Search Results

Search found 23792 results on 952 pages for 'void pointers'.

Page 313/952 | < Previous Page | 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320  | Next Page >

• Question on Virtual Methods

  - by bobber205

  IF both methods are declared as virtual, shouldn't both instances of Method1() that are called be the derived class's Method1()? I am seeing BASE then DERIVED called each time. I am doing some review for an interview and I want to make sure I have this straight. xD class BaseClass { public: virtual void Method1() { cout << "Method 1 BASE" << endl; } }; class DerClass: public BaseClass { public: virtual void Method1() { cout << "Method 1 DERVIED" << endl; } }; DerClass myClass; ((BaseClass)myClass).Method1(); myClass.Method1(); Method 1 BASE Method 1 DERVIED

  Read the article

• [C++] Question on Virtual Methods

  - by bobber205

  IF both methods are declared as virtual, shouldn't both instances of Method1() that are called be the derived class's Method1()? I am seeing BASE then DERIVED called each time. I am doing some review for an interview and I want to make sure I have this straight. xD class BaseClass { public: virtual void Method1() { cout << "Method 1 BASE" << endl; } }; class DerClass: public BaseClass { public: virtual void Method1() { cout << "Method 1 DERVIED" << endl; } }; DerClass myClass; ((BaseClass)myClass).Method1(); myClass.Method1(); Method 1 BASE Method 1 DERVIED

  Read the article

• How do I find the speed of an in-progress file upload in cURL?

  - by cinek1lol

  I'd like to know how to check out the speed of a file being uploaded in real time using the cURL library in C++. This is what I have written: void progress_func(void* ptr, double TotalToDownload, double NowDownloaded, double TotalToUpload,double NowUploaded) { cout<<NowUploaded<<endl; } //... int main() { //... curl_easy_setopt(curl, CURLOPT_PROGRESSFUNCTION, progress_func); } But the manual says that it shows average speed, but even this doesn't seem to work with me, because too mach fast is end. How to good write or A well-calculated?

  Read the article

• Silverlight Windows Phone 7: Load Images From URL

  - by Lennie De Villiers

  Hi, I got the code below that is trying to load an image from the web into an Image control, when I run it I get an error on the given line that no network access is allowed: private void button1_Click(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e) { WebClient webClientImgDownloader = new WebClient(); webClientImgDownloader.OpenReadCompleted += new OpenReadCompletedEventHandler(webClientImgDownloader_OpenReadCompleted); webClientImgDownloader.OpenReadAsync(new Uri("http://dilbert.com/dyn/str_strip/000000000/00000000/0000000/000000/80000/5000/100/85108/85108.strip.print.gif", UriKind.Absolute)); } void webClientImgDownloader_OpenReadCompleted(object sender, OpenReadCompletedEventArgs e) { BitmapImage bitmap = new BitmapImage(); bitmap.SetSource(e.Result); // ERROR HERE! image1.Source = bitmap; } Silverlight for Windows Phone 7

  Read the article

• C#, working with files, "Unauthorized Access"?

  - by Rob

  Hi, I'm learning about opening and saving files with C# and it seems that vista won't let my program save to a file on the root of C:\ , unless I run it in administrator mode. Any ideas how to allow my program to play around with whatever files it wants? Thanks! string name; private void button2_Click(object sender, EventArgs e) ///// OPEN ///// { if (openFileDialog1.ShowDialog() == DialogResult.OK) { name = openFileDialog1.FileName; textBox1.Clear(); textBox1.Text = File.ReadAllText(name); textBox2.Text = name; } } private void button1_Click(object sender, EventArgs e) ///// SAVE ///// { File.WriteAllText(name, textBox1.Text); }

  Read the article

• subscribing an event to a class object before initializing it.

