/jquery.validate.js" type="text/javascript"></script> <script src="/Scripts/jquery-ui.js" type="text/javascript"></script> <script src="/Scripts/Common.js" type="text/javascript"></script> Common.js is my own helper file. jQuery works fine there, but when I try to call for example: $(document).ready(function() { $("#dialog").dialog(); }); I'll get "Microsoft JScript runtime error: Object doesn't support this property or method" Any ideas why this happens? jQuery Works fine, but jQuery UI doesn't.

  Read the article

• ASP.NET MVC does not add ModelError when invoking from unit test

  - by Tomas Lycken

  I have a model item public class EntryInputModel { ... [Required(ErrorMessage = "Description is required.", AllowEmptyStrings = false)] public virtual string Description { get; set; } } and a controller action public ActionResult Add([Bind(Exclude = "Id")] EntryInputModel newEntry) { if (ModelState.IsValid) { var entry = Mapper.Map<EntryInputModel, Entry>(newEntry); repository.Add(entry); unitOfWork.SaveChanges(); return RedirectToAction("Details", new { id = entry.Id }); } return RedirectToAction("Create"); } When I create an EntryInputModel in a unit test, set the Description property to null and pass it to the action method, I still get ModelState.IsValid == true, even though I have debugged and verified that newEntry.Description == null. Why doesn't this work?

  Read the article

• Implements an Undo/Redo in MVC

  - by bnabilos

  Hello, I have a Java application and I want to implement an Undo/Redo option. the value that I want to stock and that I want to be able to recover is an integer. My Class Model implements the interface StateEditable and I have to redefine the 2 functions restoreState(Hashtable<?, ?> state) and storeState(Hashtable<Object, Object> state) but I don't know what to put on them. It will be really great if somebody can help me to do that. These are the first lines of my Model class, the value that I want to do an undo/redo on it is value public class Model extends Observable implements StateEditable { private int value = 5; private UndoManager undoRedo = new UndoManager(); final UndoableEditListener editListener = new UndoableEditListener() { public void undoableEditHappened(UndoableEditEvent evt) { undoRedo.addEdit(evt.getEdit()); } }; @Override public void restoreState(Hashtable<?, ?> state) { } @Override public void storeState(Hashtable<Object, Object> state) { } }

  Read the article

• How to inject UrlHelper in MVC using Castle Windsor

  - by zaph0d

  I have a component that has a dependency on UrlHelper that I need to register using Castle Windsor. UrlHelper in turn has depdendencies on RequestContext (and RouteCollection). Now my controller has a Url property of type UrlHelper but cannot really access this as far as I can tell. What is the most efficient way to register my UrlHelper dependency (using fluent configuration)?

  Read the article

• Class 'org.springframework.http.converter.ResourceHttpMessageConverter' not found - how to correct?

  - by Ash Kim

  Eclipse STS is reporting I have problem with my spring project. It's a fresh project generated from the Spring Web MVC Project Template (File-New-Spring Template Project-Spring Web MVC ). When I create the project it has no problems - it's only once I modify the pom (by adding the hibernate dependencies) that STS then picks up the spring problem. Strangely if I revert the pom the problem remains. Also I can run the project on a spring tc server and all works correctly. Any ideas how I can satisfy this problem report? "Class 'org.springframework.http.converter.ResourceHttpMessageConverter' not found" mvc-config.xml /src/main/webapp/WEB-INF/spring line 9 Spring Beans Problem mvc-config.xml: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <beans xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mvc="http://www.springframework.org/schema/mvc" xsi:schemaLocation=" http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans-3.0.xsd http://www.springframework.org/schema/mvc http://www.springframework.org/schema/mvc/spring-mvc-3.0.xsd"> <mvc:annotation-driven /> <!-- <= PROBLEMATIC LINE REPORTED BY STS --> <!-- Resolves view names to protected .jsp resources within the /WEB-INF/views directory --> <bean class="org.springframework.web.servlet.view.InternalResourceViewResolver"> <property name="prefix" value="/WEB-INF/views/"/> <property name="suffix" value=".jsp"/> </bean> </beans>

