Search Results

Search found 23792 results on 952 pages for 'void pointers'.

Page 308/952 | < Previous Page | 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315  | Next Page >

  • Parsing csv line to Java objects

    - by Noobling
    I was wondering if someone here could help me, I can't find a solution for my problem and I have tried everything. What I am trying to do is read and parse lines in a csv file into java objects and I have succeeded in doing that but after it reads all the lines it should insert the lines into the database but it only inserts the 1st line the entire time and I don't no why. When I do a print it shows that it is reading all the lines and placing them in the objects but as soon as I do the insert it wants to insert only the 1st line. Please see my code below: public boolean lineReader(File file){ BufferedReader br = null; String line= ""; String splitBy = ","; storeList = new ArrayList<StoreFile>(); try { br = new BufferedReader(new FileReader(file)); while((line = br.readLine())!=null){ line = line.replace('|', ','); //split on pipe ( | ) String[] array = line.split(splitBy, 14); //Add values from csv to store object //Add values from csv to storeF objects StoreFile StoreF = new StoreFile(); if (array[0].equals("H") || array[0].equals("T")) { return false; } else { StoreF.setRetailID(array[1].replaceAll("/", "")); StoreF.setChain(array[2].replaceAll("/","")); StoreF.setStoreID(array[3].replaceAll("/", "")); StoreF.setStoreName(array[4].replaceAll("/", "")); StoreF.setAddress1(array[5].replaceAll("/", "")); StoreF.setAddress2(array[6].replaceAll("/", "")); StoreF.setAddress3(array[7].replaceAll("/", "")); StoreF.setProvince(array[8].replaceAll("/", "")); StoreF.setAddress4(array[9].replaceAll("/", "")); StoreF.setCountry(array[10].replaceAll("/", "")); StoreF.setCurrency(array[11].replaceAll("/", "")); StoreF.setAddress5(array[12].replaceAll("/", "")); StoreF.setTelNo(array[13].replaceAll("/", "")); //Add stores to list storeList.add(StoreF); } } //print list stores in file printStoreList(storeList); executeStoredPro(storeList); } catch (Exception ex) { nmtbatchservice.NMTBatchService2.LOG.error("An exception accoured: " + ex.getMessage(), ex); //copy to error folder //email } return false; } public void printStoreList(List<StoreFile> storeListToPrint) { for(int i = 0; i <storeListToPrint.size();i++){ System.out.println( storeListToPrint.get(i).getRetailID() + storeListToPrint.get(i).getChain() + storeListToPrint.get(i).getStoreID() + storeListToPrint.get(i).getStoreName() + storeListToPrint.get(i).getAddress1() + storeListToPrint.get(i).getAddress2() + storeListToPrint.get(i).getAddress3() + storeListToPrint.get(i).getProvince() + storeListToPrint.get(i).getAddress4() + storeListToPrint.get(i).getCountry() + storeListToPrint.get(i).getCurrency() + storeListToPrint.get(i).getAddress5() + storeListToPrint.get(i).getTelNo()); } } public void unzip(String source, String destination) { try { ZipFile zipFile = new ZipFile(source); zipFile.extractAll(destination); deleteStoreFile(source); } catch (ZipException ex) { nmtbatchservice.NMTBatchService2.LOG.error("Error unzipping file : " + ex.getMessage(), ex); } } public void deleteStoreFile(String directory) { try { File file = new File(directory); file.delete(); } catch (Exception ex) { nmtbatchservice.NMTBatchService2.LOG.error("An exception accoured when trying to delete file " + directory + " : " + ex.getMessage(), ex); } } public void executeStoredPro(List<StoreFile> storeListToInsert) { Connection con = null; CallableStatement st = null; try { String connectionURL = MSSQLConnectionURL; Class.forName("com.microsoft.sqlserver.jdbc.SQLServerDriver").newInstance(); con = DriverManager.getConnection(connectionURL, MSSQLUsername, MSSQLPassword); for(int i = 0; i <storeListToInsert.size();i++){ st = con.prepareCall( "IF EXISTS (SELECT * FROM tblPay@RetailStores WHERE StoreID = " + storeListToInsert.get(i).getStoreID() + " AND RetailID = "+ storeListToInsert.get(i).getRetailID() + ")" + " UPDATE tblPay@RetailStores " + " SET RetailID = '" + storeListToInsert.get(i).getRetailID() + "'," + " StoreID = '" + storeListToInsert.get(i).getStoreID() + "'," + " StoreName = '" + storeListToInsert.get(i).getStoreName() + "'," + " TestStore = 0," + " Address1 = '" + storeListToInsert.get(i).getAddress1() + "'," + " Address2 = '" + storeListToInsert.get(i).getAddress2() + "'," + " Address3 = '" + storeListToInsert.get(i).getAddress3() + "'," + " Address4 = '" + storeListToInsert.get(i).getAddress4() + "'," + " Address5 = '" + storeListToInsert.get(i).getAddress5() + "'," + " Province = '" + storeListToInsert.get(i).getProvince() + "'," + " TelNo = '" + storeListToInsert.get(i).getTelNo() + "'," + " Enabled = 1" + " ELSE " + " INSERT INTO tblPay@RetailStores ( [RetailID], [StoreID], [StoreName], [TestStore], [Address1], [Address2], [Address3], [Address4], [Address5], [Province], [TelNo] , [Enabled] ) " + " VALUES " + "('" + storeListToInsert.get(i).getRetailID() + "'," + "'" + storeListToInsert.get(i).getStoreID() + "'," + "'" + storeListToInsert.get(i).getStoreName() + "'," + "0," + "'" + storeListToInsert.get(i).getAddress1() + "'," + "'" + storeListToInsert.get(i).getAddress2() + "'," + "'" + storeListToInsert.get(i).getAddress3() + "'," + "'" + storeListToInsert.get(i).getAddress4() + "'," + "'" + storeListToInsert.get(i).getAddress5() + "'," + "'" + storeListToInsert.get(i).getProvince() + "'," + "'" + storeListToInsert.get(i).getTelNo() + "'," + "1)"); st.executeUpdate(); } con.close(); } catch (Exception ex) { nmtbatchservice.NMTBatchService2.LOG.error("Error executing Stored proc with error : " + ex.getMessage(), ex); nmtbatchservice.NMTBatchService2.mailingQueue.addToQueue(new Mail("[email protected]", "Service Email Error", "An error occurred during Store Import failed with error : " + ex.getMessage())); } } Any advise would be appreciated. Thanks