  - by GN

  I have two classes class A and B.I have a delegate n event published in class B.The class B object is declared in class A.All he functionality dependes on the parameterised constru ctor of class B. Before initializing the object of class B i need to subscibe the event for it.how to do it? e.g public class B { public delegate void myDel(string); public event myDel myEvent; B(object obj) { ----------------- ------------------ } } class A { A objA; class XYZ objXYZ; void func() { objA.myEvent+=new myDel(); objA=new A(objXYZ); // hw to attain this? } }

  Read the article

• Strange C++ thread function invocation

  - by Tony

  I have the following: class DThread { virtual void run()=0; _beginthreadex(NULL,0,tfunc,this,0,&m_UIThreadID); // class itself being passed as param to thread function... static unsigned int __stdcall tfunc(void* thisptr) { static_cast<DThread*>(thisptr)->run(); return 0; } //other stuff } The run function is implemented in a derived class. Why is the function that's being called in the thread being called through a cast this pointer? Is this good practise? Can't it just be called directly? The actual function needing to run is in the derived class. My question is

  Read the article

• multitreading scheduling related java

  - by vichi

  class A implements Runnable{ B b=new B(); public void run(){ while(true){ System.out.println("H1"+Thread.currentThread().getName()); } } } public class Test { public static void main(String[] str){ A a1 =new A(); // A a2 =new A(); // Thread t1 =new Thread(a1, "Vichi"); Thread t2 =new Thread(a1,"Vishu"); t1.start(); t2.start(); } } what will be the ans: 1) only one of them will get the chance to execute 2) both will get chance in arbitrary manner please suggest possible ans with explations

  Read the article

• networkstream always empty!

  - by ALEX

  hey I'm writing on an Server-Client program but when my client sends something, it never reaches my server! I'm sending like this: public void Send(string s) { char[] chars = s.ToCharArray(); byte[] bytes = chars.CharToByte(); nstream.Write(bytes, 0, bytes.Length); nstream.Flush(); } and Receiving in a background thread like this void CheckIncoming(object dd) { RecievedDelegate d = (RecievedDelegate)dd; try { while (true) { List<byte> bytelist = new List<byte>(); System.Threading.Thread.Sleep(1000); int ssss; ssss = nstream.ReadByte(); if (ssss > 1) { System.Diagnostics.Debugger.Break(); } if (bytelist.Count != 0) { d.Invoke(bytelist.ToArray()); } } } catch (Exception exp) { MSGBOX("ERROR:\n" + exp.Message); } } the ssss int is never 1 whats happening here???

  Read the article

• How to make a rectangle on screen invisible to screen capture ?

  - by Kesarion

  How can I create a rectangle on the screen that is invisible to any sort of screen capture(printscreen or aplications) ? By create a rectangle on screen I mean something like this: #include <Windows.h> #include <iostream> void drawRect(){ HDC screenDC = ::GetDC(0); ::Rectangle(screenDC, 200, 200, 300, 300); ::ReleaseDC(0, screenDC); } int main(void){ char c; std::cin >> c; if (c == 'd') drawRect(); std::cin >> c; return 0; } I'm using Visual Studio 2010 on Windows XP

  Read the article

• Beginner Android Dev question navigating through intents, getting errors not sure how to fix it. I've tried rearranging and everything even tabbing.

  - by user554786

  /*I created this Sign-In page. I start by declaring variables for username/password & buttons. If user enters "test" as username & "test" as password and hits the login button, its supposed to go to the DrinksTwitter.class activity, else throw error message I created. To me the code and login makes perfect sense. I'm not sure why it wont go to the next activity I want it to go to */ package com.android.drinksonme; import android.app.Activity; import android.content.Intent; import android.os.Bundle; import android.view.View; import android.view.View.OnClickListener; import android.widget.Button; import android.widget.EditText; import android.widget.TextView; public class Screen2 extends Activity { // Declare our Views, so we can access them later private EditText etUsername; private EditText etPassword; private Button btnLogin; private Button btnSignUp; private TextView lblResult; @Override public void onCreate(Bundle savedInstanceState) { super.onCreate(savedInstanceState); setContentView(R.layout.main); // Get the EditText and Button References etUsername = (EditText)findViewById(R.id.username); etPassword = (EditText)findViewById(R.id.password); btnLogin = (Button)findViewById(R.id.login_button); btnSignUp = (Button)findViewById(R.id.signup_button); lblResult = (TextView)findViewById(R.id.result); // Check Login String username = etUsername.getText().toString(); String password = etPassword.getText().toString(); if(username.equals("test") && password.equals("test")){ final Intent i = new Intent(Screen2.this, DrinksTwitter.class); btnLogin.setOnClickListener(new OnClickListener() { public void onClick(View v) { startActivity(i); } // lblResult.setText("Login successful."); else { /* ERROR- Syntax error on token "else", { expected */ lblResult.setText("Invalid username or password."); } } }); final Intent k = new Intent(Screen2.this, SignUp.class); btnSignUp.setOnClickListener(new OnClickListener() { public void onClick(View v) { startActivity(k); } }); /* ERROR- Syntax error, insert "}" to complete Statement*/ } }

  Read the article

• Call a non member funcion on an instance before is constructed.

