Search Results

Search found 7311 results on 293 pages for 'rows'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 29/293 | < Previous Page | 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36  | Next Page >

  • optional search parameters in sql query and rows with null values

    - by glenn.danthi
    Ok here is my problem : Before i start the description, let me to tell you that I have googled up a lot and I am posting this question for a good optimal solution :) i am building a rest service on WCF to get userProfiles... the user can filter userProfiles by giving something like userProfiles?location=London now i have the following method GetUserProfiles(string firstname, string lastname, string age, string location) the sql query string i built is: select firstname, lastname, .... from profiles where (firstName like '%{firstname}%') AND (lastName like '%{lastName}%') ....and so on with all variables being replaced by string formatter. Problem with this is that it filters any row having firstname, lastname, age or location having a null value.... doing something like (firstName like '%{firstName}%' OR firstName IS NULL) would be tedious and the statement would become unmaintanable! (in this example there are only 4 arguments, but in my actual method there are 10) What would be the best solution for this?....How is this situation usually handled? Database used : MySql

    Read the article

  • How to mutate rows of data frame - replacing one value with another

    - by rhh
    I'm having trouble with what I think is a basic R task. Here's my sample dataframe named 'b' Winner Color Size Tom Yellow Med Jerry Yellow Lar Jane Blue Med where items in the Winner column are factors. I'm trying to change "Tom" in the dataframe to "Tom LLC" and I can't get it done. Here's what I tried: Simple way: b$winner[b$winner=='Tom'] = as.factor('Tom LLC') but that failed with "invalid factor level, NAs generated" Next I tried a more advanced route: name_reset = function (x, y, z) { if (x$winner == y) {x$winner = z} } b = adply(b,1,name_reset,'Tom','Tom LLC') but that failed with "Error in list_to_dataframe(res, attr(.data, "split_labels")) : Results are not equal lengths" I feel I'm missing something basic. Can someone redirect me or offer suggestions on the code I wrote above? Thank you very much

    Read the article

  • Reorganizing MySQL table to multiple rows by timestamp.

