Search Results

Search found 9516 results on 381 pages for 'devexpress mvc'.

Page 283/381 | < Previous Page | 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290  | Next Page >

  • How to make link become inactive?

    - by Konstantin Vasilcov
    The idea was simple: change li background color on hover to one color ul#menu li a:hover {...} change it on mouse press to the other color ul#menu li a:active {...} return the color to the original (normal) if the link is neither hover nor pressed The problem appeared to be that, if user rejected his intention and lets the mouse up away from the link, the back color stays as if it was pressed. Then I tried to research and came up with this: ul#menu li a:hover:active {...} It became better, and the link is not marked with special back color in a normal state after user presses the link and rejects. But the "on-hover" back color became equal to the active one. So it looks like the link gets "active" state and stays in it even after user releases mouse button. Hate to write this, but I am very new to html and css. So I may be missing something very basic here. Could you, please, suggest any way, how to achieve my goal? EDIT I've read this source CSS Styling links (thought there could be some other state to use instead of active), but found nothing suitable there...

    Read the article

  • Input type button/submit that does both form validation and submit via jquery ajax?

    - by Pandiya Chendur
    I am trying to use jquery validator plugin and form submit via ajax in jquery..... Validator plugin works with <input type="submit" value="Add a client" id="clientadd"/> but my form submit works with <input type="button" value="Add a client" id="clientadd"/>..... <form id="addform" autocomplete="off"> //My controls here </form> I didn't specify action and method attributes here as i ll submit my form using jquery.ajax().... Any suggestion how to get both working together....

    Read the article

  • passing id to controller

    - by coure06
    I have 4-5 partial view files (.ascx) like abc.ascx, cde.ascx, fgh.ascx. I want to return different partial views based on the name of the view passed to url parameter like this /someservice/abc will go to action someservice and will return abc.ascx partial view. /someservice/cde will go to action someservice and will return cde.ascx partial view. How can achieve this?

    Read the article

  • Get REST Call is not returning the string I put in url

    - by wizage
    I have very simple code: using System; using System.Collections.Generic; using System.Linq; using System.Net; using System.Net.Http; using System.Web.Http; namespace Calculator.Controllers { public class CalcController : ApiController { public string Get(string type) { return type; } } } And this is what it returns when I type in http://www.example.com/api/calc/test <string xmlns:i="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/2003/10/Serialization/" i:nil="true"/> When I use http://www.example.com/api/calc/?test=test it returns this: <string xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/2003/10/Serialization/">type</string> How to I make it so I can just do the top one instead of the bottom one?

    Read the article

  • How with lambda function in MVC3

    - by doogdeb
    I have a model which contains view models for each view. This model is held in session and is initialised when application starts. I need to be able to populate a field from one view model with the value from another so have used a lambda function. Below is my model. I am using a lambda so that when I get Test2.MyProperty it will use the FunctionTestProperty to retrieve the value from Test1.TestProperty. public class Model { public Model() { Test1 = new Test1() Test2 = new Test2(FunctionTestProperty () => Test1.TestProperty) } } public class Test1 { public string TestProperty { get; set; } } public class Test2 { public Test2() : this (() => string.Empty) {} public Test2(Func<string> functionTestProperty) { FunctionTestProperty = functionTestProperty; } public Func<string> FunctionTestProperty { get; set; } public string MyProperty { get{ return FunctionTestProperty() ?? string.Empty; } } } This works perfectly when I first run the application and navigate from Test1 to Test2; I can see that when I get the value for MyProperty it calls back to Model constructor and retrieves the Test1.TestProperty value. However when I then submit the form (Test2) it calls the default constructor which sets it to string.Empty. So if I go back to Test1 and back to Test2 again it always then calls the Test2 default constructor. Does anyone know why this works when first running the application but not after the view is submitted, or if I have made an obvious mistake?

    Read the article

  • Is this a good approach to dealing with tagging?

