Search Results

Search found 23792 results on 952 pages for 'void pointers'.

Page 316/952 | < Previous Page | 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323  | Next Page >

• how to specify a pointer to an overloaded function?

  - by davka

  I want to pass an overloaded function to the std::for_each() algorithm. e.g.: void f(char c); void f(int i); std::string s("example"); std::for_each(s.begin(), s.end(), f); I'd expect the compiler to resolve f() by the iterator type. Apparently, it (gcc 4.1.2) doesn't do it. So, how can I specify which f() I want? thanks a lot

  Read the article

• Grid View selected index

  - by user2924573

  I have a grid which contains a edit button . When i click the edit button and debug it does not hit to the selected index change event . There are no build errors code behind the grid public void btnModemDetailsEdit_Click(object sender, EventArgs e) { isEdit = true; } protected void gridModemDetails_SelectedIndexChanged(object sender, EventArgs e) { int id = Convert.ToInt32(GridModemDetails.DataKeys[GridModemDetails.SelectedIndex].Values["gridModemDetails_SelectedIndexChanged"].ToString()); } <asp:GridView ID="GridModemDetails" runat="server" Width="435px" DataKeyNames="ModemId" AllowPaging="True" OnSelectedIndexChanged="gridModemDetails_SelectedIndexChanged" AutoGenerateColumns="False"> <Columns> <asp:TemplateField HeaderText="Edit" Visible="True" > <ItemTemplate> <asp:LinkButton ID="btnModemDetailsEdit" AccessibleHeaderText="Edit" ButtonType="Button" Text="Edit" HeaderText="Edit" runat="server" OnClick="btnModemDetailsEdit_Click" runat="server"/> </ItemTemplate> </asp:TemplateField>

  Read the article

• Question about r-value in C++0x

  - by Goofy

  Rvalues IMHO are great improvement in C++, but at the beginning the're seems quite. Please look at code below: #include <string> std::string && foo (void) { std::string message ("Hello!"); return std::move (message); } void bar (const std::string &message2) { if (message == "Bye Bye!") return; } int main () { bar (foo ()); } Reference message2 is last owner of original message object returned by foo(), right?

  Read the article

• Junit | How to test parameters in a method

  - by MMRUser

  How do I test parameters inside a method itself. For example class TestClass { public void paraMethod(String para1, String para2) { String testPara1 = para1; String testPara2 = para2; } } class TestingClass { @Test public void testParaMethod () throws Exception { String myPara1 = "MyPara1"; String myPara2 = "MyPara2"; new TestClass().paraMethod(myPara1, myPara2); } } Ok, so is it possible to test if the testPara1 and testPara2 are properly set to the values that I have passed? Thanks.

  Read the article

• Operation Problems in Java Generic

  - by alantheweasel

  I got some problem when i was learning Java Generic : interface calculator<T, R> { public void execute(T t, R r); } class executeAdd<T, R> implements calculator<T, R> { private T first; private R second; public executeAdd(T first, R second) { super(); this.first = first; this.second = second; } @Override public void execute(T t, R r) { // TODO Auto-generated method stub Object o = t + r // ERROR ! What i could do it ? } }

  Read the article

• C++ rvalue temporaries in template

  - by aaa

  hello. Can you please explain me the difference between mechanism of the following: int function(); template<class T> void function2(T&); void main() { function2(function()); // compiler error, instantiated as int & const int& v = function(); function2(v); // okay, instantiated as const int& } is my reasoning correct with respect to instantiation? why is not first instantiated as const T&? Thank you

  Read the article

• doubt in - Function Objects - c++

  - by Eternal Learner

  I have a class class fobj{ public: fobj(int i):id(i) {} void operator()() { std::cout<<"Prints"<<std::endl; } private: int id; }; template<typename T> void func(T type) { type(); } My Doubt is if I invoke func like Method 1: func(fobj(1); the message I wanted to print is printed. I was always thinking I needed to do something like Method 2: fobj Iobj(1); // create an instance of the fobj class func(Iobj); //call func by passing Iobj(which is a function object) How does Method 1 work? I mean what exactly happens? and how is a call made to the operator() in class fobj ?