    - by Ben Burleson
    OK MySQL Wizards: I have a table of position data from multiple probes defined as follows: +----------+----------+------+-----+---------+-------+ | Field | Type | Null | Key | Default | Extra | +----------+----------+------+-----+---------+-------+ | time | datetime | NO | | NULL | | | probe_id | char(3) | NO | | NULL | | | position | float | NO | | NULL | | +----------+----------+------+-----+---------+-------+ A simple select outputs something like this: +---------------------+----------+----------+ | time | probe_id | position | +---------------------+----------+----------+ | 2010-05-05 14:16:42 | 00A | 0.0045 | | 2010-05-05 14:16:42 | 00B | 0.0005 | | 2010-05-05 14:16:42 | 00C | 0.002 | | 2010-05-05 14:16:42 | 01A | 0 | | 2010-05-05 14:16:42 | 01B | 0.001 | | 2010-05-05 14:16:42 | 01C | 0.0025 | | 2010-05-05 14:16:43 | 00A | 0.0045 | | 2010-05-05 14:16:43 | 00B | 0.0005 | | 2010-05-05 14:16:43 | 00C | 0.002 | | 2010-05-05 14:16:43 | 01A | 0 | | . | . | . | | . | . | . | | . | . | . | +---------------------+----------+----------+ However, I'd like to output something like this: +---------------------+--------+--------+-------+-----+-------+--------+ | time | 00A | 00B | 00C | 01A | 01B | 01C | +---------------------+--------+--------+-------+-----+-------+--------+ | 2010-05-05 14:16:42 | 0.0045 | 0.0005 | 0.002 | 0 | 0.001 | 0.0025 | | 2010-05-05 14:16:43 | 0.0045 | 0.0005 | 0.002 | 0 | 0.001 | 0.0025 | | 2010-05-05 14:16:44 | 0.0045 | 0.0005 | 0.002 | 0 | 0.001 | 0.0025 | | 2010-05-05 14:16:45 | 0.0045 | 0.0005 | 0.002 | 0 | 0.001 | 0.0025 | | 2010-05-05 14:16:46 | 0.0045 | 0.0005 | 0.002 | 0 | 0.001 | 0.0025 | | 2010-05-05 14:16:47 | 0.0045 | 0.0005 | 0.002 | 0 | 0.001 | 0.0025 | | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | +---------------------+--------+--------+-------+-----+-------+--------+ Ideally, the different probe position columns are dynamically generated based on data in the table. Is this possible, or am I pulling my hair out for nothing? I've tried GROUP BY time with GROUP_CONCAT that roughly gets the data out, but I can't separate that output into probe_id columns. mysql SELECT time, GROUP_CONCAT(probe_id), GROUP_CONCAT(position) FROM MG41 GROUP BY time LIMIT 10; +---------------------+-------------------------+------------------------------------+ | time | GROUP_CONCAT(probe_id) | GROUP_CONCAT(position) | +---------------------+-------------------------+------------------------------------+ | 2010-05-05 14:16:42 | 00A,00B,00C,01A,01B,01C | 0.0045,0.0005,0.002,0,0.001,0.0025 | | 2010-05-05 14:16:43 | 01C,01B,01A,00C,00B,00A | 0.0025,0.001,0,0.002,0.0005,0.0045 | | 2010-05-05 14:16:44 | 01C,01B,01A,00C,00B,00A | 0.0025,0.001,0,0.002,0.0005,0.0045 | | 2010-05-05 14:16:45 | 01C,01B,01A,00C,00B,00A | 0.0025,0.001,0,0.002,0.0005,0.0045 | | 2010-05-05 14:16:46 | 01C,01B,01A,00C,00B,00A | 0.0025,0.001,0,0.002,0.0005,0.0045 | | 2010-05-05 14:16:47 | 01C,01B,01A,00C,00B,00A | 0.0025,0.001,0,0.002,0.0005,0.0045 | | 2010-05-05 14:16:48 | 01C,01B,01A,00C,00B,00A | 0.0025,0.001,0,0.002,0.0005,0.0045 | | 2010-05-05 14:16:49 | 01C,01B,01A,00C,00B,00A | 0.0025,0.001,0,0.002,0.0005,0.0045 | | 2010-05-05 14:16:50 | 01C,01B,01A,00C,00B,00A | 0.0025,0.001,0,0.002,0.0005,0.0045 | | 2010-05-05 14:16:51 | 01C,01B,01A,00C,00B,00A | 0.0025,0.001,0,0.002,0.0005,0.0045 | +---------------------+-------------------------+------------------------------------+

    Read the article

  • acts_as_solr returns all rows in the database when using the model as search query

    - by chris Chan
    In our application we're using acts_as_solr for search. Everything seems to be running smoothly except for the fact that using the model name as the search query returns every single row in the table. For example, let's say we have a users table. We specify acts_as_solr in our model to search the fields first name, last name and handle acts_as_solr :fields = [:handle, :lname, :fname]. When you use "user" as the search term it returns every single user in the system, or every row in the database as a result. Has anyone else run into this?

    Read the article

  • How to select DISTINCT rows without having the ORDER BY field selected

    - by JannieT
    So I have two tables students (PK sID) and mentors (PK pID). This query SELECT s.pID FROM students s JOIN mentors m ON s.pID = m.pID WHERE m.tags LIKE '%a%' ORDER BY s.sID DESC; delivers this result pID ------------- 9 9 3 9 3 9 9 9 10 9 3 10 etc... I am trying to get a list of distinct mentor ID's with this ordering so I am looking for the SQL to produce pID ------------- 9 3 10 If I simply insert a DISTINCT in the SELECT clause I get an unexpected result of 10, 9, 3 (wrong order). Any help much appreciated.

    Read the article

  • AVG time spent on multiple rows SQL-server?

