Search Results

Search found 56878 results on 2276 pages for 'asp net mvc 2 rc'.

Page 286/2276 | < Previous Page | 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293  | Next Page >

  • Styling ASP.NET MVC Error Messages

    - by MightyZot
    Originally posted on: http://geekswithblogs.net/MightyZot/archive/2013/11/11/styling-asp.net-mvc-error-messages.aspxOff the cuff, it may look like you’re stuck with the presentation of your error messages (model errors) in ASP.NET MVC. That’s not the case, though. You actually have quite a number of options with regard to styling those boogers. Like many of the helpers in MVC, the Html.ValidationMessageFor helper has multiple prototypes. One of those prototypes lets you pass a dictionary, or anonymous object, representing attribute values for the resulting markup. @Html.ValidationMessageFor( m => Model.Whatever, null, new { @class = “my-error” }) By passing the htmlAttributes parameter, which is the last parameter in the call to the prototype of Html.ValidationMessageFor shown above, I can style the resulting markup by associating styles to the my-error css class.  When you run your MVC project and view the source, you’ll notice that MVC adds the class field-validation-valid or field-validation-error to a span created by the helper. You could actually just style those classes instead of adding your own…it’s really up to you. Now, what if you wanted to move that error message around? Maybe you want to put that error message in a box or a callout. How do you do that? When I first started using MVC, it didn’t occur to me that the Html.ValidationMessageFor helper just spits out a little bit of markup. I wanted to put the error messages in boxes with white backgrounds, our site originally had a black background, and show a little nib on the side to make them look like callouts or conversation bubbles. Not realizing how much freedom there is in the styling and markup, and after reading someone else’s post, I created my own version of the ValidationMessageFor helper that took out the span and replaced it with divs. I styled the divs to produce the effect of a popup box and had a lot of trouble with sizing and such. That’s a really silly and unnecessary way to solve this problem. If you want to move your error messages around, all you have to do is move the helper. MVC doesn’t appear to care where you put it, which makes total sense when you think about it. Html.ValidationMessageFor is just spitting out a little markup using a little bit of reflection on the name you’re passing it. All you’ve got to do to style it the way you want it is to put it in whatever markup you desire. Take a look at this, for example… <div class=”my-anchor”>@Html.ValidationMessageFor( m => Model.Whatever )</div> @Html.TextBoxFor(m => Model.Whatever) Now, given that bit of HTML, consider the following CSS… <style> .my-anchor { position:relative; } .field-validation-error {    background-color:white;    border-radius:4px;    border: solid 1px #333;    display: block;    position: absolute;    top:0; right:0; left:0;    text-align:right; } </style> The my-anchor class establishes an anchor for the absolutely positioned error message. Now you can move the error message wherever you want it relative to the anchor. Using css3, there are some other tricks. For example, you can use the :not(:empty) selector to select the span and apply styles based upon whether or not the span has text in it. Keep it simple, though. Moving your elements around using absolute positioning may cause you issues on devices with screens smaller than your standard laptop or PC. While looking for something else recently, I saw someone asking how to style the output for Html.ValidationSummary.  Html.ValidationSummery is the helper that will spit out a list of property errors, general model errors, or both. Html.ValidationSummary spits out fairly simple markup as well, so you can use the techniques described above with it also. The resulting markup is a <ul><li></li></ul> unordered list of error messages that carries the class validation-summary-errors In the forum question, the user was asking how to hide the error summary when there are no errors. Their errors were in a red box and they didn’t want to show an empty red box when there aren’t any errors. Obviously, you can use the css3 selectors to apply different styles to the list when it’s empty and when it’s not empty; however, that’s not support in all browsers. Well, it just so happens that the unordered list carries the style validation-summary-valid when the list is empty. While the div rendered by the Html.ValidationSummary helper renders a visible div, containing one invisible listitem, you can always just style the whole div with “display:none” when the validation-summary-valid class is applied and make it visible when the validation-summary-errors class is applied. Or, if you don’t like that solution, which I like quite well, you can also check the model state for errors with something like this… int errors = ViewData.ModelState.Sum(ms => ms.Value.Errors.Count); That’ll give you a count of the errors that have been added to ModelState. You can check that and conditionally include markup in your page if you want to. The choice is yours. Obviously, doing most everything you can with styles increases the flexibility of the presentation of your solution, so I recommend going that route when you can. That picture of the fat guy jumping has nothing to do with the article. That’s just a picture of me on the roof and I thought it was funny. Doesn’t every post need a picture?