  Read the article

• Break the limit of threading, segmentation fault

  - by user353573

  use pthread_create to create limited number of threads running concurrently Successfully compile and run However, after adding function pointer array to run the function, Segmentation fault Where is wrong? workserver number: 0 Segmentation fault void* workserver(void arg) { int status; while(true) { printf("workserver number: %d\n", (int)arg); ( job_queue[(int)arg])(); sleep(3); status = pthread_mutex_lock(&data.mutex); if(status != 0) printf("%d lock mutex", status); data.value = 1; status = pthread_cond_signal(&data.cond); if(status != 0) printf("%d signal condition", status); status = pthread_mutex_unlock(&data.mutex); if(status != 0) printf("%d unlock mutex", status); } }

  Read the article

• Android - How can I access a View object instantiated in onCreate in onResume?

  - by Chris

  In my onCreate() method, I'm instantiating an ImageButton View: public void onCreate(Bundle savedInstanceState) { Log.d(AntengoApplication.LOG_TAG, "BrowsePicture onCreate"); super.onCreate(savedInstanceState); setContentView(R.layout.layout_post); final ImageButton ib = (ImageButton) findViewById(R.id.post_image); ... In onResume, I want to be able to change the properties of the ImageButton with something like: @Override protected void onResume() { super.onResume(); ib.setImageURI(selectedImageUri); } //END onResume But onResume doesn't have access to the ib ImageButton object. If this were a variable, I'd simple make it a class variable, but Android does not allow you to define View object in the class. Any suggestions on how to do this?

  Read the article

• How do I return an object that is able to execute on the server?

  - by mafutrct

  Coming from a Java background, this is the way I'm thinking: The server provides an object to the client. This object should be able to execute on the server. Server: private string _S = "A"; public interface IFoo { void Bar(); } private class Foo : IFoo { void Bar() { _S = "B";} } public IFoo GetFoo() { return new Foo(); } Client: IFoo foo = serverChannel.GetFoo(); foo.Bar(); Remoting is legacy (everyone keeps pointing to WCF instead) and WCF does not support this at all basically ( http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2431510 ), so how should I implement this kind of behavior? Using 3rd party components is possible iff required. I searched on SO but found no similar question. If this has indeed been answered before, just let me know and I'll delete.

  Read the article

• Spring @Transactional - Can I Override rollbackFor

  - by user475039

  Hi all, I am calling a service which has the following annotation: @Transactional(rollbackFor=ExceptionA.class) public void myMethodA(....) throws ExceptionA { . . } I am calling this method from an other method in another Spring Bean. @Transactional(rollbackFor=ExceptionB.class) public void mainEntryPointMethod(....) throws ExceptionB { . try { myMethodA() } catch (ExceptionA exp) { . } . } My problem is that if myMethodA throws an exception, my transaction (which is passed from mainEntryPointMethod - myMethodA by default propagation) will be marked for rollback. Is there a way in which the 'rollbackFor' for the inner method can be overriden? Thanks in advance Chris

  Read the article

• Two phase Construction in C++

  - by tommieb75

  I have as part of assignment to look into a development kit that uses the "two-phase" construction for C++ classes: // Include Header class someFubar{ public: someFubar(); bool Construction(void); ~someFubar(); private: fooObject _fooObj; } In the source // someFubar.cpp someFubar::someFubar : _fooObj(null){ } bool someFubar::Construction(void){ bool rv = false; this->_fooObj = new fooObject(); if (this->_fooObj != null) rv = true; return rv; } someFubar::~someFubar(){ if (this->_fooObj != null) delete this->_fooObj; } Why would this "two-phase" be used and what benefits are there? Why not just instantiate the object initialization within the actual constructor?

  Read the article

• How do I setup Eclipse to stop on the line an exception occured?

  - by Chris Persichetti

  Hi, How can I setup Eclipse to stop at the point an exception occurred. I have an Eclipse breakpoint setup to break on an exception. In the code example below, the problem I'm having is Eclipse tries to open the Integer source code. Is there any way to just have debugger break at the point shown in my code example? If I move down the stack trace, I will get to this line, it'd be nice if there's a way to do this without the "Source not found" window coming up. This can be done in Visual Studio, so it's driving me crazy not being able to find a way to do this in Eclipse. package com.test; public class QuickTest { public static void main(String[] args) { try { test(); } catch(NumberFormatException e) { System.out.println(e.getMessage()); } } private static void test() { String str = "notAnumber"; Integer.parseInt(str);//<----I want debugger to stop here } }

