Search Results

Search found 33246 results on 1330 pages for 'gae java'.

Page 304/1330 | < Previous Page | 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311  | Next Page >

  • Java: Comparing a class with another within that class using a my own .equals

    - by user1670252
    I am making a method .equals replacing the equals method used. It accepts a object. I want it to check if that object equals the class that runs the .equals class. I know I want to compare all the private methods I have to that object. Is there a way to do this without making another private class to get the private variables from the object? How do I do this to compare equality not identity? I am stuck on this. Do i have to use == to compare? Also looking online i see others use recursion. If this is the way i have to do it can you show and explain it to me? so an example i have public boolean equals(Object o) { this is in a class we will call bobtheBuilder (first thing to pop in my head) I want to check if the object o is equal to the class he has private object array and a private int. I assume I want to check if the array and int of this class equal the array and int of the object.

    Read the article

  • Java serialization testing

    - by Jeff Storey
    Does anyone know if there is a library that exists to help test if an object graph is fully serializable? It would probably be as simple as writing it out and reading it back in, but I figured someone must have abstracted this already - I just can't find it.

    Read the article

  • java regular expression

    - by BSingh
    I am trying to write a regular expression for somethin like s1 = I am at Boston at Dowtown s2 = I am at Miami I am interested in the words after at eg: Boston, Downtown, Miami I have not been successful in creating a regex for that. Somethin like > .*? (at \w+)+.* gives just Boston in s1 (Downtown is missed). it just matches the first "at" Any suggestions

    Read the article

  • Authorization engine in java

    - by eltados
    In the course of my work i need to develop an authorization engine ( i'm already authenticated and i check access of a user to an action ) in order to store all the authorization logic inside a same place and be able to reuse it and i have created the mini library. http://github.com/eltados/canny what do you think about it? Is there any lightweight Authorization engine library i could have a look at?

    Read the article

  • Parse XML with XPath & namespaces in Java

    - by ripper234
    Can you help me adjust this code so it manages to parse the XML? If I drop the XML namespace it works: String webXmlContent = "<?xml version=\"1.0\" encoding=\"UTF-8\"?>\n" + "<foo xmlns=\"http://foo.bar/boo\"><bar>baz</bar></foo>"; DocumentBuilderFactory domFactory = DocumentBuilderFactory.newInstance(); domFactory.setNamespaceAware(true); DocumentBuilder builder = domFactory.newDocumentBuilder(); org.w3c.dom.Document doc = builder.parse(new StringInputStream(webXmlContent)); NamespaceContextImpl namespaceContext = new NamespaceContextImpl(); namespaceContext.startPrefixMapping("foo", "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"); XPath xpath = XPathFactory.newInstance().newXPath(); xpath.setNamespaceContext(namespaceContext); XPathExpression expr = xpath.compile("/foo/bar"); Object result = expr.evaluate(doc, XPathConstants.NODESET); NodeList nodes = (NodeList) result; System.out.println("Got " + nodes.getLength() + " nodes");

    Read the article

  • Why is run() not immediately called when start() called on a thread object in java

    - by pi
    Or is it? I have a thread object from: Thread myThread = new Thread(pObject); Where pObject is an object of a class implementing the Runnable interface and then I have the start method called on the thread object like so: myThread.start(); Now, my understanding is that when start() is called, the JVM implicitly (and immediately) calls the run() method which may be overridden (as it is in my case) However, in my case, it appears that the start() method is not called immediately (as desired) but until the other statements/methods are completed from the calling block i.e. if I had a method after the start() call like so: myThread.start(); doSomethingElse(); doSomthingElse() gets executed before the run() method is run at all. Perhaps I am wrong with the initial premise that run() is always called right after the start() is called. Please help! The desired again is making executing run() right after start(). Thanks.

    Read the article

  • Should I avoid using Java Label Statements?

    - by Kamikaze Mercenary
    Today I had a coworker suggest I refactor my code to use a label statement to control flow through 2 nested for loops I had created. I've never used them before because personally I think they decrease the readability of a program. I am willing to change my mind about using them if the argument is solid enough however. What are people's opinions on label statements?

    Read the article

  • Gracefully avoiding NullPointerException in Java

    - by Yuval A
    Consider this line: if (object.getAttribute("someAttr").equals("true")) { // .... Obviously this line is a potential bug, the attribute might be null and we will get a NullPointerException. So we need to refactor it to one of two choices: First option: if ("true".equals(object.getAttribute("someAttr"))) { // .... Second option: String attr = object.getAttribute("someAttr"); if (attr != null) { if (attr.equals("true")) { // .... The first option is awkward to read but more concise, while the second one is clear in intent, but verbose. Which option do you prefer in terms of readability?