    Read the article

  • ASP.NET Authentication Cookie timout and IIS 7 setting

    - by David Laplante
    Hello, I have an ASP.NET website for which i've set the authetication timeout to 60 days so that my users don't have to log in each time they come back if they checked the "remember me" option. Basic ASP.NET login mechanism... It's working fine on my developpement server as well as on the visual studio built-in web server. I can close the browser, wait around 30-40 minutes and browse back to the site and be automatically logged in. However, I've not moved the site to a hosting provider and it seems that whatever I do to my Web.config file, the cookie expires after around 30 minutes (hard to tell the exact amount of time). I have asked the provider's help support and they basically told me: "Web.config file is to configure your website. Please do not change it if you don't know what you are doing" Frustrating answer indeed... To be sure, I checked everywhere on the net for exceptions, fine prints, in the basic asp.net authentication but found none. I have access to IIS remote management for my site (IIS 7) but don't really know where to look. Can there be something in the IIS setting that is overriding my web.config authentication setting? What should I do... Thanks for you help!

    Read the article

  • ASP.NET 2.0 and COM Port Communication

    - by theaviator
    ASP.NET 2.0 and COM Port Communication Hello Guys, I have a managed DLL which communicates with the devices attached on COM/Serial ports. The desktop Winforms application sends requests on ports and receives/stores data in memory. In Winforms app I have added a reference to DLL and I am using the methods. This works well. Now, there is a situation where I need to show this data from serial/com port on a web-page. And also users should be able to send requests to the ports using this DLL. I have made a web app in ASP.NET (2.0). Added a reference to the DLL. I am able to use this DLL, the DLL communicates on the COM upon button click on web-page and also the response is shown on web page. However I am not happy with the approach and strongly feel that this is a bad approach. Also the development server crashes after 3 -4 requests. What is the best approach in this scenario. If I use a windows service then how would my ASP.net app will communicate with the Weindows service. Or can this be easily done using WCF. I have not used WCF any time nor any of .net remoting technique. Please suggest me the best architecture in this scenario. Thank you

    Read the article

  • ServiceLocator has not been initialized; I was trying to retrieve SharpArch.Core.CommonValidator.IVa