  - by Tom

  Hi everyone. I'm writing a class, and this doubt came up. Is this undef. behaviour? On the other hand, I'm not sure its recommended, or if its a good practice. Is it one if I ensure no exceptions to be thrown in the init function? //c.h class C{ float vx,vy; friend void init(C& c); public: C(); ~C(); }; //c.cpp C::C() { init(*this); } void init(C& c) //throws() to ensure no exceptions ? { c.vx = 0; c.vy = 0; } Thanks in advance

  Read the article

• java: useful example of a shutdown hook?

  - by Jason S

  I'm trying to make sure my Java application takes reasonable steps to be robust, and part of that involves shutting down gracefully. I am reading about shutdown hooks and I don't actually get how to make use of them in practice. Is there a practical example out there? Let's say I had a really simple application like this one below, which writes numbers to a file, 10 to a line, in batches of 100, and I want to make sure a given batch finishes if the program is interrupted. I get how to register a shutdown hook but I have no idea how to integrate that into my application. Any suggestions? package com.example.test.concurrency; import java.io.File; import java.io.FileNotFoundException; import java.io.FileOutputStream; import java.io.PrintWriter; public class GracefulShutdownTest1 { final private int N; final private File f; public GracefulShutdownTest1(File f, int N) { this.f=f; this.N = N; } public void run() { PrintWriter pw = null; try { FileOutputStream fos = new FileOutputStream(this.f); pw = new PrintWriter(fos); for (int i = 0; i < N; ++i) writeBatch(pw, i); } catch (FileNotFoundException e) { e.printStackTrace(); } finally { pw.close(); } } private void writeBatch(PrintWriter pw, int i) { for (int j = 0; j < 100; ++j) { int k = i*100+j; pw.write(Integer.toString(k)); if ((j+1)%10 == 0) pw.write('\n'); else pw.write(' '); } } static public void main(String[] args) { if (args.length < 2) { System.out.println("args = [file] [N] " +"where file = output filename, N=batch count"); } else { new GracefulShutdownTest1( new File(args[0]), Integer.parseInt(args[1]) ).run(); } } }

  Read the article

• A question about making a C# class persistant during a file load

  - by Adam

  Apologies for the indescriptive title, however it's the best I could think of for the moment. Basically, I've written a singleton class that loads files into a database. These files are typically large, and take hours to process. What I am looking for is to make a method where I can have this class running, and be able to call methods from within it, even if it's calling class is shut down. The singleton class is simple. It starts a thread that loads the file into the database, while having methods to report on the current status. In a nutshell it's al little like this: public sealed class BulkFileLoader { static BulkFileLoader instance = null; int currentCount = 0; BulkFileLoader() public static BulkFileLoader Instance { // Instanciate the instance class if necessary, and return it } public void Go() { // kick of 'ProcessFile' thread } public void GetCurrentCount() { return currentCount; } private void ProcessFile() { while (more rows in the import file) { // insert the row into the database currentCount++; } } } The idea is that you can get an instance of BulkFileLoader to execute, which will process a file to load, while at any time you can get realtime updates on the number of rows its done so far using the GetCurrentCount() method. This works fine, except the calling class needs to stay open the whole time for the processing to continue. As soon as I stop the calling class, the BulkFileLoader instance is removed, and it stops processing the file. What I am after is a solution where it will continue to run independently, regardless of what happens to the calling class. I then tried another approach. I created a simple console application that kicks off the BulkFileLoader, and then wrapped it around as a process. This fixes one problem, since now when I kick off the process, the file will continue to load even if I close the class that called the process. However, now the problem I have is that cannot get updates on the current count, since if I try and get the instance of BulkFileLoader (which, as mentioned before is a singleton), it creates a new instance, rather than returning the instance that is currently in the executing process. It would appear that singletons don't extend into the scope of other processes running on the machine. In the end, I want to be able to kick off the BulkFileLoader, and at any time be able to find out how many rows it's processed. However, that is even if I close the application I used to start it. Can anyone see a solution to my problem?