    Read the article

  • C# Closing a form during a constructor

    - by pm_2
    Is it possible to close a form while the constructor is executing (or simply to stop it showing at this stage)? I have the following code: public partial class MyForm : Form { public MyForm() { if (MyFunc()) { this.Close(); } } } Which errors in Main(), here: static void Main() { ... // Following line errors Application.Run(new MyForm()); } I’ve tried checking the result of MyForm like this: static void Main() { ... MyForm frm = new MyForm(); if (frm != null) { // Following line errors Application.Run(frm); } } But that doesn’t seem to help. Can anyone tell me a way around this, please? Maybe a way to check the form to see if it still exists?

    Read the article

  • Object reference case study

    - by Skogen
    When person 1 become partner with person 3, person 2 should no longer have person 1 as partner. How should I solve this? public class Person { private String name; private Person partner; public Person(String name){ this.name = name; } public void setPartner(Person partner){ this.partner = partner; partner.partner = this; } public static void main(String[] args) { Person one = new Person("1"); Person two = new Person("2"); Person three = new Person("3"); Person four = new Person("4"); one.setPartner(two); three.setPartner(four); one.setPartner(three); //Person two is still partner with person 1 }

    Read the article

  • Java Flow Control Problem

    - by Kyle_Solo
    I am programming a simple 2d game engine. I've decided how I'd like the engine to function: it will be composed of objects containing "events" that my main game loop will trigger when appropriate. A little more about the structure: Every GameObject has an updateEvent method. objectList is a list of all the objects that will receive update events. Only objects on this list have their updateEvent method called by the game loop. I’m trying to implement this method in the GameObject class (This specification is what I’d like the method to achieve): /** * This method removes a GameObject from objectList. The GameObject * should immediately stop executing code, that is, absolutely no more * code inside update events will be executed for the removed game object. * If necessary, control should transfer to the game loop. * @param go The GameObject to be removed */ public void remove(GameObject go) So if an object tries to remove itself inside of an update event, control should transfer back to the game engine: public void updateEvent() { //object's update event remove(this); System.out.println("Should never reach here!"); } Here’s what I have so far. It works, but the more I read about using exceptions for flow control the less I like it, so I want to see if there are alternatives. Remove Method public void remove(GameObject go) { //add to removedList //flag as removed //throw an exception if removing self from inside an updateEvent } Game Loop for(GameObject go : objectList) { try { if (!go.removed) { go.updateEvent(); } else { //object is scheduled to be removed, do nothing } } catch(ObjectRemovedException e) { //control has been transferred back to the game loop //no need to do anything here } } // now remove the objects that are in removedList from objectList 2 questions: Am I correct in assuming that the only way to implement the stop-right-away part of the remove method as described above is by throwing a custom exception and catching it in the game loop? (I know, using exceptions for flow control is like goto, which is bad. I just can’t think of another way to do what I want!) For the removal from the list itself, it is possible for one object to remove one that is farther down on the list. Currently I’m checking a removed flag before executing any code, and at the end of each pass removing the objects to avoid concurrent modification. Is there a better, preferably instant/non-polling way to do this?