    - by seo20
    I have a table tblSequence with 3 cols in MS SQL: ID, IP, [Timestamp] Content could look like this: ID IP [Timestamp] -------------------------------------------------- 4347 62.107.95.103 2010-05-24 09:27:50.470 4346 62.107.95.103 2010-05-24 09:27:45.547 4345 62.107.95.103 2010-05-24 09:27:36.940 4344 62.107.95.103 2010-05-24 09:27:29.347 4343 62.107.95.103 2010-05-24 09:27:12.080 ID is unique, there can be n number of IP's. Would like to calculate the average time spent per IP. in a single row Know you can do something like this: SELECT CAST(AVG(CAST(MyTable.MyDateTimeFinish - MyTable.MyDateTimeStart AS float)) AS datetime) But how on earth do I find the first and last entry of my unique IP row so I can have a start and finish time? I'M stuck. Would like to calculate the average time spent per IP. in a single row

    Read the article

  • SQL: GROUP BY after JOIN without overriding rows?

    - by krismeld
    I have a table of basketball leagues, a table af teams and a table of players like this: LEAGUES ID | NAME | ------------------ 1 | NBA | 2 | ABA | TEAMS: ID | NAME | LEAGUE_ID ------------------------------ 20 | BULLS | 1 21 | KNICKS | 2 PLAYERS: ID | TEAM_ID | FIRST_NAME | LAST_NAME | --------------------------------------------- 1 | 21 | John | Starks | 2 | 21 | Patrick | Ewing | Given a League ID, I would like to retrieve all the players' names and their team ID from all the teams in that league, so I do this: SELECT t.id AS team_id, p.id AS player_id, p.first_name, p.last_name FROM teams AS t JOIN players AS p ON p.team_id = t.id WHERE t.league_id = 1 which returns: [0] => stdClass Object ( [team_id] => 21 [player_id] => 1 [first_name] => John [last_name] => Starks ) [1] => stdClass Object ( [team_id] => 21 [player_id] => 2 [first_name] => Patrick [last_name] => Ewing ) + around 500 more objects... Since I will use this result to populate a dropdown menu for each team containing each team's list of players, I would like to group my result by team ID, so the loop to create these dropdowns will only have to cycle through each team ID instead of all 500+ players each time. But when I use the GROUP BY like this: SELECT t.id AS team_id, p.id AS player_id, p.first_name, p.last_name FROM teams AS t JOIN players AS p ON p.team_id = t.id WHERE t.league_id = 1 GROUP BY t.id it only returns one player from each team like this, overriding all the other players on the same team because of the use of the same column names. [0] => stdClass Object ( [team_id] => 21 [player_id] => 2 [first_name] => Patrick [last_name] => Ewing ) [1] => stdClass Object ( [team_id] => 22 [player_id] => 31 [first_name] => Shawn [last_name] => Kemp ) etc... I would like to return something like this: [0] => stdClass Object ( [team_id] => 2 [player_id1] => 1 [first_name1] => John [last_name1] => Starks [player_id2] => 2 [first_name2] => Patrick [last_name2] => Ewing +10 more players from this team... ) +25 more teams... Is it possible somehow?

    Read the article

  • SQL Server combining 2 rows into 1 from the same table

    - by Maton
    Hi, I have a table with an JobID (PK), EmployeeID (FK), StartDate, EndDate containing data such as: 1, 10, '01-Jan-2010 08:00:00', '01-Jan-2010 08:30:00' 2, 10, '01-Jan-2010 08:50:00', '01-Jan-2010 09:05:00' 3, 10, '02-Feb-2010 10:00:00', '02-Feb-2010 10:30:00' I want to return a record for each EndDate for a Job and then the same employees StartDate for his next immediate job (by date time). So from the data above the result would be Result 1: 10, 01-Jan-2010 08:30:00, 01-Jan-2010 08:50:00 Result 2: 10, 01-Jan-2010 09:05:00, 02-Feb-2010 10:00:00 Greatly appreciate any help!

    Read the article

  • MySQL Query order by numer of rows?

