Search Results

Search found 23792 results on 952 pages for 'void pointers'.

Page 316/952 | < Previous Page | 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323  | Next Page >

• please help me to solve problem

  - by davit-datuashvili

  i have operation on heap fixdown operation below is code public class HEap{ public static void fixdown(int a[],int k,int n){ while(2*k<=n){ int j=2*k; if (j<n && a[j]<a[j+1]) j++; if (!(a[k]<a[j])) break; int t=a[k]; a[k]=a[j]; a[j]=k; k=j; } } public static void main(String[]args){ int a[]=new int[]{12,15,20,29,23,22,17,40,26,35,19,51}; fixdown(a,1,a.length); for (int i=0;i<a.length;i++){ System.out.println(a[i]); } } } //and result is 12 29 20 40 23 22 17 3 26 35 19 51 i am interested why is 3 in the list?in the array is not

  Read the article

• How to code the set method of a Map with another Map as value?

  - by Nazgulled

  I normally do this to set a new Map to a private variable: public static void setListaClausulas(Map<String, Clausula> nvLista) { listaClausulas = new TreeMap<String, Clausula>(nvLista); } I suppose this is ok to set a new copy of the nvLista and all it's members and not a reference, is it? But now I have a Map inside another Map and I'm doing this: public static void setListaClausulas(Map<String, Map<String, Clausula>> nvLista) { listaClausulas = new TreeMap<String, Map<String, Clausula>>(nvLista); } Is this the correct way to do it or do you recommend something else? What I want is to set a new copy of nvLista (and all it's elements) and not copy just the reference.

  Read the article

• Struct like objects in Java

  - by cdv

  Is it completely against the Java way to create struct like objects? class SomeData1 { public int x; public int y; } I can see a class with accessors and mutators being more Java like. class SomeData2 { int getX(); void setX(int x); int getY(); void setY(int y); private int x; private int y; } The class from the first example is notationally convenient. // a function in a class public int f(SomeData1 d) { return (3 * d.x) / d.y; } This is not as convenient. // a function in a class public int f(SomeData2 d) { return (3 * d.getX()) / d.getY(); }

  Read the article

• Android: Stopping method to be called twice if already running.

  - by user285831

  I'm trying to prevent my application to call the same method twice in the event of a double-click, or if the user presses different buttons quickly, almost at the same time. I have clickable Views, acting as buttons, that call the same method but passing different parameters. This is the call: startTheSearch(context, getState(), what, where); Inside this method I'm creating a new Thread, because it queries a web server for the result: new Thread(new Runnable() { public void run() { progDiag = ProgressDialog.show(ctx, null, "Searching", true); getServerXML(context, what, where, searchIsCustom, mOffset); handler.sendEmptyMessage(0); } }).start(); The problem is that upon two quick clicks, the method is fired twice, two threads are created, and consequently two new activities are created. That makes my app crash. When the methods are done, and we have the result from the server, we call the handler: private Handler handler = new Handler() { @Override public void handleMessage(Message msg) { super.handleMessage(msg); try { Intent i = new Intent(Golf.this, Result.class); Bundle b = new Bundle(); b.putString("what", mWhat); b.putString("where", mWhere); b.putInt("offset", mOffset); b.putBoolean("searchIsCustom", searchIsCustom); i.putExtras(b); startActivityForResult(i, Activity.RESULT_OK); progDiag.dismiss(); } catch (Exception e) { Alerts.generalDialogAlert("Error", "settings", ctx); } } }; I tried to have a global boolean variable called "blocked" initially set to false, creating a condition like: if(!blocked){ blocked = true; new Thread(new Runnable() { public void run() { But this only seems to work on slower phones like the G1, I tried on Nexus and before it set blocked = true, the second request has was granted. So is there any way I can block the method being called if it's already running, or if the thread has started so it wont create a new one? Please, I really need to fix this. I've been developing on Android for almost 2 months now, but I'm yet to tackle that bug. Thanks in advance.

  Read the article

• Call function by pointer and set parametrs in memory block

  - by Ellesmess Glain

  Hi, I've little problem : I'm solving problem with calling function by pointer and passing to it parameters in continuous memory block. My goal is to have function named e.g CallFunc(void * func,void *params, unsigned int param_length); that I'll send function pointer, pointer to function's parameters and eventually parameters length and this calling function will call passed function with it's parameters. I will like write this in C/C++, but if somebody has idea, how this resolve in other language, that supports DLL generation and exportet functions, it will be fine too. Thanks for answers, Ellesmess P.S. I'm sorry about my English, but I'm Czech, thanks :o)

  Read the article

• How to use unnamed function arguments in C or C++

  - by zed91

  How do I use function arguments declared like void f(double) { /**/ } if it is possible?