    Read the article

  • how to set title within content page asp.net

    - by varshney4u
    Hi, I have created a Content Page using Master Page. Within Master Page, I have created the following tag for Title: <head id="Head1" runat="server"> <title></title> <meta http-equiv="X-UA-Compatible" content="IE=EmulateIE7" /> </head> Within Content Page, following are set: protected void Page_Load(object sender, EventArgs e) { if (!Page.IsPostBack) { if (String.IsNullOrEmpty(Request.QueryString["PatientRegistrationKey"])) { // .... } else { this.Page.Title = "My New Title"; //.... } } Though I am also setting the Master Page at run time as bellow: protected void Page_PreInit(Object sender, EventArgs e) { if (String.IsNullOrEmpty(Request.QueryString["PatientRegistrationKey"])) this.MasterPageFile = "~/MasterPages/A.master"; else this.MasterPageFile = "~/MasterPages/B.master"; } While getting open this page in browser, I got following Title: http://localhost:3562/?PatientRegistrationKey=0 - My New Title Please advice for the changes, so that there should be only My New Title within title, nothing extra like query string etc. Any help would be appreciated.

    Read the article

  • How do you detach an array of strings from shared memory? C

    - by Tim
    I have: int array_id; char* records[10]; // get the shared segment if ((array_id = shmget(IPC_PRIVATE, 1, 0666)) == -1) { perror("Array Creating"); } // attach records[0] = (char*) shmat(array_id, (void*)0, 0); if ((int) *records == -1) { perror("Array Attachment"); } which works fine, but when i try and detach i get an "invalid argument" error. // detach int error; if( (error = shmdt((void*) records[0])) == -1) { perror(array detachment); } any ideas? thank you

    Read the article

  • How do I get the name of the test method that was ran in a testng tear down method?

    - by Zachary Spencer
    Basically I have a tear down method that I want to log to the console which test was just ran. How would I go about getting that string? I can get the class name, but I want the actual method that was just executed. Class testSomething() { @AfterMethod public void tearDown() { system.out.println('The test that just ran was....' + getTestThatJustRanMethodName()'); } @Test public void testCase() { assertTrue(1==1); } } should output to the screen: "The test that just ran was.... testCase" However I don't know the magic that getTestThatJustRanMethodName should actually be.

    Read the article

  • Prevent Erroneous Property Assignment

    - by Gordon
    Porting android applications to iphone applications always gives me the following pattern that I accidentally create: - (void) myFunc:(id)prop { self.property = property; } Which instead should be: - (void) myFunc:(id)prop { self.property = prop; } This always causes my program to quietly break because property gets reset to its existing value rather than being set to the new value, 'prop'. I cannot name the parameter 'prop' to 'property' since the compile complains that the parameter masks the instance variables visibility. Is there a good way to avoid this situation? There are no compiler warnings. Is there a way to make xcode prevent this? I cannot see very many situations where you would set a property to the value of its underlying instance variable (maybe to trigger a KVO binding?), but I don't see myself doing that in majority of cases. I understand the above code is synthetic and should be done with @synthesize, but I am just using it as a simplified example to illustrate my point.

    Read the article

  • Make sure base method gets called in C#

    - by Fnatte
    Can I somehow force a derived class to always call the overridden methods base? public class BaseClass { public virtual void Update() { if(condition) { throw new Exception("..."); // Prevent derived method to be called } } } And then in a derived class : public override void Update() { base.Update(); // Forced call // Do any work } I've searched and found a suggestion to use a non-virtual Update() but also a protected virtual UpdateEx(). It just doesn't feel very neat, isn't there any better way? I hope you get the question and I am sorry for any bad English.