  Read the article

• Implement abstract class as a local class? pros and cons

  - by sinec

  Hi, for some reason I'm thinking on implementing interface within a some function(method) as local class. Consider following: class A{ public: virtual void MethodToOverride() = 0; }; A * GetPtrToAImplementation(){ class B : public A { public: B(){} ~B(){} void MethodToOverride() { //do something } }; return static_cast<A *>(new B()); } int _tmain(int argc, _TCHAR* argv[]) { A * aInst = GetPtrToAImplementation(); aInst->MethodToOverride(); delete aInst; return 0; } the reason why I'm doing this are: I'm lazy to implement class (B) in separate files MethodToOverride just delegates call to other class Class B shouldn't be visible to other users no need to worry about deleting aInst since smart pointers are used in real implementation So my question is if I'm doing this right? Thanks in advance!

  Read the article

• How can i pass an object to a new thread generated anonymously in a button listener

  - by WaterBoy

  I would like to pass an object (docket for printing) to a new thread which will print the docket. My code is: private final Button.OnClickListener cmdPrintOnClickListener = new Button.OnClickListener() { public void onClick(View v) { new Thread(new Runnable() { public void run() { enableTestButton(false); Looper.prepare(); doConnectionTest(); Looper.loop(); Looper.myLooper().quit(); } }).start(); } }; How do I pass the object to it? Also - I need to generate the object in the UI thread, just before starting the new thread so where could I put this method (e.g. getDocketObject()) in relation to my code below thanks, anton

  Read the article

• How to connect Model through Controller to View using bindings?

  - by Paperflyer

  I have an NSTextField in my view. Its value is bound to an NSNumber *number in my controller. The controller simply calls through to the model (value) to get the appropriate value. // In the controller - (NSNumber *)number { return [NSNumber numberWithFloat:[model value]]; } - (void)setNumber:(NSNumber *)aNumber { [model setValue:[aNumber floatValue]]; } This is fine, only the controller is not notified of model changes and thus, changing the value in the model does not update the NSTextField. The only other option I can think of is to have the model notify the controller and the controller manually update the view through an Outlet. But this circumvents the binding. // In the model, after value change [[NSNotificationCenter defaultCenter] postNotificationName:@"ValueChanged" object:self]; // In the controller, after being notified - (void)updateView:(NSNotification *)aNotification { [myTextField setFloatValue:[model value]]; } Is there a better, binding-aware way to implement this communication?

  Read the article

• Object reference not set to an instance of an object

  - by Ste

  I have this function that create runtime textbox: int i = 0; private TextBox[] addressBox = new TextBox[100]; private void appendNewTab() { addressBox[i] = new TextBox(); addressBox[i].KeyPress += new KeyPressEventHandler(this.addressBox_KeyPress); i++; } void addressBox_KeyPress(object sender, KeyPressEventArgs e) { if (e.KeyChar == (char)13) { MessageBox.Show(addressBox[i].Text); } } but i have Object reference not set to an instance of an object here MessageBox.Show(addressBox[i].Text); any suggestion?

  Read the article

• New to threading in C#, can you make thread methods generic and what are the dangers?

  - by ibarczewski

  Hey all, I'm just now starting to get into the idea of threading, and wanted to know if I could make this more abstract. Both foo and bar derive methods from a base class, so I'd like to pass in one or the other and be able to do work using a method that was derived. I'd also like to know how you properly name threads and the methods inside threads. if (ChkFoo.Checked) { Thread fooThread = new Thread(new ThreadStart(this.ThreadedFooMethod)); fooThread.Start(); } if (ChkBar.Checked) { Thread barThread = new Thread(new ThreadStart(this.ThreadedBarMethod)); barThread.Start(); } . . . public void ThreadedFooMethod() { Foo newFoo = new Foo(); //Do work on newFoo } public void ThreadedBarMethod() { Bar newBar = new Bar(); //Do similar work } Thanks all!