    Read the article

  • Revalidate and repaint - Java Swing

    - by bosra
    I have a JPanel that I am adding JLabel's to. I then want to remove all the JLabels and add some new ones. So I do the following: panel.removeAll();panel.repaint(); panel.add(new JLabel("Add something new"); panel.revalidate(); This works fine. My problem arises when I start a new thread after this like: panel.removeAll();panel.repaint(); (1)panel.add(new JLabel("Add something new"); panel.revalidate(); //new thread to start - this thread creates new JLabels that should appear under (1) firstProducer.start(); try { firstProducer.join(); } catch (InterruptedException e) { // TODO Auto-generated catch block e.printStackTrace(); } Then the output from the original JLabels is still visible. I have read that the revalidate process is a long running task and hence the firstProducer thread is getting started while the revalidation is going on and a conflict is arising. What is the best way to deal with this?

    Read the article

  • Embeddable database better than SQLite for java

    - by dexter
    I am creating a web application that is accessing a SQLite database in the server. I also have "clients" that updates this same database. As we know SQLite locks the entire database during INSERTs which are done by the clients and the web application is also trying to make some UPDATEs at the same time. So my problem now is about concurrency in database access. I would like to use an embeddable database like SQLite. Any suggestions.

    Read the article

  • Distinguish between a single click and a double click in Java

    - by user552279
    Hi, I search the forum and see this codes: public void mouseClicked(MouseEvent e) { if (e.getClickCount() == 2) { System.out.println(" and it's a double click!"); wasDoubleClick = true; } else { Integer timerinterval = (Integer) Toolkit.getDefaultToolkit().getDesktopProperty( "awt.multiClickInterval"); timer = new Timer(timerinterval.intValue(), new ActionListener() { public void actionPerformed(ActionEvent evt) { if (wasDoubleClick) { wasDoubleClick = false; // reset flag } else { System.out.println(" and it's a simple click!"); } } }); timer.setRepeats(false); timer.start(); } } but the code runs incorrectly(Sometime it prints out " and it's a single click!" 2 times . It should print out " and it's a double click!"). Can anybody show me why? or can you give me some better ways to do this? Thank you!

    Read the article

  • Java: how to use Google's HashBiMap?

    - by HH
    Keys are a file and a word. The file gives all words inside the file. The word gives all files having the word. I am unsure of the domain and co-domain parts. I want K to be of the type <String> and V to be of type <HashSet<FileObject>>. public HashBiMap<K<String>,V<HashSet<FileObject>>> wordToFiles = new HashBiMap<K<String>,V<HashSet<FileObject>>>(); public HashBiMap<K<String>,V<HashSet<FileObject>>> fileToWords = new HashBiMap<K<String>,V<HashSet<FileObject>>>(); Google's HashBiMap.

    Read the article

  • Ajax file uploading with java back end?

    - by Joren
    I don't want to use flash. I've found multiple jquery libraries that do this. Right now I'm using this one: http://demo.webdeveloperplus.com/ajax-file-upload/ The problem is they all use PHP. I tried just pointing it at my servlet instead of the PHP file, but it never gets called.

    Read the article

  • Java method: retrieve the inheriting type

    - by DrDro
    I have several classes that extend C and I would need a method that accepts any argument of type C. But in this method I would like to know if I'm dealing with A or B. * public A extends C public B extends C public void goForIt(C c)() If I cast how can I retrieve the type in a clean way (I just read using getClass or instanceof is often not the best way). *Sorry but I can't type closing braces

    Read the article

  • Fastest way to pad a number in Java to a certain number of digits

    - by Martin
    Am trying to create a well-optimised bit of code to create number of X-digits in length (where X is read from a runtime properties file), based on a DB-generated sequence number (Y), which is then used a folder-name when saving a file. I've come up with three ideas so far, the fastest of which is the last one, but I'd appreciate any advice people may have on this... 1) Instantiate a StringBuilder with initial capacity X. Append Y. While length < X, insert a zero at pos zero. 2) Instantiate a StringBuilder with initial capacity X. While length < X, append a zero. Create a DecimalFormat based on StringBuilder value, and then format the number when it's needed. 3) Create a new int of Math.pow( 10, X ) and add Y. Use String.valueOf() on the new number and then substring(1) it. The second one can obviously be split into outside-loop and inside-loop sections. So, any tips? Using a for-loop of 10,000 iterations, I'm getting similar timings from the first two, and the third method is approximately ten-times faster. Does this seem correct? Full test-method code below... // Setup test variables int numDigits = 9; int testNumber = 724; int numIterations = 10000; String folderHolder = null; DecimalFormat outputFormat = new DecimalFormat( "#,##0" ); // StringBuilder test long before = System.nanoTime(); for ( int i = 0; i < numIterations; i++ ) { StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder( numDigits ); sb.append( testNumber ); while ( sb.length() < numDigits ) { sb.insert( 0, 0 ); } folderHolder = sb.toString(); } long after = System.nanoTime(); System.out.println( "01: " + outputFormat.format( after - before ) + " nanoseconds" ); System.out.println( "Sanity check: Folder = \"" + folderHolder + "\"" ); // DecimalFormat test before = System.nanoTime(); StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder( numDigits ); while ( sb.length() < numDigits ) { sb.append( 0 ); } DecimalFormat formatter = new DecimalFormat( sb.toString() ); for ( int i = 0; i < numIterations; i++ ) { folderHolder = formatter.format( testNumber ); } after = System.nanoTime(); System.out.println( "02: " + outputFormat.format( after - before ) + " nanoseconds" ); System.out.println( "Sanity check: Folder = \"" + folderHolder + "\"" ); // Substring test before = System.nanoTime(); int baseNum = (int)Math.pow( 10, numDigits ); for ( int i = 0; i < numIterations; i++ ) { int newNum = baseNum + testNumber; folderHolder = String.valueOf( newNum ).substring( 1 ); } after = System.nanoTime(); System.out.println( "03: " + outputFormat.format( after - before ) + " nanoseconds" ); System.out.println( "Sanity check: Folder = \"" + folderHolder + "\"" );