    - by Mel
    Can this code be optimized or re-factored? Is this an optimal approach to tagging? The following code is a callback in my posts model. It creates a record that associates a tag with a post in a QuestionsTags joiner table. When necessary, if a given tag does not already exist in the tags table, the function creates it, then uses its id to create the new record in the QuestionsTags table. The difficulty with this approach is the QuestionsTags table depends on data in the tags table which may or may not exist. The function assumes the following tables: tags(id, tagName), posts(tags) // Comma delimited list questionsTags(postId, tagId) The idea is to loop over a delimited list of tags submitted with a post and check to see if each tag already exists in the tags table If tag exists: Check to see if there's already a QuestionTag record for this post and this tag in the QuestionTags table. If yes, do nothing (the association already exists) If no, create a new QuestionTag record using the id of the existing tag and the postId If tag does not already exist: Create the new tag in the tags table Use its id to create a new QuestionsTags record Code /** * @hint Sets tags for a given question. **/ private function setTags() { // Loop over the comma and space delmited list of tags for (local.i = 1; local.i LTE ListLen(this.tags, ", "); local.i = (local.i + 1)) { // Check if the tag already exists in the database local.tag = model("tag").findOneByTagName(local.i); // If the tag exists, look for an existing association between the tag and the question in the QuestionTag table if (IsObject(local.tag)) { local.questionTag = model("questionTag").findOneByPostIdAndTagId(values="#this.postId#,#local.tag.id#"); // If no assciatione exists, create a new QuestionTag record using the tagId and the postId if (! IsObject(local.questionTag)) { local.newQuestionTag = model("questionTag").new(postId = this.id, tagId = local.tag.id); // Abort if the saving the new QuestionTag is unsuccesful if (! local.newQuestionTag.save()) { return false; } } } // If the tag does not exist create it else { local.newTag = model("tag").new(tagName = local.i, userId = this.ownerUserId); // Abort if the the new tag is not saved successfully if (! local.newTag.save()) { return false; } // Otherwise create a new association in the QuestionTags table using the id of the newly created tag and the postId local.newQuestionTag = model("questionTag").new(postId = this.id, tagId = local.newTag.id); // Abort if the new QuestionTag does not save correctly if (! local.newQuestionTag.save()) { return false; } } } } FYI: I'm using CFWheels in my application, which explains the ORM functions used.

    Read the article

  • can i have a date in the url of a route in asp.net ?

    - by oo
    This code below doesn't seem to work but i can't figure out why. If i have a user entered textbox that is a datepicker and the results are displayed as: 21-May-2010 , can i take this value and stick it into a URL to send over to a controller action so instead of an id (which is an int), i want a id which is a date value View / Javascript Code: $.get('/Tracker/DailyBlog/' + this.val(), function(data) { $('#dailyblog').html(data); }); ControllAction Code: public ActionResult DailyBlog(DateTime blogDate) { //go do something } any idea why this is not working ?

    Read the article

  • C# Reflection StackTrack get value

    - by John
    I'm making pretty heavy use of reflection in my current project to greatly simplify communication between my controllers and the wcf services. What I want to do now is to obtain a value from the Session within an object that has no direct access to HttpSessionStateBase (IE: Not a controller). For example, a ViewModel. I could pass it in or pass a reference to it etc. but that is not optimal in my situation. Since everything comes from a Controller at some point in my scenario I can do the following to walk the sack to the controller where the call originated, pretty simple stuff: var trace = new System.Diagnostics.StackTrace(); foreach (var frame in trace.GetFrames()) { var type = frame.GetMethod().DeclaringType; var prop = type.GetProperty("Session"); if(prop != null) { // not sure about this part... var value = prop.GetValue(type, null); break; } } The trouble here is that I can't seem to work out how to get the "instance" of the controller or the Session property so that I can read from it.

    Read the article

  • @ symbol for strings in jQuery

    - by anilca
    if (confirm('<%=Ns1.Ns2.MyClass.GetResourceText("DeleteConfirmationMessage")%>')) { /* something to do...*/ } I have a jQuery expression as above. But the return value of GetResourceText method is a very long string. So my page renders the function like below: if (confirm(' Are you sure lablabla? If you delete this lablabla... lablabla... ')) { Because of this my jQuery functions do not work. Is there a symbol for jQuery like @ that we use in C#?

    Read the article

  • What is the mean of @ModelAttribute annotation at method argument level?