  Read the article

• Proper way to 100% wakes my device?

  - by quiel

  Do you have better way to make the device awakes by 100%? I repeatedly call the acquire() but I'm not sure if that is correct. Or should I just call the acquire() once? Or should I make use of Intent.ACTION_SCREEN_OFF? public class MyServiceThatKeepsTheDeviceAwake extends IntentService { ... @Override public void onCreate() { super.onCreate(); mPowerManager = (PowerManager) getSystemService(Context.POWER_SERVICE); mWakeLock = mPowerManager.newWakeLock(PowerManager.FULL_WAKE_LOCK |PowerManager.ACQUIRE_CAUSES_WAKEUP |PowerManager.ON_AFTER_RELEASE, TAG); } @Override public void onStart(Intent intent, int startId) { super.onStart(intent, startId); mWakeLock.acquire(); } // No release

  Read the article

• AS3: How to get all XML-Nodes with a special attribute? (With sourch)

  - by insnet

  Hi there The Challenge: i d like to collect all nodes with the attribute "id". The Problem: The code doenst work with nested nodes. <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><contentmap><fonts id="fonts"> fonts/Arial.swf swf/library_main.swf private function onXMLLoader(event : Event) : void { _xml = _loader.getXML(event.target.url.url); var searchTerms : XMLList = _xml.*.(hasOwnProperty('@id')); if (searchTerms.length() 0 ) { _NodeArray = new Array(); _parseNode(searchTerms); } private function _parseNode(xml : XMLList) : void { for each (var node: XML in xml) { if(!node.hasSimpleContent()) { _parseNode(node.children()); } else { var nodeObject : Object = new Object(); nodeObject['value'] = node.text(); for each(var a:XML in node.@*) { var name : String = String(a.name()); nodeObject[name] = a.toXMLString(); } _NodeArray.push(nodeObject); } } }

  Read the article

• pass by const reference of class

  - by small_potato

  void foo(const ClassName &name) { ... } How can I access the method of class instance name? name.method() didn't work. then I tried: void foo(const ClassName &name) { ClassName temp = name; ... .... } I can use temp.method, but after foo was executed, the original name screwed up, any idea? BTW, the member variable of name didn't screwed up, but it was the member variable of subclass of class screwed up.

  Read the article

• How do I return an object that is able to execute on the server?

  - by mafutrct

  Coming from a Java background, this is the way I'm thinking: The server provides an object to the client. This object should be able to execute on the server. Server: private string _S = "A"; public interface IFoo { void Bar(); } private class Foo : IFoo { void Bar() { _S = "B";} } public IFoo GetFoo() { return new Foo(); } Client: IFoo foo = serverChannel.GetFoo(); foo.Bar(); Remoting is legacy (everyone keeps pointing to WCF instead) and WCF does not support this at all basically ( http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2431510 ), so how should I implement this kind of behavior? Using 3rd party components is possible iff required. I searched on SO but found no similar question. If this has indeed been answered before, just let me know and I'll delete.

  Read the article

• Visual C++ CreateThread Parameter Problem

  - by Vanwaril

  I have a class that contains a function that calls create thread, and needs to pass itself (this) as a parameter: DWORD threadId; HANDLE h = CreateThread( NULL, 0, runThread, this, 0, &threadId); My runThread definition is as follows: DWORD WINAPI runThread(LPVOID args) { Obj *t = (Obj*)args; t->funct(); return 0; } Unfortunately, the object t that I get in runThread() gets garbage. My Obj class has a function pointer attribute. Could that be the problem? class Obj{ void(*funct)(); and in the constructor: Obj(void(*f)()) { funct = f; } where is my mistake? The function pointer, the createThread itself, or type-casting? I tried whatever I could think of.

  Read the article

• How do i resolve method Overlapping in java/Processing [duplicate]

  - by user3718913

  This question already has an answer here: How do I compare strings in Java? 24 answers I have two methods/function in a class, called, Qestion1 and Question2, i want it in such a way that after the user has answered Question one correctly, the Question 2 method is called. Whenever i call the method 2, it displays both of them together instead exiting the first method first. Here's a dummy code to illustrate what i'm saying: void Question1() { String question="What is the capital of England?"; String Answer="London"; if(Answer=='London') { Question2(); } } void Question2() { String question="What is the capital of California?"; String Answer="Sacramento"; if(Answer=='Sacramento') { Question3(); } } Pls, this question is in no way related to that other question. Pls peruse the thread again.

