Search Results

Search found 9516 results on 381 pages for 'devexpress mvc'.

Page 281/381 | < Previous Page | 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288  | Next Page >

  • Handling Model Inheritance in ASP.NET MVC2

    - by enth
    I've gotten myself stuck on how to handle inheritance in my model when it comes to my controllers/views. Basic Model: public class Procedure : Entity { public Procedure() { } public int Id { get; set; } public DateTime ProcedureDate { get; set; } public ProcedureType Type { get; set; } } public ProcedureA : Procedure { public double VariableA { get; set; } public int VariableB { get; set; } public int Total { get; set; } } public ProcedureB : Procedure { public int Score { get; set; } } etc... many of different procedures eventually. So, I do things like list all the procedures: public class ProcedureController : Controller { public virtual ActionResult List() { IEnumerable<Procedure> procedures = _repository.GetAll(); return View(procedures); } } but now I'm kinda stuck. Basically, from the list page, I need to link to pages where the specific subclass details can be viewed/edited and I'm not sure what the best strategy is. I thought I could add an action on the ProcedureController that would conjure up the right subclass by dynamically figuring out what repository to use and loading the subclass to pass to the view. I had to store the class in the ProcedureType object. I had to create/implement a non-generic IRepository since I can't dynamically cast to a generic one. public virtual ActionResult Details(int procedureID) { Procedure procedure = _repository.GetById(procedureID, false); string className = procedure.Type.Class; Type type = Type.GetType(className, true); Type repositoryType = typeof (IRepository<>).MakeGenericType(type); var repository = (IRepository)DependencyRegistrar.Resolve(repositoryType); Entity procedure = repository.GetById(procedureID, false); return View(procedure); } I haven't even started sorting out how the view is going to determine which partial to load to display the subclass details. I'm wondering if this is a good approach? This makes determining the URL easy. It makes reusing the Procedure display code easy. Another approach is specific controllers for each subclass. It simplifies the controller code, but also means many simple controllers for the many procedure subclasses. Can work out the shared Procedure details with a partial view. How to get to construct the URL to get to the controller/action in the first place? Time to not think about it. Hopefully someone can show me the light. Thanks in advance.

    Read the article

  • odd behavior when checking if radio button selected in jQuery

    - by RememberME
    I had the following check in my jQuery which I thought was working fine to see if a radio button was checked. if ($("input[@name='companyType']:checked").attr('id') == "primary") { ... } Here's the radiobuttons: <p> <label>Company Type:</label> <label for="primary"><input onclick="javascript: $('#sec').hide('slow');$('#primary_company').find('option:first').attr('selected','selected');" type="radio" name="companyType" id="primary" checked />Primary</label> <label for="secondary"><input onclick="javascript: $('#sec').show('slow');" type="radio" name="companyType" id="secondary" />Subsidiary</label> </p> Then, it suddenly stopped working (or so I thought). I did some debugging and finally realized that it was returning an id of "approved_status". Elsewhere on my form I have a checkbox called "approved_status". I realized that when I originally tested this, I must have testing it on records where approved_status is false. And, now most of my approved_statuses are true/checked. I changed the code to this: var id = $("input:radio[@name='companyType']:checked").attr('id'); alert(id); if (id == "primary") { And it's now properly returning "primary" or "secondary" as the id. So, it is working, but it seems that it's not checking the name at all and now just checking radio buttons. I just want to know for future use, what's wrong with the original code b/c I can see possibly having 2 different radio sets on a page and then my new fix probably wouldn't work. Thanks!

    Read the article

  • mvc3 ActionResult does not reload page if is already on it

    - by senzacionale
    public ActionResult DeleteCategory(int id) { CategoryManager manager = new CategoryManager(); manager.DeleteCategory(id); TempData["IsDeleted"] = true; return RedirectToAction("CategoriesList"); } public ActionResult CategoriesList() { List<CategoryModel> model = new CategoryManager().GetAll(); return View(model); } public void DeleteCategory(int categoryId) { using (AsoEntities context = new AsoEntities()) { var categoryToDelete = (from c in context.Categories where c.Id == categoryId select c).SingleOrDefault(); if (categoryToDelete == null) return; context.Categories.DeleteObject(categoryToDelete); context.SaveChanges(); } } when i delete article i go back to CategoriesList but page is not reloaded if i am already on CategoriesList. What to do that page will be reloaded and data will be changed?

    Read the article

  • How to connect Model through Controller to View using bindings?