    - by Chinmaya
    Server Error in '/' Application. ServiceLocator has not been initialized; I was trying to retrieve SharpArch.Core.CommonValidator.IValidator Description: An unhandled exception occurred during the execution of the current web request. Please review the stack trace for more information about the error and where it originated in the code. Exception Details: System.NullReferenceException: ServiceLocator has not been initialized; I was trying to retrieve SharpArch.Core.CommonValidator.IValidator Source Error: An unhandled exception was generated during the execution of the current web request. Information regarding the origin and location of the exception can be identified using the exception stack trace below. Stack Trace: [NullReferenceException: ServiceLocator has not been initialized; I was trying to retrieve SharpArch.Core.CommonValidator.IValidator] SharpArch.Core.SafeServiceLocator`1.GetService() in C:\MyStuff\Projects\SharpArchGitHub\src\SharpArch\SharpArch.Core\SafeServiceLocator.cs:20 SharpArch.Core.DomainModel.ValidatableObject.get_Validator() in C:\MyStuff\Projects\SharpArchGitHub\src\SharpArch\SharpArch.Core\DomainModel\ValidatableObject.cs:20 SharpArch.Core.DomainModel.ValidatableObject.ValidationResults() in C:\MyStuff\Projects\SharpArchGitHub\src\SharpArch\SharpArch.Core\DomainModel\ValidatableObject.cs:15 SharpArch.Web.ModelBinder.SharpModelBinder.OnModelUpdated(ControllerContext controllerContext, ModelBindingContext bindingContext) in C:\MyStuff\Projects\SharpArchGitHub\src\SharpArch\SharpArch.Web\ModelBinder\SharpModelBinder.cs:40 System.Web.Mvc.DefaultModelBinder.BindComplexElementalModel(ControllerContext controllerContext, ModelBindingContext bindingContext, Object model) +304 System.Web.Mvc.DefaultModelBinder.BindComplexModel(ControllerContext controllerContext, ModelBindingContext bindingContext) +772 System.Web.Mvc.DefaultModelBinder.BindModel(ControllerContext controllerContext, ModelBindingContext bindingContext) +345 SharpArch.Web.ModelBinder.SharpModelBinder.BindModel(ControllerContext controllerContext, ModelBindingContext bindingContext) in C:\MyStuff\Projects\SharpArchGitHub\src\SharpArch\SharpArch.Web\ModelBinder\SharpModelBinder.cs:241 System.Web.Mvc.ControllerActionInvoker.GetParameterValue(ControllerContext controllerContext, ParameterDescriptor parameterDescriptor) +219 System.Web.Mvc.ControllerActionInvoker.GetParameterValues(ControllerContext controllerContext, ActionDescriptor actionDescriptor) +109 System.Web.Mvc.ControllerActionInvoker.InvokeAction(ControllerContext controllerContext, String actionName) +399 System.Web.Mvc.Controller.ExecuteCore() +126 System.Web.Mvc.ControllerBase.Execute(RequestContext requestContext) +27 System.Web.Mvc.ControllerBase.System.Web.Mvc.IController.Execute(RequestContext requestContext) +7 System.Web.Mvc.MvcHandler.ProcessRequest(HttpContextBase httpContext) +151 System.Web.Mvc.MvcHandler.ProcessRequest(HttpContext httpContext) +57 System.Web.Mvc.MvcHandler.System.Web.IHttpHandler.ProcessRequest(HttpContext httpContext) +7 System.Web.CallHandlerExecutionStep.System.Web.HttpApplication.IExecutionStep.Execute() +181 System.Web.HttpApplication.ExecuteStep(IExecutionStep step, Boolean& completedSynchronously) +75

    Read the article

  • ApplicationPoolIdentity permissions on Temporary Asp.Net files

    - by Anton
    Hi all, at work I am struggling a bit with the following situation: We have a web application that runs on a WIndows Server 2008 64 bits machine. The app's ApplicationPool is running under the ApplicationPoolIdentity and configured for .net 2 and Classic pipeline mode. This works fine up to the moment that XmlSerialization requires creation of Serializer assemblies where MEF is being used to create a collection of knowntypes. To remedy this I was hoping that granting the ApplicationPoolIdentity rights to the ASP.Net Temporary Files directory would be enough, but alas... What I did was the run the following command from a cmd prompt: icacls "c:\windows\microsoft.net\framework64\v2.0.50727\Temporary ASP.NET Files" /grant "IIS AppPool\MyAppPool":(M) Obviously this did not work, otherwise you would not be reading this :) Strange thing is that whenever I grant the Users or even more specific, the Authenticated Users Group those permissions, it works. What's weird as well (in my eyes) is that before I started granting access the ApplicationPoolIdentity was already a member of IIS_IUSRS which does have Modify rights for the temporary asp files directory. And now I'm left wondering why this situation requires Modify rights for the Authenticated Users group. I thought it could be because the apppool account was missing additional rights (googling for this returned some results, so I tried those), but granting the ApplicationPoolIdentity modification rights to the Windows\Temp directory and/or the application directory itself did not fix it. For now we have a workaround, but I hate that I don't know what is exactly going on here, so I was hoping any of you guys could shed some light on this. Thanx in advance!