    - by Clemens
    hi, i have a mysql table for votes. there's am id, a project_id and a vote field (which is 1 if a specific project is voted). now i want to generate a ranking from those entries. is there a way to get the number of votes for each project_id and automatically sort the entries by the number of TRUE votes of a project with a single mysql query? Or do you know a php way? e.g. ID - Project ID - Vote 1 - 2 - 1 2 - 2 - 1 3 - 1 - 1 == Project Nr. 2 has 2 Votes Project Nr. 1 has 1 Vote Thanks in advance!

    Read the article

  • wordpress num rows, how?

    - by krike
    I'm creating a plugin for wordpress and I need to check if a post with a specific title exist or not. This to prevent duplicates, how can I query this and see if it returned true or false?

    Read the article

  • How to achieve table like rows within container using CSS

    - by Barry
    I'm helping an artist maintain her website and have inherited some pretty outdated code. Have moved lots of redundant common code to include files and am now working on moving from inline styles to more CSS-driven styles. For the gallery pages, e.g. http://artistsatlaketahoe.com/abstract.html, a lot of inline styling is used to force the current layout. My preference would be to replace this entirely with CSS that presents the following table-like layout within the "content" div: [image] [image descriptives and purchase button] [image] [image descriptives and purchase button] [image] [image descriptives and purchase button] I'd like to middle-align the image descriptives & purchase button relative to the image if possible. And then apply some padding above and below each row to stop using tags for vertical spacing. Any ideas how to create a div that I can use to get this kind of layout? Thanks!

    Read the article

  • Recursive query question - break rows into columns?

    - by Stew
    I have a table "Families", like so FamilyID PersonID Relationship ----------------------------------------------- F001 P001 Son F001 P002 Daughter F001 P003 Father F001 P004 Mother F002 P005 Daughter F002 P006 Mother F003 P007 Son F003 P008 Mother and I need output like FamilyID PersonID Father Mother ------------------------------------------------- F001 P001 P003 P004 F001 P002 P003 P004 F001 P003 F001 P004 F002 P005 P006 F002 P006 F003 P007 P008 F003 P008 In which the PersonID of the Father and Mother for a given PersonID are listed (if applicable) in separate columns. I know this must be a relatively trivial query to write (and therefore to find instructions for), but I can't seem to come up with the right search terms. Searching "SQL recursive queries" has gotten me closest, but I can't quite translate those methods to what I'm trying to do here. I'm trying to learn, so multiple methods are welcome, as is vocabulary I should read up on. Thanks!

    Read the article

  • selecting among duplicated rows in VBA _updated

    - by Elaine Kuo
    I wanna select one row of each duplicated SIDs in a field below. (an attribute table of a shape file) The priority is R S = I 0 Therefore, among SID 87, FID1 will be selected. (SID 88, STATUS will be S+I) (SID 89, FID 6 will be chosen) (SID 90, deleting FID 9 or 10) Please kindly advise VBA cord to run the selection and thanks. FID SID STATUS 1 87 R 2 87 O 3 88 I 4 88 S 5 89 I 6 89 R 7 89 I 8 89 S 9 90 S 10 90 S

    Read the article

  • Copy Rows in a One to Many with LINQ (2 SQL)

    - by Refracted Paladin
    I have a table that stores a bunch of diagnosis for a single plan. When the users create a new plan I need to copy over all existing diagnosis's as well. I had thought to try the below but this is obviously not correct. I am guessing that I will need to loop through my oldDiagnosis part, but how? Thanks! My Attempt so far... public static void CopyPlanDiagnosis(int newPlanID, int oldPlanID) { using (var context = McpDataContext.Create()) { var oldDiagnosis = from planDiagnosi in context.tblPlanDiagnosis where planDiagnosi.PlanID == oldPlanID select planDiagnosi; var newDiagnosis = new tblPlanDiagnosi { PlanID = newPlanID, DiagnosisCueID = oldDiagnosis.DiagnosisCueID, DiagnosisOther = oldDiagnosis.DiagnosisOther, AdditionalInfo = oldDiagnosis.AdditionalInfo, rowguid = Guid.NewGuid() }; context.tblPlanDiagnosis.InsertOnSubmit(newDiagnosis); context.SubmitChanges(); } }