    - by Paperflyer
    I have an NSTextField in my view. Its value is bound to an NSNumber *number in my controller. The controller simply calls through to the model (value) to get the appropriate value. // In the controller - (NSNumber *)number { return [NSNumber numberWithFloat:[model value]]; } - (void)setNumber:(NSNumber *)aNumber { [model setValue:[aNumber floatValue]]; } This is fine, only the controller is not notified of model changes and thus, changing the value in the model does not update the NSTextField. The only other option I can think of is to have the model notify the controller and the controller manually update the view through an Outlet. But this circumvents the binding. // In the model, after value change [[NSNotificationCenter defaultCenter] postNotificationName:@"ValueChanged" object:self]; // In the controller, after being notified - (void)updateView:(NSNotification *)aNotification { [myTextField setFloatValue:[model value]]; } Is there a better, binding-aware way to implement this communication?

    Read the article

  • How do I get the action name from a base controller?

    - by griegs
    Hi, I'd like to implement a base controller on one of my controllers. Within that base controller, I'd like to be able to get the current executing ActionResult name. How would I go about doing this? public class HomeController : ControllerBase { public ActionResult Index() { And; public class ControllerBase : Controller { public ControllerBase() { //method which will get the executing ActionResult } }

    Read the article

  • How to outsource pieces of a web project

    - by Luke101
    I would like to outsource pieces of a new web application/site. I don't want one company working on the whole project because they can easily change a few things and sell the software to someone else. I will be using a freelenace website like elance or guru. A buddy of mine has given me this advice but he did not say how this can be done. Any ideas on how to go about this?

    Read the article

  • How important is it that models be consistent across project components?

    - by RonLugge
    I have a project with two components, a server-side component and a client-side component. For various reasons, the client-side device doesn't carry a fully copy of the database around. How important is it that my models have a 1:1 correlation between the two sides? And, to extend the question to my bigger concern, are there any time-bombs I'm going to run into down the line if they don't? I'm not talking about having different information on each side, but rather the way the information is encapsulated will vary. (Obviously, storage mechanisms will also vary) The server side will store each user, each review, each 'item' with seperate tables, and create links between them to gather data as necessary. The client side shouldn't have a complete user database, however, so rather than link against the user for gathering things like 'name', I'd store that on the review. In other words... --- Server Side --- Item: +id //Store stuff about the item User: +id +Name -Password Review: +id +itemId +rating +text +userId --- Device Side --- Item: +id +AverageRating Review: +id +rating +text +userId +name User: +id +Name //Stuff The basic idea is that certain 'critical' information gets moved one level 'up'. A user gets the list of 'items' relevant to their query, with certain review-orientation moved up (i. e. average rating). If they want more info, they query the detail view for the item, and the actual reviews get queried and added to the dataset (and displayed). If they query the actual review, the review gets queried and they pick up some additional user info along the way (maybe; I'm not sure if the user would have any use for any of the additional user information). My basic concern is that I don't wan't to glut the user's bandwidth or local storage with a huge variety of information that they just don't need, even if proper database normalizations suggests that information REALLY should be stored at a 'lower' level. I've phrased this as a fairly low-level conceptual issue because that's the level I'm trying to think / worry over, but if it matters I'm creating a PHP / MySQL server that provides data for a iOS / CoreData client.

    Read the article

  • MVC3 Custom view engine

    - by eth0
    I have a custom View Engine that derives from WebFormViewEngine. There's a lot of stuff going on in here, mostly caching. I want to be able to use WebFormViewEngine AND RazorViewEngine at the same time, is this possible? Ideally I'd like to do; ViewEngines.Add(new MyViewEngine<WebFormsViewEngine>()); ViewEngines.Add(new MyViewEngine<RazorViewEngine>()); if a .ascx/.aspx/.master file exists then use WebForms, otherwise use Razor is a .cshtml file exists. EDIT: I should of worded my question better. As my custom view engine derives from WebFormViewEngine it obviously uses WebForms, I can't derive from two classes. I can derive from RazorViewEngine but then I'll loose WebForms. I can duplicate my code entirely, derive from RazorViewEngine and edit the views file extensions, etc. but as I said I've got a lot of custom code in my view engine and would be duplicating hundreds of lines. WebFormViewEngine and RazorViewEngine derive from BuildManagerViewEngine which in turn implements IViewEngine. The problem with that is I have to implement methods CreatePartialView() and CreateView() but how would I know what to return (WebForms/Razor?) using generics?

    Read the article

  • Read all of ASP.NET MVC 2 in Action now while you wait for the printed book

    First, you should place your advance order for ASP.NET MVC 2 in Action at http://manning.com/palermo2.  That way, you will receive the printed book even before you see it at your local bookstore.  The entire book is finished, and we are just moving through production right now.  But that doesnt mean you have to wait to read it and learn about ASP.NET MVC 2.  Since the beginning of the book project, you have been able to see the progression of the book on GitHub, our project...Did you know that DotNetSlackers also publishes .net articles written by top known .net Authors? We already have over 80 articles in several categories including Silverlight. Take a look: here.