    - by beemaster
    Spring 3 reference teaches us: When you place it on a method parameter, @ModelAttribute maps a model attribute to the specific, annotated method parameter I don't understand this magic spell, because i sure that model object's alias (key value if using ModelMap as return type) passed to the View after executing of the request handler method. Therefore when request handler method executes the model object's name can't be mapped to the method parameter. To solve this contradiction i went to stackoverflow and found this detailed example. The author of example said: // The "personAttribute" model has been passed to the controller from the JSP It seems, he is charmed by Spring reference... To dispel the charms i deployed his sample app in my environment and cruelly cut @ModelAttribute annotation from method MainController.saveEdit. As result the application works without any changes! So i conclude: the @ModelAttribute annotation is not needed to pass web form's field values to the argument's fields. Then i stuck to the question: what is the mean of @ModelAttribute annotation? If the only mean is to set alias for model object in View, then why this way better than explicitly adding of object to ModelMap?

    Read the article

  • Dependency Injection. Assign values to IENUMERABLE

    - by Boss
    public interface IFeature { string FeatureName { get; set; } } public interface IFeatureRegistry { IEnumerable<IFeature> Features { get; set; } bool IsEnabled(IEnumerable<string> featurePath); } public interface IApplicationTenant { string ApplicationName { get; } IFeatureRegistry EnabledFeatures { get; } } public abstract class AbstractApplicationTenant : IApplicationTenant { public string ApplicationName { get; protected set; } public IFeatureRegistry EnabledFeatures { get; protected set; } } public class SampleTenant : AbstractApplicationTenant { public SampleTenant() { ApplicationName = "Sample 1"; EnabledFeatures = null; } } I am new to this field. My question is how to assign values to EnabledFeatures? Thanks Jeco

    Read the article

  • Showing an image after laoding it from sql database

    - by user330075
    I have a problem showing the image form database in a view Details and a ImageController. Inside the view i have: img src=Url.Action("GetFile","Image", new {id= Model.id}) and in controller: public FileContentResult GetFile(int idl) { //int idl = 32; SqlDataReader rdr; byte[] fileContent = null; ........... return File(,,); } When the view is called, function GetFile it just wont work,but if i cut out the parameter int id1 and i instantiate it as a variable it'l work. public FileContentResult GetFile() { int idl = 32; SqlDataReader rdr; byte[] fileContent = null; ........... return File(,,); } Why?

    Read the article

  • How could I insert a string into the response stream anywhere I want?

    - by DM
    There may be an easy way to do this but I can't see it... I created a simple Http Module that starts a timer on the PreRequestHandler and stops the timer on the PostRequestHandler to calculate the time it took the page to load. I then create some simple html and write my results to Response.Write. Since I'm doing this in the PostRequestHandler it's adding my results after the </html> tag. That's fine for testing but I need in a scenario where the page needs to validate. I can't seem to figure out how I could manipulate the Response object to insert my results before the </body> tag. Response.Write and Response.Output.Write don't have that flexibility and I couldn't see a way to work with the Response as a string. Am I missing something easy?

    Read the article

  • Play 2.0 framework - POST parameters

    - by user1452715
    I'm trying to POST parameters to Action, and wrote in the routes: Home page GET / controllers.Application.index() POST /login/name:/password: controllers.Application.login(name, password) and I have an Action public static Result login(String name, String password) { return ok(name + " " + password); } my form is <form action="/login" method="post"> <input name="name" type="text" id="name"> <input name="password" type="password" id="password"> <input type="submit" value="Login"> </form> and it doesn't work For request 'POST /login' [Missing parameter: name] what am i doing wrong?

    Read the article

  • Why Controller doesn't recognize a public method which (yet) appears in the intellisense ?

    - by Richard77
    Hello, I'm using an helper class that I called CreateEditOrganizationService where I put all the helper methods. In my controller, I've createService as object of that class. So far, I've got 5 methods. Now, I've just defined a 6th method called Set_TypeOrganization. I'm getting the Set_TypeOrganization in the intellisense, but after I've chose it, I get the following error: *CreateEditOrganizationService does not contain a definition for Set_TypeOrganization are you missing a directive or a reference?* public List<TypeOrganization> Set_TypeOrganization(string choice) { //Definition goes here... } and in my Controller CreateEditOrganizationService createService = new CreateEditOrganizationService(); //... ViewData["TypeOrganizations"] = createService.Set_TypeOrganization(choice); Unfortunately, VS shows me the error? Yet, the method appear in the intellisense when I type a dot after the createService object. Thannks for helping

    Read the article

  • DisplayFor ignores metadata

    - by Juvaly
    For my Contact class, the property EmailAddress is marked with the [DataType(DataType.EmailAddress)] attribute. In my view, using Html.Display("EmailAddress") and Html.DisplayFor(c => c.EmailAddress) yields different results. The former outputs a mailto: link, which is the expected behavior, while the latter simply outputs the email address as plain text. My question is why the different behavior, I expected these two methods to have the same output.