  Read the article

• What are these c++ statements doing

  - by codingguy3000

  void useproxynum ( ) { bUseProxy = true; return; }; void useacctnum ( ) { bUseProxy = false; return; }; Can anyone give me some insight into what these c++ statements are doing? There are in a header file. bUseProxy is defined above bool bUseProxy; I'm trying to figure out what useproxynum is (method call?) and I'm also trying to figure out how to find the code behind it. This is in Visual Studio 6.

  Read the article

• Android - How can I access a View object instantiated in onCreate in onResume?

  - by Chris

  In my onCreate() method, I'm instantiating an ImageButton View: public void onCreate(Bundle savedInstanceState) { Log.d(AntengoApplication.LOG_TAG, "BrowsePicture onCreate"); super.onCreate(savedInstanceState); setContentView(R.layout.layout_post); final ImageButton ib = (ImageButton) findViewById(R.id.post_image); ... In onResume, I want to be able to change the properties of the ImageButton with something like: @Override protected void onResume() { super.onResume(); ib.setImageURI(selectedImageUri); } //END onResume But onResume doesn't have access to the ib ImageButton object. If this were a variable, I'd simple make it a class variable, but Android does not allow you to define View object in the class. Any suggestions on how to do this?

  Read the article

• Junit | How to test parameters in a method

  - by MMRUser

  How do I test parameters inside a method itself. For example class TestClass { public void paraMethod(String para1, String para2) { String testPara1 = para1; String testPara2 = para2; } } class TestingClass { @Test public void testParaMethod () throws Exception { String myPara1 = "MyPara1"; String myPara2 = "MyPara2"; new TestClass().paraMethod(myPara1, myPara2); } } Ok, so is it possible to test if the testPara1 and testPara2 are properly set to the values that I have passed? Thanks.

  Read the article

• Is read-only auto-imlemented property possible?

  - by abatishchev

  Hello. I found a topic on MSDN that talks that yes, this is possible. I did a test that seems to break this statement: using System; namespace Test { class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { Foo f = new Foo("1"); Console.WriteLine(f.Bar); // prints 1 f.Test("2"); Console.WriteLine(f.Bar);// successfully prints 2 } } class Foo { public Foo(string b) { this.Bar = b; } public string Bar { get; private set; } public void Test(string b) { // this would be impossible for readonly field! // next error would be occur: CS0191 or CS0191 // A readonly field cannot be assigned to (except in a constructor or a variable initializer) this.Bar = b; } } } Where am I wrong?

  Read the article

• How To Draw line on touch event ?

  - by AJPatel

  Hey i m beginner of objective C Please Help me i make following code but not work..... -(void) touchesBegan:(NSSet *)touches withEvent:(UIEvent *)event { UITouch *touch = [touches anyObject]; if ([touch view] == self.view) { CGPoint location = [touch locationInView:self.view]; loc1 = location; CGContextMoveToPoint(context, location.x, location.y); NSLog(@"x:%d y:%d At Touch Begain", loc1.x, loc1.y); } } - (void)touchesMoved:(NSSet *)touches withEvent:(UIEvent *)event { UITouch *touch = [touches anyObject]; if ([touch view] == self.view) { CGPoint location = [touch locationInView:self.view]; CGContextMoveToPoint(context, loc1.x, loc1.y); NSLog(@"x:%d y:%d At Touch Move", loc1.x, loc1.y); CGContextAddLineToPoint(context, location.x, location.y); NSLog(@"x:%d y:%d", location.x, location.y); } }

  Read the article

• as3 this.graphics calls do nothing

  - by zzz

  class A: [SWF(width='800',height='600',frameRate='24')] public class A extends MovieClip { private var b:B; public function A(){ super(); b = new B(); addChild(b); addEventListener(Event.ENTER_FRAME, update); } private function update(e:Event):void { b.draw(); } } class B: public class B extends MovieClip { public function draw():void { //! following code works well if put in constructor, but not here this.graphics.beginFill(0xff0000); this.graphics.drawCircle(200,200,50); } } this.graphics calls do nothing in draw method, but work fine inside B`s constructor, what i am doing wrong ?