  Read the article

• mvc post techniques

  - by user281180

  My form is as follows, how can I retrieve the values in my controller: <% using (Html.BeginForm("Create","Employee")) {% <%= Html.ValidationSummary()% <p><label for = "Name" >Name</label> <%= Html.TextBoxFor(model => model.EmployeeName)%> <%= Html.ValidationMessageFor(model => model.EmployeeName)%> </p> <label for = "ProName">Project</label> <table id="projectTable"> <tr> <td> <label for="Name" id = 1>UT1</label></td></tr> <tr> <td> <label for="Name" id= 2>UT2</label></td></tr> </table> <input type ="submit" value="Save" id="submit" /> <% }%>

  Read the article

• MVC actionlink posting List of complex type

  - by Ying

  I have an actionlink that on click im passing a List of objects to a controller action. Example: View: Html.ActionLink("TestLink", "TestMethod", "Test", Model.SampleList, null) TestController: public ActionResult TestMethod(List sampleList) { return View(sampleList); } When I do this I get a null sampleList. I can pass a single complex object fine just not a collection of it. Do I need the correct routing for this? The reason I'm doing this is instead of passing an id and do a look up in the controller action, I just pass in the data.

  Read the article

• ASP.NET MVC download image rather than display in browser

  - by RSolberg

  Rather than displaying a PNG in the browser window, I'd like the action result to trigger the file download dialogue box (you know the open, save as, etc). I can get this to work with the code below using an unknown content type, but the user then has to type in .png at the end of the file name. How can I accomplish this behavior without forcing the user to type in the file extension? public ActionResult DownloadAdTemplate(string pathCode) { var imgPath = Server.MapPath(service.GetTemplatePath(pathCode)); return base.File(imgPath, "application/unknown"); }

  Read the article

• Spring MVC 3.0: Avoiding explicit JAXBElement<> wrapper in method arg

  - by Keith Myers

  I have the following method and want to avoid having to explicitly show the JAXBElement< syntax. Is there some sort of annotation that would allow the method to appear to accept raw MessageResponse objects but in actuality work the same as shown below? I'm not sure how clear that was so I'll say this: I'm looking for some syntactic sugar :) @ServiceActivator public void handleMessageResponse(JAXBElement<MessageResponse> jaxbResponse) { MessageResponse response = jaxbResponse.getValue(); MessageStatus status = messageStatusDao.getByStoreIdAndMessageId(response.getStoreId(), response.getMessageId()); status.setStatusTimestamp(response.getDate()); status.setStatus("Complete"); }

  Read the article

• Separate functionality depending on Role in ASP.NET MVC

  - by Andrew Bullock

  I'm looking for an elegant pattern to solve this problem: I have several user roles in my system, and for many of my controller actions, I need to deal with slightly different data. For example, take /Users/Edit/1 This allows a Moderator to edit a users email address, but Administrators to edit a user's email address and password. I'd like a design for separating the two different bits of action code for the GET and the POST. Solutions I've come up with so far are: Switch inside each method, however this doesn't really help when i want different model arguments on the POST :( Custom controller factory which chooses a UsersController_ForModerators and UsersController_ForAdmins instead of just UsersController from the controller name and current user role Custom action invoker which choose the Edit_ForModerators method in a similar way to above Have an IUsersController and register a different implementation of it in my IoC container as a named instance based on Role Build an implementation of the controller at runtime using Castle DynamicProxy and manipulate the methods to those from role-based implementations Im preferring the named IoC instance route atm as it means all my urls/routing will work seamlessly. Ideas? Suggestions?

  Read the article

• paging helper asp.net mvc

  - by csetzkorn

  Hi, I have implemented a paging html helper (adapted from steven sanderson's book). This is the current code: public static string PageLinks(this HtmlHelper html, int currentPage, int totalPages, Func pageUrl) { StringBuilder result = new StringBuilder(); for (int i = 1; i <= totalPages; i++) { TagBuilder tag = new TagBuilder("a"); tag.MergeAttribute("href", pageUrl(i)); tag.InnerHtml = i.ToString(); if (i == currentPage) tag.AddCssClass("selectedPage"); result.AppendLine(tag.ToString()); } return result.ToString(); } This produces a bunch of links to each page of my items. If there are many pages this can be a bit overwhelming. I am looking for a similar implementation which produces something less overwhelming like this: where 6 is the current page. I am sure someone must have implemented something similar ... before I have to re-implement the wheel. Thanks. Christian