    Read the article

  • .NET 2.0 Application now running slow on IIS 7.5

    - by Valien
    I recently moved (and still in testing) an application from a Windows 2003 Server (Physical box) running IIS 6.x to a Windows 2008 R2 Standard (VM) IIS 7.5 server. The application is a .NET framework 2.0 application and is running under a 2.0 App Pool. This site works great except for one thing: Takes forever to get a request back. I've been tracking it with Chrome Inspect Element and it queries the site and can take up to 45 seconds to answer. Now when it does the page(s) render instantly but it's that initial request that's killing it. I see no error logs or issues with the application or Windows Event Viewer or even IIS logs so not sure where to start looking next. Some new changes was that previously the app resided behind a Pix firewall and now is behind a larger network environment in a DMZ zone (and I believe NetScaler is also being used to manage the network). I do not have rights/abilities to look at the network itself but can contact the Data center folks to look deeper into this but I wanted to make sure it's not my application that might be causing the slowdown or IIS. In summary: .NET 2.0 application works great in IIS 6.x Application moved to an IIS 7.5 server and now slow on rendering but when it does render responds back with pages instantly. Edit for solution Found out that it was the SOAP calls that were slowing the site down. In the new datacenter my application cannot request SOAP calls and so they time out after 40-45 seconds or so. Now trying to find out if I can install a proxy server to redirect this...

    Read the article

  • How to pass an enum to Html.RadioButtonFor to get a list of radio buttons in MVC 2 RC 2, C#

    - by Matt W
    Hi, I'm trying to render a radio button list in MVC 2 RC 2 (C#) using the following line: <%= Html.RadioButtonFor(model => Enum.GetNames(typeof(DataCarry.ProtocolEnum)), null) %> but it's just giving me the following exception at runtime: Templates can be used only with field access, property access, single-dimension array index, or single-parameter custom indexer expressions. Is this possible and if so, how, please? Thanks, Matt.

    Read the article

  • ASP.NET MVC 2 generation of the List/Index view

    - by Klas Mellbourn
    ASP.NET MVC 2 has powerful features for generating the model-dependent content of the Edit view (using EditorForModel) and Details view (using DisplayForModel) that automatically utilizes metadata and editor (or display) templates: <% using (Html.BeginForm()) {%> <%= Html.ValidationSummary(true) %> <fieldset> <legend><%= Html.LabelForModel() %></legend> <%= Html.EditorForModel() %> <p> <input type="submit" value="Save" /> </p> </fieldset> <% } %> However, I cannot find any comparable tools for the "last" step of generating the Index view (a.k.a. the List view). There I have to hard code the columns first in the row representing the headers and then inside the foreach loop: <h2>Index</h2> <table> <tr> <th></th> <th> ID </th> <th> Foo </th> <th> Bar </th> </tr> <% foreach (var item in Model) { %> <tr> <td> <%= Html.ActionLink("Edit", "Edit", new { id=item.ID }) %> | <%= Html.ActionLink("Details", "Details", new { id=item.ID })%> | <%= Html.ActionLink("Delete", "Delete", new { id=item.ID })%> </td> <td> <%= Html.Encode(item.ID) %> </td> <td> <%= Html.Encode(item.Foo) %> </td> <td> <%= Html.Encode(String.Format("{0:g}", item.Bar)) %> </td> </tr> <% } %> </table> What would be the best way to generate the columns (utlizing metadata such as HiddenInput), with the aim of making the Index view as free of model particulars as Edit and Details?