  Read the article

• AS3: How to get all XML-Nodes with a special attribute? (With sourch)

  - by insnet

  Hi there The Challenge: i d like to collect all nodes with the attribute "id". The Problem: The code doenst work with nested nodes. <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><contentmap><fonts id="fonts"> fonts/Arial.swf swf/library_main.swf private function onXMLLoader(event : Event) : void { _xml = _loader.getXML(event.target.url.url); var searchTerms : XMLList = _xml.*.(hasOwnProperty('@id')); if (searchTerms.length() 0 ) { _NodeArray = new Array(); _parseNode(searchTerms); } private function _parseNode(xml : XMLList) : void { for each (var node: XML in xml) { if(!node.hasSimpleContent()) { _parseNode(node.children()); } else { var nodeObject : Object = new Object(); nodeObject['value'] = node.text(); for each(var a:XML in node.@*) { var name : String = String(a.name()); nodeObject[name] = a.toXMLString(); } _NodeArray.push(nodeObject); } } }

  Read the article

• assembly.GetTypes() does not return all types

  - by meta

  I try to lead the types from an .dll (which is also referenced in the executing project). I call: public static void LoadPlugin(string pluginFile) { Assembly assembly = Assembly.LoadFrom(pluginFile); foreach (Type type in assembly.GetTypes()) { // play with it } } It loads just a few of them: public partial class Mathematics : UserControl, IMathematics, IPortable and public partial class Welcome : UserControl but the next one, and some others, are ignored: public partial class Test : UserControl, ITest, IPortable They all stand in the same assembly, under the same namespace. The public static void LoadPlugin(string pluginFile) method is located in other assembly that is also referenced in the executing project. No exceptions are thrown. What could be the issues for not loading all the types? Any ideas?

  Read the article

• this pointer to base class constructor?

  - by Rolle

  I want to implement a derived class that should also implement an interface, that have a function that the base class can call. The following gives a warning as it is not safe to pass a this pointer to the base class constructor: struct IInterface { void FuncToCall() = 0; }; struct Base { Base(IInterface* inter) { m_inter = inter; } void SomeFunc() { inter->FuncToCall(); } IInterface* m_inter; }; struct Derived : Base, IInterface { Derived() : Base(this) {} FuncToCall() {} }; What is the best way around this? I need to supply the interface as an argument to the base constructor, as it is not always the dervied class that is the interface; sometimes it may be a totally different class. I could add a function to the base class, SetInterface(IInterface* inter), but I would like to avoid that.

  Read the article

• Progress Dialog on open activity

  - by GeeXor

  hey guys, i've a problem with progress dialog on opening an activity (called activity 2 in example). The activity 2 has a lot of code to execute in this OnCreate event. final ProgressDialog myProgressDialog = ProgressDialog.show(MyApp.this,getString(R.string.lstAppWait), getString(R.string.lstAppLoading), true); new Thread() { public void run() { runOnUiThread(new Runnable() { @Override public void run() { showApps(); } }); myProgressDialog.dismiss(); } }.start(); The showApps function launch activity 2. if i execute this code on my button click event on activity 1, i see the progress, but she doesn't move and afeter i have a black screen during 2 or 3 seconds the time for android to show the activity. If i execute this code in the OnCreate of Activity2 and if i replace the showApps by the code on OnCreate, Activity1 freeze 2 seconds, i don't see the progress dialog, and freeze again 2 seconds on activity 2 before seeing the result. An idea ?

  Read the article

• Struct like objects in Java

  - by cdv

  Is it completely against the Java way to create struct like objects? class SomeData1 { public int x; public int y; } I can see a class with accessors and mutators being more Java like. class SomeData2 { int getX(); void setX(int x); int getY(); void setY(int y); private int x; private int y; } The class from the first example is notationally convenient. // a function in a class public int f(SomeData1 d) { return (3 * d.x) / d.y; } This is not as convenient. // a function in a class public int f(SomeData2 d) { return (3 * d.getX()) / d.getY(); }

  Read the article

• How can I loop through all the open instances of a particular form?