    Read the article

  • Best way to support large dropdowns

    - by JustAProgrammer
    Say I have a report that can be restricted by specifying some value in a dropdown. This dropdown list references a table with 30,000 records. I don't think this would be feasible to populate a dropdown with! So, what is the best way to provide the user the ability to select a value given this situation? These values do not really have categories and even if I subdivided (by having some nesting dropdown situation) by the first letter of the value, that may still leave a few thousand entries. What's the best way to deal with this?

    Read the article

  • CodeIgniter: help with this query

    - by iamjonesy
    Hi, I have just started my first CI app. I have a view that displays some posts. Each post can have multiple comments and I want to display the total number of comments next to each post. So far all my db call are in my controller (will be changing this). function index(){ $data['query'] = $this->db->get('posts'); $this->load->view('blog_view', $data); } In my view: <?php foreach($query->result() as $row): <div class="post-box"> <p><?php echo $row->body; ?><small>&nbsp;added by <?php echo $row->username; ?> on <?php echo date ('d/m/Y',strtotime($row->created)); ?>&nbsp;<a href="<?php echo base_url(); ?>blog/comments/<?php echo $row->id; ?>"><img src="<?php echo base_url(); ?>images/comments_icon.png" />&nbsp;0</a></small></p> </div> <?php endforeach; ?> I want to get the total number of comments where comment.post_id = the current record's id. and display it next to the comments icon. Any help with this most appreciated, Billy

    Read the article

  • Dynamically set the option values

    - by user281180
    I have 2 different lists: EmployeeNames and Names I read the values in Names and that of EmployeeNames. If EmployeeNames exists in Names, I must not add that value to "ToSelectBox" but to "FromSelectBox". If EmployeeNames doesn`t exist in Names, I must add that value to "ToSelectBox" but not to "FromSelectBox". How can I do that dynamically? I have 2 option values as follows: <select id="fromSelectBox" multiple="multiple" > <% foreach (var item in Model.EmployeeNames) { %> <option value="<%=Html.Encode(Item.Text)%>"><%=Html.Encode(item.Text)%></option> <%} %> </select> select id="ToSelectBox" multiple="multiple" > <% foreach (var item in Model.Names) { %> <option value="<%=Html.Encode(Item.Text)%>"><%=Html.Encode(item.Text)%></option> <%} %> </select>

    Read the article

  • Problem with nhibernate join

    - by MexicanHacker
    I'm trying to do a join like this using fluent nhibernate: Id(x => x.Id); Map(x => x.SourceSystemRecordId,"sourceSystemRecord_id"); Then Join("cat.tbl_SourceSystemRecords", SourceSystemRecords); But, it seems I don't have a way to specify the column I want to join with from the first table, in this case I need to join on SourceSystemRecordId and not on Id Is there any way I can specify this? I tried References() but that requires me to create an object for this relationship, what I need is to aggregate the columns in sourcesystem records to the ones in the main table.

    Read the article

  • How to user IN operator in Linq?

    - by Umapathy
    Query: Select * from pu_Products where Part_Number in ('031832','027861', '028020', '033378') and User_Id = 50 and Is_Deleted = 0 The above mentioned query is in SQL and i need the query might be converted into Linq. Is there any option using the "IN" operator in Linq?. can you convert above mentioned query into Linq?

    Read the article

  • How with lambda function in MVC3

    - by doogdeb
    I have a model which contains view models for each view. This model is held in session and is initialised when application starts. I need to be able to populate a field from one view model with the value from another so have used a lambda function. Below is my model. I am using a lambda so that when I get Test2.MyProperty it will use the FunctionTestProperty to retrieve the value from Test1.TestProperty. public class Model { public Model() { Test1 = new Test1() Test2 = new Test2(FunctionTestProperty () => Test1.TestProperty) } } public class Test1 { public string TestProperty { get; set; } } public class Test2 { public Test2() : this (() => string.Empty) {} public Test2(Func<string> functionTestProperty) { FunctionTestProperty = functionTestProperty; } public Func<string> FunctionTestProperty { get; set; } public string MyProperty { get{ return FunctionTestProperty() ?? string.Empty; } } } This works perfectly when I first run the application and navigate from Test1 to Test2; I can see that when I get the value for MyProperty it calls back to Model constructor and retrieves the Test1.TestProperty value. However when I then submit the form (Test2) it calls the default constructor which sets it to string.Empty. So if I go back to Test1 and back to Test2 again it always then calls the Test2 default constructor. Does anyone know why this works when first running the application but not after the view is submitted, or if I have made an obvious mistake?