    Read the article

  • Ajax change language

    - by nCdy
    I saw in a lot of AjaxControlToolkit.resources.dll for different languages, even mine (Russian) in my bin folder so I guess that's real to change the language of my Ajax Calendar Extender. <asp:TextBox ID="TextBox4" runat="server" oninit="TextBox4_Init" /> <ajaxToolkit:CalendarExtender ID="TextBox4_CalendarExtender" runat="server" Enabled="True" FirstDayOfWeek="Monday" Format="dd.MM.yyyy" TargetControlID="TextBox4" /> <br /> It's English by default But how can I change it to my Language ? (or to the current culture language)

    Read the article

  • [Method Error 500] in Cascading dropdown update in Ajax Control Toolkit

    - by Vinni
    I am getting [MethodError 500] when I use cascading drop down. below is my code <tr> <td > Select a Hoster: </td> <td> <asp:DropDownList ID="ddlFeaturedHoster" runat="server" ></asp:DropDownList> </td> </tr> <ajaxToolkit:CascadingDropDown ID="cddHoster" runat="server" TargetControlID="ddlFeaturedHoster" PromptText="Select a Hoster" LoadingText="Loading ..." Category="ActiveHoster" ServiceMethod="GetDropDownContents" ServicePath="~/Hosting/HostingService.asmx"/> Service Code: [WebMethod] [ScriptMethod] public CascadingDropDownNameValue[] GetActiveHosters() { List<CascadingDropDownNameValue> returnList = new List<CascadingDropDownNameValue>(); HostersManager hosterManager = new HostersManager(); List<Hosters_HostingProviderDetail> hosters = hosterManager.GetAllHosters(); returnList.Add(new CascadingDropDownNameValue("--Please Select One--","0",true)); foreach (Hosters_HostingProviderDetail item in hosters) { returnList.Add(new CascadingDropDownNameValue() { name=item.HostingProviderName, value= item.HosterID.ToString()}); } return returnList.ToArray() ; } [WebMethod] [ScriptMethod] public CascadingDropDownNameValue[] GetDropDownContents(string knownCategoryValues, string category) { knownCategoryValues = FormatCategoryWord(knownCategoryValues); List<CascadingDropDownNameValue> values = new List<CascadingDropDownNameValue>(); HostersManager hosterManager = new HostersManager(); switch (category) { case "ActiveHoster": values.AddRange(GetActiveHosters()); break; case "ActiveOffer": values.AddRange(GetActiveOffers(1)); break; } return values.ToArray<CascadingDropDownNameValue>(); } /// <summary> /// Formats the category word /// </summary> /// <param name="value"></param> /// <returns></returns> private string FormatCategoryWord(string value) { if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(value)) return value; if (value.LastIndexOf(":") > 0) value = value.Substring(value.LastIndexOf(":") + 1); if (value.LastIndexOf(";") > 0) value = value.Substring(0, value.LastIndexOf(";")); return value; } }

    Read the article

  • multiple applications using same login database logging each other out

    - by Axarydax
    Hello, I've set up two asp.net applications on a machine, their web.config files contain the same applicationName value in AspNetSqlMembershipProvider item so they share users and roles. The problem sequence is: user logs into application A, opens new tab in a browser logs into application B, his login in application A is signed out and vice versa. Should I use different approach to sharing login information between two applications? Thanks.

    Read the article

  • User Profile objects are empty, even user logged-in properly?

    - by Ahmed
    I use asp:Login control, user can login properly, but while checking user Profile information within LoggedIn event of Login control, all of the fields in the Profile objects are empty. Also, User.Identity.IsAuthenticated always returns false. But, all of these issue solved while navigating to another page. Why User.Identity.IsAuthenticated returns false, even user logged-in properly? And, is there any way to get user's profile information within LoggedIn event of Login control?

    Read the article

  • Change Action of Checkbox to Get Instead of Post

    - by Shiraz Bhaiji
    We have an ASP.Net page that uses a checkbox to toggle between a list view and a tree view. The problem is that this triggers a post. When we then click on one of the documents in the list, then press back in the browser, we get a page expired error. Is it possible to change the action of the check box to trigger a get with a parameter?