    Read the article

  • Is there an easy way to copy an iterator into a list in Java?

    - by Space_C0wb0y
    I want something like this: public void CopyIteratorIntoList(Iterator<Foo> fooIterator) { List<Foo> fooList = new ArrayList<Foo>(); fooList.addAll(fooIterator); } which should be equivalent to: public void CopyIteratorIntoList(Iterator<Foo> fooIterator) { List<Foo> fooList = new ArrayList<Foo>(); while(fooIterator.hasNext()) fooList.add(fooIterator.next()); } Is there any method in the API to achieve that, or is this the only way?

    Read the article

  • What does "static" mean in the context of declaring global template functions?

    - by smf68
    I know what static means in the context of declaring global non-template functions (see e.g. What is a "static" function?), which is useful if you write a helper function in a header that is included from several different locations and want to avoid "duplicate definition" errors. So my question is: What does static mean in the context of declaring global template functions? Please note that I'm specifically asking about global, non-member template functions that do not belong to a class. In other words, what is the difference between the following two: template <typename T> void foo(T t) { /* implementation of foo here */ } template <typename T> static void bar(T t) { /* implementation of bar here */ }

    Read the article

  • How do I set properties related to the calling method's scope?

    - by Thiado de Arruda
    I'm not looking for a way to associate values with a thread using the 'SetData' method. I need to store some kind of data that will only exist during the scope of a calling method, could be the immediate parent or any other call that is made down on the stack. For example: void SomeMethod() { string someInfo = "someInfo"; SomeOtherMethod(); object data = GetDataOnCurrentScope("someKey"); } void SomeOtherMethod() { SetDataOnParentScope("someKey", somevalue); } In this case both the 'someInfo' local variable and the data set with the "someKey" key will disapear after 'SomeMethod' returns. Is something like this possible? This may go against the rules of a stack, but who knows if someone has an idea...

    Read the article

  • passing paramter as to webservcie function in wcf

    - by prince23
    hi, this my datagrid event here i am calling the webservice. private void dgProject_RowDetailsVisibilityChanged(object sender, DataGridRowDetailsEventArgs e) { WSDataServiceClient wsService = new WSDataServiceClient(); wsService.GetProjectCompleted += new EventHandler<GetProjectCompletedEventArgs>(wsService_GetProjectCompleted); wsService.GetProjectAsync(strUniqueName); // here can i send datagrid as an parameter to the function? Datagrid gd= new Datagrid(); } void wsService_GetProjectCompleted(object sender, GetProjectCompletedEventArgs e) { // } is there any way that i can send datagrid as a paramter to this function is it possiable to do? beacuse i will be using the same websevice function her but need to bind result with different datagrid based on the condition if i can send a datagrid as paramter to this function i can reduce the code so any help on this issue would be great thank you.

    Read the article

  • Multiple key map in c++

    - by Morgan
    Hi, I'm wondering if any of you know of a c++ associative map container type which I can perform multiple key lookups on. The map needs to have constant time lookups but I don't care if it's ordered or unordered. It just needs to be fast. For example, I want to store a bunch of std::vector objects in a map with an integer and a void* as the lookup keys. Both the int and the void* must match for my vector to be retrieved. Does anything like this exist already? Or am I going to have to roll my own. If so, any suggestions? I've been trying to store a boost::unordered_map inside another boost::unordered_map, but I have not had any success with this method yet. Maybe I will continue Pershing this method if there is no simpler way. Thanks!

    Read the article

  • Can't record or play with a simple recorder?