    Read the article

  • Compare rows between 2 tables

    - by arthur
    I am new to SQL and I need to build a database for a grocery store(not real, just a course assignment) i have two fields from two different tables - supplied price - the price that the store buys from the supplier and price that is given to the customers How can I make a constraint that insures that supplied price is lower then the price that is given to the customers? The relevant tables that I have are: CREATE TABLE Supplied_Products( [Supplier ID] Int NOT NULL Foreign Key References Suppliers, [Product ID] Int NOT NULL Foreign Key References Products, Price Float NOT NULL, CHECK (Price0), Constraint PK_Supplied_Products PRIMARY KEY([Supplier ID] ,[Product ID]) ) CREATE TABLE Products( [Product-ID] Int NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY, [Product Name] Varchar(20) NOT NULL, Price Float NOT NULL, [Category-Name] Varchar(20) NOT NULL Foreign Key References Categories, [Weight] Float NOT NULL, [Is Refrigirated] Varchar(1) DEFAULT 'N' CHECK ([Is Refrigirated] in('Y','N')),/* Is Refrigirated can be only Y-yes or N-no*/ CHECK (Price 0) )

    Read the article

  • Kohana 3 - Query builder gives 0 rows

    - by pigfox
    The following query returns one row as expected when run from phpmyadmin. SELECT units . * , locations . * FROM units, locations WHERE units.id = '1' AND units.location_id = locations.id LIMIT 0 , 30 But when I try to do it in Kohana 3: $unit = DB::select('units.*', 'locations.*') ->from('units', 'locations') ->where('units.id', '=', $id)->and_where('units.location_id', '=', 'locations.id') ->execute()->as_array(); var_dump($unit); It prints array(0) { } What am I doing wrong?

    Read the article

  • count and fetch rows in php

    - by Mac Taylor
    hey guys i have a table in my mysql database named (names) now everyone can save their real names now i want to query this table and find out how many times these names used forexample the output should be : Jakob (20) Jenny (17) now this is my own code : list($usernames) =mysql_fetch_row(mysql_query('SELECT name FROM table_user GROUP BY name ORDER BY COUNT(name) DESC LIMIT 50 ')); list($c) =mysql_num_rows(mysql_query('SELECT COUNT(name) FROM table_user GROUP BY name ')); print $usernames.'('.$c.')' is this a correct approach ?!

    Read the article

  • Detecting changes between rows with same ID

    - by Noah
    I have a table containing some names and their associated ID, along with a snapshot: snapshot, id, name I need to identify when a name has changed for an id between snapshots. For example, in the following data: 1, 0, 'MOUSE_SPEED' 1, 1, 'MOUSE_POS' 1, 2, 'KEYBOARD_STATE' 2, 0, 'MOUSE_BUTTONS' 2, 1, 'MOUSE_POS' 2, 2, 'KEYBOARD_STATE' ...the meaning of id 0 changed with snapshot 2, but the others remained the same. I'd like to construct a query that (ideally) returns: 1, 0, 'MOUSE_SPEED' 2, 0, 'MOUSE_BUTTONS' I am using PostgreSQL v8.4.2.

    Read the article

  • MySql - only update some rows if the table exists - do not want an error thrown

    - by Pete Oakey
    I want to run an update query. The query will be run against multiple databases - not every database will have the table. I don't want the update to be attempted if the table does not exist. I don't want any error to be thrown - I just want the update to be ignored. Any ideas? EDIT: just to be clear - the query is executed in an automated deployment - no human interaction possible. EDIT2: the logic to say whether the update should run or not will need to be in the MySql query itself. This is not being run through a command prompt or batch or managed code.

    Read the article

  • Updating/Inserting multiple rows using jQuery and OData (WCF Data Services)

    - by Pieter
    I have three tables, Template, Fields and TemplateFields. TemplateFields holds the selected fields for each template. I need to update TemplateFields when the user is finished selecting the fields. The only way I can see to do this is by deleting all the TemplateFields for that Template and then add them one by one in separate requests. This is really bad because there is not transaction to fall back onto and there will also be MANY requests. Is there a way of adding multiple 'objects' at once using WCF Data Services? I can then use an Interceptor to update the database.