    Read the article

  • IIS7 - 401.3 Error

    - by Echilon
    I'm trying to get a site working on IIS7 with classic ASP and having problems. I've created a directory and added both Network Service and IIS_IUSRS with full control. I've also changed the anonymous authentication to the application pool identity, but still no joy. I really have no idea what to try next.

    Read the article

  • Routing and Membership

    - by Curtis White
    I have a page that uses routing and it works fine under Visual web developer. But when I deployed to IIS 7. The page that uses routing doesn't seem to recognize the user is logged in. I think I read about this but had not seen it until now. Hope there is a fix! Environment deployed too is ASP.NET 3.5 SP1, SQL SERVER 2008, and IIS 7 integrated. Thanks.

    Read the article

  • How can call a jQuery function when it is inside the formview (asp.net control)?

    - by ricky roy
    Hi, All I have a Span in side the Form view. I wanted to Call a Jquery Fucntion when the from load how can i do this? Thanks Waiting for your reply here is my code <asp:FormView ID="FormView1" runat="server" OnItemCommand="FormView1_ItemCommand"> <ItemTemplate> <asp:HiddenField ID="hidProductID" Value='<%#Eval("ProductID") %>' runat="server" /> <asp:HiddenField ID="hidCustomerID" Value='<%#Eval("CustomerID") %>' runat="server" /> <a href='<%=WinToSave.SettingsConstants.SiteURL%>WintoSave/AuctionProduct.aspx?id=<%#Eval("ProductID") %>'> <%#Eval("ProductName")%> </a> <br /> <img src='<%#Eval("ImagePath")%>' alt="Image No available" /> <br /> <asp:Label ID="lblTime" runat="server" Text='<%#Convert.ToDateTime(Eval("ModifiedOn")).ToString("hh:mm:ss") %>'></asp:Label> <span id='Countdown_<%#Eval("ProductID") %>' onload="GetTimeOnLoad('<%#Eval("ModifiedOn")%>','Countdown_<%#Eval("ProductID") %>');"></span> <br /> <asp:Label ID="lblFinalPrice" runat="server" Text='<%#Convert.ToDouble(Eval("FinalPrice")).ToString("#.00")%>'></asp:Label> <br /> <asp:Label ID="lblFullName" runat="server" Text='<%#Eval("FullName") %>'></asp:Label> <br /> <asp:Button ID="btnAddbid" Text="Bid" CommandName="AddBid" CommandArgument='<%#Eval("ID")%>' runat="server" /> </ItemTemplate> </asp:FormView> and following is my jquery code function GetTimeOnLoad(shortly,DivID) { var dt = new Date(shortly); alert(dt); alert(shortly); alert(DivID); var ProductDivID = "#" +DivID; alert(ProductDivID); $(ProductDivID).countdown({ until: dt, onExpiry: liftOff, onTick: watchCountdown, format: 'HMS', layout: '{hnn}{sep}{mnn}{sep}{snn}' }); } function liftOff(){}; function watchCountdown(){}; In above code I Used ' onload="GetTimeOnLoad('<%#Eval("ModifiedOn")%','Countdown_<%#Eval("ProductID") %');" but is not working

    Read the article

  • If I replace an image in a PictureBox control, should I dispose the original image first? .Net Winfo

    - by Jules
    Following on from my question here http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2548664/long-overdue-for-me-question-about-disposing-managed-objects-in-net-vb-net , If I replace an image in a picture box, should I dispose the original image first? Or, what about this situation: Dim bm As New Bitmap(32,32) bm = New Bitmap(32,32) bm = New Bitmap(32,32) bm = New Bitmap(32,32) Does bm need only to be disposed at the end, or should it be disposed before each re-creation?

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293  | Next Page >