    - by user1280535
    I have 2 classes, a record and a player. In my main scene, I create an instance of them and play and record. But, as I see, it only records and somehow does not play (the file is not there!) Here is the code for both : -(void)record { NSArray *dirPaths; NSString *docsDir; NSString *sound= @"sound0.caf" ; dirPaths = NSSearchPathForDirectoriesInDomains(NSDocumentDirectory, NSUserDomainMask, YES) ; docsDir = [dirPaths objectAtIndex:0]; NSString *soundFilePath = [docsDir stringByAppendingPathComponent:sound]; NSURL *soundFileURL = [NSURL fileURLWithPath:soundFilePath]; NSDictionary *settings = [NSDictionary dictionaryWithObjectsAndKeys: [NSNumber numberWithFloat: 44100.0], AVSampleRateKey, [NSNumber numberWithInt: kAudioFormatAppleLossless], AVFormatIDKey, [NSNumber numberWithInt: 1], AVNumberOfChannelsKey, [NSNumber numberWithInt: AVAudioQualityMax], AVEncoderAudioQualityKey, nil]; NSError *error; myRecorder = [[AVAudioRecorder alloc] initWithURL:soundFileURL settings:settings error:&error]; if (myRecorder) { NSLog(@"rec"); [myRecorder prepareToRecord]; myRecorder.meteringEnabled = YES; [myRecorder record]; } else NSLog( @"error" ); } I can see the log of rec. -(void)play { NSArray *dirPaths; NSString *docsDir; dirPaths = NSSearchPathForDirectoriesInDomains(NSDocumentDirectory, NSUserDomainMask, YES); docsDir = [dirPaths objectAtIndex:0]; NSString *soundFilePath1 = @"sound0.caf" ; NSURL *soundFileURL = [NSURL fileURLWithPath:soundFilePath1]; BOOL isMyFileThere = [[NSFileManager defaultManager] fileExistsAtPath:soundFilePath1]; if(isMyFileThere) { NSLog(@"PLAY"); avPlayer1 = [[AVAudioPlayer alloc] initWithContentsOfURL:soundFileURL error:NULL]; avPlayer1.volume = 8.0; avPlayer1.delegate = self; [avPlayer1 play]; } } I DONT SEE THE LOG OF PLAY ! I call them both with: recInst=[recorder alloc]; //to rec [recInst record]; plyInst=[player alloc]; //play [plyInst play]; and to stop the recorder: - (void)stopRecorder { NSLog(@"stopRecordings"); [myRecorder stop]; //[myRecorder release]; } What's wrong here? Thanks.

    Read the article

  • Fail to save a managed object to core-data after its properties were updated.

    - by Tzur Gazit
    I have to trouble to create the object, but updating it fails. Here is the creation code: // Save data from pList to core data fro the first time - (void) saveToCoreData:(NSDictionary *)plistDictionary { // Create system parameter entity SystemParameters *systemParametersEntity = (SystemParameters *)[NSEntityDescription insertNewObjectForEntityForName:@"SystemParameters" inManagedObjectContext:mManagedObjectContext]; //// // GPS SIMULATOR //// NSDictionary *GpsSimulator = [plistDictionary valueForKey:@"GpsSimulator"]; [systemParametersEntity setMGpsSimulatorEnabled:[[GpsSimulator objectForKey:@"Enabled"] boolValue]]; [systemParametersEntity setMGpsSimulatorFileName:[GpsSimulator valueForKey:@"FileName"]]; [systemParametersEntity setMGpsSimulatorPlaybackSpeed:[[GpsSimulator objectForKey:@"PlaybackSpeed"] intValue]]; [self saveAction]; } During execution the cached copy is changed and then it is saved (or trying) to the database. Here is the code to save the changed copy: // Save data from pList to core data fro the first time - (void) saveSystemParametersToCoreData:(SystemParameters *)theSystemParameters { // Step 1: Select Data NSFetchRequest *fetchRequest = [[NSFetchRequest alloc] init]; NSEntityDescription *entity = [NSEntityDescription entityForName:@"SystemParameters" inManagedObjectContext:mManagedObjectContext]; [fetchRequest setEntity:entity]; NSError *error = nil; NSArray *items = [self.managedObjectContext executeFetchRequest:fetchRequest error:&error]; [fetchRequest release]; if (error) { NSLog(@"CoreData: saveSystemParametersToCoreData: Unresolved error %@, %@", error, [error userInfo]); abort(); } // Step 2: Update Object SystemParameters *systemParameters = [items objectAtIndex:0]; //// // GPS SIMULATOR //// [systemParameters setMGpsSimulatorEnabled:[theSystemParameters mGpsSimulatorEnabled]]; [systemParameters setMGpsSimulatorFileName:[theSystemParameters mGpsSimulatorFileName]]; [systemParameters setMGpsSimulatorPlaybackSpeed:[theSystemParameters mGpsSimulatorPlaybackSpeed]]; // Step 3: Save Updates [self saveAction]; } As to can see, I fetch the object that I want to update, change its values and save. Here is the saving code: - (void)saveAction { NSError *error; if (![[self mManagedObjectContext] save:&error]) { NSLog(@"ERROR:saveAction. Unresolved Core Data Save error %@, %@", error, [error userInfo]); exit(-1); } } The Persistent store method: - (NSPersistentStoreCoordinator *)persistentStoreCoordinator { if (mPersistentStoreCoordinator != nil) { return mPersistentStoreCoordinator; } NSString *path = [self databasePath]; NSURL *storeUrl = [NSURL fileURLWithPath:path]; NSError *error = nil; mPersistentStoreCoordinator = [[NSPersistentStoreCoordinator alloc] initWithManagedObjectModel:[self managedObjectModel]]; if (![mPersistentStoreCoordinator addPersistentStoreWithType:NSSQLiteStoreType configuration:nil URL:storeUrl options:nil error:&error]) { NSLog(@"Unresolved error %@, %@", error, [error userInfo]); abort(); } return mPersistentStoreCoordinator; } There is no error but the sqLite file is not updated, hence the data is not persistent. Thanks in advance.