    Read the article

  • Hibernate: Walk millions of rows and don't leak memory

    - by Autocracy
    The below code functions, but Hibernate never lets go of its grip of any object. Calling session.clear() causes exceptions regarding fetching a joined class, and calling session.evict(currentObject) before retrieving the next object also fails to free the memory. Eventually I exhaust my heap space. Checking my heap dumps, StatefulPersistenceContext is the garbage collector's root for all references pointing to my objects. public class CriteriaReportSource implements JRDataSource { private ScrollableResults sr; private Object currentObject; private Criteria c; private static final int scrollSize = 10; private int offset = 1; public CriteriaReportSource(Criteria c) { this.c = c; advanceScroll(); } private void advanceScroll() { // ((Session) Main.em.getDelegate()).clear(); this.sr = c.setFirstResult(offset) .setMaxResults(scrollSize) .scroll(ScrollMode.FORWARD_ONLY); offset += scrollSize; } public boolean next() { if (sr.next()) { currentObject = sr.get(0); if (sr.isLast()) { advanceScroll(); } return true; } return false; } public Object getFieldValue(JRField jrf) throws JRException { Object retVal = null; if(currentObject == null) { return null; } try { retVal = PropertyUtils.getProperty(currentObject, jrf.getName()); } catch (Exception ex) { Logger.getLogger(CriteriaReportSource.class.getName()).log(Level.SEVERE, null, ex); } return retVal; } }

    Read the article

  • How to return number of rows in the template

    - by xRobot
    In my view I return all posts of one blog: posts = Post.objects.filter(blog=blog) and pass it to context. But.. How can I get the number of posts in the template ? This is my template: <h1>Number of posts: {{ ??? }} </h1> {% for post in posts %} {{ post.title }} {{ post.body }} {% endfor %}

    Read the article

  • table design for storing large number of rows

    - by hyperboreean
    I am trying to store in a postgresql database some unique identifiers along with the site they have been seen on. I can't really decide which of the following 3 option to choose in order to be faster and easy maintainable. The table would have to provide the following information: the unique identifier which unfortunately it's text the sites on which that unique identifier has been seen The amount of data that would have to hold is rather large: there are around 22 millions unique identifiers that I know of. So I thought about the following designs of the table: id - integer identifier - text seen_on_site - an integer, foreign key to a sites table This approach would require around 22 mil multiplied by the number of sites. id - integer identifier - text seen_on_site_1 - boolean seen_on_site_2 - boolean ............ seen_on_site_n - boolean Hopefully the number of sites won't go past 10. This would require only the number of unique identifiers that I know of, that is around 20 millions, but it would make it hard to work with it from an ORM perspective. one table that would store only unique identifiers, like in: id - integer unique_identifier - text, one table that would store only sites, like in: id - integer site - text and one many to many relation, like: id - integer, unique_id - integer (fk to the table storing identifiers) site_id - integer (fk to sites table) another approach would be to have a table that stores unique identifiers for each site So, which one seems like a better approach to take on the long run?

    Read the article

  • SQL 2005 Merge / concatenate multiple rows to one column

    - by Dave
    Hi, We have a bit of a SQL quandry. Say I have a results that look like this... 61E77D90-D53D-4E2E-A09E-9D6F012EB59C | A 61E77D90-D53D-4E2E-A09E-9D6F012EB59C | B 61E77D90-D53D-4E2E-A09E-9D6F012EB59C | C 61E77D90-D53D-4E2E-A09E-9D6F012EB59C | D 7ce953ca-a55b-4c55-a52c-9d6f012ea903 | E 7ce953ca-a55b-4c55-a52c-9d6f012ea903 | F is there a way I can group these results within SQL to return as 61E77D90-D53D-4E2E-A09E-9D6F012EB59C | A B C D 7ce953ca-a55b-4c55-a52c-9d6f012ea903 | E F Any ideas people? Many thanks Dave

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36  | Next Page >