  Read the article

• Copy unmanaged data into managed array

  - by JeffRSon

  I need to copy native (i.e. unmanaged) data (byte*) to managed byte array with C++/CLI (array). I tried Marshal::Copy (data is pointed to by const void* data and is dataSize bytes) array<byte>^ _Data=gcnew array<byte>(dataSize); System::Runtime::InteropServices::Marshal::Copy((byte*)data, _Data, 0, dataSize); This gives error C2665: none of the 16 overloads can convert all parameters. Then I tried System::Runtime::InteropServices::Marshal::Copy(new IntPtr(data), _Data, 0, dataSize); which produces error C2664: parameter 1 cannot be converted from "const void*" to "__w64 int". So how can it be done and is Marshal::Copy indeed the "best" (simplest/fastest) way to do so?

  Read the article

• How to make area outside of custom dialog view unclickable?

  - by portfoliobuilder

  I created a custom dialog (no, this is not dialog object) from an image and some other views. The conflict I am having with this custom dialog (again, this is a layout) is that the area around it closes the custom dialog. Is there a way I can make the outside area unclickable? I have tried wrapping the dialog view with a fullscreen frameLayout w/ transparent background, and then programmatically I set the frame attribute to setClickable(false). framelayout.setClickable(false); This does nothing. It still closes the dialog. Any other suggestions? Thank you in advance. This is my code: //used to disable background from closing the custom dialog private FrameLayout fl; @Override protected void onCreate(Bundle savedInstanceState) { super.onCreate(savedInstanceState); requestWindowFeature(Window.FEATURE_NO_TITLE); setContentView(R.layout.layout_dialog); btnContinue = (Button) findViewById(R.id.btnContinue); btnContinue.setOnClickListener(this); fl.setClickable(false); //background suppose to lock } @Override public void onClick(View v) { // TODO Auto-generated method stub switch (v.getId()) { case R.id.Continue: finish(); } break; } } I also have another class for broadcastReceiver public class DialogManagerBroadcastReceiver extends BroadcastReceiver { @Override public void onReceive(Context context, Intent intent) { if(IdeaPlayInterfaceApplication.isActivityVisible()){ Intent i=new Intent(context,CustomDialogActivity.class); i.setFlags(Intent.FLAG_ACTIVITY_NEW_TASK); context.startActivity(i); } } } The idea is that this custom dialog is not called at a specific instance, it is called every set amount of time no matter what I am doing in the application. I use an Intent and PendingIntent to repeatedly call this custom dialog over time. With something like this: cancelAlarmNotificationMonitoring(context); Calendar calendar = Calendar.getInstance(); Intent intent = new Intent(context, AlarmManagerBroadcastReceiver.class); PendingIntent pintent = PendingIntent.getBroadcast(context, 0, intent, 0); AlarmManager alarm = (AlarmManager) context.getSystemService(Context.ALARM_SERVICE); alarm.setRepeating(AlarmManager.RTC_WAKEUP,calendar.getTimeInMillis()+ALARM_INTERVAL,ALARM_INTERVAL, pintent); Hopefully this is more clear now.

  Read the article

• program received signal SIGABRT (xcode)