    Read the article

  • IE 7 issues: Super simple page - TD height not taking effect

    - by Anthony
    This is my markup: <!DOCTYPE HTML> <html> <head> <title>Test title</title> <style type="text/css"> * { margin:0px auto; padding:0px; } html,body { height:100%; width:100%; } </style> </head> <body> <table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" style="width: 100%; height: 100%;"> <tr> <td style="height:55px;background:#CCC;" valign="top"> <h1>Header</h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td valign="top"> Content @RenderBody() </td> </tr> <tr> <td style="height:85px;background:#CCC;" valign="bottom"> Footer </td> </tr> </table> </body> </html> Can anybody tell me why td height is not taking effect? This same markup works in IE9. Is it due to the HTML5 doctype?

    Read the article

  • get look up a string given a func<T,object> param

    - by Sammy
    given this code namespace GridTests { public class Grid<T> { IEnumerable<T> DataSource { get; set; } IList<Column> Columns = new List<Column>(); class Column { public string DisplayText { get; set; } Func<T, object> Rowdata { get; set; } } } } I need to be able to loop through the columns collection and get the Rowdata's object value using the DisplayText. Thanks

    Read the article

  • Why the only hidden field that is being filled from GET action is not being passed in model?

    - by user1807954
    Sorry for the long title, I didn't know how to make it any shorter. My code: My model: public class CarFilter { public String carMake { get; set; } public String carModel { get; set; } public String carEdition { get; set; } . . . public String SortBy { get; set; } } public class CarSearch : CarFilter { public List<Car> Car { get; set; } } My controller: public ActionResult SearchResult(CarSearch search) { var cars = from d in db.Cars select d; if (Request.HttpMethod == "POST") { search.SortBy = "Price"; } search.Car = new List<Car>(); search.Car.AddRange(cars); var temp = new List<CarSearch>(); temp.Add(search); return View(temp); } My Index view (where user filters results): @model IEnumerable<Cars.Models.CarSearch> @using (Html.BeginForm("SearchResult", "Home", FormMethod.Post)){..forms and other stuff..} My SearchResult view (where user sees the results of filtration): @model IEnumerable<Cars.Models.CarSearch> @using (Html.BeginForm("SearchResult", "Home", FormMethod.Get)) { @Html.Hidden("carMake") @Html.Hidden("carModel") @Html.Hidden("carEdition") . . . @Html.Hidden("SortBy", temp.SortBy) <input name="SortBy" class="buttons" type="submit" value="Make"/> My goal What I'm trying to do is when user clicked on sort by Make it will have to GET back all the variables in hidden field back to the SearchResult action in order to sort the result (same filtered results). Result Is: <input id="SortBy" name="SortBy" type="hidden" value=""/>. The value is null and it's not being passed but all the other hidden fields such as carMake and etc have value. But when I use foreach it works perfect. Question Why is this like this? the SortBy is in the same model class as other fields in the view. The only difference is that SortBy is not being filled in the Index view with other fields, instead it's being filled in controller action. What is the explanation for this? Am I missing any C# definition or something such as dynamic objects or something?

    Read the article

  • specified size of td

    - by ognjenb
    <table class="data-table"> <tr> <th style="width: 200px;"> Description </th> </tr> <% foreach (var item in Model) { %> <tr> <td style="width: 200px;"> <%= Html.Encode(item.Description) %> </td> </tr> </table> browser html: <table class="data-table"> <tr> <th style="width: 200px;"> Description </th> </tr> <tr> <td > This is description </td> </tr> </table> Why this td size is not to apply on View page? In Design view on VS 2008 td size is applied, but after run project in my browser not have specified size

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290  | Next Page >