    Read the article

  • Print an EObject ?

    - by tul
    I am writing some eclipse emf code and would like to print the content of an EObject (not store it to disk). Here is what I try: public static void print(EObject obj) { Resource eResource = obj.eResource(); try { eResource.save(System.out, null); } catch (IOException e) { e.printStackTrace(); } } but that gives a NullPointerException. I have tried this instead: public static void print(EObject obj) { ResourceSet resourceSet = new ResourceSetImpl(); resourceSet.getResourceFactoryRegistry().getProtocolToFactoryMap() .put("*", new XMIResourceFactoryImpl()); Resource resource = resourceSet.createResource(URI.createURI("dummyfile.xml")); resource.getContents().add(obj); try { resource.save(System.out, null); } catch (IOException ioe) { ioe.printStackTrace(); } } This works, but is it not possible to print to screen without specifying a dummy URI??

    Read the article

  • How to keep a .NET console app running?

    - by intoorbit
    Consider a Console application that starts up some services in a separate thread. All it needs to do is wait for the user to press Ctrl+C to shut it down. Which of the following is the better way to do this? static ManualResetEvent _quitEvent = new ManualResetEvent(false); static void Main() { Console.CancelKeyPress += delegate { _quitEvent.Set(); }; // kick off asynchronous stuff _quitEvent.WaitOne(); // cleanup/shutdown and quit } Or this, using Thread.Sleep(1): static bool _quitFlag = false; static void Main() { Console.CancelKeyPress += delegate { _quitFlag = true; }; // kick off asynchronous stuff while (!_quitFlag) { Thread.Sleep(1); } // cleanup/shutdown and quit }

    Read the article

  • very simple delegate musing

    - by Ted
    Sometimes the simplest questions make me love C/C++ and C# more and more. Today sitting on the bus musing aout delegates I remembered reading somwhere you don't need to use the new keyword when instaniating a new delegate. For example: public static void SomeMethod(string message) { ... } ... public delegate void TestDelgate(string message); //Define a delegate ........... //create a new instance ..METHOD 1 TestDelgate t = new TestDelgate(SomeMethod); //OR another way to create a new instance ..METHOD 2 TestDelgate t = SomeMethod; //create a new instance ..METHOD 2 So todays questions are What happens under the hood in method 2. Does the compiler expand method 2 into method 1, hence writing TestDelgate t = SomeMethod; is just a shortcut for TestDelgate t = new TestDelgate(SomeMethod);, or is there another reason for the exsitence of method 2 Do you guys think method 1 or method 2 is better for readability (this is a subjective question, but I'd just like to get a unscientific feel of general opinion of stackoverflow :-))