    Read the article

  • Array of datas returning issue, Overwriting

    - by sijith
    Hi, Please help me on this Here i want to save the converted data into new pointers. But everytime the data is overwriting with most recent data. Please check my code TCHAR nameBuffer[256]; //Globally Declared void Caller() { TCHAR* ptszSecondInFile= QStringToTCharBuffer(userName); TCHAR* ptszOutFile=QStringToTCharBuffer(Destinationfilename); } TCHAR *dllmerge::QStringToTCharBuffer( QString buffer ) { memset(nameBuffer, 0, sizeof(nameBuffer)); #if UNICODE _tcscpy_s(nameBuffer, _countof(nameBuffer), buffer.toUtf8()); #else _tcscpy_s(nameBuffer, _countof(nameBuffer), buffer.toLocal8Bit()); #endif _tprintf( _T( "nameBuffer %s\n" ), nameBuffer ); return nameBuffer; } I am gettting ptszSecondInFile and ptszOutFile both same answer. Is it possible to do with TCHAR* nameBuffer[256];

    Read the article

  • checkbox val not showing false

    - by user281180
    I have the follwoing code: $("input:checkbox").live('click', function() { alert($(this).val()); }); True is shown if the checkbox is checked. However, if the checkbox is checked and I uncheck it, the value shown is still true. How can I correct that? What is wrong with the code? Thanks

    Read the article

  • Endless scroll paging in jquery Safari

    - by socheata
    I'm using : $(window).scroll(function () { if ($(window).scrollTop() + 10 >= ($(document).height() - $(window).height())) { loadContent(); } } It works fine with Chrome, IE, Firefox but except in Safari. In function loadContent, I used JSON to load data, as this tutorial. But while I test in Safari, It takes the content twice from JSON. If the other takes 9 items, then Safari takes 18 items. Does anyone know how to solve this problem? Thanks.

    Read the article

  • Add multiple ActionName for button

    - by NewToBirtReporting
    I have one controller on which i have Save button click event. Im using same controller and view for Add and Edit purpose. My code is as per below [HttpPost] [Button(ButtonName = "Save")] [ActionName("Create")] [ValidateAntiForgeryToken(Salt = "PostData")] public ActionResult Save(Ntegra m_Ntegra,FormCollection form) {} As Im Using ActionName("Create") here so button can not work for ActionName("Edit"). can anyone tell me how i can achive my requirnment!! Thanks for help...... :)

    Read the article

  • What is the mean of @ModelAttribute annotation at method argument level?

    - by beemaster
    Spring 3 reference teaches us: When you place it on a method parameter, @ModelAttribute maps a model attribute to the specific, annotated method parameter I don't understand this magic spell, because i sure that model object's alias (key value if using ModelMap as return type) passed to the View after executing of the request handler method. Therefore when request handler method executes the model object's name can't be mapped to the method parameter. To solve this contradiction i went to stackoverflow and found this detailed example. The author of example said: // The "personAttribute" model has been passed to the controller from the JSP It seems, he is charmed by Spring reference... To dispel the charms i deployed his sample app in my environment and cruelly cut @ModelAttribute annotation from method MainController.saveEdit. As result the application works without any changes! So i conclude: the @ModelAttribute annotation is not needed to pass web form's field values to the argument's fields. Then i stuck to the question: what is the mean of @ModelAttribute annotation? If the only mean is to set alias for model object in View, then why this way better than explicitly adding of object to ModelMap?

    Read the article

  • Play 2.0 framework - POST parameters

    - by user1452715
    I'm trying to POST parameters to Action, and wrote in the routes: Home page GET / controllers.Application.index() POST /login/name:/password: controllers.Application.login(name, password) and I have an Action public static Result login(String name, String password) { return ok(name + " " + password); } my form is <form action="/login" method="post"> <input name="name" type="text" id="name"> <input name="password" type="password" id="password"> <input type="submit" value="Login"> </form> and it doesn't work For request 'POST /login' [Missing parameter: name] what am i doing wrong?

    Read the article

  • MVC2 JSON action, if I want to be RESTful should I allow GET, POST, or Both?

    - by Yads
    The project I'm currently working has a whole bunch of JSON actions in order to populate cascading dropdowns via ajax calls. Since they're technically Select queries and we're trying to be RESTful, we've been marking these actions with the HttpGet attributes. However by default, JsonResultdoes not allow to return results via a GET. So we've had to explicitly call Json(data, JsonRequestBehavior.AllowGet). What I'm wondering is, is this bad practice? Should we only be allowing Post requests to our Json actions? If it makes a difference, this is an enterprise application, that requires a log in to a particular environment before it can be accessed.

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288  | Next Page >