  Read the article

• what does "throw;" outside a catch block do?

  - by Tobias Langner

  Hi, I just stumbled this code: void somefunction() { throw; } and I wonder: what does it mean?

  Read the article

• Unit tests logged (or run) multiple times

  - by HeavyWave

  I have this simple test: protected readonly ILog logger = LogManager.GetLogger(MethodBase.GetCurrentMethod().ReflectedType); private static int count = 0; [Test] public void TestConfiguredSuccessfully() { logger.Debug("in test method" + count++); } log4net is set up like this: [TestFixtureSetUp] public void SetUp() { log4net.Config.BasicConfigurator.Configure(); } The problem is, that if I run this test in nUnit once, I get the output (as expected): 1742 [TestRunnerThread] DEBUG Tests.TestSomthing (null) - in test method0 But if I press RUN in nUnit.exe again (or more) I get the following: 1742 [TestRunnerThread] DEBUG Tests.TestSomthing (null) - in test method1 1742 [TestRunnerThread] DEBUG Tests.TestSomthing (null) - in test method1 And so on (if I run it 5 times, I'll get 5 repeating lines). Now, if I run the same test alone from reSharper the output is fine and does not repeat. However, if I run this test along side 2 other tests in the same class, the output is repeated three times. I am totally confused. What the hell is going on here?

  Read the article

• Keeping object in memory (iPhone SDK)

  - by Chris

  I am trying to create a UIImageView called theImageView in the touchesBegan method that I can then then move to a new location in touchesMoved. Currently I am receiving an "undeclared" error in touchesMoved where I set the new location for theImageView. What can I do to keep theImageView in memory between these two methods? - (void)touchesBegan:(NSSet *)touches withEvent:(UIEvent *)event { ... UIImageView *theImageView = [[UIImageView alloc] initWithImage:[UIImage imageNamed:@"image.png"]]; theImageView.frame = CGRectMake(263, 228, 193, 300); [theImageView retain]; ... } - (void)touchesMoved:(NSSet *)touches withEvent:(UIEvent *)event { ... theImageView.frame = CGRectMake(300, 300, 193, 300); ... }

  Read the article

• Does a CPU assigns a value atomically to memory?

  - by Poni

  Hi! A quick question I've been wondering about for some time; Does the CPU assign values atomically, or, is it bit by bit (say for example a 32bit integer). If it's bit by bit, could another thread accessing this exact location get a "part" of the to-be-assigned value? Think of this: I have two threads and one shared "unsigned int" variable (call it "g_uiVal"). Both threads loop. On is printing "g_uiVal" with printf("%u\n", g_uiVal). The second just increase this number. Will the printing thread ever print something that is totally not or part of "g_uiVal"'s value? In code: unsigned int g_uiVal; void thread_writer() { g_uiVal++; } void thread_reader() { while(1) printf("%u\n", g_uiVal); }

  Read the article

• How to make a recursive onClickListener for expanding and collapsing?

  - by hunterp

  In plain english, I have a textview, and when I click on it I want it to expand, and when I click on it again, I want it to compress. How can I do this? I've tried the below, but it warns on the final line about expander might not be initialized on holderFinal.text.setOnClickListener(expander); So now the code: final View.OnClickListener expander = new View.OnClickListener() { @Override public void onClick(View v) { holderFinal.text.setText(textData); holderFinal.text.setOnClickListener( new View.OnClickListener() { @Override public void onClick(View v) { holderFinal.text.setText(shortText); holderFinal.text.setOnClickListener(expander); } }); } };

  Read the article

• How to restrict this function from execution in android? Please help

  - by andyfan

  This code is present in one of this activity. I want to restrict addJoke() function from executing if the String variable new_joke is null, has no text or contains just spaces. Here is code protected void initAddJokeListeners() { // TODO m_vwJokeButton.setOnClickListener(new OnClickListener() { @Override public void onClick(View view) { //Implement code to add a new joke here... String new_joke=m_vwJokeEditText.getText().toString(); if(new_joke!=null&&new_joke!=""&&new_joke!=" ") { addJoke(new_joke); } } }); } I don't know why addJoke() function is getting executed even I don't enter any text in EditText field. Please help.

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320  | Next Page >