  Read the article

• ASP.NET MVC grid/table

  - by nivlam

  public class Person { public string First { get; set; } public string Last { get; set; } public int Age { get; set; } public IEnumerable<Child> Children { get; set; } } public class Child { public string First { get; set; } public string Last { get; set; } public int Age { get; set; } } I'm searching for a way to render a table from my model, which is of type IEnumerable<Person>. I'm trying to generate the following table: <table> <tr class="person"> <td>First 1</td> <td>Last 1</td> <td>1</td> </tr> <tr class="child"> <td>First 1</td> <td>Last 1</td> <td>1</td> </tr> <tr class="child"> <td>First 2</td> <td>Last 2</td> <td>2</td> </tr> ... ... </table> Each person is a row and each of their children would be individual rows under the person row. This would repeat for each person in IEnumerable<Person>. Are there any grids or components that generate a table like this? I found MvcContrib's grid component, but it doesn't appear to be able to generate these child rows. Is there a way to extend MvcContrib's grid to do this?

  Read the article

• Does using web services to expose a .NET DAL add security?

  - by Jonno

  Currently my employer deploys a web application over 3 servers. DB - No public route Web Service DAL - No public route Web Server - Public route The reason for this is the theory that if the web server is compromised, they don't arrive at the DB directly, but instead arrive at the DAL box. To my mind, as the DAL box and Web Sever box - both run windows/IIS - if the public box has been compromised, the same exploit would likely work on the DAL box - therefore I do not see this as a real security benefit. I would like to propose we remove the middle machine and allow the web server to connect directly to the database. Is this middle box really a benefit?

  Read the article

• render view as a string in mvc 2

  - by stuarty

  hi is there an easy way to caputer the output of a view or partial view as a string? TIA Stuart

  Read the article

• Update Table in Asp.Net MVC

  - by Xulfee

  I have table on page i want to delete record from table and also update table after deletion record. <%= Ajax.ActionLink("Delete Ajax", "PostTypeDelete",new { id = item.int_PostTypeId }, new AjaxOptions{LoadingElementId="status"}) %> I used above code its working fine (it delete record) but it doesn't update table.

  Read the article

• Is enemy / bot A.I. part of the model or controller in an MVC game

  - by Iain

  It could be part of the model because it's part of the business logic of the game. It could be part of the controller because it could be seen as simulating player input, which would be considered part of the controller, right? Or would it? What about a normal enemy, like a goomba in Mario? UPDATE: Wow, that's really not the answer I was expecting. As far as I could tell, A.I. is an internal part of the autonomous game system, hence model. I'm still not convinced.

  Read the article

• Generic data input form in asp.net mvc application

  - by Diego

  Hello, I have an application that have EF 16 classes that share this information: They all are classes only with a key field and a description. I think it should be a waste if I make a controller with just 1 method just to present a form to fill these classes info, then I was thinking in to make a generic form(with key, description) and dynamically fill the right class through a sort of selection the selected info in any way, any good suggestion or pattern to do that? Where the generic methods should be located.

  Read the article

• NHibernate session management in ASP.NET MVC

  - by Kevin Pang

  I am currently playing around with the HybridSessionBuilder class found on Jeffrey Palermo's blog post: http://jeffreypalermo.com/blog/use-this-nhibernate-wrapper-to-keep-your-repository-classes-simple/ Using this class, my repository looks like this: public class UserRepository : IUserRepository { private readonly ISessionBuilder _sessionBuilder; public UserRepository(ISessionBuilder sessionBuilder) { _sessionBuilder = sessionBuilder; } public User GetByID(string userID) { using (ISession session = _sessionBuilder.GetSession()) { return session.Get<User>(userID); } } } Is this the best way to go about managing the NHibernate session / factory? I've heard things about Unit of Work and creating a session per web request and flushing it at the end. From what I can tell, my current implementation isn't doing any of this. It is basically relying on the Repository to grab the session from the session factory and use it to run the queries. Are there any pitfalls to doing database access this way?

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281  | Next Page >