    Read the article

  • siverlight and windows workflow foundation

    - by wissem
    private void btnUpdate_Click(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e) { xxxxxxx.Workflow1_WebServiceSoapClient zer = new xxxxx.Workflow1_WebServiceSoapClient(); zer.demanderSubmitReportCompleted += new EventHandler<xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.demanderSubmitReportCompletedEventArgs>(service2); zer.demanderSubmitReportAsync("zzz", 20000); } public void service2(object sender, xxxxx.demanderSubmitReportCompletedEventArgs e) { string a = e.Result; } I'm trying to call a windows workflow foundation published as a web service from a Silverlight project. When I call it from a console application it works fine because I can add a web reference then I just make an instance of that webservice then I invoke the method I want. The problem is in the silverlight project cause i can just add a service reference so I find myself working with soap stuff that doesn't work at all, and here is the code error: here is the code error:i change it a litle bit in english Error in exécution Microsoft JScript: Unhandled Error in Silverlight Application exception happened in the operation, résult not valide. Consult InnerException for more information. in System.ComponentModel.AsyncCompletedEventArgs.RaiseExceptionIfNecessary() in AEDSilverlightIntegrated.ServiceReference2.demanderSubmitReportCompletedEventArgs.get_Result() in AEDSilverlightIntegrated.SilverEntryAedHeaderNew.mmm_demanderSubmitReportCompleted(Object sender, demanderSubmitReportCompletedEventArgs e) in AEDSilverlightIntegrated.ServiceReference2.Workflow1_WebServiceSoapClient.OndemanderSubmitReportCompleted(Object state)

    Read the article

  • WebView not responding when called from a method

    - by AragornSG
    I have an app with tabbar and webview. I'm trying to make the app come back to default url each time user taps the bar. Right now I'm intercepting taps and launching a method, however it's not affecting my webview. The same syntax for calling webview from awakeFromNib works, so I don't have a clue what's up. I suspect it's something to do with how I call the method, but I don't know what. Here is the code: #import "SecondViewController.h" @implementation SecondViewController - (void)awakeFromNib { NSString *loadURL = [NSString stringWithFormat:@"http://pageurl"]; // [secondView loadRequest:[NSURLRequest requestWithURL:[NSURL URLWithString:loadURL]]]; SecondViewController *ptr = [[SecondViewController alloc] init]; [ptr goToPage]; } - (void) goToPage { NSLog(@"go to page"); NSString *newURL = [NSString stringWithFormat:@"http://pageurl"]; [secondView loadRequest:[NSURLRequest requestWithURL:[NSURL URLWithString:newURL]]]; } Thanks fot your help!

    Read the article

  • Exception and Inheritance in JAVA

    - by user1759950
    Suppose we have this problem public class Father{ public void method1(){...} } public class Child1 extends Father{ public void method1() throws Exception{ super.method1(); ... } } Child1 extends Father and override method1 but given implementation Child1.method1 now throws a exception, this wont compile as override method can't throw new exceptions. What is the best solution? Propagate the required exception to the Father.. to me this is against encapsulation, inheritance and general OOP ( the father potentially throw and exception that will never happen ) Use a RuntimeException instead? This solution wont propagate the Exception to the father but I read In Oracle docs and others sources states class of exceptions should be used when "Client code cannot do anything" this is not that case, this exception will b useful to recover blablabla ( why is wrong to use RuntimeException instead? ) Other.. thanks, Federico

    Read the article

  • error in copy/ paste of image

    - by sayyad
    I am getting an error by implementing this simple code. I donot understand where I am doing mistake. // ERROR An unhandled exception of type 'System.NullReferenceException' occurred in ImageCSharp.exe Additional information: Der Objektverweis wurde nicht auf eine Objektinstanz festgelegt. I can get clipboard text but why i can't get /set image. //CODE public void copy() { // Determine the active child form. fImage activeChild = this.ActiveMdiChild as fImage; if (activeChild != null) { PictureBox mypicbox = activeChild.picbox; string win_name = activeChild.Tag.ToString(); Clipboard.SetImage(mypicbox.Image); Clipboard.SetText(win_name); } } private void paste() { Image im= Clipboard.GetImage(); this.pictureBox1.Image = im; MessageBox.Show(im.Size.ToString()); } regards,

    Read the article

  • iPhone memory management: a release after setting self.someProperty = nil

    - by ddawber
    I am reading the LazyTableImages code that Apple have released and they do something to this effect (in an NSOperation subclass): - (void)dealloc { [myProperty release]; [myProperty2 release]; } - (void)main { // // Parse operation undertaken here // self.myProperty = nil; self.myProperty2 = nil; } My thinking is that they do this in case dealloc is called before setting properties to nil. Is my thinking correct here? Are the releases unnecessary, as self.myProperty = nil effectively releases myProperty? One thing I have noticed in this code is that they don't release all retained objects in dealloc, only some of them, which is really the cause for my confusion. Cheers

    Read the article

  • UTC date and time

    - by klaus-vlad
    Hi, How can I obtain the current UTC time and date using a gps location changed lsitener ? public void onLocationChanged(Location lastLocation) { lastLocation.getTime() }

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315  | Next Page >