    Read the article

  • java statistics collection for performance evaluation

    - by user384706
    What is the most efficient way to collect and report performance statistic analysis from an application? If I have an application that uses a series of network apis, and I want to report statistics at runtime, e.g. Method doA() was called 3 times and consumed on avg 500ms Method doB() was called 5 times and consumed on avg 1200ms etc Then, I thought of using a well defined data structure (of collection) that each thread updates per remote call, and this can be used for the report. But I think that it will make the performance worse, for the time spend for statistics collection. Am I correct? How would I procceed if I used a background thread for this, and the other threads that did the remote calls were unaware of this collection gathering? Thanks

    Read the article

  • Statically checking a Java app for link errors

    - by monorailkitty
    I have a scenario where I have code written against version 1 of a library but I want to ship version 2 of the library instead. The code has shipped and is therefore not changeable. I'm concerned that it might try to access classes or members of the library that existed in v1 but have been removed in v2. I figured it would be possible to write a tool to do a simple check to see if the code will link against the newer version of the library. I appreciate that the code may still be very broken even if the code links. I am thinking about this from the other side - if the code won't link then I can be sure there is a problem. As far as I can see, I need to run through the bytecode checking for references, method calls and field accesses to library classes then use reflection to check whether the class/member exists. I have three-fold question: (1) Does such a tool exist already? (2) I have a niggling feeling it is much more complicated that I imagine and that I have missed something major - is that the case? (3) Do you know of a handy library that would allow me to inspect the bytecode such that I can find the method calls, references etc.? Thanks!

    Read the article

  • Make Java parent class not part of the interface

    - by Bart van Heukelom
    (This is a hypothetical question for discussion, I have no actual problem). Say that I'm making an implementation of SortedSet by extending LinkedHashMap: class LinkedHashSortedMapThing extends LinkedHashMap implements SortedSet { ... } Now programmers who use this class may do LinkedHashMap x = new LinkedHashSortedMapThing(); But what if I consider the extending of LinkedHashMap an implementation detail, and do not want it to be a part of the class' contract? If people use the line above, I can no longer freely change this detail without worrying about breaking existing code. Is there any way to prevent this sort of thing, other than favouring composition over inheritance (which is not always possible due to private/protected members)?

    Read the article

  • Stopping looping thread in Java

    - by halfwarp
    I'm using a thread that is continuously reading from a queue. Something like: public void run() { Object obj; while(true) { synchronized(objectsQueue) { if(objectesQueue.isEmpty()) { try { objectesQueue.wait(); } catch (InterruptedException e) { e.printStackTrace(); } obj = objectesQueue.poll(); } } // Do something with the Object obj } } What is the best way to stop this thread? I see two options: 1 - Since Thread.stop() is deprecated, I can implement a stopThisThread() method that uses a n atomic check-condition variable. 2 - Send a Death Event object or something like that to the queue. When the thread fetches a death event it exists. I prefer the 1st way, however, I don't know when to call the stopThisThread() method, as something might be on it's way to the queue and the stop signal can arrive first (not desirable). Any suggestions?

    Read the article

  • Java static method parameters

    - by Blitzkr1eg
    Why does the following code return 100 100 1 1 1 and not 100 1 1 1 1 ? public class Hotel { private int roomNr; public Hotel(int roomNr) { this.roomNr = roomNr; } public int getRoomNr() { return this.roomNr; } static Hotel doStuff(Hotel hotel) { hotel = new Hotel(1); return hotel; } public static void main(String args[]) { Hotel h1 = new Hotel(100); System.out.print(h1.getRoomNr() + " "); Hotel h2 = doStuff(h1); System.out.print(h1.getRoomNr() + " "); System.out.print(h2.getRoomNr() + " "); h1 = doStuff(h2); System.out.print(h1.getRoomNr() + " "); System.out.print(h2.getRoomNr() + " "); } } Why does it appear to pass Hotel by-value to doStuff() ?

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311  | Next Page >