  - by manish1990

  #import <UIKit/UIKit.h> @interface tableview : UIViewController<UITableViewDataSource> { NSArray *listOfItems; } @property(nonatomic,retain) NSArray *listOfItems; @end #import "tableview.h" @implementation tableview @synthesize listOfItems; - (UITableViewCell *)tableView:(UITableView *)tableView cellForRowAtIndexPath:(NSIndexPath *)indexPath { static NSString *CellIdentifier = @"Cell"; UITableViewCell *cell = [tableView dequeueReusableCellWithIdentifier:CellIdentifier]; if (cell == nil) { cell = [[[UITableViewCell alloc] initWithStyle:UITableViewCellStyleDefault reuseIdentifier:CellIdentifier ]autorelease]; } //NSString *cellValue = [listOfItems objectAtIndex:indexPath.row]; cell.textLabel.text = [listOfItems objectAtIndex:indexPath.row]; return cell; } - (NSInteger)tableView:(UITableView *)tableView numberOfRowsInSection:(NSInteger)section { return 3; } - (id)initWithNibName:(NSString *)nibNameOrNil bundle:(NSBundle *)nibBundleOrNil { self = [super initWithNibName:nibNameOrNil bundle:nibBundleOrNil]; if (self) { // Custom initialization } return self; } - (void)didReceiveMemoryWarning { // Releases the view if it doesn't have a superview. [super didReceiveMemoryWarning]; // Release any cached data, images, etc that aren't in use. } #pragma mark - View lifecycle - (void)viewDidLoad { listOfItems = [[NSArray alloc] initWithObjects:@"first",@"second",@"third", nil]; //listOfItems = [[NSMutableArray alloc]init]; // [listOfItems addObject:@"first"]; //[listOfItems addObject:@"second"]; [super viewDidLoad]; // Do any additional setup after loading the view from its nib. } -(void)dealloc { [listOfItems release]; [super dealloc]; } @end GNU gdb 6.3.50-20050815 (Apple version gdb-1708) (Mon Aug 15 16:03:10 UTC 2011) Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions. Type "show copying" to see the conditions. There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty" for details. This GDB was configured as "x86_64-apple-darwin".sharedlibrary apply-load-rules all Attaching to process 438. 2012-04-27 13:33:23.276 tableview test[438:207] -[UIView tableView:numberOfRowsInSection:]: unrecognized selector sent to instance 0x6855500 2012-04-27 13:33:23.362 tableview test[438:207] * Terminating app due to uncaught exception 'NSInvalidArgumentException', reason: '-[UIView tableView:numberOfRowsInSection:]: unrecognized selector sent to instance 0x6855500' * First throw call stack: (0x13bb052 0x154cd0a 0x13bcced 0x1321f00 0x1321ce2 0x1ecf2b 0x1ef722 0x9f7c7 0x9f2c1 0xa228c 0xa6783 0x51322 0x13bce72 0x1d6592d 0x1d6f827 0x1cf5fa7 0x1cf7ea6 0x1d8330c 0x23530 0x138f9ce 0x1326670 0x12f24f6 0x12f1db4 0x12f1ccb 0x12a4879 0x12a493e 0x12a9b 0x2282 0x21f5) terminate called throwing an exceptionCurrent language: auto; currently objective-c (gdb)

  Read the article

• C++ array of classes

  - by nickik

  I working on a game but I have a problem with the initialization of the level. (feld is just field in german) class level{ private: feld spielfeld[10][10]; public: /* other staff */ void init_feld(); }; void level::init_feld() { for(int i=0;i!=10;i++){ for(int n=0;n!=10;n++){ spielfeld[i][n] = new feld(land, i, n); } } } The Error: Error: no match for »operator=« in »((level*)this)-level::spielfeld[i][n] = (operator new(24u), (, ((feld*))))« /home/nick/stratego/feld.h:18:11: Remark: candidate is: feld& feld::operator=(const feld&) Process terminated with status 1 (0 minutes, 0 seconds) 2 errors, 0 warnings

  Read the article

• Passing a generic class to a java function?

  - by rodo

  Is it possible to use Generics when passing a class to a java function? I was hoping to do something like this: public static class DoStuff { public <T extends Class<List>> void doStuffToList(T className) { System.out.println(className); } public void test() { doStuffToList(List.class); // compiles doStuffToList(ArrayList.class); // compiler error (undesired behaviour) doStuffToList(Integer.class); // compiler error (desired behaviour) } } Ideally the List.class and ArrayList.class lines would work fine, but the Integer.class line would cause a compile error. I could use Class as my type instead of T extends Class<List> but then I won't catch the Integer.class case above.

  Read the article

• Progress Dialog on open activity

  - by GeeXor

  hey guys, i've a problem with progress dialog on opening an activity (called activity 2 in example). The activity 2 has a lot of code to execute in this OnCreate event. final ProgressDialog myProgressDialog = ProgressDialog.show(MyApp.this,getString(R.string.lstAppWait), getString(R.string.lstAppLoading), true); new Thread() { public void run() { runOnUiThread(new Runnable() { @Override public void run() { showApps(); } }); myProgressDialog.dismiss(); } }.start(); The showApps function launch activity 2. if i execute this code on my button click event on activity 1, i see the progress, but she doesn't move and afeter i have a black screen during 2 or 3 seconds the time for android to show the activity. If i execute this code in the OnCreate of Activity2 and if i replace the showApps by the code on OnCreate, Activity1 freeze 2 seconds, i don't see the progress dialog, and freeze again 2 seconds on activity 2 before seeing the result. An idea ?

  Read the article

• Threading in java vs C#

  - by ffayyaz

  I need a little confirmation over something i am confused at . I know how threads work in java. new DialList(string a , string b).start(); // where DialList is a class public class DialList extends Thread { public DialList(String a, string b) { FilePath = a; ThreadLogFile = b"; } public void run() { // some code to run in different thread } } Now i want to run same code in C# , Shall i put the code which is in run() into a method and do something like Thread t = new Thread (runcsharp); // Kick off a new thread t.Start(); static void runcsharp() { // code } or is there some other way to do it ?

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323  | Next Page >