  - by raz3r

  I need to update a ListBox of a Form2 created dinamically. Let's say that in the event where I have to update this ListBox (in Form1 of course) I don't have a reference of this Form2 so I can't call the UpdateList method (and no, I can't make it static). I don't even know if there is a Form2 opened, it could be or not. What do you suggest? Is there a way to loop through all the open istances of Form2? Code Sample: //Form1 public void event() { //UPDATE FORM2 LISTBOX } //SOMEWHERE IN FORM1 Form2 runTime = new Form2(); //Form2 public void UpdateList() { //UPDATE LISTBOX }

  Read the article

• I want to know the logic behind Array.Reverse method

  - by prantick

  what is the native logic work behind public static void Reverse(Array array, int index, int length);

  Read the article

• why is this legal, c++ typedef func

  - by acidzombie24

  i did this in msvc 2005. typedef void (*cleanup_t)(); void func(cleanup_t clean) { cleanup_t(); } Why does this compile? and not give me a warning? ok, it gave me a unreferenced formal parameter warning but originally i did this when clean was in a class no there was no unreferenced formal parameter when this code gave me problems. What is cleanup_t(); really doing and what is the point? now for laughs i tried int() and that worked also.

  Read the article

• including a string as a parameter to a function in a header file? c++

  - by Nara

  hello everyone, total newbie is here :) i have this header file, zeeheader.h, and i wrote some classes in it, i'm having problems giving a string as a parameter to one of the functions: class DeliTest { public: void DeliCheck(Stack*,string); void ComCheck (unsigned,string); bool EofCheck (unsigned,string); }; as i was implementinng it in the cpp file, i added #include to it, it seemed to be working, for example : as i was writing the "data." i got the "length()" appear by the intellisense, so i thought that it was working, but it wasn't. i got errors like: syntax error : identifier 'string' overloaded member function not found in 'DeliTest' this is one of the fucntions in the cpp file: bool DeliTest::EofCheck(unsigned i, string data) { if (i == data.length()-1) return 1; return 0; } am i supposed to be adding something to the header file??

  Read the article

• C++ Static Array Initialization - Memory Issue

  - by donalmg

  Hi, I have a header file which contains a member variable declaration of a static char array: class ABC { public: static char newArray[4]; // other variables / functions private: void setArray(int i, char * ptr); } In the CPP file, I have the array initialized to NULL: char ABC::newArray[4] = {0}; In the ABC constructor, I need to overwrite this value with a value constructed at runtime, such as the encoding of an integer: ABC::ABC() { int i; //some int value defined at runtime memset(newArray, 0, 4); // not sure if this is necessary setArray(i,newArray); } ... void setArray(int i, char * value) { // encoding i to set value[0] ... value [3] } When I return from this function, and print the modified newArray value, it prints out many more characters than the 4 specified in the array declaration. Any ideas why this is the case. I just want to set the char array to 4 characters and nothing further. Thanks...

  Read the article

• Visual C++ CreateThread Parameter Problem

  - by Vanwaril

  I have a class that contains a function that calls create thread, and needs to pass itself (this) as a parameter: DWORD threadId; HANDLE h = CreateThread( NULL, 0, runThread, this, 0, &threadId); My runThread definition is as follows: DWORD WINAPI runThread(LPVOID args) { Obj *t = (Obj*)args; t->funct(); return 0; } Unfortunately, the object t that I get in runThread() gets garbage. My Obj class has a function pointer attribute. Could that be the problem? class Obj{ void(*funct)(); and in the constructor: Obj(void(*f)()) { funct = f; } where is my mistake? The function pointer, the createThread itself, or type-casting? I tried whatever I could think of.

  Read the article

• [GCC, linking] How to link app with static library + why this is not working

  - by user278799

  I have a problem. I wrote example code and I want to build it without the error: main.cpp.text+0x5): undefined reference to `test()' Library test1.c #include <stdlib.h> void test() { puts("Dziala"); } test1.h #ifndef TEST1_H #define TEST1_H extern void test(); #endif makefile all: gcc -c ./src/test1.c -o ./lib/test1.o ar rcs ./lib/libtest1.a ./lib/test1.o Program main.cpp #include <test1.h> int main() { test(); return 0; } makefile all: g++ -static -I../test1/include -L../test1/lib ./src/main.cpp -o ./build/MyApp -ltest1 What am I doing wrong?

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323  | Next Page >